Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · School inspection (EIF)

St Berteline's CofE Primary School

Inspected 26 Feb 2020 · published 13 Mar 2020 · URN 111383

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    26 Feb 2020

  • Inspectors verified

    Amanda Dodd, Moira Atkins, Steve Bentham

  • Behaviour and attitudes verified

    Good

  • Early years verified

    Good

  • Leadership and management verified

    Good

  • Overall effectiveness verified

    Good

  • Personal development verified

    Outstanding

  • Quality of education verified

    Good

  • Postcode verified

    WA7 6QN

  • Name on report verified

    St Berteline’s CofE Primary School

  • URN verified

    111383

Page 1 of 7
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2006.

  • OverallGood
  • Behaviour and attitudesGood
  • Early yearsGood
  • Leadership and managementGood
  • Personal developmentOutstanding
  • Quality of educationGood

66% of comparable inspections in the last three years were graded Good (5,043 inspections).

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+51Positivemore positive than 37% of reports of this type graded Good
OutstandingGoodRIInadequate

In line with other reports of this type graded Good.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praiseoutstandingpositivestronglovesuccessfulhigh expectationsenjoyconsistently
Criticismweaknessesat riskfall behindconcernslackstruggleerrorsnot yet

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsSafeguardingAbout the inspection positive critical
  • Findings1226w+60
  • Safeguarding100w+4

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
7
Words of findings
1,294
about usual (typical 1098)
Reading level
Fairly hard
Flesch 57, typical 55
Average sentence
15 words
Next steps
5
typical 4
Hedged sentences
11%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 64%Safeguarding 5%About the inspection 31%

Full report text

Inspection of St Berteline’s CofE Primary School Norton Lane, Norton, Runcorn, Cheshire WA7 6QN

p.1

Overall effectiveness Good

The quality of education Good Behaviour and attitudes Good Personal development Outstanding Leadership and management Good Early years provision Good Previous inspection grade Outstanding

p.1

Overall effectiveness Good

The previous ‘outstanding’ judgement reflected the school’s overall effectiveness in December 2006 under the relevant inspection framework at that time.

p.1

Overall effectiveness Good

The new judgement of ‘good’ reflects the current inspection framework, as well as any changes at the school since the last inspection.

p.1

Overall effectiveness Good

The school has not been inspected for 14 years, which is longer than the five-year maximum interval between inspections. Changes in school effectiveness may have happened at any point in that period. The long time between inspections is because the law changed in 2011; it made outstanding schools exempt from routine inspection. 25–26 February 2020

p.1

What is it like to attend this school?

Pupils at St Berteline’s feel like part of a family. They are happy at school. There is a genuine warmth among staff and pupils. Pupils feel cared for and well supported. Pupils demonstrate the school’s vision of ‘A love of life, a love of learning’ in their actions. They are enthusiastic learners.

p.2

What is it like to attend this school?

The pupils that we spoke to said that they feel safe at school and there are no issues with behaviour or bullying. They feel protected because staff act swiftly to resolve any minor disputes or rare instances of bullying. Pupils respect each other’s differences. They behave well. There are no disruptions to learning.

p.2

What is it like to attend this school?

Pupils are successful in their learning because the high expectations that staff set match the national curriculum well in all subjects.

p.2

What is it like to attend this school?

Pupils enjoy a wide range of opportunities to enrich their learning. Pupils feel included in all aspects of school life. For example, after-school clubs are chosen so that they match pupils’ interests. Key stage 1 and key stage 2 pupils enjoy residential trips that are linked well to the topics they learn. These visits bring pupils’ learning to life.

p.2

better?

Senior leaders and governors know the school’s strengths and weaknesses well. They make sure that everyone is included in school life. Staff said that senior leaders are supportive and that their workload is generally manageable.

p.2

better?

Pupils achieve well. This includes disadvantaged pupils and those with special educational needs and/or disabilities. Attainment in reading, writing and mathematics at the end of key stage 2 is often as good as, and sometimes better than, that of other pupils nationally.

p.2

better?

Leaders have set clear aims for children’s learning in phonics in the early years. This is improving consistency between classes so that the phonics programme is taught well to all children. Children who fall behind are supported to catch up. This support continues into Year 1, where pupils apply their phonics knowledge well. However, some pupils struggle to read fluently by the end of key stage 1. They do not recognise familiar words quickly enough. Despite this, older pupils progress to become accomplished readers by the end of key stage 2.

p.2

better?

In writing, some pupils do not apply some of their learning consistently enough because they forget key points. Pupils make simple errors in their work. They do not apply their prior learning consistently when using punctuation and grammar. Pupils’ writing is often better in their topic books. This is because they use specific vocabulary to match their area of learning, such as in Year 5 when writing about the Second World War. 25–26 February 2020

p.2

3

In mathematics, the curriculum is well planned. In the early years, children are supported effectively to develop their understanding of number. For example, children in the Nursery class play games to match numbers to quantities of objects. However, there are some minor inconsistencies in the way in which the mathematics curriculum is delivered in the early years and in lower key stage 2. This results in pupils not remembering some of their prior learning. Some pupils are not confident when solving problems mentally. Although they are eventually successful, they do not apply their knowledge as efficiently as they could.

p.3

3

In the early years, the leader is improving the provision by setting more consistent goals for children’s learning. She has put in place clear curriculum expectations but these are not yet applied well enough across the early years. This means that some children do not progress through the curriculum as quickly as they could. Staff nurture children well. They are patient and attentive, allowing children to express their ideas. Children demonstrate their positive attitudes and behaviours by working well with others and exploring their learning.

p.3

3

In other subjects, pupils study a lively and engaging curriculum. They remember their learning well, although few excel. The curriculum is enriched by a range of visitors and trips where pupils have opportunities to apply their learning. Pupils talked to us with enthusiasm about the learning they had gained during residential visits. This helped them to deepen their knowledge of many curriculum areas, such as art, music and geography. Subject leaders are presently reviewing the curriculum to set even higher expectations so that learning has more depth.

p.3

3

Pupils have positive attitudes towards their learning. They are attentive and engaged in their work. Pupils develop a good understanding of their own and others’ cultures. Pupils are well prepared for life in modern Britain and have a strong understanding of equalities. After-school opportunities help pupils to continue their talent or interests, particularly in music and performing arts.

p.3

Safeguarding

The arrangements for safeguarding are effective.

p.3

Safeguarding

Pupils have a strong awareness of how to keep themselves safe in a range of situations, including when online. Pupils feel that staff listen well to their opinions and concerns.

p.3

Safeguarding

Staff are trained well on safeguarding matters. They are vigilant for the signs that pupils may be at risk of harm. The positive relationships that staff have with parents and carers mean that they engage well with parents to help them in times of need. Governors also receive appropriate training for their roles, including training for the safer recruitment of staff. 25–26 February 2020

p.3

(Information for the school and appropriate authority)

 Leaders are currently revising their curriculum to make it even better. Presently, few pupils learn subjects in depth. Subject leaders should ensure that they raise expectations of pupils’ learning even further by developing curriculum plans to more clearly define the essential learning for each topic at key points in the year. They should ensure that they identify how this learning will enable pupils’ future learning.  Some pupils do not recall some of their essential learning quickly enough in key subjects. This means that some pupils cannot apply their prior learning automatically in reading, writing and mathematics. Leaders should ensure that pupils have opportunities to consolidate their learning so that they apply their skills automatically. This will help pupils to be more assured when reading in key stage 1 and when writing and solving mathematical problems in key stage 2.  In the early years, there is a lack of consistency between the expectations set in

p.4

(Information for the school and appropriate authority)

different classes. This means that some children achieve better than others. Leaders should ensure that there are clear expectations set for children’s learning at key points in the year. They should help adults to make sure that these expectations are met for all children so that they are even better prepared for Year 1.

p.4

How can I feed back my views?

or to find out what other parents and carers think. We use Ofsted Parent View information when deciding which schools to inspect, when to inspect them and as part of their inspection.

p.4

How can I feed back my views?

The Department for Education has further guidance on how to complain about a school.

p.4

How can I feed back my views?

If you are the school and you are not happy with the inspection or the report, you can complain to Ofsted .

p.4

Further information

You can search for published performance information about the school.

p.4

Further information

In the report, ‘disadvantaged pupils’ refers to those pupils who attract government pupil premium funding: pupils claiming free school meals at any point in the last six years and pupils in care or who left care through adoption or another formal route. 25–26 February 2020

p.4

School details

Inspection number 10122163 Type of school Primary

p.5

School details

Appropriate authority The governing body

p.5

School details

Chair of governing body Mrs Lesley Austin

p.5

School details

Date of previous inspection 13 December 2006

p.5

Information about this school

 St Berteline’s is a Church of England school. The school’s last section 48 inspection for schools with a religious character took place in March 2018.  The school took over the management of the on-site pre-school in September 2015.  There have been relatively few changes in staff since the last inspection. Senior leaders remain in post and seven teachers and three teaching assistants are still at the school since the last inspection 14 years ago.

p.5

Information about this inspection

We carried out this inspection under section 8 of the Education Act 2005. We deemed the inspection a section 5 inspection under the same Act.

p.5

Information about this inspection

The previous ‘outstanding’ judgement reflected the school’s overall effectiveness in December 2006 under the relevant inspection framework at that time.

p.5

Information about this inspection

The new judgement of ‘good’ reflects the current inspection framework, as well as any changes at the school since the last inspection. 25–26 February 2020

p.5

6

The school has not been inspected for 14 years, which is longer than the five-year maximum interval between inspections under section 5 of the Education Act 2005. Changes in school effectiveness may have happened at any point in that period. The long time between inspections is because the law changed in 2011; it made most outstanding schools exempt from routine inspection.

p.6

6

 We met with the headteacher, deputy headteacher and subject leaders throughout the inspection.  We spoke with representatives from Halton local authority and from the Diocese of Chester.  We met with groups of pupils from across the school to ask them about safeguarding. We also met with the headteacher, governors, teachers and teaching assistants. We reviewed documentation which included the school’s safeguarding policy, the register of checks carried out on new employees and safeguarding records.  We looked at the school’s behaviour records, observed pupils at breaktimes and discussed behaviour and bullying with pupils.  We spoke with parents at the start of the school day.  We did deep dives in these subjects: reading, mathematics, science and geography. For these subjects, we spoke with the headteacher, met with curriculum leaders, teachers and pupils, undertook an analysis of pupils’ work and

p.6

6

visited lessons. We heard pupils read. We also looked at pupils’ work in subjects across the curriculum and met with other subject leaders.

p.6

Inspection team

Steve Bentham, lead inspector Her Majesty’s Inspector

p.6

Inspection team

Amanda Dodd Ofsted Inspector 25–26 February 2020

p.6

7

regulates and inspects to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.

p.7

7

If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.7

7

You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .

p.7

7

Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .

p.7

7

T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.7

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion