Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · Further education monitoring visit

Hull College

Inspected 6 Feb 2020 · published 10 Mar 2020 · URN 130579

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Ken Merry

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection datesingle source

    6 Feb 2020

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Ken Merry

  • Postcode verified

    HU1 3DG

  • Name on report verified

    Hull College

  • URN verified

    130579

Page 1 of 5
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

−38Criticalmore positive than 41% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praiseimprovedeffectivelypositiveimprovingaccuratesecure
Criticismtoo manytoo lowweaknessesat riskrequires improvementlownot yetnot improved

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

Findings positive critical

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
5
Words of findings
1,305
longer than usual (typical 36)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 38, typical 37
Average sentence
20 words
Next steps
2
typical 0
Hedged sentences
8%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 100%

Full report text

Hull College Report following a monitoring visit to a ‘requires improvement’ provider

p.1

Name of lead inspector: Ken Merry, Her Majesty’s Inspector

p.1

Type of provider: General further education college

p.1

Address: Queen’s Gardens Wilberforce Drive Hull HU1 3DG Monitoring visit: Hull College, 5–6 February 2020

p.1

Context and focus of visit

Hull College was inspected in May 2019. At that time, inspectors judged the overall effectiveness of the provision to require improvement.

p.2

Context and focus of visit

The focus of this monitoring visit was to evaluate the progress that leaders and managers have made in addressing the main areas for improvement identified at the previous inspection.

p.2

Context and focus of visit

Since the inspection in May 2019, there have been significant changes to the senior leadership team of the college. The chief executive officer and deputy chief executive officer have both left the college. At the time of this monitoring visit, there was an interim chief executive in post.

p.2

Context and focus of visit

At the time of this monitoring visit, Hull College was providing education for 191 learners aged 14 to 16 years old; 1,737 learners on study programmes; 2,607 adult learners; and 1,676 apprentices.

p.2

Reasonable progress

Leaders, managers and governors are acutely aware of the areas that they need to improve. They passionately believe that the college has a vital role in supporting the skills agenda across the city of Hull and the wider region. They have taken appropriate action to address many of the weaknesses that they have identified. Some of these are starting to have an impact on improving the quality of provision.

p.2

Reasonable progress

Governors have recently broadened the range of skills of board members. The introduction of new governors who have educational and financial expertise means that the board of governors is better placed to hold senior leaders to account for the quality of provision. Governors are currently working with a national leader of governance to improve their effectiveness further.

p.2

Reasonable progress

Managers have introduced a comprehensive and helpful professional development programme that focuses on developing the craft of teachers and trainers by giving them more confidence to try new and innovative ideas. Most teachers and skills trainers have good subject expertise that they use effectively when planning their teaching so that learners and apprentices build on their previous knowledge and Monitoring visit: Hull College, 5–6 February 2020 skills. Most teachers and skills trainers use a wide range of assessment activities to check learners’ understanding.

p.2

Reasonable progress

Since the previous inspection, leaders have revised their self-assessment of adult learning programmes, and now consider this provision to require improvement. This reflects leaders’ view that, while the proportion of adult learners who achieve their qualifications is high, too many learners do not make the progress of which they are capable.

p.3

Reasonable progress

Leaders are now closely monitoring the progress that learners and apprentices make toward achieving their qualifications and completing their apprenticeships. They work closely with curriculum directors to ensure that there is accurate oversight of those who may be at risk of not achieving. Improved reporting enables leaders to have more-effective discussions with curriculum staff who have direct responsibility for the progress of learners and apprentices. As a result, leaders can identify when learners and apprentices are not making the progress expected of them.

p.3

Reasonable progress

Since the previous inspection, managers have improved the process that they use when recruiting apprentices. They now work very closely with employers to ensure that employers fully understand their commitment to an apprenticeship, including releasing their apprentices for off-the-job training and coordinating the on-the-job training. As a result, only a very small proportion of the apprentices who have started with the college since May 2019 have withdrawn from learning without achieving their apprenticeship. Most of those who started after this date are making at least expected progress for the length of time that they have been on their programme.

p.3

Reasonable progress

Most staff use teaching and learning activities that challenge learners of different abilities, including those who are most able. As a result, a large majority of learners on study programmes are developing new knowledge and skills in their vocational subject areas.

p.3

Reasonable progress

Too many teachers do not use the results of initial assessments well enough to determine learners’ starting points. In vocational subjects, teachers do not routinely assess subject-specific knowledge and skills at the start of the programme to identify what learners can already do. As a result, they are unable to plan the curriculum to meet individual needs.

p.3

Reasonable progress

In 2018/19, the proportion of learners on study programmes who achieved their qualification was too low. The proportion of learners on study programmes who Monitoring visit: Hull College, 5–6 February 2020 achieved a good pass in GCSE English and mathematics in their resit examination was very low. Managers estimate that a higher proportion of learners on study programmes will achieve their qualifications in the current academic year. However, their target for improvement is not high enough and, if met, would still mean that the proportion of learners achieving will remain too low. Of those apprentices due to complete their programmes in the current academic year, too many remain in learning beyond their planned end date.

p.3

Insufficient progress

Despite the efforts of leaders and managers, the proportion of learners and apprentices who frequently attend college has not improved sufficiently since the previous inspection. The average rate of attendance has only marginally improved; attendance at English and mathematics lessons remains very low. The actions of leaders and managers have not yet had a consistent impact on the proportion of learners and apprentices who have high levels of attendance. As a result, the attendance of learners and apprentices varies significantly across different curriculum areas.

p.4

Insufficient progress

Leaders, managers and governors recognise that attendance needs to be better. They have made attendance one of their headline key performance indicators. As a result, there is ongoing scrutiny of attendance rates from senior leaders and governors.

p.4

Insufficient progress

At the start of this academic year, senior leaders introduced a range of new roles to support learners on study programmes and apprentices to improve their attendance. Staff such as youth workers now support learners and apprentices who have barriers that prevent them from attending college. Where appropriate, college staff provide financial support to learners and apprentices to help them with transport and course material costs, as well as carrying out home visits when learners on study programmes have persistently low attendance.

p.4

Insufficient progress

The very recent creation of a senior leadership post with responsibility for all aspects of learners’ experience at the college is intended to provide a better overview of attendance. However, it is too early to see the impact of this role. Leaders and managers now celebrate learners who have high attendance. They have also introduced a range of incentives that actively promote positive attendance; for example, learners studying construction can win a toolbox with vital trade equipment. Monitoring visit: Hull College, 5–6 February 2020 regulates and inspects to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education

p.4

Insufficient progress

and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.

p.5

Insufficient progress

If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.5

Insufficient progress

You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .

p.5

Insufficient progress

Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .

p.5

Insufficient progress

T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.5

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion