Schools & FE · School inspection (EIF)
Holy Apostles' Church of England Primary School
Summary
Julie Carrington (lead), Emma Jelley
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection date verified
26 Feb 2020
- Inspectors verified
Emma Jelley, Julie Carrington
- Behaviour and attitudes verified
Good
- Early years verified
Good
- Leadership and management verified
Good
- Overall effectiveness verified
Good
- Personal development verified
Good
- Quality of education verified
Good
- Postcode verified
GL52 6QZ
- Name on report verified
Holy Apostles’ Church of England Primary School
- URN verified
115679
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Grade profile
Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2012.
- OverallGood
- Behaviour and attitudesGood
- Early yearsGood
- Leadership and managementGood
- Personal developmentGood
- Quality of educationGood
66% of comparable inspections in the last three years were graded Good (5,043 inspections).
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type graded Good.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- The previous ‘outstanding’ judgement reflected the school’s overall effectiveness in June 2012 under the relevant inspection framework at that time. p.1
- The long time between inspections is because the law changed in 2011; it made outstanding schools exempt from routine inspection. 25–26 February 2020 p.1
- Pupils achieve very well in reading, writing, and mathematics by the time they leave for secondary school. p.2
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No strong criticism found.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- As better plans are being put into place, for example in physical education, pupils are gaining the detailed knowledge they should. p.3
- Leaders need to ensure that curriculum plans are demanding and build on what pupils already know and understand so that all pupils do as well as they should. p.4
- Leaders need to have a better understanding of the implementation of the writing curriculum, so they are confident that pupils use and apply their writing knowledge and that planned writing opportunities enable pupils to excel in this subject in every year group. p.4
- They say staff are very caring and support them well, particularly when they need to talk through a worry. p.2
- Some pupils do not gain the depth of knowledge and understanding that they need to do consistently well. p.4
- Leaders need to ensure that the curriculum is well planned and implemented in every subject so that pupils know and remember more in every subject of the national curriculum. p.4
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 7
- Words of findings
- 1,295
- about usual (typical 1098)
- Reading level
- Fairly hard
- Flesch 56, typical 55
- Average sentence
- 15 words
- Next steps
- 6
- typical 4
- Hedged sentences
- 6%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Inspection of Holy Apostles’ Church of England Primary School Battledown Approach, Charlton Kings, Cheltenham, Gloucestershire GL52 6QZ
p.1
Overall effectiveness Good
The quality of education Good Behaviour and attitudes Good Personal development Good Leadership and management Good Early years provision Good Previous inspection grade Outstanding
p.1
Overall effectiveness Good
The previous ‘outstanding’ judgement reflected the school’s overall effectiveness in June 2012 under the relevant inspection framework at that time.
p.1
Overall effectiveness Good
The new judgement of ‘good’ reflects the current inspection framework as well as any changes at the school since the last inspection.
p.1
Overall effectiveness Good
The school has not been inspected for eight years, which is longer than the five-year maximum interval between inspections. Changes in school effectiveness may have happened at any point in that period. The long time between inspections is because the law changed in 2011; it made outstanding schools exempt from routine inspection. 25–26 February 2020
p.1
What is it like to attend this school?
Pupils enjoy school and attend well. Pupils become well-mannered and very reflective young people here. They feel a strong sense of belonging at this church school and live out the school’s values well. Pupils really like the science weeks, musical events, choir, extra school visits and visitors that staff provide. They enjoy the sporting activities, including the ‘mud run’.
p.2
What is it like to attend this school?
Pupils say that lunchtimes are usually fun. Sports leaders help younger pupils. Pupils say that staff are quick to respond if there is any poor behaviour at lunchtime, including during football, and this is usually managed well. However, on occasions, pupils say that when there are smaller issues, staff could be quicker to intervene. Nonetheless, pupils feel very safe at school. They say staff are very caring and support them well, particularly when they need to talk through a worry.
p.2
What is it like to attend this school?
Pupils achieve very well in reading, writing, and mathematics by the time they leave for secondary school. Pupils experience a wide range of subjects. Pupils work hard and they complete the activities set. Nonetheless, some pupils would like to learn more and deepen their knowledge further. Inspectors agree. Pupils do not gain detailed knowledge and skills in every subject. This prevents pupils from excelling academically.
p.2
better?
Leaders and teachers ensure that pupils learn ‘the basics’ well. Leaders’ work is bringing about further improvements to the quality of education pupils receive. The school’s overall effectiveness has turned a corner for the better and is good.
p.2
better?
The standards which the oldest pupils achieve have remained very high over several years. In the early years, and across key stage 1, almost every pupil sees success as a reader.
p.2
better?
Leaders’ recent efforts to improve pupils’ sentence writing, vocabulary, and spelling help pupils to write well. However, the writing curriculum, including in the early years, does not support pupils to excel.
p.2
better?
The headteacher is well respected by staff and pupils. Leaders are out and about in the school a lot. They provide strong care and support. This develops pupils’ character well. Pupils follow instructions and adhere to the school rules. Pupils are respectful to one another and behave well.
p.2
better?
However, in the past, leaders did not assure themselves how effectively all curriculum subjects were being implemented. Leaders are making a determined start to overhaul the curriculum subject by subject now. However, it is early days. 25–26 February 2020
p.2
3
Curriculum plans include appropriate subject content. However, the depth of knowledge which pupils are required to learn is at a superficial level in some subjects, for example in science. This means that while many pupils remember a lot about scientific concepts, and do well, others do not.
p.3
3
Leaders have not upgraded all subjects yet. Leaders’ new plans in art and design and computing set out exactly what will be taught and when. As better plans are being put into place, for example in physical education, pupils are gaining the detailed knowledge they should.
p.3
3
In mathematics, teachers use their good subject knowledge to plan work that meets pupils needs well. As a result, pupils complete number work accurately and many use their prior knowledge to secure complex work. Pupils say that their teachers demand a lot of them in mathematics. They like this feeling, but they do not feel it to the same extent in every subject.
p.3
3
Younger pupils use their phonics to read words and sentences well. Hesitant readers get the precise support they need and catch up. Even so, there are still occasions when the reading curriculum does not extend pupils’ understanding of what they read consistently well. For example, it can be a big jump up in Year 6 for some. Their time at Holy Apostles’ makes pupils determined in their learning, and so many pupils make this leap admirably. As a result, very many pupils are avid readers. However, some sequences of work, further down the school, are not demanding enough. This hinders pupils’ ability to shine as the accomplished readers they can be.
p.3
3
Senior leaders ensure that teachers use all the information they have to provide timely support for any pupil who needs extra help. Pupils who are disadvantaged or have special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND) do well because of the additional support they receive.
p.3
3
Leaders make sure that teachers plan a curriculum that enriches pupils’ learning well. The curriculum ensures that pupils gain an appreciation of a range of cultures and religions. They know about the world around them and beyond. Sports events and competitions are open to all. Pupils appreciate learning about keeping healthy, including their recent work on drugs education.
p.3
Safeguarding
The arrangements for safeguarding are effective. The school completes the necessary checks to ensure that all staff are safe to work with children.
p.3
Safeguarding
Leaders provide staff with the training they need so that everyone knows how to keep pupils safe. Adults know how to refer concerns about pupils’ well-being and safety. The pastoral support leader knows families well and provides effective support. Pupils know how to keep themselves safe and understand the risks of cyber bullying. 25–26 February 2020
p.3
(Information for the school and appropriate authority)
The school’s curriculum is not yet planned coherently in every subject. It is clear from the actions that leaders have already taken to plan and train staff in how to deliver the curriculum that they are in the process of bringing this about. For this reason, the transition arrangement has been applied. Leaders need to ensure that the curriculum is well planned and implemented in every subject so that pupils know and remember more in every subject of the national curriculum. Governors have not held leaders to account for ensuring that the curriculum demands enough of the pupils it serves in every subject. Some pupils do not gain the depth of knowledge and understanding that they need to do consistently well. Leaders need to ensure that curriculum plans are demanding and build on what pupils already know and understand so that all pupils do as well as they should. Leaders’ work to establish how well the writing curriculum is implemented is not
p.4
(Information for the school and appropriate authority)
developed fully. Leaders do not routinely assure themselves that teachers’ plans, including in the early years, are delivered consistently well. Leaders need to have a better understanding of the implementation of the writing curriculum, so they are confident that pupils use and apply their writing knowledge and that planned writing opportunities enable pupils to excel in this subject in every year group.
p.4
How can I feed back my views?
or to find out what other parents and carers think. We use Ofsted Parent View information when deciding which schools to inspect, when to inspect them and as part of their inspection.
p.4
How can I feed back my views?
The Department for Education has further guidance on how to complain about a school.
p.4
How can I feed back my views?
If you are the school and you are not happy with the inspection or the report, you can complain to Ofsted .
p.4
Further information
You can search for published performance information about the school.
p.4
Further information
In the report, ‘disadvantaged pupils’ refers to those pupils who attract government pupil premium funding: pupils claiming free school meals at any point in the last six years and pupils in care or who left care through adoption or another formal route. 25–26 February 2020
p.4
School details
Inspection number 10133443 Type of school Primary
p.5
School details
Appropriate authority The governing body
p.5
School details
Date of previous inspection 21–22 June 2012
p.5
Information about this school
There have been a number of staff changes since the last inspection. However, the leadership has remained the same. The school’s last section 48 inspection was carried out in November 2017 and found the school’s Christian distinctiveness to be outstanding. The proportion of pupils who are disadvantaged or have SEND is much lower than that seen nationally. There is a pre-school on the school’s site that takes children from aged two to four. This was last inspected in May 2019. There is before- and after-school care provided by external registered providers. These are inspected separately by Ofsted and did not form part of this inspection.
p.5
Information about this inspection
We carried out this inspection under section 8 of the Education Act 2005. We deemed the inspection a section 5 inspection under the same Act.
p.5
Information about this inspection
The previous ‘outstanding’ judgement reflected the school’s overall effectiveness in June 2012 under the relevant inspection framework at that time. 25–26 February 2020
p.5
6
The new judgement of ‘good’ reflects the current inspection framework as well as any changes at the school since the last inspection.
p.6
6
The school has not been inspected for eight years, which is longer than the five-year maximum interval between inspections under section 5 of the Education Act 2005. Changes in school effectiveness may have happened at any point in that period. The long time between inspections is because the law changed in 2011; it made most outstanding schools exempt from routine inspection.
p.6
6
The lead inspector met with five governors, including the chair of governors on day one of the inspection. Inspectors also met with the chair of governors on day two. The lead inspector held a meeting with a local authority representative to discuss the external support the school receives. We met with the headteacher, deputy headteacher, and other members of the extended leadership team, including the leader of SEND. We reviewed the school’s safeguarding arrangements. We examined a range of documentation provided by the school, including leaders’ self-evaluation, improvement plans and documentation relating to the safeguarding, attendance and behaviour of pupils. We considered the 17 responses to Ofsted’s online survey, Parent View. An inspector also met with parents at the start of the school day to gather their views of the school. Throughout the inspection, we met with staff and pupils to gather their views.
p.6
6
We did deep dives in these subjects: reading, mathematics, writing and physical education. This included visiting lessons, looking at pupils’ work, meeting with senior and subject leaders and discussions with teachers and pupils. We also looked further into the quality of education pupils receive in science, geography and history.
p.6
Inspection team
Julie Carrington, lead inspector Her Majesty’s Inspector
p.6
Inspection team
Emma Jelley Ofsted Inspector 25–26 February 2020
p.6
7
regulates and inspects to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.
p.7
7
If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .
p.7
7
You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .
p.7
7
Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .
p.7
7
T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted
p.7
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion