Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · School inspection (EIF)

De La Salle School

Inspected 5 Feb 2020 · published 4 Mar 2020 · URN 104834

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    5 Feb 2020

  • Inspectors verified

    Annette Patterson, Denah Jones, Nell Banfield, Phill Walmsley, Stephen Ruddy

  • Behaviour and attitudes verified

    Good

  • Leadership and management verified

    Good

  • Overall effectiveness verified

    Requires improvement

  • Personal development verified

    Good

  • Quality of education verified

    Requires improvement

  • Postcode verified

    WA10 4QH

  • Name on report verified

    De La Salle School

  • URN verified

    104834

Page 1 of 7
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2017.

  • OverallRequires improvement
  • Behaviour and attitudesGood
  • Leadership and managementGood
  • Personal developmentGood
  • Quality of educationRequires improvement

15% of comparable inspections in the last three years were graded Requires improvement (5,043 inspections).

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

−6Mixedmore positive than 15% of reports of this type graded Requires improvement
OutstandingGoodRIInadequate

Reads more critically than most reports of this type graded Requires improvement.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praiseambitiouspositiveimprovedenjoyhigh-qualityfeel safeimprovingeffective
Criticismconcernsseriouslyweaknessespoorat risktoo oftengapsdo not know

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsWhat needs to improveSafeguardingAbout the inspection positive critical
  • Findings1068w+10
  • Safeguarding97w−52
  • What needs to improve25w—

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
7
Words of findings
1,158
about usual (typical 1215)
Reading level
Plain English
Flesch 61, typical 56
Average sentence
13 words
Next steps
6
typical 5
Hedged sentences
9%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 63%Safeguarding 6%What needs to improve 1%About the inspection 30%

Full report text

Inspection of De La Salle School Mill Brow, Eccleston, St Helens, Merseyside WA10 4QH

p.1

Overall effectiveness Requires improvement

The quality of education Requires improvement Behaviour and attitudes Good Personal development Good Leadership and management Good Previous inspection grade Requires improvement 4–5 February 2020

p.1

What is it like to attend this school?

Leaders at all levels, including governors, are determined to bring about high-quality education for all pupils. The pupils who responded to the online survey and spoke to inspectors are impressed by the positive differences their school leaders are making.

p.2

What is it like to attend this school?

Pupils value their education. They behave well and try hard in class. Pupils move sensibly around school, arrive promptly for lessons and wear their uniforms with pride. Pupils know and think about the school’s Lasallian values.

p.2

What is it like to attend this school?

Pupils say that they feel safe. Pupils treat each other the same, regardless of any differences, such as faith or sexuality. Pupils get along well together. Bullying is rare. It is sorted out quickly if it does happen. Staff, including the headteacher, know the pupils well. They take the time to speak with pupils about any concerns which pupils may have.

p.2

What is it like to attend this school?

The quality of education is improving. Pupils achieve better in their examinations than previously, but still not well enough. This includes disadvantaged pupils and pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND).

p.2

What is it like to attend this school?

In the past, the school did not plan the curriculum well enough. This is now better, but needs to improve further. Pupils do not get to learn what they need to know in some subjects in key stage 3.

p.2

better?

The headteacher has transformed how the school is led. He provides pupils, parents and carers, and staff with opportunities to say what is going well and what needs to improve. Leaders listen to what they are told. They then plan what needs to happen. The school is moving forward in a unified way.

p.2

better?

The quality of education which pupils receive has improved. Some curriculums, such as that for mathematics, are planned well. They set out clearly the essential knowledge that pupils need and the order in which they should learn this. Other curriculums, such as those in English and science, are not as well developed. However, leaders are making the improvements needed. Leaders in these subjects have the know-how to bridge any gaps. They are helping pupils to catch up quickly.

p.2

better?

Leaders are reviewing the school’s key stage 3 curriculum. This curriculum leaves pupils short of important knowledge and cultural capital in some subjects. Pupils will need this knowledge for their future lives. Leaders have well-developed plans in place to overcome these weaknesses.

p.2

better?

Pupils can take courses at key stage 4 which match their needs and interests. Many pupils choose to follow academic courses. Around half of pupils choose courses which meet the requirements of the English Baccalaureate. This includes disadvantaged pupils and pupils with SEND. Art and design-based courses are also 4–5 February 2020

p.2

3

very popular at key stage 4. As soon as pupils have the essential subject knowledge, teachers encourage them to work on their own ambitious projects. These opportunities stretch and excite pupils’ thinking. This means that pupils achieve well in these subjects.

p.3

3

Leaders have tackled disadvantaged pupils’ poor attendance and achievement head- on. This has led to better attendance and outcomes for many disadvantaged pupils. However, some disadvantaged pupils continue to be absent too often. This means that they miss out on important learning.

p.3

3

Leaders take their duty to provide a good education for pupils with SEND seriously. This responsibility includes those pupils who are part of the resourced provision. These pupils enjoy learning and socialising with one another, as well as with other pupils. However, in some subjects, pupils with SEND are not provided with good- enough support. This is especially the case at key stage 3.

p.3

3

Leaders, including governors, make sure that pupils’ personal development is always in the spotlight. Pupils feel interested and involved in what goes on. For example, they like to talk about the school’s work to become an eco-school. They are excited by the record attempt to build the world’s biggest bug hotel. Pupils are prepared well to become involved in and make a positive difference to the world in which we live.

p.3

3

Staff strengthen pupils’ experiences and cultural capital beyond lessons. Many different activities, clubs and responsibilities are provided. A lot of pupils, including disadvantaged pupils and those with SEND, take part in and enjoy these opportunities.

p.3

Safeguarding

The arrangements for safeguarding are effective.

p.3

Safeguarding

Staff take pupils’ safety seriously. They take the time to get to know pupils well. Training is regular, so staff know what to look out for if pupils are at risk. Staff know how to deal with concerns. Leaders ensure that, when concerns are raised, vulnerable pupils and their families receive appropriate support. Pupils know how to keep themselves safe, including when they are online. They know who to talk to or contact if they are worried or unhappy. Leaders are introducing more ways for pupils to report any concerns anonymously.

p.3

(Information for the school and appropriate authority)

 Pupils’ examination results are improving but pupils do not perform as well as they should at the end of key stage 4 in several subjects. This is the case for all pupils, but especially those who are disadvantaged. Leaders must continue to 4–5 February 2020

p.3

4

take action to remove these inequalities and secure pupils’ good achievement across the board.  Leaders have acted this year to improve the quality of the curriculum at key stage 3. This is because the previous plans did not meet pupils’ entitlement to a broad and ambitious curriculum in some subjects. Pupils do not know and remember all that they should. Leaders must implement a key stage 3 curriculum that has at least the breadth and ambition of the national curriculum.  Most pupils attend school regularly. The attendance of disadvantaged pupils has improved markedly since the last inspection. However, a minority of disadvantaged pupils still do not attend often enough. This means they miss out on important learning. Leaders should continue to improve the attendance of these pupils so that they attend regularly.  The quality of support that pupils with SEND receive varies from class to class, especially in key stage 3. As a result, these pupils sometimes struggle to keep up

p.4

4

and gain the knowledge that they need. Leaders should make sure that teachers and other adults provide more consistently the quality of support which these pupils need in key stage 3 so that they achieve well.

p.4

How can I feed back my views?

or to find out what other parents and carers think. We use Ofsted Parent View information when deciding which schools to inspect, when to inspect them and as part of their inspection.

p.4

How can I feed back my views?

The Department for Education has further guidance on how to complain about a school.

p.4

How can I feed back my views?

If you are the school and you are not happy with the inspection or the report, you can complain to Ofsted .

p.4

Further information

You can search for published performance information about the school.

p.4

Further information

In the report, ‘disadvantaged pupils’ refers to those pupils who attract government pupil premium funding: pupils claiming free school meals at any point in the last six years and pupils in care or who left care through adoption or another formal route. 4–5 February 2020

p.4

School details

Inspection number 10121938 Type of school Secondary comprehensive

p.5

School details

Number of pupils on the school roll 1,161

p.5

School details

Appropriate authority The governing body

p.5

School details

Date of previous inspection 20–21 September 2017, under section 5 of the Education Act 2005

p.5

Information about this school

 A small number of pupils attend alternative provision at the Launchpad Centre.  The school is part of the Roman Catholic Archdiocese of Liverpool. The most recent section 48 inspection took place in October 2019.  The school includes a specialist resourced provision for 18 pupils aged 11 to 16 years of age. This provision supports pupils with autism spectrum disorder.

p.5

Information about this inspection

We carried out this inspection under section 5 of the Education Act 2005.

p.5

Information about this inspection

 We held meetings with the headteacher, senior and subject leaders, the school improvement partner, a representative of the local authority and a representative of the Archdiocese of Liverpool.  We reviewed the school’s records of safeguarding checks and referrals to the local authority. We spoke with staff about how they keep pupils safe. We also asked the pupils how they keep themselves safe and what to do if they have concerns. 4–5 February 2020

p.5

6

 We took account of the views of the 508 pupils who responded to Ofsted’s online pupil questionnaire.  We held discussions with staff and considered the responses of 62 staff to Ofsted’s online staff questionnaire.  We considered the views of the 215 parents who completed Parent View, Ofsted’s online survey, including the 129 free-text responses.  In considering the quality of education, we focused on art, English, geography, mathematics and science. We discussed the arrangements for the curriculum and teaching with the headteacher, senior leaders, subject leaders and teachers. We visited lessons and then talked with pupils about what they had learned. We looked at examples of pupils’ work in their exercise books and folders in these subjects.

p.6

Inspection team

Stephen Ruddy, lead inspector Ofsted Inspector

p.6

Inspection team

Annette Patterson Ofsted Inspector 4–5 February 2020

p.6

7

regulates and inspects to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.

p.7

7

If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.7

7

You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .

p.7

7

Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .

p.7

7

T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.7

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion