Schools & FE · School inspection (EIF)
Trowell CofE Primary School
Summary
Heidi Malliff (lead), Graham Boyd
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection date verified
13 Feb 2020
- Inspectors verified
Graham Boyd, Heidi Malliff
- Behaviour and attitudes verified
Good
- Early years verified
Good
- Leadership and management verified
Good
- Overall effectiveness verified
Good
- Personal development verified
Good
- Quality of education verified
Good
- Postcode verified
NG9 3QD
- Name on report verified
Trowell CofE Primary School
- URN verified
122770
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Grade profile
Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2017.
- OverallGood
- Behaviour and attitudesGood
- Early yearsGood
- Leadership and managementGood
- Personal developmentGood
- Quality of educationGood
66% of comparable inspections in the last three years were graded Good (5,043 inspections).
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
Reads more critically than most reports of this type graded Good.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Leadership & governance11
“Leaders are beginning to design a more ambitious physical education (PE) curriculum.” p.2
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 7
- Words of findings
- 1,042
- about usual (typical 1098)
- Reading level
- Plain English
- Flesch 62, typical 55
- Average sentence
- 13 words
- Next steps
- 2
- typical 4
- Hedged sentences
- 15%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Inspection of Trowell CofE Primary School Derbyshire Avenue, Trowell, Nottingham, Nottinghamshire NG9 3QD
p.1
Overall effectiveness Good
The quality of education Good Behaviour and attitudes Good Personal development Good Leadership and management Good Early years provision Good Previous inspection grade Requires improvement 12–13 February 2020
p.1
What is it like to attend this school?
The school’s ‘big four’ values: love others, aim high, do the right thing and believe you can do it, form the backbone of the school. These values shine through everything. Pupils told us they are proud of their school and enjoy coming each day. They described their school as ‘fun, amazing and life changing’. They said it is a place where you ‘learn a lot and make friends’.
p.2
What is it like to attend this school?
Pupils behave well in a calm, purposeful and inclusive learning environment. Everyone is welcome and well looked after. The school culture is built on respect. Pupils understand what bullying is. They said it rarely happens. Pupils are confident that they can talk to staff if something is worrying them.
p.2
What is it like to attend this school?
Pupils try hard in their lessons and are keen to learn. They study the full range of subjects. Most pupils achieve well. However, in some subjects, some pupils are not always helped as well as they could be.
p.2
What is it like to attend this school?
Pupils enjoy the range of clubs they can join, such as gymnastics, archery and the newspaper club. They learn to be responsible through the various roles they take on.
p.2
better?
Leaders and staff are working hard to review and improve the school’s curriculum. They have identified the important skills and knowledge they wish pupils to learn. Leaders have made sure that most subjects are planned and sequenced well from Year 1 to Year 6. However, not all subjects have been linked with learning in the early years.
p.2
better?
The teaching of mathematics and science is particularly strong throughout the school. In these subjects, teachers skilfully plan lessons which enable pupils to build on what they already know to learn new concepts. As a result, pupils are beginning to know more and remember more. Leaders are beginning to design a more ambitious physical education (PE) curriculum. This is in the early stages of development.
p.2
better?
Leaders and staff have given reading a high priority. Books are everywhere. Pupils are exposed to a variety of authors and poets throughout their time in school. Parents are invited into school to read with their children. Workshops are provided to demonstrate to parents how phonics is taught.
p.2
better?
Leaders have made sure that phonics is taught systematically. Pupils are given books which match their phonics knowledge. In the early years, teachers quickly identify when a pupil falls behind. However, in Years 1 and 2, expectations are less clear. As a result, teachers do not always step in quickly enough to help pupils catch up. The teaching of phonics works well for the vast majority of pupils. Work in pupils’ books shows that most 12–13 February 2020
p.2
3
pupils use phonics to support them in their writing. However, due to some inconsistencies in teaching, a small number of pupils continue to struggle in both reading and writing.
p.3
3
Pupils benefit from residential trips and visits to places such as the National Holocaust Centre, the National Space Centre and the Nottingham Islam Information Centre. Visitors also come into school to help bring learning to life. A re-enactment of the Great Fire of London was enjoyed by the Year 2 pupils.
p.3
3
Pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND) study all subjects. They are supported well in mathematics and PE. In some other subjects, however, teachers do not always adapt the curriculum to meet the needs of all pupils. This hinders progress for some pupils with SEND.
p.3
3
Children in the early years follow a well-planned curriculum based on their needs and interests. Children were keen to tell us about what they were learning. They show enjoyment and perseverance in completing activities designed to spark their curiosity. Adults encourage children to develop good vocabulary through meaningful conversations. For example, children were engrossed in their investigation of ‘gloop’, and one stated, ‘When you add pressure on it, it hardens.’ Teachers keep records of children’s learning. However, occasionally, teachers’ comments focus on a description of what happened rather than what children learned.
p.3
Safeguarding
The arrangements for safeguarding are effective.
p.3
Safeguarding
Leaders make sure that staff have regular safeguarding training. Staff know what to do if they have a concern. Leaders respond appropriately to the information they receive from staff. However, the process of recording some concerns needs a little tightening.
p.3
Safeguarding
Pupils said that they feel safe in school and the vast majority of parents agree. Pupils said that they learn how to keep themselves safe both inside and outside school. They learn how to stay safe when using the internet. Pupils learn about how to live physically and mentally healthy lifestyles.
p.3
(Information for the school and appropriate authority)
Leaders have not yet completed the work to review the curriculum. Some subjects are less well developed and are not coherently sequenced so that pupils can build on prior knowledge and skills from the early years throughout key stages 1 and 2. However, it is clear from the actions that leaders have already taken that they are in the process of bringing this about. For this reason, the transition arrangement has been applied in this case. Leaders need to ensure that the work to review the curriculum is completed within the next two years. 12–13 February 2020
p.3
4
Teachers do not use assessment consistently to meet the needs of all pupils. Sometimes, staff do not adapt the curriculum appropriately for pupils with SEND. They do not ensure that all pupils who are falling behind in phonics catch up quickly. Leaders need to ensure that assessment is used accurately to identify pupils’ needs quickly and that the curriculum is adapted accordingly.
p.4
How can I feed back my views?
or to find out what other parents and carers think. We use Ofsted Parent View information when deciding which schools to inspect, when to inspect them and as part of their inspection.
p.4
How can I feed back my views?
The Department for Education has further guidance on how to complain about a school.
p.4
How can I feed back my views?
If you are the school and you are not happy with the inspection or the report, you can complain to Ofsted .
p.4
Further information
You can search for published performance information about the school.
p.4
Further information
In the report, ‘disadvantaged pupils’ refers to those pupils who attract government pupil premium funding: pupils claiming free school meals at any point in the last six years and pupils in care or who left care through adoption or another formal route. 12–13 February 2020
p.4
School details
Local authority Nottinghamshire County Council
p.5
School details
Inspection number 10121209 School category Maintained
p.5
School details
Appropriate authority The governing body
p.5
School details
Date of previous inspection 11 ─ 12 October 2017
p.5
Information about this school
Since the previous inspection, the deputy headteacher and three new teachers have been appointed.
p.5
Information about this inspection
We carried out this inspection under section 5 of the Education Act 2005.
p.5
Information about this inspection
We spoke with senior leaders, including the headteacher and the deputy headteacher. We considered in detail the quality of reading, mathematics, science and PE throughout the school. We met with subject leaders, teachers and pupils. We visited lessons across the school and looked at pupils’ work. We looked at the school’s single central record of recruitment checks, the school’s safeguarding policy and staff training records. We spoke with leaders and staff and checked the records that the school keeps. The views of pupils, parents and staff were considered. We spoke with members of the governing body and representatives from the local authority and the diocese. 12–13 February 2020
p.5
Inspection team
Heidi Malliff, lead inspector Ofsted Inspector
p.6
Inspection team
Graham Boyd Ofsted Inspector 12–13 February 2020
p.6
7
regulates and inspects to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.
p.7
7
If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .
p.7
7
You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .
p.7
7
Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .
p.7
7
T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted
p.7
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion