Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Development Processes Group Limited

Inspected 2 Mar 2020 · published 12 Mar 2020 · URN 2556358

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Anita Pyrkotsch-Jones

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    2 Mar 2020

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Anita Pyrkotsch-Jones

  • Postcode verified

    M28 7BQ

  • Name on report verified

    Development Processes Group PLC

  • URN verified

    2556358

Page 1 of 4
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

−45Criticalmore positive than 8% of reports of this type

Reads more critically than most reports of this type.

Praiserigorousimprovedindependentsafeaccuratelysecure
Criticismconcernsweaknessesinsufficientlackingnot yetyet tobelow

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

Findings positive critical

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
4
Words of findings
776
shorter than usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 32, typical 45
Average sentence
19 words
Next steps
1
typical 5
Hedged sentences
0%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 100%

Full report text

Development Processes Group PLC Monitoring visit report

p.1

Name of lead inspector: Anita Pyrkotsch-Jones, Her Majesty’s Inspector

p.1

Type of provider: Independent learning provider

p.1

Address: 93 Walkden Road Worsley Manchester M28 7BQ Monitoring visit: Development Processes Group PLC, 2 March 2020

p.1

Context and focus of visit

From October 2018, Ofsted undertook to carry out monitoring visits to all newly directly funded providers of apprenticeship training provision which began to be funded from April 2017 or after by the Education and Skills Funding Agency and/or the apprenticeship levy. This follow-up safeguarding monitoring visit has been carried out consequent to the provider being found to be making insufficient progress with respect to safeguarding at their previous monitoring visit. It follows the arrangements outlined in the ‘Further education and skills inspection handbook’.

p.2

Context and focus of visit

The focus of this visit is only on the safeguarding theme below.

p.2

Context and focus of visit

Development Processes Group PLC (DPG) currently has 35 apprentices working towards standards-based human resources (HR) apprenticeships in HR support at level 3 and HR consultant/partner at level 5. DPG delivers the professional qualifications contained within the standards. The remaining elements of the apprenticeship programme are delivered by a subcontractor, Interserve.

p.2

Reasonable progress

Leaders and managers have worked assiduously to address the weaknesses identified at the previous monitoring visit. Safeguarding now rightly has the high priority that was lacking at the previous visit.

p.2

Reasonable progress

Safeguarding arrangements are now rigorous and are implemented competently. Leaders and managers have reviewed, updated and implemented safeguarding and safeguarding-related policies and procedures. This, coupled with frequent training and updates for safeguarding and the ‘Prevent’ duty, means that staff now have a good understanding of their own roles and responsibilities in keeping themselves and their apprentices safe.

p.2

Reasonable progress

At the previous monitoring visit, not all staff had suitable checks before they started to work with apprentices. Staff within DPG are now checked thoroughly to ensure that they are suitable for their job role and to work with apprentices. All staff now have Disclosure and Barring Service checks which are recorded accurately in a single central record.

p.2

Reasonable progress

The designated safeguarding officer (DSO), deputy DSO and the board member responsible for safeguarding are appropriately trained and experienced in their roles. No safeguarding referrals have been received, which means that safeguarding arrangements have not yet been tested. Monitoring visit: Development Processes Group PLC, 2 March 2020 Apprentices told us that their understanding of safeguarding and safeguarding related concerns has improved significantly since the previous monitoring visit. The safeguarding handbook, frequent updates and monthly text messages remind apprentices how and to whom they should report safeguarding concerns. Workshop sessions and apprentice reviews of learning incorporate training and updates on safeguarding. Apprentices say they value these activities and can apply them in their workplaces. Leaders and managers have reviewed and updated apprentices’ induction to their programmes. Induction now includes certificated training in

p.2

Reasonable progress

safeguarding and the ‘Prevent’ duty. However, as DPG has not recruited any new apprentices since the previous monitoring visit, the new induction processes are yet to be implemented.

p.3

Reasonable progress

Leaders and managers have worked closely with external agencies to develop a suitable ‘Prevent’ duty risk assessment and action plan that covers potential risks in the areas that apprentices work: the north west, the north east, the midlands and London. The apprentices that we spoke to have a good understanding of the risks associated with radicalisation and extremism. They develop their knowledge further through their individual learning reviews, off-the-job training and the discussion of ‘hot topics’, such as the London Bridge terror attack, with their training and development officers. Monitoring visit: Development Processes Group PLC, 2 March 2020 regulates and inspects to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher

p.3

Reasonable progress

training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.

p.4

Reasonable progress

If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.4

Reasonable progress

You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .

p.4

Reasonable progress

Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .

p.4

Reasonable progress

T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.4

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion