Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted letter

Setting

Inspected 24 Feb 2020

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Chris Stevens

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection datesingle source

    24 Feb 2020

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Chris Stevens

  • Postcode verified

    LE2 0HE

Page 1 of 4
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+59Positivemore positive than 85% of reports of this type

Reads more warmly than most reports of this type.

Praiseoutstandingstrongsuccessfulpositiveconfidentlyambitiousenthusiasticenjoy
Criticismnot alwaysnot securebelowlimitedlower

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

Findings positive critical

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
4
Words of findings
1,593
longer than usual (typical 963)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 45, typical 48
Average sentence
19 words
Next steps
1
typical 2
Hedged sentences
7%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 100%

Full report text

Store Street Manchester M1 2WD T 0300 123 1231 www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.1

Ms N Jassat Headteacher Charnwood Primary School Nedham Street Leicester Leicestershire LE2 0HE

p.1

Subject inspection of Charnwood Primary School

Following my visit to your school on 24 February 2020, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to confirm the inspection findings. The findings do not change the overall effectiveness judgement of outstanding from the last section 5 inspection.

p.1

Subject inspection of Charnwood Primary School

This inspection was conducted under section 8 of the Education Act 2005 and in accordance with Ofsted’s published procedures for a no formal designation inspection of schools. The inspection was carried out to enable Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector to better understand the quality of education in specific subjects provided by outstanding primary schools.

p.1

Main findings

Pupils at the school are very enthusiastic about geography. They have a strong desire to find out more about the world they inhabit. As one pupil put it, ‘I enjoy learning in geography because I like being surprised when I find out more knowledge about the world.’

p.1

Main findings

Geography is currently taught as a discrete subject in blocks of time, alternating with history each half term. Leaders have a clear vision and passion for the subject. They have recently implemented a new and ambitious curriculum for geography. This has been designed to ensure that the full scope of the national curriculum is accessible to all pupils, including pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND). With the close support of additional adults, teachers adapt their approach for these pupils and those who require more support. Some pupils take part in the forest school programme, where they learn basic mapping skills and how to create shelter using natural materials, for example. The subject leader has a good understanding of what is working well and what needs to be done to improve the curriculum further. The curriculum in Reception builds on what children learn in Nursery and enables pupils to be ready for Year 1.

p.1

Main findings

Similar links ensure that learning in key stage 2 builds upon what pupils have learned in key stage 1. Staff work collaboratively to plan the curriculum together. Leaders have invested in professional training and planning time to ensure that staff create an imaginative and inspiring curriculum, based on ‘big questions’ such as ‘How are we connected?’ and ‘Do we live in a dangerous world?’ Leaders have utilised the expertise of a member of the governing body in shaping the geography curriculum and ensuring that the new plans help pupils to be ready for key stage 3 by the end of Year 6.

p.2

Main findings

The subject leader, together with class teachers, has made a successful start to delivering the new curriculum and enhancing the quality of pupils’ learning in geography across all phases. However, the implementation of the curriculum is at a more advanced stage in some year groups than others. Leaders’ plans, together with the quality of work in pupils’ books, show that the provision for geography is stronger in key stage 1 and upper key stage 2 than in lower key stage 2. Leaders have acted to ensure greater consistency in all classes. Opportunities for fieldwork are well considered in the early years and key stage 1. There is a strong focus on comparing places and enabling pupils to identify the similarities and differences between them. Planning for in-depth fieldwork at key stage 2 is at a developmental stage.

p.2

Main findings

Children in the early years get off to a very positive start in their understanding of the world around them. Staff plan schemes of learning flexibly, making sure that they take children’s interests into account. Vibrant displays stimulate pupils’ discovery of the planned themes and capture their experiences from visits to local places. Pupils learn about the similarities and differences between places through the whole-class reading of books, such as ‘Lubna and the pebble.’ This story helps children to develop empathy at an early age by considering the thoughts and feelings of people involved in migration or as refugees. Learning activities promote children’s independent thinking and their willingness to share their thoughts and ideas. Staff make connections with the local area. For example, children learn about ‘our street’ and identify familiar surroundings such as the local park, library, mosque

p.2

Main findings

and fish and chip shop. Continuous play develops children’s understanding of local features by encouraging writing of key words about ‘our street’ on the displayed map and constructing a railway, for example.

p.2

Main findings

Teachers typically have good subject knowledge and they use this enthusiastically. Through their questioning and resources they promote the use of subject-specific terms well. Knowledge-retrieval activities, such as ‘simmering starters’, are helping pupils to recall and remember knowledge. In Year 6, for example, pupils can confidently recall their understanding of greenfield and brownfield sites. They use this knowledge to evaluate where the best sites might be to build new homes and a supermarket in their local area. Pupils are encouraged to think independently, and they feel confident to ask challenging questions. Many questioned the need for increased housing and held firm views about the need for more green spaces. They questioned why brownfield sites could not be used for recreation space instead.

p.2

Main findings

Pupils demonstrate good locational knowledge, especially in key stage 2. In the topics that have been planned most effectively, the curriculum successfully develops pupils’ understanding of human and physical geography in the context of different places and locations. For example, in Year 5 pupils learn about global trade in their topic ‘how are we connected?’ Pupils understand the unequal distribution of natural resources across the world. They can discuss the reasons why food products are imported and exported between different countries and they consider the environmental impact of this. Pupils begin to understand why some countries have become more powerful than others. In Year 2, pupils can confidently explain the difference between human and physical features. They use this knowledge to describe the similarities and differences between Leicester and a small region in Madagascar. These units of learning are successful because teachers have precisely

p.3

Main findings

identified the knowledge they want pupils to acquire and remember.

p.3

Main findings

The quality of pupils’ written work does not always reflect the quality of pupils’ spoken knowledge and understanding in geography. For example, there are limited opportunities for pupils to demonstrate the depth of their understanding through writing tasks. Sometimes the assessment of pupils’ understanding in geography is not well thought out. In Year 4, for example, pupils’ learning about floods in the United Kingdom and Florida does not secure or deepen their understanding of the causes and consequences of them.

p.3

Main findings

Leaders have ensured that the formal curriculum for geography is complemented by enrichment experiences. For example, pupils in Years 3 and 4 participate in reciprocal visits to a school in rural Lincolnshire to help them understand the similarities and differences between rural and urban places in the United Kingdom. Pupils in Year 5 perform songs and poetry using a variety of instruments as part of a multi-cultural music project with the Leicestershire Music Education Hub. All classes showcased their research projects on different countries to parents as part of the school’s ‘geography day’, reflecting their understanding of different cultures. Together, these experiences support pupils’ learning in geography and contribute to their understanding of spiritual, moral, social and cultural themes.

p.3

Main findings

Leaders and class teachers recognise that the new curriculum plans are in the first year of implementation and, therefore, it is too soon to assess their impact. The numerous displays around the school site and in each classroom reflect the importance that is placed on this subject. You are keen that provision for geography strengthens further as the implementation of the school’s new curriculum continues to evolve. This includes improving the purposeful use of fieldwork at key stage 2, building on the strengths in the early years and key stage 1. The enthusiasm of staff and pupils for caring for the environment is also strongly evident in their commitment to a wide variety of environmental projects, including the Leicester ‘litter less’ campaign, monitoring energy usage and recycling projects. The ethos of the school is positive, and the activities collectively promote the school’s values and motto ‘Empathy, respect and together’.

p.3

Evidence

During the inspection I met with you, the deputy headteacher and the subject leader for geography. I evaluated the curriculum plans for geography. Together with the subject leader and deputy headteacher, I visited lessons in the Reception class and in Years 2, 5 and 6. I looked at a selection of pupils’ books from the lessons visited with senior leaders. I also looked at a small sample of pupils’ work from other year groups. I met with the class teachers from the lessons I had visited and the leader for the Reception class. I spoke with three groups of pupils from Years 2, 5 and 6. I also spoke with pupils informally during lessons. I also met with the coordinator for the school’s environmental sustainability projects.

p.4

Context

Charnwood Primary School is a larger-than-average-sized primary school. There are currently 447 pupils on roll. The school is fully staffed. The proportion of disadvantaged pupils is below the national average. The proportion of pupils with SEND is below average. The proportion of pupils who have an education, health and care plan is below the national average. The proportion of pupils who speak English as an additional language is well above the national average.

p.4

Context

I am copying this letter to the chair of the governing body, to the regional schools commissioner and the director of children’s services for Leicester City. This letter will be published on the Ofsted website.

p.4

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion