Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted letter

Setting

Inspected 5 Feb 2020

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Michael Wardle

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection datesingle source

    5 Feb 2020

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Michael Wardle

  • Postcode verified

    YO19 6JQ

Page 1 of 3
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+13Mostly positivemore positive than 56% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praiseoutstandingenthusiasticclear
Criticismlimitedbelow

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

Findings positive critical

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No next steps set out.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
3
Words of findings
790
about usual (typical 963)
Reading level
Fairly hard
Flesch 57, typical 48
Average sentence
14 words
Next steps
0
typical 2
Hedged sentences
3%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 100%

Full report text

Store Street Manchester M1 2WD T 0300 123 1231 www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.1

Miss Emma Miller Headteacher Escrick Church of England Voluntary Controlled Primary School Carr Lane Escrick York North Yorkshire YO19 6JQ

p.1

Controlled Primary School

Following my visit to your school on 5 February 2020, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to confirm the inspection findings. The findings do not change the overall effectiveness judgement of outstanding from the last section 5 inspection.

p.1

Controlled Primary School

This inspection was conducted under section 8 of the Education Act 2005 and in accordance with Ofsted’s published procedures for a no formal designation inspection of schools. The inspection was carried out to enable Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector to better understand the quality of education in specific subjects provided by outstanding primary schools. The subject in focus was languages.

p.1

Main findings

You and other leaders have been focusing on developing the curriculum in subjects other than languages. For example, since your appointment you have been looking at the quality of the curriculum in English, mathematics and science. You have only very recently turned your attention to languages. You know that you are only at the beginning of a journey in as far as French is concerned.

p.1

Main findings

Plans to improve the curriculum in French have been prepared. There has been a recent change of subject leader. The assistant headteacher is also spearheading the development of French at school. Work is underway to enhance the status of the subject. However, much of this work is in its infancy. You have shown a level of commitment to French. All pupils from Year 3 to Year 6 now have regular French lessons. Pupils have one 45-minute lesson per fortnight. French is taught by class teachers. They use a scheme of work that provides lesson plans, overviews, sound files and teaching resources to support them. The scheme builds upon knowledge step by step. It includes planning for progression in phonics, grammar and vocabulary.

p.1

Main findings

However, over time there has not been sufficient focus on French. It has not been prioritised in a way which has enabled pupils to retain vocabulary and structures in their long-term memory. Lessons have not been regular. You accept that professional development in this subject has been limited. The impact of this is clear. Currently, Year 6 pupils can only recall some very basic vocabulary and respond to a few simple rehearsed question and answer exchanges. Their understanding of the sound–spelling link in French is limited. They have very limited understanding of simple grammar. They cannot alter simple sentences to express their own views. Their knowledge has not built over time as intended by the curriculum.

p.2

Main findings

Pupils have had little in the way of opportunities to extend their spoken or written French. Currently, Year 3 pupils are creating sentences that are similar in complexity to those written by pupils in Year 6. Assessment is in its infancy. Many pupils do not have their own books or notes. A ‘class book’ is used to record what has been covered in class. This does not help teachers to know where individual pupils are in their language learning. Currently, the curriculum that has been provided does not match the demands of the national curriculum. Nor does it reflect the ambition that is in the school’s chosen scheme of work for French.

p.2

Main findings

Green shoots are in evidence. Your assistant headteacher understands what progress looks like in languages and is beginning to share this across the school. Pupils are interested in languages, very enthusiastic about learning and want to do their best. You are now turning your attention to languages as part of your programme of school improvement.

p.2

Evidence

I met with you, the assistant headteacher and the curriculum leader for French. I visited French lessons that included pupils from Year 3, 5 and 6. I looked at pupils’ work that was available. This included some work from lessons that I visited. I spoke with three groups of pupils about their learning in French and we looked at their work together. I spoke to the class teachers whose lessons I visited. I evaluated the curriculum plans, policies and development plans for languages.

p.2

Context

Escrick Church of England Voluntary Controlled Primary School is smaller than the average-sized primary school. There are currently 154 pupils on roll. The proportion of pupils who are entitled to free school meals is below average. Overall, the proportion of pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities, including pupils with education, health and care plans, is below average.

p.2

Context

I am copying this letter to the chair of the governing body, the director of education for the Diocese of York, the regional schools commissioner and the director of children’s services for North Yorkshire. This letter will be published on the Ofsted website.

p.3

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion