Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · School inspection (EIF)

Edlesborough School

Inspected 9 Jan 2020 · URN 110225

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

Inadequate

Sarah Hubbard (lead), Hilary Goddard

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    9 Jan 2020

  • Inspectors verified

    Hilary Goddard, Sarah Hubbard

  • Behaviour and attitudes verified

    Inadequate

  • Early years verified

    Good

  • Leadership and management verified

    Inadequate

  • Overall effectiveness verified

    Inadequate

  • Personal development verified

    Requires improvement

  • Quality of education verified

    Inadequate

  • Postcode verified

    LU6 2HS

  • Name on report verified

    Edlesborough School

  • URN verified

    110225

Page 1 of 8
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2016.

  • OverallInadequate
  • Behaviour and attitudesInadequate
  • Early yearsGood
  • Leadership and managementInadequate
  • Personal developmentRequires improvement
  • Quality of educationInadequate

3% of comparable inspections in the last three years were graded Inadequate (5,043 inspections).

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+5Mostly positivemore positive than 87% of reports of this type graded Inadequate
OutstandingGoodRIInadequate

Reads more warmly than most reports of this type graded Inadequate.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praiseeffectiveinspirationaleffectivelypositivelyhigh expectationswell-plannedhigh-qualityimproved
Criticismweaknessesconcernsweaktoo lowlacknot securetoo oftendisruption

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsSafeguardingAbout the inspection positive critical
  • Findings1313w+4
  • Safeguarding105w+17

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
8
Words of findings
1,381
about usual (typical 1552)
Reading level
Fairly hard
Flesch 53, typical 53
Average sentence
14 words
Next steps
6
typical 6
Hedged sentences
13%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 62%Safeguarding 5%About the inspection 33%

Full report text

Inspection of Edlesborough School High Street, Edlesborough, Dunstable, Bedfordshire LU6 2HS

p.1

Overall effectiveness Inadequate

The quality of education Inadequate Behaviour and attitudes Inadequate Personal development Requires improvement Leadership and management Inadequate Early years provision Good Previous inspection grade Good 8–9 January 2020

p.1

What is it like to attend this school?

Pupils’ experiences of school are very mixed. Leaders’ expectations of what pupils can achieve are too low. Pupils do not have a good grounding in the subjects they will go on to study at secondary school. However, they like the improved environment, including inspirational quotes on the walls.

p.2

What is it like to attend this school?

Sometimes, when pupils need to concentrate in class, they cannot do so because it is too noisy. In some classes, a small minority of pupils take up a lot of their teachers’ time, leaving others feeling left out. Pupils and staff sometimes show their feelings of frustration, resulting in raised voices.

p.2

What is it like to attend this school?

Pupils are keen to adhere to the school’s new values: ‘inquisitive, inclusive, inspired’. They can explain what these words mean but are less clear about how these ideas should guide their own behaviour. There are some occasions when pupils do not treat each other kindly, including through their words and actions.

p.2

What is it like to attend this school?

Pupils feel safe at school. Some parents commented positively on free-text within Parent View about how well staff care for their children. However, a number expressed concerns that pupils are not more stimulated by their learning.

p.2

better?

Leaders’ actions have not improved the school. Many of their approaches need further refinement because leaders have underestimated pupils’ potential. In addition, leaders lack the capacity to make sure that changes are effective. More positively, they have made sure staffing is more stable after a period of turbulence.

p.2

better?

The curriculum is too narrow and has key weaknesses. Pupils do not have enough opportunities to study art, music, design technology and modern foreign languages. Teachers set tasks that do not support pupils’ learning effectively, including in reading and writing. Pupils are not able to apply their prior learning when teachers introduce new, more demanding topics. For example, in history pupils do not master concepts of empire and state. Therefore, they do not have firm foundations upon which to learn the causes of the Second World War in Year 6.

p.2

better?

Leaders and teachers have not ensured that all pupils learn to read well. They do not make sure that pupils who did not reach the expected standard in the Year 1 phonics screening check catch up. They fall further behind because their reading books are not matched to their phonic capabilities. Some recent improvements in phonics teaching are fragile. Teachers’ phonic knowledge is not secure. On occasion, teachers introduce misconceptions. In key stage 2, pupils do not read a wide enough variety of whole, rich texts. Writing tasks do not enable pupils to gain solid foundations in a range of styles, forms and genres. Pupils do not have the chance to embed their knowledge of spelling, punctuation and grammar. 8–9 January 2020

p.2

3

Leaders have not ensured that pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND) receive the support they need. Teaching staff do not work well enough with pupils who have a range of different needs, including behaviour needs. Assistants sometimes occupy these pupils rather than helping them to learn.

p.3

3

Teachers do not make sure that pupils behave well. Pupils, especially in key stage 2, too often cannot concentrate on their learning. In some classes, teachers do not manage the behaviour of pupils with additional needs well. Other pupils’ learning can be disrupted because of this. Leaders do not have an accurate, up-to-date picture of behaviour in the school. They do not ensure that grievances between pupils are fully resolved, leading to some incidents of bullying.

p.3

3

Some aspects of personal development are effective. Leaders now have better oversight of which extra-curricular clubs pupils attend. Some topics in the personal development curriculum are less well developed than others. Pupils’ spiritual development is not as strong as other elements of social, moral, spiritual and cultural learning. This is because of weaknesses in the religious education curriculum.

p.3

3

Early years is better than other aspects of the school. The Reception and Nursery leaders share good practice. They ensure that children get a good grounding in number and letters. Children deepen their understanding of these concepts through well-planned play activities. They develop good routines in early years that prepare them well for key stage 1.

p.3

3

Governors are rightly focused on pupils’ education and on improving relationships with stakeholders. They have surveyed stakeholders about how they rate the school. Governors have not ensured that leaders follow up promptly on weaknesses identified in these surveys. They have also not challenged leaders effectively about some key aspects of the school, such as the curriculum.

p.3

Safeguarding

The arrangements for safeguarding are effective. The designated safeguarding lead keeps a close eye on the concerns that staff raise about pupils. She ensures that they are recorded in detail and acted upon appropriately. The designated lead liaises closely with the local authority after making referrals. She carefully checks that the authority’s follow-up actions are appropriate and timely.

p.3

Safeguarding

The designated lead has introduced effective approaches for keeping staff up to date about any issues pupils have regarding their well-being, self-esteem and mental health. She works closely with specially trained staff to make sure pupils with these issues receive the support they need. 8–9 January 2020

p.3

(Information for the school and appropriate authority)

 Leaders have not ensured that there is a culture of high expectations across the school. In addition, they do not have the capacity to make the necessary improvements. Governors and senior leaders should ensure that all staff raise their expectations of pupils. They should also make sure that leaders have the time and expertise to improve the school, including by further developing the curriculum. Leaders need to evaluate the impact of any new approaches carefully and make further changes if required. Governors should hold leaders to account for how effectively and promptly they implement changes.  Leaders and teachers need to ensure that improving reading is placed front and centre. Pupils who cannot yet read fluently should be provided with high-quality support so that they quickly catch up. All pupils who are learning how to decode should have books that teachers select for them, which closely match their phonic

p.4

(Information for the school and appropriate authority)

capabilities. Teachers delivering phonics need more training.  Leaders need to develop teachers’ subject knowledge. They should ensure that teachers have a firm grasp of the key concepts, knowledge and skills in the subjects they teach. Leaders and teachers need to make sure that these elements are effectively sequenced. They should also ensure that pupils access a broader range of subjects, especially, but not only, creative subjects.  The local authority has commissioned support for the school to develop writing. Leaders have implemented recommendations made by external experts. However, recommendations have not had the intended impact and writing remains weak. Leaders and teachers need to make sure that pupils’ knowledge of spelling, punctuation and grammar is embedded. Writing tasks need to be better sequenced so pupils can write confidently in a range of forms, genres and styles.  Leaders need to track pupils’ behaviour so that they have accurate and up-to-date

p.4

(Information for the school and appropriate authority)

information about low-level disruption and incidents of bullying. They should analyse this information to target improvements, including better approaches to dealing with disputes between pupils.  Teachers and teaching assistants need to develop their expertise in supporting pupils with SEND, especially those with behavioural needs, so these pupils can access learning better.  Leaders have planned improvements to the personal development programme. These need to be implemented so that pupils develop deeper knowledge and understanding of complex issues, for example those relating to social media and e-safety. They should also make sure that meaningful spiritual education is threaded through the curriculum.  The school should not appoint NQTs. 8–9 January 2020

p.4

How can I feed back my views?

to find out what other parents and carers think. We use Ofsted Parent View information when deciding which schools to inspect, when to inspect them and as part of their inspection.

p.5

How can I feed back my views?

The Department for Education has further guidance on how to complain about a school.

p.5

How can I feed back my views?

If you are the school and you are not happy with the inspection or the report, you can complain to Ofsted .

p.5

Further information

You can search for published performance information about the school.

p.5

Further information

In the report, ‘disadvantaged pupils’ refers to those pupils who attract government pupil premium funding: pupils claiming free school meals at any point in the last six years and pupils in care or who left care through adoption or another formal route. 8–9 January 2020

p.5

School details

Inspection number 10122225 Type of school Primary

p.6

School details

Appropriate authority The governing body

p.6

School details

Chair of governing body Mr Warren Newbert

p.6

School details

Date of previous inspection 21 June 2016

p.6

Information about this school

 Since the last inspection, there have been significant changes to the staff, with a high proportion of staff leaving and joining the school. A new headteacher joined the school in September 2018. A new deputy headteacher joined in September 2019. The phonics lead is also the English lead, key stage 1 lead and Reception lead. She took on the subject leader roles in September 2019.  The proportion of disadvantaged pupils is well below national average and in several classes, there are no disadvantaged pupils.  The school has Nursery classes which cater for children aged two and over. Nursery classes are known as the ‘pre-school’. They provide part-time care in either the morning or afternoon, with a small number of children attending both sessions.

p.6

Information about this inspection

We carried out this inspection under section 5 of the Education Act 2005.

p.6

Information about this inspection

In accordance with section 44(1) of the Education Act 2005, Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector is of the opinion that this school requires special measures because it is failing to give its pupils an acceptable standard of education and the persons 8–9 January 2020

p.6

7

responsible for leading, managing or governing the school are not demonstrating the capacity to secure the necessary improvement in the school.

p.7

7

 We met with the headteacher and deputy headteacher, members of the governing body, including the chair of the governing body, and the special educational needs coordinator. We met a range of staff individually and in groups. We also met with a group of pupils on the second day of the inspection. We held a telephone call with a representative from the local authority who has been supporting the school and scrutinised records of visits from the local authority.  We observed pupils at play and spoke with them informally.  As part of our inspection of safeguarding, we met with the designated lead twice. On one occasion, she was accompanied by her deputy. We also reviewed records and documents relating to safeguarding, including checks made when staff are appointed.  We considered 97 responses to the Parent View survey and 53 comments made in the free-text boxes on Parent View. We also reviewed 25 replies to the staff

p.7

7

questionnaire and 111 responses made to the pupil survey.  We undertook deep dives in reading, writing, history and science. We visited classes, met with leaders, including subject leaders, and met separately with pupils and class teachers. We looked at pupils’ work and heard pupils read. In addition, we held a meeting with leaders to discuss their curriculum development plans and review a wider sample of books.  As part of the inspection of early years, we met with Reception and Nursery leaders, visited Reception and Nursery settings and reviewed records of children’s development and learning.

p.7

Inspection team

Sarah Hubbard, lead inspector Her Majesty’s Inspector

p.7

Inspection team

Hilary Goddard Ofsted Inspector 8–9 January 2020

p.7

8

regulates and inspects to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.

p.8

8

If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.8

8

You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .

p.8

8

Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .

p.8

8

T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.8

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion