Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection datesingle source
4 Mar 2020
- URN verified
2519703
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
Reads more critically than most reports of this type.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No standout praise found.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No strong criticism found.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 2
- Words of findings
- 294
- about usual (typical 281)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 34, typical 42
- Average sentence
- 23 words
- Next steps
- 1
- typical 1
- Hedged sentences
- 15%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Summary of outcome
All early years providers must meet the legal requirements in the 'Statutory framework for the early years foundation stage', which you can find at www.gov.uk/government/publications/early-years-foundation-stage-framework--2. If we find that a provider is not meeting the requirements, we can take action to ensure they put matters right.
p.1
Summary of outcome
On 17 January 2020, we received concerns that this provider was not meeting some of these requirements and on 20 January 2020, we received a notification from the provider. This notification means the provider met their legal responsibility as set out in the early years foundation stage welfare requirements to notify Ofsted of any significant event which is likely to affect the suitability of the early years provider or any person who cares for, or is in regular contact with, children on the premises, albeit the notification was not made as soon as reasonably practicable as required.
p.1
Summary of outcome
We found that the provider had taken prompt action to prevent a re-occurrence. The action taken was to:
p.1
Summary of outcome
n review policies, procedures and training plans. Refresher training was planned for all staff and several staff were disciplined (Staff qualifications, training, support and skills).
p.1
Summary of outcome
We were satisfied with the action taken by the provider but also asked them to look into some further concerns which had arisen out of their internal investigation. However, the provider resigned their registration before this could be completed and are no longer registered with Ofsted.
p.1
Publication of complaints
We publish details of complaints made against childminders, home childcarers and childcare providers where we or the provider have taken action in order to meet legal requirements.
p.1
Publication of complaints
We publish details of complaints for five years commencing on the date we complete our investigation.
p.1
Publication of complaints
For further information about the complaints process please view the Concerns and complaints about childminders and childcare providers leaflet .
p.1
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion