Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · School inspection (EIF)

The Mirfield Free Grammar

Inspected 13 Feb 2020 · published 11 Mar 2020 · URN 136674

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    13 Feb 2020

  • Inspectors verified

    Janet Sheriff, Jim McGrath, Liz Cresswell, Nick Horn, Tim Johnson

  • Behaviour and attitudes verified

    Good

  • Leadership and management verified

    Good

  • Overall effectiveness verified

    Good

  • Personal development verified

    Good

  • Quality of education verified

    Good

  • Postcode verified

    WF14 9EZ

  • Name on report verified

    The Mirfield Free Grammar

  • URN verified

    136674

Page 1 of 7
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2017.

  • OverallGood
  • Behaviour and attitudesGood
  • Leadership and managementGood
  • Personal developmentGood
  • Quality of educationGood

66% of comparable inspections in the last three years were graded Good (5,043 inspections).

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+39Positivemore positive than 18% of reports of this type graded Good
OutstandingGoodRIInadequate

In line with other reports of this type graded Good.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praisestronghigh expectationspositivehigh-qualityeffectivelyeffectivethriveambitious
Criticismgapsweakat riskharmtoo fewconcernsnot yetnot happy

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsSafeguardingAbout the inspection positive critical
  • Findings1033w+50
  • Safeguarding104w−18

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
7
Words of findings
1,101
about usual (typical 1098)
Reading level
Fairly hard
Flesch 60, typical 55
Average sentence
12 words
Next steps
5
typical 4
Hedged sentences
4%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 63%Safeguarding 6%About the inspection 31%

Full report text

Inspection of The Mirfield Free Grammar Kitson Hill Road, Mirfield, West Yorkshire WF14 9EZ

p.1

Overall effectiveness Good

The quality of education Good Behaviour and attitudes Good Personal development Good Leadership and management Good Sixth-form provision Good Previous inspection grade Requires improvement 12–13 February 2020

p.1

What is it like to attend this school?

The executive principal and new leaders have turned the school around. Pupils, parents and carers and staff recognise the rapid improvements made over the past year. A better curriculum has led to effective learning. Behaviour in class has improved considerably. Staff have high expectations for all pupils.

p.2

What is it like to attend this school?

Pupils are proud of their school. They are polite. Pupils respect the views of others and are prepared well for life in modern Britain. Pupils get along well together. There are positive relationships between pupils and staff, with good attitudes to learning.

p.2

What is it like to attend this school?

Pupils feel safe. There is very little bullying. Staff deal with bullying quickly. Pupils receive high-quality pastoral support. They know staff will help them if they have any worries. Pupils enjoy a wide range of visits and enrichment activities. Pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND) are positive about the Thrive and Link facilities that give extra support to them.

p.2

What is it like to attend this school?

Leaders and governors are making a significant difference to the school. They have overcome a period of turbulence and have stabilised staffing. They are considerate of staff workload. Staff morale is high and leaders support staff effectively in developing their skills.

p.2

better?

Leaders are ambitious for pupils. They have designed a curriculum that is well organised. Subject content is taught in the right order. Pupils understand their work much better than in the past. They are remembering more over time.

p.2

better?

Teachers recap and revisit pupils’ prior knowledge using ‘Do Now’ tasks at the start of lessons. They question pupils effectively to check pupils’ understanding. As a result, pupils can apply their knowledge to more difficult learning. Notable examples were seen in drama, history and science.

p.2

better?

Teachers use assessment well to check what pupils know and can do. When necessary, they adjust what is being taught to fill in any gaps in pupils’ knowledge. Skilful implementation of the curriculum is improving pupils’ knowledge across a wide range of subjects. The new mathematics curriculum is being taught effectively. A previously weak mathematics curriculum has left gaps in pupils’ knowledge that staff are tackling.

p.2

better?

At the end of key stage 4 in 2019, there was strong improvement in progress in English and languages. However, overall progress was below average. It was skewed by a small minority of pupils with challenging needs and health issues.

p.2

better?

A new curriculum in languages is sparking much greater enjoyment in French and Spanish. Currently, too few pupils follow a modern foreign language in Year 11. However, good progress is being made in increasing numbers in coming years. 12–13 February 2020

p.2

3

Disadvantaged pupils’ work is comparable to that of other pupils. Pupils with SEND are well supported. Teachers have high expectations of these pupils. The school is willing to go the extra mile to support pupils with SEND. A range of strategies is used to make sure that all pupils have access to mainstream classes.

p.3

3

There are many opportunities for pupils to develop their reading skills in form time and across subjects. Extra support for reading is given to the weakest readers. They say it increases their self-esteem and helps them learn better by developing vocabulary.

p.3

3

Staff manage pupils’ behaviour well. Pupils are clear about what is expected of them. They have positive attitudes to learning and work hard. The attendance team works hard to support pupils and families and ensure attendance is above average. Few pupils are regularly absent.

p.3

3

There is a high-quality offer for pupils’ personal development. It is designed around the school’s core values of respect, integrity, teamwork and aspiration. There are many educational visits and opportunities for leadership development. Careers education is a strength of the school. There is work experience for all older pupils and learners in the sixth form. Many employers contribute to the careers programme right from Year 7.

p.3

3

Learners in the sixth form benefit from a wide range of opportunities to develop leadership skills that prepare them for the future. Learners are highly positive about the support they receive with university and job applications. Leaders have started to increase the range of courses to better match the needs of some pupils. Learners repeating GCSE English and/or mathematics make strong progress.

p.3

Safeguarding

The arrangements for safeguarding are effective.

p.3

Safeguarding

There is a strong culture of safeguarding within the school. The well-being and safety of pupils are key priorities for everyone. All staff and governors have completed safeguarding training. They are vigilant and know what to do if they have safeguarding concerns. Leaders identify pupils who may need early help to prevent them being at risk of harm. They work with parents and a range of agencies to protect children from harm. Pupils know how to stay safe. Governors assure themselves that leaders make all the appropriate checks to ensure that staff are safe to work with pupils.

p.3

(Information for the school and appropriate authority)

 Some pupils in Years 9 to 11 have gaps in their mathematical knowledge. The curriculum was not designed and implemented well in the past. Leaders should further develop the work they are doing to close gaps in pupils’ mathematical 12–13 February 2020

p.3

4

knowledge in these years. They should ensure that gaps close quickly and pupils achieve well by the end of key stage 4.  Sixth-form study programmes are not yet well matched for the least able students. These learners have not achieved well because the courses they take can be too demanding. It is clear that leaders have recognised this and started to provide a wider range of vocational courses. Leaders should further develop sixth- form study programmes to match the needs of all learners.  The curriculum for each subject in the sixth form is well planned, but on occasions, some subjects are not taught well. As a result, some learners do not achieve as well as they should. Leaders should make sure there is a well-designed programme of professional development for those sixth-form teachers who need it.

p.4

How can I feed back my views?

or to find out what other parents and carers think. We use Ofsted Parent View information when deciding which schools to inspect, when to inspect them and as part of their inspection.

p.4

How can I feed back my views?

The Department for Education has further guidance on how to complain about a school.

p.4

How can I feed back my views?

If you are the school and you are not happy with the inspection or the report, you can complain to Ofsted .

p.4

Further information

You can search for published performance information about the school.

p.4

Further information

In the report, ‘disadvantaged pupils’ refers to those pupils who attract government pupil premium funding: pupils claiming free school meals at any point in the last six years and pupils in care or who left care through adoption or another formal route. 12–13 February 2020

p.4

School details

Inspection number 10121714 Type of school Secondary comprehensive

p.5

provision

Number of pupils on the school roll 1,487

p.5

sixth form

Principal Lorraine Barker (Executive Principal)

p.5

sixth form

Date of previous inspection 31 October 2017, under section 5 of the Education Act 2005

p.5

Information about this school

 The executive principal returned to lead the school in June 2018. She had been supporting other schools in the trust. There have been significant changes in senior leadership and staffing since the previous inspection.  The school uses three alternative providers for a very small number of pupils. The alternative providers are Brian Jackson College, ETHOS and Reach Academy.

p.5

Information about this inspection

We carried out this inspection under section 5 of the Education Act 2005.

p.5

Information about this inspection

 During the inspection, we spoke to pupils and learners, both formally and informally, about their work and life in school. 12–13 February 2020

p.5

6

 We met with the principal, other leaders and a wide range of staff about their work. We spoke with the trustees and members of the local governing body of the school. We spoke with a local authority adviser who works with the school.  We scrutinised a wide range of documentation relating to the school’s work to safeguard pupils. We checked the school’s single central record, which includes the checks made on staff to ensure that they are safe to work with pupils. We checked the certification of designated safeguarding staff. An inspector met with the designated safeguarding leaders. We spoke to staff about safeguarding and child protection.  The inspection particularly focused on English, mathematics, science, history and drama. Other subjects were also considered as part of the inspection. We spoke to curriculum leaders, visited lessons and looked at pupils’ work. We held discussions with teachers and pupils.

p.6

6

 We took account of the views of staff, pupils and parents who responded to Ofsted’s questionnaires and Ofsted’s Parent View.

p.6

Inspection team

Jim McGrath, lead inspector Ofsted Inspector

p.6

Inspection team

Nick Horn Ofsted Inspector 12–13 February 2020

p.6

7

regulates and inspects to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.

p.7

7

If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.7

7

You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .

p.7

7

Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .

p.7

7

T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.7

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion