Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Early years · Childminder inspection (EIF)

Childminder 207931

Inspected 14 Feb 2020 · URN 207931

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

Inadequate

Jan Hughes

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    14 Feb 2020

  • Inspectors verified

    Jan Hughes

  • Behaviour and attitudes verified

    Requires improvement

  • Leadership and management verified

    Inadequate

  • Overall effectiveness verified

    Inadequate

  • Personal development verified

    Inadequate

  • Previous overall verified

    Good

  • Quality of education verified

    Inadequate

  • Name on report verified

    Childminder report

  • URN verified

    207931

Page 1 of 7
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Each judgement on its scale, weakest to strongest.

  • OverallInadequate
  • Behaviour and attitudesRequires improvement
  • Leadership and managementInadequate
  • Personal developmentInadequate
  • Quality of educationInadequate

5% of comparable inspections in the last three years were graded Inadequate (17,905 inspections).

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

−46Criticalmore positive than 33% of reports of this type graded Inadequate
OutstandingGoodRIInadequate

In line with other reports of this type graded Inadequate.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praisemake good progressstrong relationshipsconfidentlyeffectiveenjoyeffectivelyconsistentsafe
Criticismpoorlackcompromisedlimitedweakgapsnot effectivebreaches

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsSafeguardingAbout the inspection positive critical
  • Findings729w−43
  • Safeguarding223w−47

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
7
Words of findings
921
about usual (typical 899)
Reading level
Fairly hard
Flesch 52, typical 51
Average sentence
15 words
Next steps
1
typical 1
Hedged sentences
3%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 51%Safeguarding 16%About the inspection 34%

Full report text

Overall effectiveness Inadequate

The quality of education Inadequate Behaviour and attitudes Requires improvement Personal development Inadequate Leadership and management Inadequate Overall effectiveness at previous inspection Good

p.1

The provision is inadequate

Children's welfare and safety are significantly compromised because the childminder does not understand how to report an allegation against herself or the wider issues of safeguarding children. The childminder has a poor understanding of the requirements of the early years foundation stage. She does not have a good enough understanding of the learning and development requirements to provide children with activities that offer children increasing amounts of challenge in their play. Despite this, children are welcomed into the childminder's home and settle well. They smile happily, and confidently move around the room self-selecting toys. While their behaviour is good, children do not gain positive attitudes towards their learning because of the lack of challenging activities provided by the childminder.

p.2

The provision is inadequate

The childminder does not have high expectations for the children. She does not motivate and inspire them. Often children play alone with limited interaction from the childminder. Children do engage in conversations while taking part in adult-led activities. They talk about their own experiences with their families. The childminder is not always clear what she wants children to learn from the activities she provides, or how she intends to help children learn new skills. Children have, however, made strong relationships with the childminder.

p.2

need to do better?

n The childminder has a weak understanding of child development and does not plan a curriculum that builds on children's prior knowledge. Activities do not inspire or interest children and lack purpose. For example, older children are provided with a cut-out flower. They are given a box of assorted felt pens and are asked to colour in the flower. After children have completed the colouring, they are given strips of stickers to stick on their flower. This activity provides no challenge, does not build on the skills the children already have, and gives them no choice. n Assessment arrangements are poor. The childminder lacks understanding of how to assess children in order to help them make good progress. For example, she identifies some next steps in children's learning. However, these steps are often inaccurate and do not reflect what children can already do. This means the activities provided are not enhancing children's learning. Also, gaps in children's

p.2

need to do better?

learning are missed and therefore not addressed. The childminder does, however, complete the progress check for children between the ages of two and three years, and share this with parents. n Training and professional development are very limited. Since the last inspection, the childminder has done little to develop her own knowledge and understanding of the early years foundation stage. This means that she does not understand how to provide quality opportunities across the seven areas of

p.2

need to do better?

14 February 2020 learning to help children make good progress towards their future success. n Partnerships with parents are effective. The childminder gathers information from parents when their children first start with her. For example, she finds out about children's likes and dislikes, interests and current experiences at home. The childminder then provides further experiences, such as taking children to soft-play areas and the park to enhance their physical development. Additionally, she takes children to meet up with other minded children, to help extend their social skills. The childminder talks to parents on a daily basis about what their child has being doing throughout the day. n Children follow appropriate hygiene routines and older children use the bathroom independently. The childminder routinely checks that children have washed their hands on their return. She encourages children to drink throughout

p.2

need to do better?

the day. The childminder helps children to develop their physical health. She often takes them on outings to encourage them to be active as they run, climb and balance on equipment at the park. These activities help children to be aware of living a healthy lifestyle. n The childminder provides consistent boundaries which are gently reinforced. Children behave well and are familiar with routines. They are self-motivated and play with their chosen toys for long periods of time. For example, children enjoy playing with the dolls. They dress and undress them, put them in the pushchair and take them for a ride. After the ride, children feed the dolls and rock them to sleep. This shows that they can make up their own stories, use their imagination and extend their own ideas.

p.3

Safeguarding

The arrangements for safeguarding are not effective.

p.3

Safeguarding

There are breaches in the safeguarding and welfare requirements. This means children's safety cannot be assured. The childminder does not have a good enough understanding of the procedure to follow if an allegation is made against herself. In addition, she does not fully understand the issues that are linked to the 'Prevent' duty and keeping children safe. The childminder has completed relevant training and has a basic awareness of possible indicators of abuse. She is aware of what to do and who to contact should she have a concern about a child in her care.

p.3

Due date

14 February 2020 develop an understanding of what to do if an allegation of abuse is made against an adult who lives or works on the childminding premises 14/03/2020

p.3

Due date

obtain up-to-date knowledge of safeguarding practice in order to fully understand the wider issues linked to safeguarding children 14/03/2020

p.4

Due date

undertake appropriate and ongoing training to obtain knowledge of the early years foundation stage, in order to offer quality learning experiences for children 28/03/2020

p.4

Due date

ensure assessment is accurate and provides information about what a child knows and can do, so that any gaps in children's learning can be quickly identified and closed 28/03/2020

p.4

Due date

provide quality interactions and challenging, enjoyable and purposeful experiences for children, in order to promote their individual learning effectively. 28/03/2020

p.4

Setting details

Unique reference number 207931 Local authority Derbyshire Inspection number 10062474 Type of provision Childminder

p.5

Registers

Early Years Register, Compulsory Childcare Register, Voluntary Childcare Register Day care type Childminder Age range of children 1 to 11 Total number of places 6 Number of children on roll 10 Date of previous inspection 10 July 2015

p.5

Information about this early years setting

The childminder registered in 1992 and lives in the village of Tibshelf, near Alfreton, Derbyshire. She operates all year round from 8am to 6pm, Monday to Friday, except for Christmas week, bank holidays and family holidays. The childminder is in receipt of funding for early education for two-, three- and four- year-old children.

p.5

Inspection activities

n The childminder and the inspector conducted a learning walk to understand how the curriculum is organised. The inspector also considered risk assessments and how the childminder checks that the environment and equipment are safe and suitable for use. n The childminder and the inspector discussed the quality of the educational programme. They jointly evaluated an activity and the impact this had on children's learning. n The inspector observed the quality of adult and child interactions alongside the quality of education. n The views of parents were gathered through comments made by the childminder. n The inspector checked the suitability of the childminder and reviewed a sample of documentation, for example the accident procedures, the safeguarding policy and first-aid and insurance certificates, as well as the attendance register.

p.5

Inspection activities

14 February 2020 We carried out this inspection under sections 49 and 50 of the Childcare Act 2006 on the quality and standards of provision that is registered on the Early Years Register. The registered person must ensure that this provision complies with the statutory framework for children's learning, development and care, known as the early years foundation stage.

p.5

Inspection activities

14 February 2020 regulates and inspects to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children's social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children's services, and inspects services for looked after children, safeguarding and child protection.

p.6

Inspection activities

If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.7

Inspection activities

You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk

p.7

Inspection activities

Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .

p.7

Inspection activities

T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.7

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion