Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · School inspection (EIF)

Stanley High School

Inspected 12 Feb 2020 · published 16 Mar 2020 · URN 144618

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    12 Feb 2020

  • Inspectors verified

    David Hampson, David Roberts, Elaine Parkinson, Mike Pennington

  • Behaviour and attitudes verified

    Good

  • Leadership and management verified

    Good

  • Overall effectiveness verified

    Good

  • Personal development verified

    Good

  • Quality of education verified

    Good

  • Postcode verified

    PR9 9TF

  • Name on report verified

    Stanley High School

  • URN verified

    144618

Page 7 of 7
Page 7 of the report with the evidence highlighted

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Each judgement on its scale, weakest to strongest.

  • OverallGood
  • Behaviour and attitudesGood
  • Leadership and managementGood
  • Personal developmentGood
  • Quality of educationGood

66% of comparable inspections in the last three years were graded Good (5,043 inspections).

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+62Positivemore positive than 58% of reports of this type graded Good
OutstandingGoodRIInadequate

In line with other reports of this type graded Good.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praisehigh expectationsstrongproudimprovedpositivekeenambitiouswell designed
Criticismconcernsnot successfullylimitedunclearnot happy

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsSafeguardingAbout the inspection positive critical
  • Findings979w+60
  • Safeguarding89w+52

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
7
Words of findings
1,045
about usual (typical 1098)
Reading level
Plain English
Flesch 63, typical 55
Average sentence
12 words
Next steps
5
typical 4
Hedged sentences
12%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 66%Safeguarding 6%About the inspection 29%

Full report text

Inspection of Stanley High School Fleetwood Road, Southport, Merseyside PR9 9TF

p.1

Overall effectiveness Good

The quality of education Good Behaviour and attitudes Good Personal development Good Leadership and management Good

p.1

Overall effectiveness Good

Previous inspection grade Not previously inspected under section 5 of the Education Act 2005 11–12 February 2020

p.1

What is it like to attend this school?

Pupils are proud to be part of Stanley High School. Relationships between teachers and pupils are strong. Pupils behave well. They are polite and show respect for each other and their teachers. Teachers have high expectations of pupils. Pupils respond well to teachers’ high expectations. They work hard and try their best.

p.2

What is it like to attend this school?

The pupils that we spoke to said that they feel safe in school. They said that teachers listen to any concerns that they have. Teachers deal with the rare cases of bullying well. They genuinely care for pupils and know them well. At breaktimes and lunchtime, the school is a calm and pleasant place.

p.2

What is it like to attend this school?

Pupils are keen to take part in revision and support sessions after school. There are a wide range of clubs and activities provided. These include sports clubs, rocket club and juggling club. Pupils also take part in visits to places such as the Houses of Parliament and Germany. There are many opportunities for pupils to develop as leaders. For example, many pupils take part in the Duke of Edinburgh’s Award scheme. Pupils also take up roles with responsibility, such as student leaders.

p.2

better?

The headteacher, together with leaders and governors, has improved many aspects of the school. Leaders make decisions that are in the best interests of pupils. They are keen for all to succeed. Many of the parents and carers who shared their views with us commented on the positive atmosphere in the school.

p.2

better?

The school has developed an ambitious curriculum for all pupils. A high proportion of pupils take the English Baccalaureate (EBacc). Leaders have provided focused staff training. Teachers’ subject knowledge is well developed. This has improved the way in which the planned curriculum is taught. Most teachers check what pupils already know and can do before they introduce new learning. Pupils achieve well in their GCSE examinations.

p.2

better?

Leaders plan and sequence the curriculum well in most subjects. This enables pupils to build on what they have already learned. Pupils revisit their learning regularly. This helps pupils to remember more and know more. However, some subjects in key stage 3 are not planned in a logical order. This means that some pupils do not learn what they need to know before moving on to new concepts. Leaders are currently reviewing the key stage 3 curriculum to ensure that it offers increasing challenge and a greater depth of learning.

p.2

better?

Leaders have high expectations of all pupils, including those with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND). Many teachers and teaching assistants work well to remove any barriers to learning. That said, a small number of teachers do not adapt curriculum plans successfully for pupils with SEND. 11–12 February 2020

p.2

3

There is a strong programme to support pupils’ personal development. For example, pupils are taught how to live healthy lives and take part in a wide range of exercise, including dance. However, leaders do not check to see if all pupils are able to access these exciting activities. Pupils are respectful of other cultures. They accept the differences between themselves and others. For example, pupils can take part in a British Sign Language club. The careers programme is well designed. It gives pupils a strong foundation to continue their education further.

p.3

3

Pupils are enthusiastic learners and keen to show off their best. Pupils told us that they enjoy coming to school. Their high rates of attendance reflect this.

p.3

3

Staff are proud to work in the school. They reported that the headteacher and the senior leadership team lead and manage the school well. Staff said that leaders consider their well-being.

p.3

Safeguarding

The arrangements for safeguarding are effective.

p.3

Safeguarding

Leaders and governors have created a positive safeguarding culture. Teachers have safeguarding training. Pupils trust the school staff to help keep them safe. Pupils are confident in sharing any concerns that they might have. Teachers act quickly to keep pupils safe. They work well with external agencies.

p.3

Safeguarding

Pupils learn about the dangers present in the local community. They benefit from sessions provided by the police about keeping safe from knife crime. Teachers help pupils to manage risk and act sensibly, including when online.

p.3

(Information for the school and appropriate authority)

 Some staff do not adapt the curriculum well enough for pupils with SEND. Consequently, some pupils are not successfully accessing the curriculum in some lessons and achieving as well as they should. Leaders must ensure that all staff use information about pupils with SEND to adapt their curriculum plans more carefully so that these pupils can learn more.  Leaders’ analysis of pupils’ participation in extra-curricular activities is limited. As a result, leaders are unclear to what extent some pupils are benefiting from the range of personal development opportunities available in school. Leaders need to check that all groups of pupils are making the most of the opportunities to support their wider development.  Most subjects are well planned. However, leaders are aware that in some subjects pupils’ learning is not sequenced as well as it could be. It is clear from the actions that leaders have already taken that they are in the process of bringing this

p.3

(Information for the school and appropriate authority)

about. It is for that reason that the transition arrangements have been used in reaching a judgement that the school remains good. Leaders should review the 11–12 February 2020

p.3

4

curriculum plans in these subjects to ensure that pupils’ learning is ordered in a logical way. This will enable pupils to build their knowledge as they move through the school.

p.4

How can I feed back my views?

or to find out what other parents and carers think. We use Ofsted Parent View information when deciding which schools to inspect, when to inspect them and as part of their inspection.

p.4

How can I feed back my views?

The Department for Education has further guidance on how to complain about a school.

p.4

How can I feed back my views?

If you are the school and you are not happy with the inspection or the report, you can complain to Ofsted .

p.4

Further information

You can search for published performance information about the school.

p.4

Further information

In the report, 'disadvantaged pupils' refers to those pupils who attract government pupil premium funding: pupils claiming free school meals at any point in the last six years and pupils in care or who left care through adoption or another formal route. 11–12 February 2020

p.4

School details

Inspection number 10135026 Type of school Secondary comprehensive

p.5

School details

Date of previous inspection Not previously inspected

p.5

Information about this school

 Stanley High School converted to become an academy on 1 September 2017. It is part of the Southport Learning Trust.  A new headteacher took up his post in November 2016.  A small number of pupils attend alternative provision at the following providers: Phoenix Training, The Pinefield Centre and Blackburn Rovers FC Academy.

p.5

Information about this inspection

We carried out this inspection under section 5 of the Education Act 2005.

p.5

Information about this inspection

 We held meetings with the headteacher, senior leaders and subject leaders. We also met with the chair of the trust board, the executive headteacher, a parent governor and the chair of the local governing body.  We checked safeguarding documentation, including the school’s appointment checks on staff.  We considered the views of the 39 pupils and 44 staff who responded to Ofsted’s online surveys. We also considered the views expressed by parents in the 115 11–12 February 2020

p.5

6

responses to Ofsted’s online survey, Parent View, including the comments received via the free-text facility.  We spoke with groups of pupils to gather their views, particularly on behaviour and safety.  We did deep dives in these subjects: English, mathematics, science and history. We met with subject leaders, pupils and teaching staff, visited lessons and looked at pupils’ work.

p.6

Inspection team

David Hampson, lead inspector Ofsted Inspector

p.6

Inspection team

Elaine Parkinson Ofsted Inspector 11–12 February 2020

p.6

7

regulates and inspects to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children's social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children's services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.

p.7

7

If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.7

7

You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .

p.7

7

Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .

p.7

7

T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.7

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion