Summary
Julian Scholefield (lead), Janis Warren
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection date verified
6 Feb 2020
- Inspectors verified
Janis Warren, Julian Scholefield
- Postcode verified
NG8 3EZ
- Name on report verified
Woodlands Academy
- URN verified
144321
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
Reads more critically than most reports of this type.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Pupils enjoy coming to school and feel safe. p.1
- Pupils are polite and caring towards each other, staff and visitors. p.1
- Teachers have high expectations of pupils. p.1
- There is a clear purpose to the curriculum for physical education (PE), and teachers have strong subject knowledge. p.2
- This is called a section 8 inspection of a good school or non-exempt outstanding school. p.3
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- However, inspectors have some concerns that standards may be declining, as set out below. p.1
- If we have serious concerns about safeguarding, behaviour or the quality of education, we will convert the section 8 inspection to a section 5 inspection immediately. p.3
- Trustees do not have a good enough understanding of the school’s weaknesses. p.2
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Leaders are not clear about what pupils’ next steps should be. p.2
- However, staff are not clear about what pupils should understand at key points so that they know and remember more. p.2
- Leaders are not clear enough about how the school should improve. p.2
- Leaders must check that this is happening. p.3
- Staff are not as clear as they should be about the best way to sequence pupils’ learning over time. p.3
- Leaders have not ensured that curriculum plans for all subjects set out what pupils should know and by when. p.3
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Leadership & governance19
“Trustees do not have a good enough understanding of the school’s weaknesses.” p.2Teaching & assessment12
“Teachers have high expectations of pupils.” p.1
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 7
- Words of findings
- 1,178
- about usual (typical 1153)
- Reading level
- Plain English
- Flesch 63, typical 55
- Average sentence
- 15 words
- Next steps
- 6
- typical 4
- Hedged sentences
- 13%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Inspection of a good school: Woodlands Academy Beechdale Road, Aspley, Nottingham, Nottinghamshire NG8 3EZ
p.1
Outcome
Woodlands Academy continues to be a good school. However, inspectors have some concerns that standards may be declining, as set out below.
p.1
What is it like to attend this school?
Pupils enjoy coming to school and feel safe. They have good relationships with staff and each other. Staff know the pupils well. Behaviour in lessons and around school is good. Pupils are polite and caring towards each other, staff and visitors. Parents and carers say what a positive difference the school has made to their children’s attendance and attitudes to school.
p.1
What is it like to attend this school?
Leaders want pupils to develop their personal, social and emotional skills. Staff are skilled in addressing these needs across different subjects. Pupils learn to talk about their feelings and manage their behaviour. They have regular opportunities to go abroad on residential trips to broaden their knowledge of different countries and cultures.
p.1
What is it like to attend this school?
Pupils and parents say that bullying is rare. When incidents do occur, they are managed well by staff.
p.1
What is it like to attend this school?
Teachers have high expectations of pupils. However, leaders do not have a clear overview of the curriculum across different subjects and for all ages. Therefore, they cannot be sure that all pupils get the same opportunities to build on previous learning.
p.1
What does the school do well and what does it need to do better?
Leaders want all pupils to become fluent readers. The school has an attractive library where pupils can read in calm and pleasant surroundings. Pupils read books regularly, and staff read aloud to them every day. Early reading is taught well in some classes, where pupils learn to remember sounds and letters. They learn to write letters that they already know. However, there is a lack of oversight of the teaching of early reading across the school. It is not taught across all ages, and not all teachers have been trained to teach early reading skills. Therefore, some pupils do not get the same opportunity as others to develop their reading skills. Sometimes, pupils’ books are too hard for them to 5–6 February 2020
p.1
2
read. They have to work out every word, which inhibits confidence and enjoyment. When pupils are writing, work is not always matched to their abilities. For example, in one task, some pupils were unable to write sentences because they needed help to write individual letters.
p.2
2
The mathematics leader has a clear overview of what pupils should learn across some age groups. This is not the case for all age groups. Leaders are not clear about what pupils’ next steps should be. Teachers are using a new mathematics scheme that helps them to sequence learning and plan lessons carefully around the needs of pupils. Teachers modify the scheme so that they can revisit learning to enable pupils to practise what they learn before moving on. Pupils are grouped so that teachers can support their needs more effectively. Staff use practical resources to help some pupils. Teachers refer back to earlier work to check that pupils have remembered what they have learned.
p.2
2
There is a clear purpose to the curriculum for physical education (PE), and teachers have strong subject knowledge. Plans show how learning is sequenced to develop different physical skills. However, staff are not clear about what pupils should understand at key points so that they know and remember more. Teachers have made changes to plans to help pupils build their confidence. They adapt lessons to meet the pupils’ different physical needs.
p.2
2
Trustees at the multi-academy trust do not have a sharp enough understanding of the school’s strengths and weaknesses. They have not held leaders to account effectively.
p.2
Safeguarding
The arrangements for safeguarding are effective.
p.2
Safeguarding
All staff are trained to spot the signs of abuse. Staff understand the clear procedures for sharing concerns. When staff share concerns, leaders respond promptly. Leaders work closely with other agencies, such as social care, to ensure that pupils receive the support they need.
p.2
Safeguarding
Teachers use assemblies to talk to pupils about how to keep themselves safe, for example when using social media.
p.2
(Information for the school and appropriate authority)
Trustees do not have a good enough understanding of the school’s weaknesses. They should ensure that plans to appoint a local governing body to hold leaders to account effectively are enacted well. Leaders are not clear enough about how the school should improve. They do not make clear enough the specific changes they wish to see. Leaders should be clear in their plans for improvements and hold staff better to account. 5–6 February 2020
p.2
3
Leaders have not ensured that curriculum plans for all subjects set out what pupils should know and by when. Staff are not as clear as they should be about the best way to sequence pupils’ learning over time. Sometimes, pupils do not achieve as well as they could. Leaders should ensure that all curriculum plans clearly set out the knowledge pupils need to learn and by when. Leaders should ensure that staff have the expertise they need to plan work that is appropriately demanding for all pupils. Leaders must check that this is happening. Leaders have not ensured that all staff have the expertise they need to make sure that the teaching of reading is consistent and focused and builds on what pupils know. Leaders should check more carefully that there is a logical and well-understood approach to the teaching of early reading throughout the school, and that books and tasks are matched well to pupils’ abilities. They should ensure that staff have the
p.3
3
training and support they need to deliver the reading curriculum well.
p.3
Background
When we have judged a school to be good, we will then normally go into the school about once every four years to confirm that the school remains good. This is called a section 8 inspection of a good school or non-exempt outstanding school. We do not give graded judgements on a section 8 inspection. However, if we find some evidence that the school could now be better than good or that standards may be declining, then the next inspection will be a section 5 inspection. Usually this is within one to two years of the date of the section 8 inspection. If we have serious concerns about safeguarding, behaviour or the quality of education, we will convert the section 8 inspection to a section 5 inspection immediately.
p.3
Background
This is the first section 8 inspection since we judged the predecessor school, Woodlands School, to be good on 2–3 February 2016.
p.3
How can I feed back my views?
find out what other parents and carers think. We use Ofsted Parent View information when deciding which schools to inspect, when to inspect them and as part of their inspection.
p.3
How can I feed back my views?
The Department for Education has further guidance on how to complain about a school.
p.3
How can I feed back my views?
If you are the school and you are not happy with the inspection or the report, you can complain to Ofsted .
p.3
Further information
You can search for published performance information about the school. 5–6 February 2020
p.3
4
In the report, ‘disadvantaged pupils’ refers to those pupils who attract government pupil premium funding: pupils claiming free school meals at any point in the last six years and pupils in care or who left care through adoption or another formal route. 5–6 February 2020
p.4
School details
Inspection number 10121246 Type of school All-through special
p.5
School details
School category Academy special converter
p.5
School details
Principal Andrew Morgan (acting principal)
p.5
School details
Date of previous inspection Not previously inspected as an academy.
p.5
Information about this school
The school converted to become an academy school on 3 April 2017. When its predecessor school, Woodlands School, was last inspected by Ofsted, it was judged to be good overall. The school is part of the Raleigh Learning Trust. The acting principal was appointed in November 2019. The school uses three alternative providers. These are Real Education, Nottingham Education and Progression to Work. The school caters for pupils with social, emotional and mental health needs, autism spectrum disorder, speech, language and communication needs, severe learning disabilities and moderate learning disabilities.
p.5
Information about this inspection
We did deep dives in reading, mathematics and PE. We met subject leaders, visited lessons and scrutinised samples of pupils’ work alongside senior leaders. We held meetings with the acting principal, senior leaders, teachers, trustees and parents. 5–6 February 2020
p.5
6
We spoke with groups of pupils from key stages 2, 3 and 4. We also talked informally with other pupils. We took account of the six responses to Ofsted’s online survey, Parent View, and considered the one free-text comment. We evaluated a range of documents related to safeguarding, and looked at information on the school’s website.
p.6
Inspection team
Julian Scholefield, lead inspector Ofsted Inspector
p.6
Inspection team
Janis Warren Ofsted Inspector 5–6 February 2020
p.6
7
regulates and inspects to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.
p.7
7
If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .
p.7
7
You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .
p.7
7
Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .
p.7
7
T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted
p.7
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion