Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Waltham Forest College

Inspected 26 Feb 2020 · URN 130456

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Rieks Drijver

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    26 Feb 2020

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Rieks Drijver

  • Postcode verified

    E17 4JB

  • Name on report verified

    Waltham Forest College

  • URN verified

    130456

Page 1 of 4
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

−20Mixedmore positive than 15% of reports of this type

Reads more critically than most reports of this type.

Praiseeffectivelyeffectivevery wellsecurewell-plannedfeel safeaccuratesafe
Criticismconcernsnot alwaystoo manyat risknot effectivedo not know

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

Findings positive critical

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No next steps set out.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
4
Words of findings
926
about usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 37, typical 45
Average sentence
15 words
Next steps
0
typical 5
Hedged sentences
8%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 100%

Full report text

Waltham Forest College Monitoring visit report

p.1

Name of lead inspector: Rieks Drijver, Her Majesty’s Inspector

p.1

Type of provider: General further education college

p.1

Address: 707 Forest Rd Walthamstow London E17 4JB Monitoring visit: Waltham Forest College, 26 February 2020

p.1

Context and focus of visit

Waltham Forest College is a general further education college in east London. The college’s most recent inspection was in February 2018 when overall effectiveness was judged to be good. Safeguarding was judged to be effective.

p.2

Context and focus of visit

This monitoring visit was made as a response to concerns that Ofsted had received regarding safeguarding at the college. These related to the overall culture of safeguarding at the college, and how leaders and managers responded to notified concerns.

p.2

Reasonable progress

Leaders and managers have established a suitable culture for safeguarding. They have appropriate policies, procedures and risk assessments, including in relation to the ‘Prevent’ duty. They keep an accurate single central record. Leaders have created effective safeguarding roles within the college, referred to as the ‘BeSafe’ team. Learners have a good awareness of this team and its purpose.

p.2

Reasonable progress

Governors have a secure overview of safeguarding. They receive sufficiently frequent reports on referrals and incidents and are well-informed about notifications to external agencies. In their reports to governors, leaders and managers do not set out how they will continuously improve the effectiveness of safeguarding. As a result, governors cannot support, or hold leaders to account for, their ongoing development of safeguarding.

p.2

Reasonable progress

Through the well-planned tutorial programme, learners receive appropriate training in safeguarding. They receive pertinent information about being safe at the college and within their own neighbourhoods. All learners the inspector spoke to said they feel safe. However, too many learners cannot recall the content of their safeguarding training. Staff do not check, over time, that learners have retained relevant information. Student services staff, who design the safeguarding training, and managers of vocational subjects do not work together closely enough. As a result, student services staff do not know if teachers have implemented the safeguarding curriculum effectively.

p.2

Reasonable progress

Senior staff liaise very well with local agencies. They represent the college on important local safeguarding forums. They work closely with, for example, the safer schools officer, so they are quickly aware of any issues affecting their learners. Monitoring visit: Waltham Forest College, 26 February 2020 Managers have not always been sufficiently vigilant in ensuring all staff complete safeguarding training. In 2018/19, too many staff were not up to date with this. On becoming aware of the issue, managers have ensured all staff have now received training.

p.2

Reasonable progress

Leaders and managers use their procedures for dealing with safeguarding concerns effectively. They deal promptly with any safeguarding issues when they arise. They investigate appropriately any concerns raised. These include examples when allegations related to safeguarding have been made about staff.

p.3

Reasonable progress

Leaders and managers work effectively with local agencies when necessary. Three recent cases came to the attention of the local authority designated officer. Local authority managers concluded that college managers had investigated the cases appropriately, with reference to their policies and procedures. Inspectors considered the outcomes from the investigations to be reasonable.

p.3

Reasonable progress

Safeguarding managers have comprehensive records of all learners referred for safeguarding purposes. In these, they record and can demonstrate their close work with partners from external agencies. For example, they work well with the youth offending team so that they know of any learners who have previous criminal convictions. They maintain this work, also in liaison with the police, to gain information about learners who become involved in crime or receive cautions. Safeguarding managers make sure that they inform teaching staff fully of any such issues.

p.3

Reasonable progress

Curriculum and student services staff do not maintain sufficiently effective communication to monitor at-risk learners, once they know about them. Teachers do not always feedback adequately on the actions they take with learners who are at risk. Teachers do not always take effective enough action to monitor at-risk learners. For example, they do not check adequately why at-risk learners have been absent.

p.3

Reasonable progress

Senior leaders have created a secure culture and practice regarding safeguarding. However, examples exist where senior leaders have been suitably notified of, and managed, safeguarding referrals, but a few staff have remained dissatisfied, despite outcomes being reached and appropriate actions put in place. These staff have then circumvented the established procedures for raising concerns, including using those set out in the whistleblowing policy, to air their grievances relating to these closed issues. Monitoring visit: Waltham Forest College, 26 February 2020 regulates and inspects to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education

p.3

Reasonable progress

and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.

p.4

Reasonable progress

If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.4

Reasonable progress

You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .

p.4

Reasonable progress

Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .

p.4

Reasonable progress

T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.4

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion