Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Social care · Children's home inspection (SCCIF)

Children's home run by Cherry Trees Limited

Inspected 30 Jan 2020 · URN SC013598

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Group verified

    Cherry Trees Limited

  • Inspection date verified

    30 Jan 2020

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Ruth Coler

  • Helped and protected verified

    Good

  • Leadership and management verified

    Good

  • Overall effectiveness verified

    Good

  • Name on report verified

    SC013598

  • URN verified

    SC013598

Page 1 of 9
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2018.

  • OverallGood
  • Helped and protectedGood
  • Leadership and managementGood

70% of comparable inspections in the last three years were graded Good (12,716 inspections).

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

−22Mixedmore positive than 7% of reports of this type graded Good
OutstandingGoodRIInadequate

Reads more critically than most reports of this type graded Good.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praisesuccessfullyexcellenteffectivethrivesafestrengtheffectivelyhappy
Criticismconcernsharmconcernlimitedat riskweaknessseriousnot always

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings1219w+5
  • What needs to improve630w−78

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
9
Words of findings
1,823
longer than usual (typical 1319)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 48, typical 51
Average sentence
19 words
Next steps
8
typical 4
Hedged sentences
7%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 53%What needs to improve 28%About the inspection 19%

Full report text

Inspection report children’s home: SC013598 1 SC013598 Registered provider: Cherry Trees Limited

p.1

Full inspection Inspected under the social care common inspection framework

p.1

Information about this children’s home

This home provides short breaks for children who have a wide range of learning and physical disabilities and sensory impairments. The aims of the organisation are to enhance children’s lives and support parents to look after their children well.

p.1

Information about this children’s home

The current manager has been registered with Ofsted since 10 May 2019.

p.1

Overall experiences and progress of

children and young people, taking into account

p.1

good

How well children and young people are helped and protected good

p.1

good

The effectiveness of leaders and managers good

p.1

good

The children’s home provides effective services that meet the requirements for good.

p.1

good

Overall judgement at last inspection: good

p.1

good

Enforcement action since last inspection: none Inspection report children’s home: SC013598 2

p.1

Inspection date Inspection type Inspection judgement

08/10/2018 Full Good 06/12/2017 Full Good 06/02/2017 Interim Improved effectiveness 11/10/2016 Full Good Inspection report children’s home: SC013598 3

p.2

Statutory requirements

This section sets out the actions that the registered person(s) must take to meet the Care Standards Act 2000, Children’s Homes (England) Regulations 2015 and the ‘Guide to the children’s homes regulations including the quality standards’. The registered person(s) must comply within the given timescales.

p.3

Requirement Due date

The protection of children standard is that children are protected from harm and enabled to keep themselves safe. In particular, the standard in paragraph (1) requires the registered person to ensure that staff— assess whether each child is at risk of harm, taking into account information in the child’s relevant plans, and, if necessary, make arrangements to reduce the risk of any harm to the child. (Regulation 12 (1)(2)(a)(i))

p.3

Requirement Due date

In particular, the registered person must ensure that all risk assessments contain suitable levels of guidance for staff about how to respond to any identified risks to children’s health, well- being and safety. 13/03/2020

p.3

Requirement Due date

The protection of children standard is that children are protected from harm and enabled to keep themselves safe. In particular, the standard in paragraph (1) requires the registered person to ensure that the premises used for the purposes of the home are designed, furnished and maintained so as to protect each child from avoidable hazards to the child’s health. (Regulation 12 (1)(2)(d))

p.3

Requirement Due date

In particular, the registered person must ensure that all areas of the home are regularly checked for safety and safety hazards. The registered person must also ensure that action to rectify any concerns identified is taken within suitable timescales. 13/03/2020

p.3

Requirement Due date

The leadership and management standard is that the registered person enables, inspires and leads a culture in relation to the children’s home that helps children aspire to fulfil their potential; and promotes their welfare. In particular, the standard in paragraph (1) requires the registered person to use monitoring and review systems to make continuous improvements in the quality of care provided in the home. (Regulation 13 (1)(2)(h)) 13/03/2020 Inspection report children’s home: SC013598 4 In particular, the registered person must ensure that there monitoring and reviewing systems appropriately take into account all areas of the home’s operation.

p.3

Recommendations

 The registered person is responsible for deciding what each review should focus on, based on the specific circumstances of the home at that particular time and any areas of high risk to the children that the home is designed to care for, such as missing or exploitation. They will also consider what information or data recorded in the home will form part of the evidence base for their analysis and conclusions. There is no expectation that the registered person will review the home against every part of the Quality Standards every six months – registered persons should use their professional judgement to decide which factors to focus on. The review should enable the registered person to identify areas of strength and possible weakness in the home’s care, which will be captured in the written report. The report should clearly identify any actions required for the next 6 months of delivery within the home and how those actions will be addressed. The

p.4

Recommendations

whole review process and the resulting report should be used as a tool for continuous improvement in the home. (‘Guide to the children’s homes regulations including the quality standards’, page 64, paragraph 15.4)

p.4

Recommendations

 The registered person must have systems in place so that all staff, including the manager, receive supervision of their practice from an appropriately qualified and experienced professional, which allows them to reflect on their practice and the needs of the children assigned to their care. Professionally qualified staff employed by the home, e.g. teachers or social workers, should be provided with relevant professional or clinical supervision by an appropriately qualified and experienced professional. (‘Guide to the children’s homes regulations including the quality standards’, page 61, paragraph 13.2)

p.4

Overall experiences and progress of children and young people: good

The staff effectively support children to be ready to come and stay for a short break at this home. Staff ensure that children have good introduction plans before staying overnight. Some children take only a few visits for this to happen; others take much longer. This flexible approach results in children settling in well and being able to benefit from long-term support that assists their growth and development.

p.4

Overall experiences and progress of children and young people: good

Parents often ask social workers whether their child can come to this home because they have heard that children do well here. Staff successfully develop individual services for each child, and their family. Parents have said to a social worker that there is a homely Inspection report children’s home: SC013598 5 atmosphere here and the staff have children’s best interests at heart. Another social worker said that she was impressed that, when she visited, all the children were smiling, busy and having fun.

p.4

Overall experiences and progress of children and young people: good

Children’s goals fit with their educational plan well. Each child has an individual goal or goals. Staff understand these goals and provide the support that children need in order to meet them successfully. Every bit of a child’s progress is noticed, valued and recognised. Small achievements that children make are celebrated and shared with parents.

p.5

Overall experiences and progress of children and young people: good

Healthy living is promoted well. Children who eat a limited range of foods are successfully encouraged to try to incorporate a wider variety of foods in their diet. One parent said that she was ‘really happy about how he [her child] has changed what he eats’, and that ‘he loved coming here’. However, changes to staff responsibilities have had a negative impact on the frequency with which medication was being audited. This was changed during the inspection so that daily medication audits have been re- established.

p.5

Overall experiences and progress of children and young people: good

Staff give careful thought to seating arrangements at mealtimes, to ensure that children sit with peers who get on well together. However, the children’s individual needs are less carefully considered. For example, the practice of plating and serving children food at the table removes an opportunity for some children, who are able to help themselves, from doing so.

p.5

How well children and young people are helped and protected: good

Staff understand and follow safeguarding policies and procedures well. Managers tenaciously ensure that they receive a conclusion to any safeguarding concern. Records of safeguarding referrals are recorded in a well-written chronology. The chronology itself is a useful record which provides a very good overview of the issue and actions taken in response to safeguarding concerns.

p.5

How well children and young people are helped and protected: good

The manager ensures that the service keeps up to date with developments within safeguarding practice and shares this information with staff promptly. Changes to the local authority safeguarding procedures are known and followed. Her work with the staff team has increased staff’s awareness of safeguarding issues such as child sexual exploitation.

p.5

How well children and young people are helped and protected: good

Managers have supported staff to understand the importance of considering family resilience and the criteria for families to receive help (known as early help). This means that staff are better equipped to identify and recognise the need to refer families for early help quickly. This ensures that those children who need extra help to thrive can access the support they need.

p.5

How well children and young people are helped and protected: good

Risks for children are generally identified well in risk assessments. The quality of the guidance for staff in children’s behaviour management plans to reduce or prevent risk is variable. One assessment was excellent. It contained clear details of the risks and Inspection report children’s home: SC013598 6 guidance for staff to follow to reduce these risks. Another did not contain any strategies or guidance for staff to follow. In practice, staff understand the children’s needs and know how to meet these needs.

p.5

How well children and young people are helped and protected: good

Staff generally manage risks well. Few incidents of concern occur and there have been no instances of children going missing from the home. The inspector observed a member of staff vigilantly checking and stopping a child from putting items in his mouth, which on one occasion prevented a potential choking hazard for the child.

p.6

How well children and young people are helped and protected: good

Children are seldom restrained, and, when they are, records contain good information about what occurred. Records do not always include how staff reflect on these incidents to explore whether there is anything they could have done differently to inform future practice. Managers and staff, consequently, do not have all available information to inform decisions about whether a child’s care plans should change. The shortfalls in the recording of physical interventions was not picked up as part of the manager’s review of the quality of care provided in the home.

p.6

How well children and young people are helped and protected: good

The manager of the home makes good use of external advice from recognised health and safety bodies, to inform and develop practice. On the whole, staff pick up serious concerns as part of their daily health and safety checks. However, the inspector noted some trip hazards in a garden area which was not in use. Body creams in the bathroom had not been labelled correctly to show that they were to be used only for one particular child.

p.6

The effectiveness of leaders and managers: good

Managers continually seek opportunities to improve the quality of care and support that they provide to children, and to their families. Developments this year include:

p.6

The effectiveness of leaders and managers: good

 greater celebration of children’s achievements  a refurbished bathroom which increases opportunities for children to develop their independence skills  an increased availability of communal areas through the addition of a covered walkway to the art room  improvements to records and monitoring of staff training. This has ensured that staff complete relevant courses and qualifications in appropriate timescales.

p.6

The effectiveness of leaders and managers: good

Monitoring and reviewing systems are in place but are not fully effective. The registered manager has put in place plans to rectify this; however, these recent plans have not yet been tested to assess whether they will be effective.

p.6

The effectiveness of leaders and managers: good

Staff supervision is frequent and helpful; however, managers do not review the quality of supervision and induction records. Some records do not reflect the supervision meeting in sufficient detail. Most staff induction is completed within suitable timescales. For one new member of staff, this was not the case. The registered manager had picked Inspection report children’s home: SC013598 7 up on the length of time it was taking to complete the induction and no timescale was set for this to be completed.

p.6

The effectiveness of leaders and managers: good

The arrangements for the registered manager’s supervision do not ensure that she is supervised by an appropriately qualified and experienced professional. This is a missed opportunity for her to reflect on her practice.

p.7

The effectiveness of leaders and managers: good

The quality of evaluation and analysis with the six-monthly report on the quality of care does not fully demonstrate that leaders and managers focus their reports on the most important issues. The reports are lengthy, contain high levels of detail and do not do justice to the high standards of care and the positive outcomes and experiences for the children using the short-break service.

p.7

Information about this inspection

Inspectors have looked closely at the experiences and progress of children and young people. Inspectors considered the quality of work and the differences made to the lives of children and young people. They watched how professional staff work with children and young people and each other and discussed the effectiveness of help and care provided. Wherever possible, they talked to children and young people and their families. In addition, the inspectors have tried to understand what the children’s home knows about how well it is performing, how well it is doing and what difference it is making for the children and young people whom it is trying to help, protect and look after.

p.7

Information about this inspection

Using the ‘Social care common inspection framework’, this inspection was carried out under the Care Standards Act 2000 to assess the effectiveness of the service, how it meets the core functions of the service as set out in legislation, and to consider how well it complies with the Children’s Homes (England) Regulations 2015 and the ‘Guide to the children’s homes regulations including the quality standards’. Inspection report children’s home: SC013598 8

p.7

Children’s home details

Registered provider: Cherry Trees Limited

p.8

Inspector

Ruth Coler, social care inspector Inspection report children’s home: SC013598 9 achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for looked after children, safeguarding and child protection.

p.8

Inspector

If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk . You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit http://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .

p.9

Inspector

Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .

p.9

Inspector

T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: http://www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.9

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion