Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · School inspection (EIF)

Whitley Academy

Inspected 9 Jan 2020 · published 3 Mar 2020 · URN 136840

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    9 Jan 2020

  • Inspectors verified

    Alun Williams, Clare Considine, Gwen Onyon, Richard Gill

  • Behaviour and attitudes verified

    Inadequate

  • Leadership and management verified

    Inadequate

  • Overall effectiveness verified

    Inadequate

  • Personal development verified

    Requires improvement

  • Quality of education verified

    Inadequate

  • Postcode verified

    CV3 4BD

  • Name on report verified

    Whitley Academy

  • URN verified

    136840

Page 1 of 8
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2019.

  • OverallInadequate
  • Behaviour and attitudesInadequate
  • Leadership and managementInadequate
  • Personal developmentRequires improvement
  • Quality of educationInadequate

3% of comparable inspections in the last three years were graded Inadequate (5,043 inspections).

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

−45Criticalmore positive than 25% of reports of this type graded Inadequate
OutstandingGoodRIInadequate

In line with other reports of this type graded Inadequate.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praisevery higheffectivewell ledhigh-qualitypositivesafepoliteeffectively
Criticismpoorweaknessesconcernconcernstoo manydisruptiondecliningweak

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsSafeguardingAbout the inspection positive critical
  • Findings1302w−43
  • Safeguarding100w−43

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
8
Words of findings
1,368
about usual (typical 1552)
Reading level
Fairly hard
Flesch 56, typical 53
Average sentence
13 words
Next steps
6
typical 6
Hedged sentences
18%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 66%Safeguarding 5%About the inspection 29%

Full report text

Inspection of Whitley Academy Abbey Road, Whitley, Coventry, West Midlands CV3 4BD

p.1

Overall effectiveness Inadequate

The quality of education Inadequate Behaviour and attitudes Inadequate Personal development Requires improvement Leadership and management Inadequate Sixth-form provision Good Previous inspection grade Requires improvement 8–9 January 2020

p.1

What is it like to attend this school?

This school does not give pupils an acceptable education. Too many pupils behave inappropriately in lessons and at other times of the day. Attendance is also poor. A substantial minority of pupils regularly arrive at lessons very late.

p.2

What is it like to attend this school?

There has been a very high turnover of teachers recently. Many teachers are inexperienced or new to the school. This poses problems in supporting new staff and ensuring consistency of practice. The quality of teaching varies considerably.

p.2

What is it like to attend this school?

Pupils’ views of the school are very mixed. Some are positive, but many are not. Pupils are safe in school despite the poor behaviour of some. Bullying is not common, and it is mostly dealt with appropriately. However, a sizeable minority of pupils and parents do not have confidence in staff to tackle bullying or other problems.

p.2

What is it like to attend this school?

Senior leaders are honest, open and show integrity. They understand the school’s weaknesses and are determined to see it improve. They have recently sought help from the local authority. Most senior leaders teach many lessons to cover gaps in the timetable. As a result, they do not have enough time to carry out their leadership responsibilities.

p.2

What is it like to attend this school?

At the time of inspection, the school had no effective governance in place.

p.2

better?

Recent months have been very difficult for the school and its senior leaders. Several staff have left the school and others have been absent. Most of the school’s governors resigned in December 2019. Senior leaders have taken on additional responsibilities and several now teach for a high proportion of the week. Senior leaders do not have the time they need to carry out their responsibilities adequately. The situation is not sustainable.

p.2

better?

Senior leaders have requested support from the local authority. The local authority has very recently put in place some support for the school. Senior leaders appreciate this and there are some very early signs that it is beginning to help.

p.2

better?

The learning of pupils is planned and organised well in most subjects. Clear work schemes set out what pupils should learn and when they should learn it. When taught by established teachers, pupils who attend school regularly learn well. This is not the experience of many pupils. The school has many new and inexperienced teachers. Leaders and established staff do their best to support them, but do not have the time to do so adequately. Consequently, teaching varies in quality and does not help pupils to learn as well as it should. Results in GCSE examinations have been very weak in most subjects over recent years. 8–9 January 2020

p.2

3

The behaviour of some pupils is a serious concern. Too many lessons are affected by low-level or significant disruption. Lunchtimes and breaktimes are far from calm. Even when staff are present, some pupils do not behave well. Too many pupils are late to school and slow to move from one lesson to the next. During lessons, there are usually several pupils wandering around the school’s corridors. The attendance of a sizeable minority of pupils is low and declining. The attendance of pupils currently in Year 11 is a particular concern.

p.3

3

The majority of pupils behave well throughout the day. They attend school regularly and punctually. They are polite and courteous. They are desperate to see the school improve.

p.3

3

Teaching assistants give effective support in lessons for pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND). Leaders ensure that teachers have accurate information about pupils’ needs. Some teachers use this information well when planning learning, but others do not. The experience of pupils with SEND in lessons therefore varies in quality.

p.3

3

The school provides many opportunities that contribute well to pupils’ personal development. These include sports clubs, annual musical productions, a school council, the Duke of Edinburgh’s Award scheme and off-site visits. Many pupils take advantage of these. All pupils in Year 7 attend enrichment clubs every Monday afternoon. Leaders recognise that the range and take-up of opportunities need to be better planned and checked to ensure that no pupils miss out.

p.3

3

The school’s careers programme is well established, although repeated changes to its leadership have impaired its development. The programme helps pupils make informed choices about what they will do when they leave the school. Almost all pupils and students who leave the school at the end of Year 11 or Year 13 move on to appropriate education or training.

p.3

3

The sixth form provides students with a good quality of education. The weaknesses that exist elsewhere in the school are not evident in the sixth form. This area is well led. Students choose from a good range of subjects. Their learning is planned well and they achieve results that are comparable to students nationally with similar starting points. Students conduct themselves well. They attend regularly and behave well. They provide good role models for younger pupils.

p.3

Safeguarding

The arrangements for safeguarding are effective.

p.3

Safeguarding

The school’s safeguarding policies and procedures are fit for purpose. Staff have been trained appropriately. They pass on to leaders any concerns they have about pupils. Leaders deal with these concerns correctly, involving outside agencies when appropriate. 8–9 January 2020

p.3

4

Some pupils who spoke with us and some parents who completed Parent View said that pupils do not feel safe in school. They expressed other concerns, most notably about behaviour. We concluded that pupils and parents are right to be concerned about behaviour. However, we also concluded that pupils are safe in the school.

p.4

(Information for the school and appropriate authority)

 Most of the school’s governors resigned in December 2019. Since that time, there has been no effective governance of the school. At the time of the inspection, plans were in hand to strengthen the governing body with new, highly experienced, individuals. The trust’s members should ensure that effective governance arrangements are in place.  Most senior leaders teach a considerable number of lessons each week. Several have taken on additional responsibilities to cover for absent colleagues. This means that most senior leaders do not have the time to carry out their responsibilities as well as they should. The impact of this lack of capacity is evident in many areas of school life, including providing support for new staff and tackling issues with behaviour and attendance. Governors should ensure that senior leaders have sufficient time and support to be able to carry out their responsibilities effectively.

p.4

(Information for the school and appropriate authority)

 The school has suffered from a very high turnover of teachers in recent times. It has also struggled to recruit high-quality teachers in several subjects, including mathematics and science. At the time of inspection, the school had vacancies for two teachers of English. This staffing turbulence has contributed to the weaknesses in teaching and pupils’ behaviour. Leaders and governors should ensure that teacher turnover is reduced and that new teachers are supported well, so that there is greater consistency and quality of practice across the school.  A minority of pupils do not behave as they should. Low-level disruption is evident in too many lessons. Some lessons are disrupted significantly. Behaviour at breaktime, lunchtime and between lessons is poor. Some pupils pay little heed to members of staff who challenge their poor behaviour. Leaders should ensure that pupils’ behaviour improves considerably, both in lessons and at other times of the

p.4

(Information for the school and appropriate authority)

day.  Attendance is low and declining. The attendance of some groups of pupils, for example those in Year 11, is a significant concern. Similarly, punctuality to school and to lessons is poor. Leaders should ensure that pupils’ attendance and punctuality improve considerably.

p.4

How can I feed back my views?

or to find out what other parents and carers think. We use Ofsted Parent View information when deciding which schools to inspect, when to inspect them and as part of their inspection. 8–9 January 2020

p.4

5

The Department for Education has further guidance on how to complain about a school.

p.5

5

If you are the school and you are not happy with the inspection or the report, you can complain to Ofsted .

p.5

Further information

You can search for published performance information about the school.

p.5

Further information

In the report, ‘disadvantaged pupils’ refers to those pupils who attract government pupil premium funding: pupils claiming free school meals at any point in the last six years and pupils in care or who left care through adoption or another formal route. 8–9 January 2020

p.5

School details

Inspection number 10134083 Type of school Secondary comprehensive

p.6

sixth form

Date of previous inspection 6–7 March 2019, under section 5 of the Education Act 2005

p.6

Information about this school

 The school has not undergone any significant change since the last inspection.  At the time of this inspection, the principal was absent from the school. The governing body had not met since July 2019. Most of the school’s governors resigned in December 2019. There is currently an acting chair of governors.  Approximately 10 pupils study for part of the week, away from the school, at one of the following alternative providers: Creative Optimistic Visions, Central Building and Welding Academy, Nulogic Training, Positive Youth Foundation, Educ8, Heart of England Training and Coventry College.

p.6

Information about this inspection

We carried out this inspection under section 8 of the Education Act 2005. We deemed the inspection a section 5 inspection under the same Act. 8–9 January 2020

p.6

7

In accordance with section 44(1) of the Education Act 2005, Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector is of the opinion that this school requires special measures because it is failing to give its pupils an acceptable standard of education and the persons responsible for leading, managing or governing the school are not demonstrating the capacity to secure the necessary improvement in the school.

p.7

7

 We met with the acting principal, the two vice principals, one of whom is the designated safeguarding lead, and the three assistant vice principals. The lead inspector met with a representative of the local authority and the school’s acting chair of governors.  We talked to many pupils about their learning and their attitudes to, and opinions about, school. We observed pupils at breaktime and lunchtime and as they moved around the school. We visited several tutor periods.  We scrutinised several documents, including those relating to safeguarding and child protection. We checked that the single central record contained all required information.  We took account of parents’ views by considering the 77 responses to Ofsted’s Parent View questionnaire as well as questionnaires completed by parents at recent parents’ evenings.  As part of this inspection, we paid particular attention to English, mathematics,

p.7

7

science and history. In these subjects, we met with curriculum leaders, visited lessons, scrutinised pupils’ work and spoke with teachers and pupils.

p.7

Inspection team

Alun Williams, lead inspector Her Majesty’s Inspector

p.7

Inspection team

Clare Considine Ofsted Inspector 8–9 January 2020

p.7

8

regulates and inspects to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.

p.8

8

If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.8

8

You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .

p.8

8

Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .

p.8

8

T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.8

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion