Other · Ofsted letter
Setting
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection datesingle source
5 Feb 2020
- Inspectorssingle source
Michael Wardle
- Postcode verified
YO19 6JQ
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No strong criticism found.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No next steps set out.
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Communication & language11
“Pupils are interested in languages, very enthusiastic about learning and want to do their best.” p.2Progress & outcomes2
“It includes planning for progression in phonics, grammar and vocabulary.” p.1
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 3
- Words of findings
- 790
- about usual (typical 963)
- Reading level
- Fairly hard
- Flesch 57, typical 48
- Average sentence
- 14 words
- Next steps
- 0
- typical 2
- Hedged sentences
- 3%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Store Street Manchester M1 2WD T 0300 123 1231 www.gov.uk/ofsted
p.1
Miss Emma Miller Headteacher Escrick Church of England Voluntary Controlled Primary School Carr Lane Escrick York North Yorkshire YO19 6JQ
p.1
Controlled Primary School
Following my visit to your school on 5 February 2020, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to confirm the inspection findings. The findings do not change the overall effectiveness judgement of outstanding from the last section 5 inspection.
p.1
Controlled Primary School
This inspection was conducted under section 8 of the Education Act 2005 and in accordance with Ofsted’s published procedures for a no formal designation inspection of schools. The inspection was carried out to enable Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector to better understand the quality of education in specific subjects provided by outstanding primary schools. The subject in focus was languages.
p.1
Main findings
You and other leaders have been focusing on developing the curriculum in subjects other than languages. For example, since your appointment you have been looking at the quality of the curriculum in English, mathematics and science. You have only very recently turned your attention to languages. You know that you are only at the beginning of a journey in as far as French is concerned.
p.1
Main findings
Plans to improve the curriculum in French have been prepared. There has been a recent change of subject leader. The assistant headteacher is also spearheading the development of French at school. Work is underway to enhance the status of the subject. However, much of this work is in its infancy. You have shown a level of commitment to French. All pupils from Year 3 to Year 6 now have regular French lessons. Pupils have one 45-minute lesson per fortnight. French is taught by class teachers. They use a scheme of work that provides lesson plans, overviews, sound files and teaching resources to support them. The scheme builds upon knowledge step by step. It includes planning for progression in phonics, grammar and vocabulary.
p.1
Main findings
However, over time there has not been sufficient focus on French. It has not been prioritised in a way which has enabled pupils to retain vocabulary and structures in their long-term memory. Lessons have not been regular. You accept that professional development in this subject has been limited. The impact of this is clear. Currently, Year 6 pupils can only recall some very basic vocabulary and respond to a few simple rehearsed question and answer exchanges. Their understanding of the sound–spelling link in French is limited. They have very limited understanding of simple grammar. They cannot alter simple sentences to express their own views. Their knowledge has not built over time as intended by the curriculum.
p.2
Main findings
Pupils have had little in the way of opportunities to extend their spoken or written French. Currently, Year 3 pupils are creating sentences that are similar in complexity to those written by pupils in Year 6. Assessment is in its infancy. Many pupils do not have their own books or notes. A ‘class book’ is used to record what has been covered in class. This does not help teachers to know where individual pupils are in their language learning. Currently, the curriculum that has been provided does not match the demands of the national curriculum. Nor does it reflect the ambition that is in the school’s chosen scheme of work for French.
p.2
Main findings
Green shoots are in evidence. Your assistant headteacher understands what progress looks like in languages and is beginning to share this across the school. Pupils are interested in languages, very enthusiastic about learning and want to do their best. You are now turning your attention to languages as part of your programme of school improvement.
p.2
Evidence
I met with you, the assistant headteacher and the curriculum leader for French. I visited French lessons that included pupils from Year 3, 5 and 6. I looked at pupils’ work that was available. This included some work from lessons that I visited. I spoke with three groups of pupils about their learning in French and we looked at their work together. I spoke to the class teachers whose lessons I visited. I evaluated the curriculum plans, policies and development plans for languages.
p.2
Context
Escrick Church of England Voluntary Controlled Primary School is smaller than the average-sized primary school. There are currently 154 pupils on roll. The proportion of pupils who are entitled to free school meals is below average. Overall, the proportion of pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities, including pupils with education, health and care plans, is below average.
p.2
Context
I am copying this letter to the chair of the governing body, the director of education for the Diocese of York, the regional schools commissioner and the director of children’s services for North Yorkshire. This letter will be published on the Ofsted website.
p.3
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion