Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Code Nation Limited

Inspected 5 Feb 2020 · published 2 Mar 2020 · URN 2539252

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Ken Fisher

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    5 Feb 2020

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Ken Fisher

  • Postcode verified

    M2 1FB

  • Name on report verified

    Code Nation Limited

  • URN verified

    2539252

Page 1 of 5
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+27Mostly positivemore positive than 38% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praisehighly effectiveexcellent relationshipseffectiveextremelyvery highgood progressrigorouspositive
Criticismlimitedlacksseriouslyerrorsbelow

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

Findings positive critical

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
5
Words of findings
1,115
about usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 30, typical 45
Average sentence
15 words
Next steps
1
typical 5
Hedged sentences
3%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 100%

Full report text

Code Nation Limited Monitoring visit report

p.1

Name of lead inspector: Ken Fisher, Ofsted Inspector

p.1

Type of provider: Independent learning provider

p.1

Address: 5 th Floor 19 Spring Gardens Manchester M2 1FB Monitoring visit: Code Nation Limited, 4–5 February 2020

p.1

Context and focus of visit

From October 2018, Ofsted undertook to carry out monitoring visits to all newly directly funded providers of apprenticeship training provision which began to be funded from April 2017 or after by ESFA and/or the apprenticeship levy. This monitoring visit was undertaken as part of those arrangements and as outlined in the Further education and skills inspection handbook, especially the sections entitled ‘Monitoring visits’ and ‘Monitoring visits to providers that are newly directly publicly funded’. The focus of these visits is on the themes set out below.

p.2

Context and focus of visit

Code Nation Limited has had a contract to deliver apprenticeships since October 2018. The first group of apprentices began in January 2019. All apprentices are on standards-based programmes. Currently, 79 apprentices are working towards software developer at level 4. One apprentice is working towards cyber security technologist, also at level 4. The apprenticeship levy funds 66 of the apprentices.

p.2

Reasonable progress

Leaders and managers have designed and implemented a highly effective curriculum. They work collaboratively with employers to ensure that the content is relevant and logical. Through this curriculum, leaders and managers make a good contribution to developing employees with digital-talent skills which are in demand locally, regionally and nationally.

p.2

Reasonable progress

Leaders, managers and employers justify the importance of apprentices learning off the job during their first 12 weeks on the programme. However, leaders and managers have not given enough attention to the long- and medium-term planning of on-the-job learning.

p.2

Reasonable progress

Leaders and managers are extremely proactive in keeping up to date with developments in the digital industry. They make full use of their knowledge and experience to ensure that apprentices’ training reflects current digital practices.

p.2

Reasonable progress

Leaders and managers make sure they follow the principles and requirements of an apprenticeship. They have excellent relationships with employers. Employers also contribute to the curriculum by giving stimulating presentations and talks.

p.2

Reasonable progress

Leaders and managers implement a rigorous and appropriately sequenced recruitment process. They ensure that they involve employers in selecting suitable Monitoring visit: Code Nation Limited, 4–5 February 2020 apprentices for their organisations. This has had a positive impact on apprentices’ retention, which is very high.

p.2

Reasonable progress

Board members receive frequent reports about the apprenticeship provision. They hold leaders and managers to account for the quality of the programme. Currently, only two out of six board members are external appointments.

p.3

Reasonable progress

Leaders and managers ensure that end-point assessments for apprentices are in place. They have communicated information about these appropriately to apprentices, employers and staff. However, not all apprentices receive full information about the standard of their work and what they need to do to achieve a merit or distinction grade.

p.3

Reasonable progress

Managers have implemented a new electronic portfolio system. Although they cannot utilise this fully, they are developing it to increase its potential and benefit to apprentices.

p.3

Reasonable progress

Apprentices acquire substantial new software development knowledge, technical skills and behaviours very swiftly during the 12-week off-the-job training period. For example, they learn how to write good-quality code, test code and analyse the results to correct errors. They also receive a good introduction to effective team working. Consequently, apprentices make an effective contribution to employers’ businesses as soon as they start their on-the-job training.

p.3

Reasonable progress

Employers maintain frequent contact with apprentices throughout their off-the-job training. They facilitate and support a relevant and bespoke work-related project towards the end of this period. Apprentices contribute to other projects, such as developing software to maintain medical supplies in hospital wards, during their on- the-job training.

p.3

Reasonable progress

Instructors and other staff are highly experienced in the digital sector and have appropriate qualifications. They use their expertise effectively to support apprentices to apply their new knowledge, skills and behaviours in their workplaces. Apprentices place a high value on the guidance instructors and other staff provide.

p.3

Reasonable progress

Apprentices receive their full entitlement to off-the-job learning. Skills coaches are in frequent contact with apprentices after their initial 12-week off-the-job learning period. They provide specific support for the various group projects on which apprentices work.

p.3

Reasonable progress

Apprentices enjoy their programme and most are making good progress. Most apprentices have been successful in recent professional examinations. Monitoring visit: Code Nation Limited, 4–5 February 2020 Apprentices develop their English and mathematics in the workplace through individual and group project work. For example, they code algorithms, produce and analyse statistics, and write product-release notes. However, leaders and managers place too little importance on apprentices developing their English and mathematical competencies to the highest possible level.

p.3

Reasonable progress

Skills coaches and employers review apprentices’ on-the-job learning frequently. However, their recording of apprentices’ progress lacks coordination and documentation.

p.4

arrangements are in place?

Leaders and managers place a high priority on safeguarding apprentices and staff. The designated safeguarding officers have clearly defined roles and responsibilities. They take all safeguarding and safeguarding-related incidents seriously. They follow them up immediately and track them systematically to their conclusion.

p.4

arrangements are in place?

All staff, including board members, receive training for a safeguarding qualification at level 1. They also receive frequent updates to help them understand their safeguarding and ‘Prevent’ duty responsibilities. Managers check applicants for employment thoroughly to assess their suitability for a training role.

p.4

arrangements are in place?

Apprentices have a basic understanding of safeguarding and a good awareness of how to keep safe online. Leaders and managers have not previously given enough attention to risk assessing employers’ geographical locations to identify possible local risks to apprentices. They are starting to carry out risk assessments and to inform apprentices of potential dangers. Monitoring visit: Code Nation Limited, 4–5 February 2020 regulates and inspects to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding

p.4

arrangements are in place?

If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.5

arrangements are in place?

You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .

p.5

arrangements are in place?

Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .

p.5

arrangements are in place?

T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.5

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion