Schools & FE · School inspection (EIF)
Cliff Lane Primary School
Summary
John Mitcheson (lead), Angela Savill, Rachel Welch
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection date verified
30 Jan 2020
- Inspectors verified
Angela Savill, John Mitcheson, Rachel Welch
- Behaviour and attitudes verified
Good
- Early years verified
Requires improvement
- Leadership and management verified
Good
- Overall effectiveness verified
Requires improvement
- Personal development verified
Good
- Quality of education verified
Requires improvement
- Postcode verified
IP3 0PJ
- Name on report verified
Cliff Lane Primary School
- URN verified
141591
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Grade profile
Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2017.
- OverallRequires improvement
- Behaviour and attitudesGood
- Early yearsRequires improvement
- Leadership and managementGood
- Personal developmentGood
- Quality of educationRequires improvement
15% of comparable inspections in the last three years were graded Requires improvement (5,043 inspections).
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type graded Requires improvement.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Leaders should provide staff with further training in how to use this planning so that learning is 29–30 January 2020 p.3
- They should provide subject leaders and leaders of the early years with further training in how to monitor rigorously the quality of education, and hold them fully accountable for the achievement of children and pupils. p.4
- Leaders should take prompt action to ensure that these pupils attend school more often than they currently do. p.4
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Reading & phonics8
“Results in reading, writing and mathematics were too low in 2019.” p.2
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 7
- Words of findings
- 1,074
- about usual (typical 1215)
- Reading level
- Plain English
- Flesch 63, typical 56
- Average sentence
- 14 words
- Next steps
- 3
- typical 5
- Hedged sentences
- 7%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Inspection of Cliff Lane Primary School Cliff Lane, Ipswich, Suffolk IP3 0PJ
p.1
Overall effectiveness Requires improvement
The quality of education Requires improvement Behaviour and attitudes Good Personal development Good Leadership and management Good Early years provision Requires improvement Previous inspection grade Requires improvement 29–30 January 2020
p.1
What is it like to attend this school?
Most pupils behave well. School is a safe, friendly place to be. They feel free from bullying. Pupils are shown how to keep safe. They know what to do if they feel unhappy. Pupils and parents value the care and support provided. Staff are caring and supportive. Classrooms and corridors include bright displays of pupils’ work. Pupils enjoy exciting activities and off-site visits that help them learn. This adds to their overall enjoyment of school. Most pupils attend regularly, but a few do not turn up often enough.
p.2
What is it like to attend this school?
Until this year, pupils have not done well enough. Results in reading, writing and mathematics were too low in 2019. Much of the school’s work has been weak. In the Early Years, children have not got off to a good start. Older pupils have not learned well and have left Year 6 without the skills needed for secondary school.
p.2
What is it like to attend this school?
New leaders have quickly found out what needs doing and have put in place plans to improve the school. The new interim headteacher is doing a good job and she has the full support of staff. She needs more time to show that what she is getting staff to do will make the school a better place to be for all pupils.
p.2
better?
Plans are in place to let staff know what to teach, but they have not been shown how to use them properly. Leaders have not checked that staff use these plans to help pupils learn. They have not found out if pupils are learning well enough in all of their subjects.
p.2
better?
In recent years, pupils have not made enough progress in reading, writing and mathematics. Overall results at the end of key stage 2 have remained well below average. Pupils have not built on their achievements at the end of key stage 1. There are significant gaps in pupils’ knowledge, skills and understanding, particularly in years 5 and 6.
p.2
better?
Joining a different academy trust and appointing new leaders have added good capacity to improve. Teachers are now expected to think more carefully about what they want pupils to learn. New approaches to checking pupils’ understanding are leading to better progress in lessons.
p.2
better?
Reading has not been taught effectively. Pupils gain a good grounding in phonics but have not built on this in key stage 2. To improve this, experts from the trust and other schools are helping to sharpen the teaching of reading, broaden pupils’ vocabulary and encourage them to read more often.
p.2
better?
In mathematics, recent staff training has improved teaching so that pupils acquire new learning in the right order and practise mathematical skills. Teachers check how well pupils are progressing, and they spot those pupils who need more help. 29–30 January 2020
p.2
3
Additional support sessions are provided, but this leads to some pupils missing out on learning in subjects taught in the afternoons.
p.3
3
Improvement plans recognise that similar improvements are needed in science, geography, history and physical education (PE) because planning is not used effectively. Leaders’ monitoring has not held staff accountable for ensuring that their teaching leads to good progress made by pupils.
p.3
3
Pupils’ conduct around school is good. In lessons, most pupils are attentive and respectful. They know the procedures used to manage poor behaviour and feel that, generally, they work well. Attendance has improved and is close to the national average. A few pupils are persistently absent from school.
p.3
3
Pupils’ personal development is good. Pupils proudly record house points awarded for good work. Their achievements are celebrated. School councillors ensure that pupils’ views are listened to and acted on. In assemblies, pupils sing together, reflect and consider the views of others. Regular off-site visits and an annual residential experience enrich pupils’ wider understanding.
p.3
3
In the early years, results show that not all children do as well as they could and that they are not fully prepared for key stage 1. To tackle these weaknesses, the trust has provided expert guidance and support and has appointed new staff to build capacity to make improvements. Suitable activities are planned to enable children to engage in learning and play indoors and outside, using a range of equipment. Phonics is taught systematically. Staff keep records of children’s early reading skills and take effective action to help those in need of extra support to catch up.
p.3
Safeguarding
The arrangements for safeguarding are effective.
p.3
Safeguarding
There is a strong culture of safeguarding in the school. Records of the checks made when appointing new staff are complete and well maintained. A knowledgeable and committed team of leaders responsible for safeguarding oversee child protection arrangements effectively. Records of the actions taken to protect pupils from harm are recorded systematically. Working relations with families and local support agencies are firmly established. Access to school buildings and grounds are carefully controlled.
p.3
(Information for the school and appropriate authority)
Teachers do not make effective use of the school’s curriculum plans. Pupils do not build on their prior learning or gain a good range of knowledge and skills in a wide range of subjects. Leaders have not made regular checks to ensure that learning in lessons is well-planned and leads to pupils’ good progress. Leaders should provide staff with further training in how to use this planning so that learning is 29–30 January 2020
p.3
4
well sequenced and suitably matched to pupils ages and abilities. They should provide subject leaders and leaders of the early years with further training in how to monitor rigorously the quality of education, and hold them fully accountable for the achievement of children and pupils. A small minority of pupils are persistently absent from school. Leaders should take prompt action to ensure that these pupils attend school more often than they currently do.
p.4
How can I feed back my views?
to find out what other parents and carers think. We use Ofsted Parent View information when deciding which schools to inspect, when to inspect them and as part of their inspection.
p.4
How can I feed back my views?
The Department for Education has further guidance on how to complain about a school.
p.4
How can I feed back my views?
If you are the school and you are not happy with the inspection or the report, you can complain to Ofsted .
p.4
Further information
You can search for published performance information about the school.
p.4
Further information
In the report, ‘disadvantaged pupils’ refers to those pupils who attract government pupil premium funding: pupils claiming free school meals at any point in the last six years and pupils in care or who left care through adoption or another formal route. 29–30 January 2020
p.4
School details
Inspection number 10121376 Type of school Primary
p.5
School details
Chair of trust Professor J H West-Burnham
p.5
School details
Date of previous inspection 31 October–1 November 2017
p.5
Information about this school
The school has undergone significant change since the previous inspection. Following a period of instability and slow progress, the school changed sponsor and joined the Asset Education Academy Trust in March 2019. The substantive headteacher is currently absent from school. Interim arrangements are in place to lead the school. A senior leader within the academy trust is the current acting headteacher. A new chair of the governing body took up her role in 2018. The school is larger than average. The number of pupils on roll has fallen since the previous inspection. The school does not use alternative provision.
p.5
Information about this inspection
We carried out this inspection under section 5 of the Education Act 2005. 29–30 January 2020
p.5
6
We visited lessons to observe pupils at work. We also visited lessons to observe the support provided for pupils with SEND, disadvantaged pupils and those who speak English as an additional language. We walked the school with a senior leader to see how effectively leaders promote pupils’ spiritual, moral, social and cultural education. We held meetings with senior and middle leaders, teachers, newly qualified staff, two members of the governing body and the chief executive of the academy trust. We met with the school council and a representative group of key stage 2 pupils. We scrutinised pupils’ work in books. We looked at safeguarding and child protection policy and procedures, self-evaluation and improvement planning, minutes of meetings of the governing body, records of behaviour and attendance, and other information provided by school leaders. We considered 24 free-text responses from parents and 46 responses to Ofsted’s
p.6
6
online questionnaire, Parent View. We also considered 33 responses to Ofsted’s questionnaire for staff and 46 responses to Ofsted’s questionnaire for pupils. We conducted deep dives into the following subjects: reading, mathematics, science, geography and history, and PE.
p.6
Inspection team
John Mitcheson, lead inspector Her Majesty’s Inspector
p.6
Inspection team
Rachel Welch Ofsted Inspector 29–30 January 2020
p.6
7
regulates and inspects to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.
p.7
7
If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .
p.7
7
You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .
p.7
7
Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .
p.7
7
T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted
p.7
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion