Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · School inspection (EIF)

Penwortham Priory Academy

Inspected 4 Mar 2020 · published 18 Mar 2020 · URN 138948

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    4 Mar 2020

  • Inspectors verified

    Emma Jackson, Julie Yarwood, Mike Pennington, Will Smith

  • Behaviour and attitudes verified

    Good

  • Leadership and management verified

    Good

  • Overall effectiveness verified

    Good

  • Personal development verified

    Good

  • Quality of education verified

    Good

  • Postcode verified

    PR1 0JE

  • Name on report verified

    Penwortham Priory Academy

  • URN verified

    138948

Page 1 of 7
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2017.

  • OverallGood
  • Behaviour and attitudesGood
  • Leadership and managementGood
  • Personal developmentGood
  • Quality of educationGood

66% of comparable inspections in the last three years were graded Good (5,043 inspections).

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+47Positivemore positive than 29% of reports of this type graded Good
OutstandingGoodRIInadequate

In line with other reports of this type graded Good.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praiseimprovedambitioushigh expectationsextremelyhappyfeel safepolitekeen
Criticismpoorat riskweakerlowharmnot happyabsence

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsSafeguardingAbout the inspection positive critical
  • Findings1061w+59
  • Safeguarding89w−27

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
7
Words of findings
1,123
about usual (typical 1098)
Reading level
Fairly hard
Flesch 54, typical 55
Average sentence
15 words
Next steps
3
typical 4
Hedged sentences
10%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 66%Safeguarding 6%About the inspection 29%

Full report text

Inspection of Penwortham Priory Academy Crow Hills Road, Penwortham, Preston, Lancashire PR1 0JE

p.1

Overall effectiveness Good

The quality of education Good Behaviour and attitudes Good Personal development Good Leadership and management Good Previous inspection grade Requires improvement 3–4 March 2020

p.1

What is it like to attend this school?

Pupils are typically happy and feel safe at Penwortham Priory Academy. They trust staff to sort out issues, such as those related to the infrequent incidents of bullying.

p.2

What is it like to attend this school?

We saw pupils behaving sensibly in lessons and around the school. The pupils we spoke to told us that behaviour is mainly good and that teachers deal with poor behaviour well. Pupils are usually polite and considerate towards others.

p.2

What is it like to attend this school?

Leaders are ambitious for all pupils, including those with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND) and those who are disadvantaged. Most pupils are keen to meet the high expectations that staff have of their learning and wider personal development.

p.2

What is it like to attend this school?

Pupils are now learning more than in the past. This is because of the widespread improvements that have been made to the quality of education.

p.2

What is it like to attend this school?

Pupils learn to value the differences that exist between different groups of people. They are well prepared to assume their roles in modern Britain, partly as a result of daily ‘learning for life’ lessons.

p.2

What is it like to attend this school?

Many pupils take advantage of the extra-curricular opportunities on offer, such as the astronomy club and many sporting activities. The recent production of ‘We Will Rock You’, by all accounts, was a resounding success.

p.2

better?

Penwortham Priory Academy is a rapidly improving school. Leaders have made significant improvements to most aspects of the school’s work.

p.2

better?

Leaders have focused on developing the quality of the curriculum. Pupils now study a curriculum that is more ambitious than in the past. As a result, pupils’ performance in external examinations at the end of Year 11 has already improved. Many pupils who left the school in 2018 had not learned well during their time at the school. However, those leaving the school in 2019 made overall progress that was in line with the national average. They attained well in many subjects, including English, mathematics and modern foreign languages.

p.2

better?

Leaders and teachers of most subjects have thought carefully about what they want pupils to know and be able to do. They plan pupils’ learning thoughtfully to help pupils to know and remember more over time. The activities that they set pupils during lessons also help pupils to remember important information. As a result, pupils can confidently recall prior learning. For example, pupils told inspectors about their understanding of different musical elements, such as tempo and texture. 3–4 March 2020

p.2

3

Despite this, some subjects have improved significantly more than others. For example, pupils now learn much better in mathematics because of the support that has been given to leaders and teachers in this area. Other subjects, such as science and history, are at an earlier stage of improvement. As a result, pupils who left the school in 2019 did not attain well in these subjects.

p.3

3

The proportion of pupils entered for the English Baccalaureate (EBacc) has been very low. Although this is beginning to change, the majority of pupils currently in key stage 4 are not entered for the EBacc.

p.3

3

Leaders have made sure that the curriculum is ambitious for all pupils, including those with SEND and those who are disadvantaged. This is helping to transform the learning of these pupils. Disadvantaged pupils who left the school in 2019 had made impressive progress during their time at the school. Pupils with SEND are fully involved in school life. They appreciate the way that staff help them and are learning well.

p.3

3

Pupils’ behaviour has improved greatly. This, in part, is because pupils get on well with each other and their teachers. It is also because teachers closely follow the new systems that have been introduced to manage pupils’ behaviour.

p.3

3

Overall, pupils’ attendance is similar to national figures. However, disadvantaged pupils and those with SEND attend less regularly than others in the school.

p.3

3

Leaders think that pupils’ wider personal development is very important. They have planned opportunities carefully to help pupils become healthy, responsible and moral citizens.

p.3

3

Leaders have skilfully overseen the improvements made. The staff are extremely motivated and keen to improve the school further.

p.3

3

Until this school year, all pupils in key stage 4 studied for a vocational qualification in information and communication technology. However, leaders have ended this practice because they did not feel it was in pupils’ best educational interests.

p.3

Safeguarding

The arrangements for safeguarding are effective.

p.3

Safeguarding

Leaders ensure that all appropriate checks are carried out on new members of staff. Staff take part in regular training on matters to do with safety. This enables them to spot signs that a pupil may be at risk from harm.

p.3

Safeguarding

Leaders work well with a range of external agencies to make sure that vulnerable pupils receive the support that they need.

p.3

Safeguarding

Pupils are helped to develop an age-appropriate understanding of different risks, such as knife crime, drugs and gambling. 3–4 March 2020

p.3

(Information for the school and appropriate authority)

 The quality of education provided by the school is improving. However, some departments have improved much more than others. As a result, pupils’ outcomes have improved in some subjects, such as mathematics, but remain weaker in others, such as history and science. Leaders should therefore ensure that all departments receive the support that they need to quickly and securely improve.  The proportion of pupils entered for the EBacc has been very low. Although this is beginning to change, most pupils do not study the full suite of qualifications that make up the EBacc. This is because a relatively small proportion of pupils have opted to study either history or geography, and a modern foreign language. To align with the ambition that leaders have for all pupils, they should ensure that a higher proportion of pupils are entered for the EBacc.  The attendance of disadvantaged pupils and pupils with SEND is not as good as

p.4

(Information for the school and appropriate authority)

that of others in the school. This could undermine the positive work that has been done to improve outcomes for these groups of pupils. Leaders should therefore further develop their strategy to reduce rates of absence, so that the attendance of these pupils improves.

p.4

How can I feed back my views?

or to find out what other parents and carers think. We use Ofsted Parent View information when deciding which schools to inspect, when to inspect them and as part of their inspection.

p.4

How can I feed back my views?

The Department for Education has further guidance on how to complain about a school.

p.4

How can I feed back my views?

If you are the school and you are not happy with the inspection or the report, you can complain to Ofsted .

p.4

Further information

You can search for published performance information about the school.

p.4

Further information

In the report, ‘disadvantaged pupils’ refers to those pupils who attract government pupil premium funding: pupils claiming free school meals at any point in the last six years and pupils in care or who left care through adoption or another formal route. 3–4 March 2020

p.4

School details

Inspection number 10110909 Type of school Secondary comprehensive

p.5

School details

Date of previous inspection 19 December 2018, under section 8 of the Education Act 2005

p.5

Information about this school

 The school uses The Heights Free School for the full-time education of a small number of pupils.

p.5

Information about this inspection

We carried out this inspection under section 5 of the Education Act 2005.

p.5

Information about this inspection

 During the inspection, we spoke formally with pupils about their work and school life. We also spoke to pupils during lessons and around the school site. Meetings were held with senior leaders, middle leaders and teachers, including those who are new to the profession. We spoke with members of the governing body, including its chair who is also the chair of the trust board. We spoke with a representative from the local authority.  We reviewed documentation, which included leaders’ plans to improve the school.  We considered the views expressed by parents in the 148 responses to Ofsted’s survey Parent View, as well as the comments received via the text-facility. We considered the 243 responses to the questionnaire for pupils and the 75 responses to the staff questionnaire. 3–4 March 2020

p.5

6

 We focused deeply on mathematics, modern foreign languages, history, music and art. In these subjects, we met with subject leaders, visited lessons, spoke with pupils, met with teaching staff and looked at pupils’ work. We looked at other subjects, such as geography, science and English, in less depth.  We reviewed a range of documentation about safeguarding, including the school’s record of checks undertaken on newly appointed staff.

p.6

Inspection team

Will Smith, lead inspector Her Majesty’s Inspector

p.6

Inspection team

Mike Pennington Ofsted Inspector 3–4 March 2020

p.6

7

regulates and inspects to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.

p.7

7

If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.7

7

You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .

p.7

7

Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .

p.7

7

T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.7

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion