Schools & FE · School inspection (EIF)
Ark De Lacy Primary School
Summary
Kirsty Godfrey (lead), James Kilner, Mary Lanovy-Taylor
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection date verified
31 Jan 2020
- Inspectors verified
James Kilner, Kirsty Godfrey, Mary Lanovy-Taylor
- Behaviour and attitudes verified
Good
- Early years verified
Good
- Leadership and management verified
Good
- Overall effectiveness verified
Requires improvement
- Personal development verified
Good
- Quality of education verified
Requires improvement
- Postcode verified
WF8 2TG
- Name on report verified
Pontefract De Lacy Primary School
- URN verified
140023
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Grade profile
Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2015.
- OverallRequires improvement
- Behaviour and attitudesGood
- Early yearsGood
- Leadership and managementGood
- Personal developmentGood
- Quality of educationRequires improvement
15% of comparable inspections in the last three years were graded Requires improvement (5,043 inspections).
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type graded Requires improvement.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- This means that too many pupils who have fallen behind with reading are not learning to read with fluency and understanding as soon as they should. p.4
- They should make sure that gaps in pupils’ learning are being addressed and that staff have the necessary expertise to deliver the subjects they teach. p.4
- For example, many pupils who need to rapidly catch up are not getting the right support. p.4
- Leaders need to fully implement the new programme and check that it is having the desired effect. p.4
- Leaders should make sure absence decreases further for this group of pupils so they are not disadvantaged by poor attendance. p.4
- Leaders should consider the views of the small number of concerned parents so they can build more positive relationships with these families. p.4
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Parents & families6
“However, some parents have concerns about their children’s education.” p.3
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 8
- Words of findings
- 1,302
- about usual (typical 1215)
- Reading level
- Fairly hard
- Flesch 58, typical 56
- Average sentence
- 15 words
- Next steps
- 6
- typical 5
- Hedged sentences
- 9%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Inspection of Pontefract De Lacy Primary School Chequerfield Lane, Pontefract, West Yorkshire WF8 2TG
p.1
Overall effectiveness Requires improvement
The quality of education Requires improvement Behaviour and attitudes Good Personal development Good Leadership and management Good Early years provision Good Previous inspection grade Good 30–31 January 2020
p.1
What is it like to attend this school?
The school has been through an unsettled period. Following the previous inspection, standards were low throughout the school and across subjects. High expectations from new leaders and staff are now resulting in more positive signs of improvement in pupils’ outcomes.
p.2
What is it like to attend this school?
Too many pupils in key stages 1 and 2, including those who have special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND), are behind with reading. New approaches are helping. However, early reading remains an urgent priority for leaders to fully address.
p.2
What is it like to attend this school?
Pupils understand the behaviour system and feel it is applied fairly. They say the school now feels calm and safe because behaviour has improved. Pupils know that when bullying happens, an adult will listen and follow up their concerns. Pupils behave well overall. They are respectful of one another and can often be seen spontaneously encouraging each other’s efforts. Some pupils find it difficult to manage their emotions. They are well supported by the school’s inclusive and nurturing approach.
p.2
What is it like to attend this school?
Pupils enjoy the range of experiences staff provide. Recent examples include a visit to Eden Camp and children in the early years learning about Chinese New Year. Pupils are keen to be involved in the life of the school. School council representatives are currently working on providing new play equipment to improve breaktimes.
p.2
better?
There was a prolonged period of staffing and leadership upheaval following the previous inspection. New leaders are starting to secure the necessary improvements. In 2019, leaders’ actions resulted in a sharp increase in the proportion of pupils reaching the expected standards by the end of key stage 2, particularly in writing and mathematics.
p.2
better?
Leaders have introduced a newly designed curriculum. Its aim is to broaden pupils’ horizons and give them the knowledge they need for their life ahead. In some subjects, such as mathematics and science, the curriculum is further developed. In these subjects, pupils are becoming more secure in their learning. However, a legacy of poor teaching in the past means that pupils have gaps in their learning in some subjects. Pupils who are behind, including those with SEND, sometimes complete work of poor quality. They have not secured the basics well enough. For example, they are unable to write with appropriate letter formation or make use of finger spaces. In these cases, teachers have not made sure that gaps in pupils’ knowledge from previous year groups have been addressed. Many subject leaders are new to their roles. They are being supported to check the effectiveness of the curriculum 30–31 January 2020
p.2
3
and how well pupils are remembering important knowledge. However, this is at an early stage.
p.3
3
Too many pupils enter key stage 2 without being able to read fluently. This hinders them from being able to access their learning in other subjects. New leaders have prioritised reading. They have introduced a reading strategy which makes sure that pupils read a variety of texts at different points throughout the school day. Pupils are showing more interest in reading. They say they enjoy the books that teachers read to them. Leaders have chosen these books carefully as the basis of the English curriculum. They provide pupils with exposure to a broad range of high-quality texts.
p.3
3
The teaching of early reading, including phonics, has only seen more recent signs of improvement. A new programme has been introduced and early years and key stage 1 staff have been trained. Pupils read books which are usually well matched to the sounds they know. The early signs are encouraging. In Reception, the new phonics approach is becoming quickly embedded. Children are keeping up with the expectations of the programme. However, there are too many pupils in key stages 1 and 2, including those with SEND, who began their current year group well behind what is expected for their age. These pupils are now receiving much improved phonics teaching, but many of them have a lot of catching up to do. The extra support for struggling readers is not frequent enough or precisely targeted to help these pupils catch up quickly.
p.3
3
Children in the early years enter the classrooms happily each morning. Staff have built very positive relationships with children and have established important routines which support children’s learning and development.
p.3
3
Leaders have made important improvements in pupils’ behaviour and attendance. Fixed-term exclusions are reducing. This has been achieved through more accurately identifying pupils’ needs so that they receive the right support. The nurture room and sensory room provide pupils with safe places where they can learn to manage their emotions effectively.
p.3
3
Most parents are satisfied with the school. They recognise the improvements which leaders are making. However, some parents have concerns about their children’s education. There is further work to do in building positive relationships with these parents.
p.3
Safeguarding
The arrangements for safeguarding are effective.
p.3
Safeguarding
Staff receive training which is effective in helping them to recognise possible signs of concern. Leaders follow up concerns diligently and communicate with external agencies effectively.
p.3
Safeguarding
Pupils are taught how to keep themselves safe. For example, pupils learn about how to be safe when crossing the road and when they use the internet. Assemblies, for 30–31 January 2020
p.3
4
example, provided by the National Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Children (NSPCC), make sure that the curriculum addresses issues which are pertinent to the pupils in this area.
p.4
(Information for the school and appropriate authority)
Some aspects of the new phonics programme are not yet in place in key stages 1 and 2 and need urgent attention. For example, many pupils who need to rapidly catch up are not getting the right support. Staff in key stage 2 have not been trained in the school’s phonics approach. This means that too many pupils who have fallen behind with reading are not learning to read with fluency and understanding as soon as they should. Leaders need to fully implement the new programme and check that it is having the desired effect. They must ensure there is a rigorous system for supporting pupils, including those with SEND, who urgently need to catch up so they receive effective practice and targeted support. Subject leadership is in the early stages of development in many subjects. Senior leaders should continue to support new subject leaders so that they are able to check that their subject is being implemented consistently well throughout each
p.4
(Information for the school and appropriate authority)
key stage. They should make sure that gaps in pupils’ learning are being addressed and that staff have the necessary expertise to deliver the subjects they teach. Absence and persistent absence have reduced considerably this year. However, the learning and progress of pupils with SEND continues to be affected by their absence. Leaders should make sure absence decreases further for this group of pupils so they are not disadvantaged by poor attendance. Some parents have mixed views about the school. For example, they are not sure how their children are being supported with aspects of learning which they are struggling with. Leaders should consider the views of the small number of concerned parents so they can build more positive relationships with these families.
p.4
How can I feed back my views?
or to find out what other parents and carers think. We use Ofsted Parent View information when deciding which schools to inspect, when to inspect them and as part of their inspection.
p.4
How can I feed back my views?
The Department for Education has further guidance on how to complain about a school.
p.4
How can I feed back my views?
If you are the school and you are not happy with the inspection or the report, you can complain to Ofsted . 30–31 January 2020
p.4
Further information
You can search for published performance information about the school.
p.5
Further information
In the report, ‘disadvantaged pupils’ refers to those pupils who attract government pupil premium funding: pupils claiming free school meals at any point in the last six years and pupils in care or who left care through adoption or another formal route. 30–31 January 2020
p.5
School details
Inspection number 10088954 Type of school Primary
p.6
School details
Date of previous inspection 21–22 April 2015
p.6
Information about this school
There has been considerable turbulence in the school’s staffing and leadership arrangements since the last inspection. The headteacher took up post in June 2019. The two assistant headteachers began their positions during the 2018/19 school year. The trust primary director was the interim headteacher in the absence of a headteacher, before the new headteacher’s appointment. He is currently providing leadership support for the school during this period of transition in the school’s leadership. The school is part of the Pontefract Academies Trust. A new chief executive officer (CEO) was appointed to the multi-academy trust in March 2018. There have also been several changes in the trust’s directors. The school operates a local governing body called the school performance review board. The school runs a breakfast club.
p.6
Information about this inspection
We carried out this inspection under section 5 of the Education Act 2005.
p.6
Information about this inspection
We held meetings with the headteacher, primary director, senior leaders and subject leaders. Meetings also took place with three trustees, including the CEO, 30–31 January 2020
p.6
7
and two representatives of the school performance review board, including the chair. We carried out deep dives in reading, mathematics, science and design technology. These subjects were considered closely to evaluate the quality of education. In each of these subjects, inspection activities included: lesson visits; discussions with staff and pupils; meetings with subject leaders; and work scrutiny. The lead inspector also listened to pupils read. A range of documentation was considered. This included the school’s self- evaluation and plans for improvement. Inspectors spoke to parents informally at the start of the school day and one inspector made a visit to the breakfast club. Many of the inspection activities gave inspectors the opportunity to evaluate the culture of safeguarding in the school. Additionally, we asked staff about the impact of the safeguarding training they have received. Child protection records
p.7
7
and the single central record of checks on the suitability of staff to work with children were also scrutinised.
p.7
Inspection team
Kirsty Godfrey, lead inspector Her Majesty’s Inspector
p.7
Inspection team
Mary Lanovy-Taylor Ofsted Inspector 30–31 January 2020
p.7
8
regulates and inspects to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.
p.8
8
If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .
p.8
8
You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .
p.8
8
Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .
p.8
8
T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted
p.8
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion