Social care · Children's home inspection (SCCIF)
Children's Home run by Ethelbert Specialist Homes Limited in Kent
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Group verified
Ethelbert Specialist Homes Limited
- Inspection date verified
30 Jan 2020
- Inspectorssingle source
John Pledger
- Helped and protected verified
Good
- Leadership and management verified
Good
- Overall effectiveness verified
Good
- Name on report verified
SC023743
- URN verified
SC023743
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Grade profile
Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2018.
- OverallGood
- Helped and protectedGood
- Leadership and managementGood
70% of comparable inspections in the last three years were graded Good (12,716 inspections).
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type graded Good.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Emotional and behavioural difficulties subside, and children become settled; their ability to trust and build positive relationships grows and they feel increasingly safe and secure. p.4
- Safe recruitment practice is strong, and staff maintain good knowledge of the amenities and potential hazards of the home’s locality. p.5
- In general, the staff and the children meet the high expectations and standards he sets. p.5
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No strong criticism found.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- As outlined in 10.1, the registered person should plan staffing levels to ensure that they meet the needs of children and can respond flexibly to unexpected events or opportunities. p.4
- Staffing structures should promote continuity of care from the child’s perspective. p.4
- The registered person is responsible for deciding what each (regulation 45) review should focus on, based on the specific circumstances of the home at that particular time and any areas of high risk to the children that the home is designed to care for, such as missing or exploitation. p.4
- They will also consider what information or data recorded in the home will form part of the evidence base for p.4
- There is no expectation that the registered person will review the home against every part of the Quality Standards every six months – registered persons should use their professional judgement to decide which factors to focus on. p.4
- The review should enable the registered person to identify areas of strength and possible weakness in the home’s care, which will be captured in the written report. p.4
- The report should clearly identify any actions required for the next 6 months of delivery within the home and how those actions will be addressed. p.4
- The whole review process and the resulting report should be used as a tool for continuous improvement in the home. p.4
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Records & policies5
“Some records are, however, insufficiently detailed and the manager’s” p.5
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 8
- Words of findings
- 1,396
- about usual (typical 1319)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 46, typical 51
- Average sentence
- 22 words
- Next steps
- 8
- typical 4
- Hedged sentences
- 8%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Inspection report children’s home: SC023743 1 SC023743 Registered provider: Ethelbert Specialist Homes Limited
p.1
Full inspection Inspected under the social care common inspection framework
p.1
Information about this children’s home
The home offers accommodation for up to three children who have complex needs, resulting from their early life experiences. This private provider has several homes in the area and operates a school, being an education option for children in residence. The manager registered with Ofsted in September 2016.
p.1
Overall experiences and progress of
children and young people, taking into account
p.1
good
How well children and young people are helped and protected good
p.1
good
The effectiveness of leaders and managers good
p.1
good
The children’s home provides effective services that meet the requirements for good.
p.1
good
Overall judgement at last inspection: good
p.1
good
Enforcement action since last inspection: none Inspection report children’s home: SC023743 2
p.1
Inspection date Inspection type Inspection judgement
22/08/2018 Full Good 10/01/2018 Full Good 17/01/2017 Full Good 26/04/2016 Interim Declined in effectiveness Inspection report children’s home: SC023743 3
p.2
Statutory requirements
This section sets out the actions that the registered person(s) must take to meet the Care Standards Act 2000, Children’s Homes (England) Regulations 2015 and the ‘Guide to the children’s homes regulations including the quality standards’. The registered person(s) must comply within the given timescales.
p.3
Requirement Due date
The registered person must ensure that— within 24 hours of the use of a measure of control, discipline or restraint in relation to a child in the home, a record is made which includes— the name of the child; details of the child’s behaviour leading to the use of the measure; the date, time and location of the use of the measure; a description of the measure and its duration; details of any methods used or steps taken to avoid the need to use the measure; the name of the person who used the measure (“the user”), and of any other person present when the measure was used; the effectiveness and any consequences of the use of the measure; and a description of any injury to the child or any other person, and any medical treatment administered, as a result of the measure; within 48 hours of the use of the measure, the registered person, or a person who is authorised by the registered person to do so (“the authorised person”)—
p.3
Requirement Due date
has spoken to the user about the measure; and has signed the record to confirm it is accurate; and within 5 days of the use of the measure, the registered person or the authorised person adds to the record confirmation that they have spoken to the child about the measure. (Regulation 35 (3)(a)(i)(ii)(iii)(iv)(v)(vi)(vii)(viii)(b)(i)(ii)(c)(iv))
p.3
Requirement Due date
In particular, the registered person must be satisfied that there is sufficient detail provided to show that the measure was both necessary and proportionate. 01/04/2020 Inspection report children’s home: SC023743 4
p.3
Recommendations
As outlined in 10.1, the registered person should plan staffing levels to ensure that they meet the needs of children and can respond flexibly to unexpected events or opportunities. Staffing structures should promote continuity of care from the child’s perspective. (‘Guide to the children’s homes regulations including the quality standards’, page 54, paragraph 10.15) Specifically, staffing levels should be sustainable and ensure that staff do not work excessive hours and enable the registered person to consistently meet his management and leadership responsibilities. The registered person is responsible for deciding what each (regulation 45) review should focus on, based on the specific circumstances of the home at that particular time and any areas of high risk to the children that the home is designed to care for, such as missing or exploitation. They will also consider what information or data recorded in the home will form part of the evidence base for
p.4
Recommendations
their analysis and conclusions. There is no expectation that the registered person will review the home against every part of the Quality Standards every six months – registered persons should use their professional judgement to decide which factors to focus on. The review should enable the registered person to identify areas of strength and possible weakness in the home’s care, which will be captured in the written report. The report should clearly identify any actions required for the next 6 months of delivery within the home and how those actions will be addressed. The whole review process and the resulting report should be used as a tool for continuous improvement in the home. (‘Guide to the children’s homes regulations including the quality standards’, page 65, paragraph 15.4)
p.4
Overall experiences and progress of children and young people: good
The children develop strong feelings of belonging and attachment to the home and to the adults who care for them. Emotional and behavioural difficulties subside, and children become settled; their ability to trust and build positive relationships grows and they feel increasingly safe and secure. Children say that staff listen to them and care about them. The children engage fully in their learning because they feel settled and secure. They make noteworthy academic progress and develop aspirations for the future. This happens largely due to carers affirming the children’s abilities and talents, wanting the best for them and expecting them to achieve. Staff also maintain close contact with teachers. The high standard of care that the adults provide stimulates the children to explore and develop their interests and special abilities. Staff and peers celebrate the children’s extra- curricular and academic progress and achievements.
p.4
Overall experiences and progress of children and young people: good
Inspection report children’s home: SC023743 5 The care and nurturing of the children are highly personalised, and their individual differences are celebrated. Staff talk about the children with care, understanding and affection. The positive relationships and stability in the home provide the children with the emotional safeness to revisit past difficulties that may contribute to current challenges to their progress and well-being. Staff pay close attention to the health needs of the children and access specialist care for them when necessary. The home environment has a family feel and the children speak with satisfaction and enthusiasm about their shared mealtimes together with staff.
p.5
How well children and young people are helped and protected: good
The children express confidence in the adults to keep them safe. They say that they feel secure in the home and are well-looked after. One child said, ‘We don’t have to worry about anything.’ The plans that guide staff to keep the children safe are relevant and current and reflect careful consideration of the vulnerabilities of each child. Without being overprotective, staff are vigilant in the supervision of the children and help them to build confidence and resilience by allowing them to take risks appropriate to their abilities and understanding. No children have gone missing during this inspection period. The settled atmosphere of the home and the positive relationships forged between staff and the children mean that there is only the occasional need for physical interventions by staff. Records show that these actions are almost always necessary and proportionate. Some records are, however, insufficiently detailed and the manager’s
p.5
How well children and young people are helped and protected: good
review of these is lacking in rigour. This reduces the capacity of staff and managers to learn lessons about how similar situations can be managed in the future without the need for physical intervention. The staff know and follow the procedures designed to keep the children safe and work closely with their external partners when necessary. The home is well maintained and regular checks keep the children safe from identified hazards. Safe recruitment practice is strong, and staff maintain good knowledge of the amenities and potential hazards of the home’s locality.
p.5
The effectiveness of leaders and managers: good
A dedicated and experienced manager leads a small staff team by example. He is firmly focused on the progress and well-being of the children, for whom he is highly aspirational. In general, the staff and the children meet the high expectations and standards he sets. Staffing levels have been at a minimum for most of this inspection period. The small staff team has, however, been able to maintain continuity of care for the children and has ensured a stable and settled home environment. This has been made possible by all Inspection report children’s home: SC023743 6 staff consistently working extra hours and being supported through regular supervision and staff meetings. The manager’s extensive involvement in the daily running of the home has, however, reduced his capacity to undertake some of his leadership responsibilities, in particular the routine monitoring of the quality of care being provided and how this can be improved.
p.5
The effectiveness of leaders and managers: good
The quality and suitability of staff is good and the selection, induction and probation of the two most recent recruits have been careful and considered. The children say that they like the newest staff and that ‘they really fit in’. The effects on the children of changes in the staff team are amplified by its small size, and the sudden recent absence of one member of staff has unsettled the children. Plans are, however, underway for staff numbers to be increased soon. It is envisaged that this will result in some relief for existing staff and allow for the further development of the home.
p.6
Information about this inspection
Inspectors have looked closely at the experiences and progress of children and young people. Inspectors considered the quality of work and the differences made to the lives of children and young people. They watched how professional staff work with children and young people and each other and discussed the effectiveness of help and care provided. Wherever possible, they talked to children and young people and their families. In addition, the inspectors have tried to understand what the children’s home knows about how well it is performing, how well it is doing and what difference it is making for the children and young people whom it is trying to help, protect and look after.
p.6
Information about this inspection
Using the ‘Social care common inspection framework’, this inspection was carried out under the Care Standards Act 2000 to assess the effectiveness of the service, how it meets the core functions of the service as set out in legislation, and to consider how well it complies with the Children’s Homes (England) Regulations 2015 and the ‘Guide to the children’s homes regulations including the quality standards’. Inspection report children’s home: SC023743 7
p.6
Children’s home details
Registered provider: Ethelbert Specialist Homes Limited
p.7
Children’s home details
Registered provider address: 17 Leigh Road, Ramsgate, Kent CT12 5EU
p.7
Children’s home details
Responsible individual: Leslie Davenport
p.7
Inspector
John Pledger, social care inspector Inspection report children’s home: SC023743 8 achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.
p.7
Inspector
If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email q . You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit http://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .
p.8
Inspector
Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .
p.8
Inspector
T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: http://www.gov.uk/ofsted
p.8
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion