Other · Ofsted report
Brighton & Hove City Council
Summary
Montserrat Perez-Parent (lead), Charles Searle, Martin Hughes
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection date verified
13 Feb 2020
- Inspectors verified
Charles Searle, Martin Hughes, Montserrat Perez-Parent
- Name on report verified
Short inspection of Brighton & Hove City Council
- URN verified
50835
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No standout praise found.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Tutors should provide feedback to learners on non-accredited courses on how to improve their work so that they can strive to produce work to even higher standards. p.3
- Members of the governance board need to support leaders and managers more effectively and hold them to account to further improve learners’ experience and achievements. p.3
- Leaders and managers should support tutors to be more confident in the way they discuss the risks of radicalisation and extremism in classes so that learners become more aware of the relevance of these risks in their daily lives. 12–13 February 2020 p.3
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 6
- Words of findings
- 841
- about usual (typical 1049)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 48, typical 45
- Average sentence
- 18 words
- Next steps
- 3
- typical 5
- Hedged sentences
- 2%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Further education and skills inspection report
p.1
Short inspection of Brighton & Hove City Council
p.1
Outcome
Brighton & Hove City Council continues to be a good provider.
p.1
Information about this provider
Brighton & Hove City Council (BHCC) subcontracts all its adult and community learning to two subcontractors and two partner providers. Courses range from entry level to level 2.
p.1
Information about this provider
An established subcontractor, Friends Centre, delivers accredited and non-accredited courses in English, mathematics, English for speakers of other languages, information and communication technology, family learning and a wide range of personal and community learning courses such as arts and crafts, fashion, textiles, photography and languages. BHCC has recently commissioned Tempus Training to provide accredited employability, warehousing and construction courses to fill skills gaps in these sectors.
p.1
Information about this provider
At the time of the inspection, there were 116 learners on accredited courses and 350 learners on non-accredited courses. There were 49 learners engaged in community development learning: 39 with the Hangleton & Knoll Project and 10 with Whitehawk Inn.
p.1
What is it like to be a learner with this provider?
Learners benefit from an ambitious curriculum that helps them overcome barriers in their lives, such as low income, unemployment and mental illness. Learners from many different backgrounds experience the same challenging courses in a wide range of subjects in a highly inclusive environment.
p.1
What is it like to be a learner with this provider?
Learners are enthusiastic and motivated by what they learn. Learners in practical classes, such as sewing and dressmaking, work on projects at home and bring them back to sessions for further guidance from tutors. Learners in mathematics classes apply what they have learned in class to help with their children’s homework.
p.1
What is it like to be a learner with this provider?
Learners receive effective information, careers advice and guidance from staff and tutors before the start and towards the end of their courses. As a result, many move on from non-accredited courses to take qualifications at levels 1 and 2. 12–13 February 2020
p.1
better?
Tutors are confident and well equipped to meet the needs of all learners in their sessions. They help learners with social and mental health problems to make progress and increase their chances of employment. For example, learners with long-term health conditions find the short courses provide them with a perfect way to re-engage in purposeful activity. Parents develop a new interest that they can fit around their busy family lives.
p.2
better?
Tutors have a good understanding of the individual starting points of their learners. They adapt their teaching to ensure that those with more advanced starting points benefit from additional and more complex activities. At the same time, they make sure that all the learners in the class participate. For example, in creative writing, all learners complete two and a half minutes of free-flow writing exercises.
p.2
better?
Tutors plan and teach their subjects in a sequence that begins with the fundamental building blocks of the subject. Learners then apply their newly acquired knowledge through exercises and practical projects. In a machine sewing class for beginners, for example, learners first learn how to use a sewing machine and how to fix it if it goes wrong. They then learn about tracing and cutting out patterns before moving on to mastering specific techniques, such as attaching zips.
p.2
better?
On accredited courses, tutors give precise and helpful verbal feedback that enables learners to quickly understand the mistakes they have made and provide corrections. In English and mathematics classes, tutors assess learners’ work quickly and provide instant improvement points to encourage learners to identify and correct errors. In fashion and dressmaking at level 2, tutors give guidance on what learners need to do to achieve the best marks. As a result, learners strive to complete courses to the highest standards.
p.2
better?
On non-accredited courses, tutors’ feedback on learners’ individual learning plans serves little purpose beyond providing praise and encouragement. There are too few examples where learners are told how to improve their work where this would help them produce work to higher standards.
p.2
better?
A high proportion of learners achieve their accredited courses and personal learning goals. Tutors assess learners’ progress against their course learning aims effectively. The new extended class profile and robust attendance management have resulted in more learners completing their courses. Consequently, overall achievement in accredited courses has increased for a third year running.
p.2
better?
BHCC managers maintain effective oversight of the quality and performance of the provision delivered by subcontractors through termly contract review meetings. Managers use these meetings to identify when performance declines and agree changes to bring about improvements. For example, when too many learners were leaving functional skills courses early, managers agreed to move towards shorter, 12–13 February 2020
p.2
3
single-unit courses. As a result, most learners who started English and mathematics courses in the current academic year have completed them.
p.3
3
The recently formed governance board is not yet operating effectively. As a result, the support and challenge that leaders and managers need to improve the provision further is weak.
p.3
Safeguarding
The arrangements for safeguarding are effective.
p.3
Safeguarding
Leaders and managers ensure that safeguarding arrangements of subcontractors and partners are fit for purpose.
p.3
Safeguarding
Learners feel safe and are confident that if they had a personal problem or safeguarding concern they could discuss it with their tutor, who would take appropriate action.
p.3
Safeguarding
Tutors benefit from expert training from BHCC on aspects of radicalisation and extremism affecting the area, for example right-wing extremism. However, they lack the confidence to discuss these in classes so that learners are aware of the risks they face locally.
p.3
What does the provider need to do to improve?
Tutors should provide feedback to learners on non-accredited courses on how to improve their work so that they can strive to produce work to even higher standards. Members of the governance board need to support leaders and managers more effectively and hold them to account to further improve learners’ experience and achievements. Leaders and managers should support tutors to be more confident in the way they discuss the risks of radicalisation and extremism in classes so that learners become more aware of the relevance of these risks in their daily lives. 12–13 February 2020
p.3
Provider details
Address First Floor Hove Town Hall Norton Road Hove East Sussex BN3 4AH
p.4
Website
www.brighton- hove.gov.uk/content/children-and- education/adult-education
p.4
Website
Date of previous inspection 13–14 January 2016
p.4
Website
Main subcontractors Friends Centre Tempus Training
p.4
Website
Partner providers: Hangleton & Knoll Project Whitehawk Inn / Brighton Housing Trust 12–13 February 2020
p.4
Information about this inspection
The inspection was the second short inspection carried out since Brighton & Hove City Council was judged to be good in February 2010.
p.5
Information about this inspection
The inspection team was assisted by the Education and Skills Officer, as nominee. Inspectors took account of the provider’s most recent self-assessment report and development plans, and the previous inspection report. The inspection was carried out using the further education and skills inspection handbook and took into account all relevant provision at the provider. Inspectors collected a wide range of evidence to inform judgements, including observing learning sessions, scrutinising learners’ work, seeking the views of learners, staff and other stakeholders, and examining the provider’s documentation and records.
p.5
Inspection team
Montserrat Perez-Parent, lead inspector Her Majesty’s Inspector Martin Hughes Ofsted Inspector Charles Searle Her Majesty’s Inspector 12–13 February 2020
p.5
6
regulates and inspects to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children's social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children's services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.
p.6
6
If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .
p.6
6
You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .
p.6
6
Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .
p.6
6
T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted
p.6
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion