Summary
Jude Wilson (lead), David Davies
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection date verified
27 Feb 2020
- Inspectors verified
David Davies, Jude Wilson
- Behaviour and attitudes verified
Requires improvement
- Leadership and management verified
Requires improvement
- Overall effectiveness verified
Requires improvement
- Personal development verified
Requires improvement
- Previous overall verified
Requires improvement
- Quality of education verified
Requires improvement
- Postcode verified
SE6 2BX
- Name on report verified
Education My Life Matters
- URN verified
143933
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Grade profile
Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2018.
- OverallRequires improvement
- Behaviour and attitudesRequires improvement
- Leadership and managementRequires improvement
- Personal developmentRequires improvement
- Quality of educationRequires improvement
15% of comparable inspections in the last three years were graded Requires improvement (5,043 inspections).
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
Reads more critically than most reports of this type graded Requires improvement.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 8
- Words of findings
- 1,428
- about usual (typical 1215)
- Reading level
- Fairly hard
- Flesch 57, typical 56
- Average sentence
- 13 words
- Next steps
- 1
- typical 5
- Hedged sentences
- 9%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Inspection of Education My Life Matters 5 Rosenthal Road, Lewisham, London SE6 2BX
p.1
Overall effectiveness Requires improvement
The quality of education Requires improvement Behaviour and attitudes Requires improvement Personal development Requires improvement Leadership and management Requires improvement Overall effectiveness at previous inspection Requires improvement
p.1
Overall effectiveness Requires improvement
Does the school meet the independent school standards?
p.1
What is it like to attend this school?
Leaders and staff help pupils to get back into mainstream education. They make sure that pupils feel safe and settled during their time here. However, the quality of education that pupils receive is not good enough. Pupils who stay at the school for a long time do not build up knowledge and skills in a range of subjects. Leaders and staff do not have high enough expectations of pupils. Too often, they set limits on what pupils can do.
p.2
What is it like to attend this school?
Many pupils are vulnerable and have high needs. Pupils often arrive with very negative attitudes towards education. Leaders and staff spend time getting to know each pupil. They are patient and approachable. Pupils feel valued here. They told us that staff listen and care about them. Pupils also look out for each other. They work with staff to make sure any bullying gets sorted out.
p.2
What is it like to attend this school?
Staff know how to deal with pupils who have challenging behaviour. Pupils try to behave well in lessons, but this varies. Staff use different strategies to promote positive behaviour. For example, pupils compete to earn points to win a voucher or have ‘golden time’. They also go on reward trips, such as ice-skating and bowling.
p.2
better?
School leaders have struggled to make lasting improvements to the school. Governors, including the proprietor, do not have clear plans to improve the school. Their oversight of the school is weak.
p.2
better?
Staff help pupils to improve their behaviour. Pupils learn strategies to deal with difficult situations. They told me about the ‘different zones of behaviour’, and how they learn to control their anger. Staff keep in close contact with parents and carers. Leaders also work with agencies such as social care and the youth offending team. They have a joined-up approach to ensure that pupils get the help they need.
p.2
better?
The school has different numbers of pupils most weeks. Pupils might attend for some days while they take time out from their base school. Other pupils may be here for weeks and/or months. Staff support pupils to complete work that their teachers have set. Most pupils have a successful return to their school or move to a new school.
p.2
better?
All pupils study English and mathematics. Staff follow a programme to help pupils gain basic reading, writing and mathematical skills. This leads to a qualification, which some pupils have achieved in the past. Teachers explain concepts well. However, tasks are often repetitive and dull. Pupils can lose interest quickly and give up.
p.2
better?
Pupils learn a range of subjects. Leaders do not give much thought to what pupils learn, other than in English and mathematics. Their work is often a series of random 25–27 February 2020
p.2
3
tasks. Teachers do not always use lesson time well. Pupils have limited experience in subjects such as science and physical education.
p.3
3
Pupils have opportunities to develop their computing skills. They do research work for projects on subjects that interest them, for example the history of women’s football or important people from Black history. Pupils also have access to recording equipment and like creating their own music.
p.3
3
Pupils who are here on a long-term placement do not have a clear programme of study. Leaders create a daily timetable, but pupils do the same thing most days. Work is not tailored for each pupil. As a result, pupils do not always have tasks that are suitable for their age and ability. This includes pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND).
p.3
3
For many pupils, their school attendance has been poor or non-existent. Staff gradually re-engage pupils and their attendance improves. Punctuality is an ongoing issue for some pupils.
p.3
3
Many pupils have low self-esteem. Staff try to build their confidence through activities such as art therapy. They explore any personal issues through one-to one sessions. Pupils learn to work together. They have team games and group discussions on topical and moral issues.
p.3
Safeguarding
The arrangements for safeguarding are effective.
p.3
Safeguarding
School leaders and staff take their responsibilities seriously. They understand pupils’ challenging circumstances and the risks many of them face outside of the school. Staff search pupils each morning and take in mobile phones. Pupils comply because they know that staff have their best interests at heart.
p.3
Safeguarding
Staff have regular safeguarding training and updates. They are vigilant about any changes in pupils’ behaviour and follow up any concerns swiftly. Pupils learn about staying safe and how to look after their mental health. Visitors to the school teach pupils about specific risks, such as gangs and county lines.
p.3
(Information for the school and proprietor)
The proprietor and governors do not hold school leaders sufficiently to account. Governors lack urgency in developing the school further. They are unclear about the school’s effectiveness and what needs to improve. There are unmet independent school standards. Governors should take immediate action to improve their skills and knowledge so that they can carry out their roles and responsibilities effectively. 25–27 February 2020
p.3
4
The curriculum is not well thought out. Apart from English and mathematics, pupils learn subjects on an ad-hoc basis and planning is not carefully sequenced to build up pupils’ knowledge. Pupils have limited experience of some subjects. Leaders need to ensure that the curriculum is well structured and consistently broad. Staff need training to help them deliver high-quality lessons in a range of subjects. Leaders do not have clear plans in place to ensure that pupils on long-term placements receive a good quality of education. They are not ambitious enough for these pupils. All pupils generally do the same tasks and activities. Leaders need to ensure that the curriculum meets the needs of all pupils, including those on a long-term placement. The school caters for the needs of pupils with SEND. Staff support the wide- ranging needs of pupils effectively. However, staff do not always have the knowledge and training to tailor the provision for pupils with specific and complex
p.4
4
needs. Leaders need to ensure that staff receive high-quality training in this respect.
p.4
How can I feed back my views?
or to find out what other parents and carers think. We use Ofsted Parent View information when deciding which schools to inspect, when to inspect them and as part of their inspection.
p.4
How can I feed back my views?
The Department for Education has further guidance on how to complain about a school.
p.4
How can I feed back my views?
If you are the provider and you are not happy with the inspection or the report, you can complain to Ofsted . 25–27 February 2020
p.4
School details
Unique reference number 143933 DfE registration number 209/6003
p.5
School details
Inspection number 10115226 Type of school Other Independent School
p.5
School details
Date of previous inspection 20–22 March 2018
p.5
Information about this school
Education My Life Matters is an independent school in the London borough of Lewisham. The school provides full-time alternative provision for pupils who have been permanently excluded from mainstream schools or other providers. Pupils typically attend on a temporary basis. The school also offers a respite service to schools, providing short-term places for pupils with behavioural needs. The school has registration for up to 20 pupils aged 11 to 16. The current headteacher took up her post in September 2019. She acts as an advisory headteacher and works part-time at the school. The Department for 25–27 February 2020
p.5
6
Education’s online database ‘Getting Information About Schools’ does not reflect the name of the current headteacher. The school does not use alternative provision. The previous standard inspection took place in March 2018. Progress monitoring inspections took place on 28 November 2018, 25 April 2019 and 30 October 2019.
p.6
Information about this inspection
We carried out this inspection under section 109(1) and (2) of the Education and Skills Act 2008. The purpose of the inspection is to advise the Secretary of State for Education about the school’s suitability for continued registration as an independent school.
p.6
Information about this inspection
The school has failed to meet the independent school standards. These are the requirements of the schedule to the Education (Independent School Standards) Regulations 2014.
p.6
Information about this inspection
We held meetings with leaders, including the advisory headteacher and the strategic lead for the school. I met with the proprietor and held telephone discussions with two governors, including the chair of governors. We looked at English, mathematics, information and communication technology and personal, social, health and economic education in detail. We met with subject leaders, visited lessons, looked at pupils’ work and spoke with teachers, support staff and pupils. All other subjects were also considered. We spoke with pupils during visits to lessons and at break and lunchtime. We held telephone discussions with staff from schools who have previously placed pupils at Education My Life Matters. I also spoke with a representative from the Lewisham special educational needs team. There were no responses to the online surveys for parents, pupils and staff. We looked at a range of documentation provided by school leaders and
p.6
Information about this inspection
information on the school website. This included records related to safeguarding, attendance and behaviour.
p.6
Inspection team
Jude Wilson, lead inspector Her Majesty’s Inspector
p.6
Inspection team
David Davies Ofsted Inspector 25–27 February 2020
p.6
Part 1. Quality of education provided
3 The standard in this paragraph is met if the proprietor ensures that the teaching at the school–
p.7
Part 1. Quality of education provided
– 3(c) involves well planned lessons and effective teaching methods, activities and management of class time;
p.7
Part 1. Quality of education provided
– 3(d) shows a good understanding of the aptitudes, needs and prior attainments of the pupils, and ensures that these are taken into account in the planning of lessons;
p.7
Part 1. Quality of education provided
– 3(e) demonstrates good knowledge and understanding of the subject matter being taught;
p.7
Part 1. Quality of education provided
– 3(g) demonstrates that a framework is in place to assess pupils’ work regularly and thoroughly and use information from that assessment to plan teaching so that pupils can progress;
p.7
Part 8. Quality of leadership in and management of schools
34(1) The standard about the quality of leadership and management is met if the proprietor ensures that persons with leadership and management responsibilities at the school–
p.7
Part 8. Quality of leadership in and management of schools
– 34(1)(a) demonstrate good skills and knowledge appropriate to their role so that the independent school standards are met consistently;
p.7
Part 8. Quality of leadership in and management of schools
– 34(1)(b) fulfil their responsibilities effectively so that the independent school standards are met consistently; 25–27 February 2020
p.7
8
to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.
p.8
8
If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .
p.8
8
You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .
p.8
8
Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .
p.8
8
T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted
p.8
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion