Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · School inspection (EIF)

St Bartholomew's CofE VC Primary School

Inspected 12 Feb 2020 · published 5 Mar 2020 · URN 143833

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Heather Simpson (lead), Lindsay Nash

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    12 Feb 2020

  • Inspectors verified

    Heather Simpson, Lindsay Nash

  • Postcode verified

    DY13 0EL

  • Name on report verified

    St Bartholomew’s CofE VC Primary School

  • URN verified

    143833

Page 1 of 7
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

−28Mixedmore positive than 6% of reports of this type
OutstandingGoodRIInadequate

Reads more critically than most reports of this type.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praiseenjoypositiveoutstandingsafehappysuccessfulconfidentsuccessfully
Criticismweaknessesconcernsdecliningpersistently absentlimitedtoo manyseriousdisruption

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsSafeguardingAbout the inspection positive critical
  • Findings1408w−28
  • Safeguarding133w−19

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
7
Words of findings
1,530
longer than usual (typical 1153)
Reading level
Fairly hard
Flesch 58, typical 55
Average sentence
15 words
Next steps
6
typical 4
Hedged sentences
10%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 67%Safeguarding 6%About the inspection 26%

Full report text

Inspection of a good school: St Bartholomew’s CofE VC Primary School Princess Way, Stourport-on-Severn, Worcestershire DY13 0EL

p.1

Outcome

St Bartholomew’s CofE VC Primary School continues to be a good school. However, inspectors have some concerns that standards may be declining, as set out below.

p.1

What is it like to attend this school?

Leaders make sure that school is a safe and happy place to learn. Pupils are friendly and well cared for by staff.

p.1

What is it like to attend this school?

Pupils behave well and disruption in lessons is rare. Leaders have been successful in reducing the number of exclusions and behaviour incidents. Pupils know that bullying is ‘several times on purpose (STOP)’. They are confident to report any issues to adults and that action is taken.

p.1

What is it like to attend this school?

A new approach to learning has been introduced. Learning is based on key principles, such as ‘diversity’ and ‘oneness’. Pupils are encouraged to ask questions and find things out. Lessons are often practical. Staff and pupils enjoy the enrichment activities offered every Wednesday afternoon. These include performing, creative arts and forest school.

p.1

What is it like to attend this school?

Staff want pupils to do well but their expectations of what pupils can achieve are sometimes not high enough, especially in early years and key stage 1. Consequently, some pupils do not achieve as well as they should.

p.1

What is it like to attend this school?

Parents have positive views of the school. As one parent put it, ‘I have nothing but praise for the school.’ Parents particularly value the support their children receive if they have a learning or communication difficulty.

p.1

What does the school do well and what does it need to do better?

Children get off to a good start in the recently opened class for two-year-olds. They are well cared for by staff and encouraged to develop good speaking and listening skills from the outset. Children settle quickly and happily pretend to make cups of tea, cook and listen to stories. Toilet training is also managed well. Children continue to make good gains in the Nursery. Stories, rhymes and games are used successfully to develop early 11–12 February 2020

p.1

2

language skills. Children develop good levels of independence, for example putting on their coats and eating at the snack table.

p.2

2

Leaders have recently redesigned the curriculum. They call this their ‘harmony’ curriculum. Questions are posed such as ‘What’s wrong with our water?’ Pupils then investigate and link different subject knowledge and skills together over a number of weeks to reach a conclusion. Science is covered well using this approach. However, there is limited coverage of other subjects, such as art, music or modern foreign languages. These are not taught very often or included in current planning. This means that pupils do not gain the skills and knowledge they should in all subjects.

p.2

2

Sometimes there are differences in what teachers plan and work that pupils complete. Leaders are aware that the new curriculum is in its very early stages. They know that more checks are needed by subject leaders to make sure the curriculum is being planned and delivered as intended.

p.2

2

Reading is a whole-school priority and leaders have introduced rewards and initiatives to encourage pupils to read regularly. In key stage 2 each day starts with ‘reading for pleasure’. However, some pupils lack fluency and confidence in their reading as these skills are not developed well enough in key stage 1. While additional adult support is provided for pupils who are struggling, this is not as regular as it could be. Phonics is taught daily in the early years and Year 1. However, some home reading books do not match the sounds that pupils know. This limits their progress.

p.2

2

Staff expectations of pupils’ writing are too low. Teachers accept work which is untidy. They do not pick up errors in pupils’ writing early enough. As a result, standards in writing remain low in key stage 1.

p.2

2

Relationships between pupils and staff are positive. Pupils talk about ‘five trusted adults’, counting on their fingers who they can go to if they have a problem. Pupils are also aware of the ‘cherry orchard room’ where they can go at lunchtime if they are sad or anxious.

p.2

2

Leaders ensure that pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND) are identified early and specialist professionals provide support where needed. Teachers make sure that these pupils are given the help they need to be able to achieve well.

p.2

2

Work on promoting pupils’ personal, physical, social and emotional development is a strength of the school. One afternoon a week is dedicated to enhancing pupils’ physical and mental well-being. Values such as compassion, respect and resilience are taught. These contribute strongly to pupils’ personal development.

p.2

2

Pupils readily take on additional responsibilities and carry out these roles sensibly. Pupils enjoy the trips, clubs and events organised which expand their cultural development.

p.2

2

There are too many pupils who are persistently absent. This has a negative impact on their education. Leaders are determined to work with parents to improve attendance. 11–12 February 2020

p.2

Safeguarding

The arrangements for safeguarding are effective.

p.3

Safeguarding

Leaders ensure that safeguarding is a collective responsibility. Staff receive regular training to check their understanding of safeguarding systems and policies. Adults know what steps to take if they have any concerns about a pupils’ well-being.

p.3

Safeguarding

Leaders contact other agencies to seek additional help for families who need it. On occasion, leaders trust social care too readily. They do not follow up concerns they raise about the most vulnerable pupils, whose attendance is very low, robustly enough. This means that leaders do not know what action, if any, has been taken by social care. Consequently, these pupils remain persistently absent and miss too much school.

p.3

Safeguarding

The records for checking the suitability of staff are well maintained. Parents, staff and pupils agree that the school keeps pupils safe.

p.3

(Information for the school and appropriate authority)

 In the foundation subjects leaders’ plans for the curriculum are in the early stages of development. Not enough pupils have an age-appropriate understanding of a range of subjects across the curriculum and they have gaps in their skills and knowledge. Leaders should ensure that all subjects are taught and that intended curriculum plans are fully implemented and monitored for impact.  Some subject leaders are new to their roles and have had limited time to monitor the effectiveness of the new curriculum. Leaders should ensure that all those who lead a curriculum area have the skills and training required to identify where development is needed and provide the support needed to ensure that pupils achieve as well as they should in all areas.  There are weaknesses in the teaching of reading. This means that too few pupils read as well as they should for their age. The lowest-ability pupils do not read daily to an

p.3

(Information for the school and appropriate authority)

adult and their home reading books are not checked and changed regularly to aid progression. Early reading books are not well matched to the phonic sounds that pupils know. Older pupils are not encouraged to read aloud frequently to develop their fluency and confidence. Leaders should address these weaknesses in the teaching of reading to improve pupils’ outcomes and ensure that the least able catch up quickly.  Children in the early years and key stage 1 are not prepared well enough for the next stage of their education in writing. Standards at the end of Year 2 are significantly below the national average. Leaders should ensure that teachers pay close attention to basic skills, such as finger spacing, letter formation, spelling and punctuation, so that weaknesses in writing are picked up and addressed quickly.  Too many pupils are persistently absent, and numbers are rising. This means that too

p.3

(Information for the school and appropriate authority)

many pupils are missing parts of their education. Leaders should take further steps to work with parents to instil the importance of regular school attendance. Leaders should 11–12 February 2020

p.3

4

also be more robust in following up referrals made to social care when the most vulnerable pupils are not in school.

p.4

Background

When we have judged a school to be good we will then normally go into the school about once every four years to confirm that the school remains good. This is called a section 8 inspection of a good school or non-exempt outstanding school. We do not give graded judgements on a section 8 inspection. However, if we find some evidence that the school could now be better than good or that standards may be declining, then the next inspection will be a section 5 inspection. Usually this is within one to two years of the date of the section 8 inspection. If we have serious concerns about safeguarding, behaviour or the quality of education, we will convert the section 8 inspection to a section 5 inspection immediately.

p.4

Background

This is the first section 8 inspection since we judged the predecessor school, St Bartholomew’s CofE VC Primary School, to be good on 7–8 November 2013.

p.4

How can I feed back my views?

find out what other parents and carers think. We use Ofsted Parent View information when deciding which schools to inspect, when to inspect them and as part of their inspection.

p.4

How can I feed back my views?

The Department for Education has further guidance on how to complain about a school.

p.4

Further information

You can search for published performance information about the school.

p.4

Further information

In the report, ‘disadvantaged pupils’ refers to those pupils who attract government pupil premium funding: pupils claiming free school meals at any point in the last six years and pupils in care or who left care through adoption or another formal route. 11–12 February 2020

p.4

School details

Inspection number 10122526 Type of school Primary

p.5

School details

Website www.st-bartholomews.worcs.sch.uk

p.5

School details

Date of previous inspection Not previously inspected

p.5

Information about this school

 This school joined the Severn Academies Educational Trust in March 2017. When its predecessor school, St Bartholomew’s CofE VC Primary School, was last inspected by Ofsted in November 2013, it was judged to be good overall.  The headteacher was appointed in September 2019.  The school opened provision for two-year-olds in September 2018.  The school was inspected as a voluntary controlled school under section 48 of the 2006 Education Act in December 2016. The school was graded as outstanding.

p.5

Information about this inspection

 We met with the headteacher, phase leaders, curriculum leaders, teachers and pupils.  The lead inspector met with the chief executive officer, a member of the board of directors and the director responsible for primary schools in the trust. She also met with four members of the local governing body.  The subjects considered as part of this inspection were reading, mathematics and science. These deep dives entailed meeting with subject leaders and teachers, looking at curriculum plans, visiting lessons, speaking to pupils about their learning and 11–12 February 2020

p.5

6

scrutinising pupils’ work. Inspectors also considered other curriculum subjects, including writing.  The lead inspector listened to pupils read in class and observed a member of staff hearing pupils read.  The arrangements for safeguarding were checked. This included checks on the single central record, staff training and safeguarding records.  We discussed behaviour with leaders and checked records. Records of attendance were also checked. We also observed pupils’ behaviour in lessons, at breaktimes and as they moved around the school.  We analysed the school’s plans for improvement and looked at curriculum planning. Checks of the school’s website were made together with publicly available pupil performance information.  We talked with pupils in lessons and during meetings about their work.  We took account of the 32 responses to Ofsted’s survey, Parent View. The school’s own parent survey was also considered.

p.6

6

 We met with a number of staff and considered the 18 responses to Ofsted’s online staff survey.

p.6

Inspection team

Heather Simpson, lead inspector Her Majesty’s Inspector

p.6

Inspection team

Lindsay Nash Ofsted Inspector 11–12 February 2020

p.6

7

regulates and inspects to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.

p.7

7

If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.7

7

You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .

p.7

7

Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .

p.7

7

T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.7

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion