Schools & FE · School inspection (EIF)
Dinnington High School
Summary
Barry Found (lead), Colin Scott, Phil Riozzi, Stephen Crossley
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection date verified
12 Feb 2020
- Inspectors verified
Barry Found, Colin Scott, Phil Riozzi, Stephen Crossley
- Behaviour and attitudes verified
Requires improvement
- Leadership and management verified
Requires improvement
- Overall effectiveness verified
Requires improvement
- Personal development verified
Requires improvement
- Quality of education verified
Requires improvement
- Postcode verified
S25 2NZ
- Name on report verified
Dinnington High School
- URN verified
141730
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Grade profile
Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2017.
- OverallRequires improvement
- Behaviour and attitudesRequires improvement
- Leadership and managementRequires improvement
- Personal developmentRequires improvement
- Quality of educationRequires improvement
15% of comparable inspections in the last three years were graded Requires improvement (5,043 inspections).
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
Reads more critically than most reports of this type graded Requires improvement.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Some pupils do not get the individual help they need to deal with the existing gaps in their knowledge. p.2
- The support they receive in the classroom is not as effective as it should be. p.4
- The behaviour of a significant minority of pupils is not as positive as it should be. p.4
- Leaders know that attendance must improve further. p.3
- Leaders should continue to work with pupils and families to encourage better attendance and reduce absence. p.4
- A significant number of pupils do not achieve as they should. p.2
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Progress & outcomes11
“However, too many do not achieve to their potential.” p.2
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 8
- Words of findings
- 1,278
- about usual (typical 1215)
- Reading level
- Plain English
- Flesch 63, typical 56
- Average sentence
- 13 words
- Next steps
- 6
- typical 5
- Hedged sentences
- 23%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Inspection of Dinnington High School Doe Quarry Lane, Dinnington, Sheffield, South Yorkshire S25 2NZ
p.1
Overall effectiveness Requires improvement
The quality of education Requires improvement Behaviour and attitudes Requires improvement Personal development Requires improvement Leadership and management Requires improvement Sixth-form provision Requires improvement Previous inspection grade Requires improvement 11–12 February 2020
p.1
What is it like to attend this school?
Since the previous inspection, the school has made improvements. However, there are more improvements to make so that pupils’ experiences are of a better quality. Pupils’ achievement is beginning to improve. However, too many do not achieve to their potential. In most subjects, pupils’ learning is in a sensible order. This is beginning to help them to remember important knowledge.
p.2
What is it like to attend this school?
Most pupils behave in lessons and around the school. However, a few do not. Some do not have positive attitudes in lessons. At social times, some pupils do not cooperate with staff straight away. Pupils say that bullying is rare. They say that staff help to sort it out if it happens.
p.2
What is it like to attend this school?
Too many pupils do not attend school often enough. There have been some small improvements in attendance. However, attendance has not improved enough.
p.2
What is it like to attend this school?
Pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND) get better support than they experienced in the past. There is still more to do to make sure that they get the necessary support in the classroom to help them improve their work.
p.2
What is it like to attend this school?
Staff and pupils recognise the improvements made since the previous inspection. They are positive about the school and enjoy working and learning in it.
p.2
better?
The quality of education requires improvement. Pupils’ achievement is improving. However, the improvements have been too slow. A significant number of pupils do not achieve as they should. Teachers organise lessons so that pupils revisit learned knowledge. This helps to identify gaps in knowledge and understanding. However, some teachers do not make the best use of this information consistently. Some pupils do not get the individual help they need to deal with the existing gaps in their knowledge. This is because teachers work hard to keep pupils on task and do not always have the time to help. A significant minority of pupils do not have the self- control to keep themselves on task.
p.2
better?
In most subjects, teachers cover topics and concepts in an order which makes sense to pupils. The order helps them to learn. Some teachers do not consistently use assessment to identify the gaps in pupils’ learning. Because of this, some pupils fall behind.
p.2
better?
The school has adopted a two-year key stage 3 curriculum. This means that pupils do not get the opportunity to study some subjects in enough depth. In addition, music, food technology and computing are not in the key stage 3 curriculum at all. Leaders are aware of this and plan to include these subjects in the very near future. 11–12 February 2020
p.2
3
Disadvantaged pupils’ work is comparable to that of other pupils in the school. Leaders have made sure that disadvantaged pupils and those with SEND have the same opportunities to learn as others. Leaders have not identified the needs of some pupils with SEND precisely. Because of this, some pupils with SEND do not get the support they need. Their progress suffers. The school’s inclusion facility provides dedicated support for those pupils who need it. As a result, these pupils make better progress.
p.3
3
Most pupils have positive attitudes to learning and behave well. However, some pupils do not respond to teachers’ requests at the first time of asking. This is particularly the case during social times. A minority of pupils lack courtesy towards others. Staff work hard to encourage pupils to change their behaviour. Exclusions have reduced. Pupils say that relationships with staff are much more positive than in the past. The school is proud of the extensive care it offers to those pupils who need it the most.
p.3
3
A large minority of pupils do not attend school as they should. The attendance team supports pupils and families to improve attendance. Leaders know that attendance must improve further. The multi-academy trust has been slow to act but is now supporting the school in this area.
p.3
3
The school provides pupils with opportunities to develop their confidence. Pupils say that student leadership has changed and now they have more say in how to improve their school.
p.3
3
Students enjoy the sixth form and have very positive attitudes. They appreciate the support they get. Not all students achieve as they should in some of the A-level subjects. Most students move on to the type of education, training or employment they aim for.
p.3
3
School leaders and trustees are aware that the school needs to improve further. The trust has been slow to provide the support required in the past. This has changed recently. School leaders are now getting the support they need.
p.3
Safeguarding
The arrangements for safeguarding are effective.
p.3
Safeguarding
Staff receive the training they need to keep pupils safe. The culture of safeguarding is very strong. Pupils are safe and looked after while they are in school. Staff and pupils know what to do if they have any concerns. Effective systems are in place for teachers and staff.
p.3
Safeguarding
The school works with families, external agencies and with the local authority to protect vulnerable pupils. All pupils say that they feel safe at the school. 11–12 February 2020
p.3
(Information for the school and appropriate authority)
Teachers’ expectations of pupils are not consistently high. Consequently, the quality of work some pupils produce, including those with SEND, does not help them to make the progress they are capable of making. Leaders should ensure that the expectations of all pupils, including those who are disadvantaged and those with SEND, are high so that pupils achieve to their potential. The needs of some pupils with SEND are not identified with precision. The support they receive in the classroom is not as effective as it should be. Some pupils with SEND, therefore, are not making the progress they are capable of making. Leaders should ensure that all teachers receive precise information on pupils with SEND which allows them to provide the support these pupils need to make better progress. The curriculum in key stage 3 does not allow pupils to study the broad and balanced curriculum which they are expected to cover. Because of this, they are
p.4
(Information for the school and appropriate authority)
missing out on important subjects such as music, computing and food technology. In other subjects, they are not covering the content in enough depth. Leaders should ensure that the key stage 3 curriculum is at least as broad and ambitious as the national curriculum. The behaviour of a significant minority of pupils is not as positive as it should be. This gets in the way of pupils’ learning. It takes up a lot of teachers’ time. Leaders should ensure that the school’s behaviour policy is applied consistently by all staff. They should further raise the expectations of all pupils so that behaviour improves further and quickly. Too many pupils do not attend school regularly enough despite the determined work of leaders and staff. Pupils who are regularly absent miss important work. This holds back their learning. Leaders should continue to work with pupils and families to encourage better attendance and reduce absence.
p.4
How can I feed back my views?
or to find out what other parents and carers think. We use Ofsted Parent View information when deciding which schools to inspect, when to inspect them and as part of their inspection.
p.4
How can I feed back my views?
The Department for Education has further guidance on how to complain about a school.
p.4
How can I feed back my views?
If you are the school and you are not happy with the inspection or the report, you can complain to Ofsted . 11–12 February 2020
p.4
Further information
You can search for published performance information about the school.
p.5
Further information
In the report, ‘disadvantaged pupils’ refers to those pupils who attract government pupil premium funding: pupils claiming free school meals at any point in the last six years and pupils in care or who left care through adoption or another formal route. 11–12 February 2020
p.5
School details
Inspection number 10121726 Type of school Secondary Comprehensive
p.6
sixth form
Date of previous inspection 5 March 2019, under section 8 of the Education Act 2005
p.6
Information about this school
Since the previous inspection in March 2019, the school has undergone a number of leadership changes at senior and other levels. The school is a member of the LEAP Academy Trust. A number of pupils attend alternative provision. The school makes use of Jade; Chislett; First Class Green Beans; Unity Centre and a number of other local authority approved alternative provisions. The school has developed the Segrave facility to cater for the needs of those pupils who require individualised support. 11–12 February 2020
p.6
Information about this inspection
We carried out this inspection under section 5 of the Education Act 2005.
p.7
Information about this inspection
Discussions were held with the principal, trust leaders, senior leaders, curriculum leaders for mathematics, science, history and geography and also with a range of leaders across the school. The lead inspector met with members of the local governing body and trustees. The subjects which were considered as part of the inspection through the deep dive methodology were mathematics, science, history and geography. As part of the deep dive methodology, we visited lessons, talked to the curriculum leader for each subject, held discussions with the teachers and pupils from the lessons visited and scrutinised pupils’ work. To inspect safeguarding in the school, we scrutinised the school’s single central register relating to the safe recruitment of those adults who work with pupils, along with records relating to safeguarding. We also held discussions with staff and pupils as well as with the designated safeguarding leaders for the school.
p.7
Inspection team
Barry Found, lead inspector Her Majesty’s Inspector
p.7
Inspection team
Phil Riozzi Ofsted Inspector 11–12 February 2020
p.7
8
regulates and inspects to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.
p.8
8
If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .
p.8
8
You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .
p.8
8
Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .
p.8
8
T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted
p.8
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion