Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

ECM Southwest Ltd

Inspected 5 Feb 2020 · published 2 Mar 2020 · URN 2539268

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Sara Hunter

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection datesingle source

    5 Feb 2020

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Sara Hunter

  • Postcode verified

    TA1 3PN

  • Name on report verified

    ECM Southwest Ltd

  • URN verified

    2539268

Page 1 of 5
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

−52Criticalmore positive than 7% of reports of this type

Reads more critically than most reports of this type.

Praiseambitiousindependentstrengthsknowledgeablefeel saferespectfulaccurateaccurately
Criticismpoorconcernsnot effectiveweaknessesineffectivetoo manyweaknot ambitious

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

Findings positive critical

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
5
Words of findings
1,250
about usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 36, typical 45
Average sentence
17 words
Next steps
2
typical 5
Hedged sentences
6%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 100%

Full report text

ECM Southwest Ltd Monitoring visit report

p.1

Name of lead inspector: Sara Hunter, Ofsted Inspector

p.1

Type of provider: Independent learning provider

p.1

Address: 32 High Street Taunton TA1 3PN Monitoring visit ECM Southwest Ltd, 4-5 February 2020

p.1

Context and focus of visit

From October 2018, Ofsted undertook to carry out monitoring visits to all newly directly funded providers of apprenticeship training provision which began to be funded from April 2017 or after by ESFA and/or the apprenticeship levy. This monitoring visit was undertaken as part of those arrangements and as outlined in the Further education and skills inspection handbook, especially the sections entitled ‘Providers newly directly funded to deliver apprenticeship training provision’ and ‘Monitoring visits’. The focus of these visits is on the themes set out below.

p.2

Context and focus of visit

ECM Training Ltd (trading as Construction Assessments) is an independent learning provider based in Taunton, Somerset. It started to deliver framework apprenticeships to levy-paying employers in August 2018. At the time of the visit, eight apprentices were enrolled on level 3 construction programmes, based with employers in London and Cornwall.

p.2

Insufficient progress

Leaders do not have sufficient understanding of apprenticeships to ensure that all apprentices meet the requirements of the programme. They have not implemented effective processes to track apprentices’ off-the-job training and cannot confirm that all apprentices receive their full entitlement. Leaders have not made any provision to develop intermediate apprentices’ mathematics and English skills beyond the levels expected for the apprenticeship.

p.2

Insufficient progress

Leaders have not developed an effective curriculum strategy. They do not plan or sequence the curriculum to meet apprentices’ individual needs. The curriculum is too narrow and focuses on achieving the main qualification; it is not ambitious and does not develop apprentices’ broader knowledge and behaviours. Staff do not engage with employers enough. They do not plan and coordinate on- and off-the-job training, assessments and review points.

p.2

Insufficient progress

Leaders do not have effective systems to monitor apprentices’ progress. As a result, they are unable to provide accurate information on when apprentices are due to complete their programmes, or if they have undertaken functional skills examinations.

p.2

Insufficient progress

Leaders have not developed adequate quality assurance or quality improvement processes. Managers do not undertake observations of assessors’ practice to confirm the quality of training and assessment. The self-assessment report does not reflect Monitoring visit ECM Southwest Ltd, 4-5 February 2020 accurately the provider’s strengths and weaknesses, and there is no plan in place to ensure continued improvement.

p.2

Insufficient progress

The governance arrangements are ineffective. Leaders recognise that, as a very small team, they rely too heavily on verbal agreements. Leaders do not record decisions or hold anybody to account for their actions. There is no external oversight of leaders’ actions.

p.3

Insufficient progress

Employers are committed to apprenticeships and they value the new skills and knowledge that apprentices develop during their programme. All the apprentices are newly recruited to their current roles within the construction industry and they develop some good skills and knowledge.

p.3

Insufficient progress

Managers have been slow to adapt from their previous delivery of construction qualifications to meet the broader requirements of apprenticeships. They have focused their activities on redesigning paperwork for the portfolios, rather than developing an ambitious curriculum that meets apprentices’ individual needs. For example, the initial assessment paperwork is comprehensive and detailed, but the results are not used to plan the apprentice’s learning programme.

p.3

Insufficient progress

The standard of apprentices’ work is below that which is expected of level 3 learners. Apprentices are not encouraged to take enough responsibility for their own research and evidence. In too many cases, where the apprentices’ work is of a poor standard, the assessor does not provide appropriate feedback.

p.3

Insufficient progress

Assessment practice is weak; it does not measure how apprentices develop their skills, knowledge and behaviours in a logical and systematic way. Assessors provide useful verbal feedback to apprentices; however, this does not allow assessors to accurately check the progress that apprentices make.

p.3

Insufficient progress

Too many apprentices are uncertain about the progress they are making. They do not know when they are due to complete their apprenticeship or whether they still need to take their functional skills examinations.

p.3

Insufficient progress

Apprentices benefit from good personal support from their assessor who is knowledgeable and well qualified. This motivates apprentices to work hard to complete their qualifications, and they gain in self-confidence and self-esteem. Most apprentices are given additional responsibilities or gain promotion at work as a result of their training.

p.3

Insufficient progress

Apprentices have good opportunities to gain additional qualifications that will enhance their career prospects within the construction industry, for example in Monitoring visit ECM Southwest Ltd, 4-5 February 2020 harness training, site traffic management and first-aid training. Some apprentices attend outward bound courses to develop core skills in teamwork and self- confidence.

p.3

Insufficient progress

Leaders do not promote safeguarding arrangements effectively. The designated safeguarding lead has not received appropriate training to carry out her duties and responsibilities for the role. Not all staff have undergone a disclosure and barring check. Leaders have not established any links with external specialist agencies for referral, advice or guidance.

p.4

Insufficient progress

Leaders do not understand the requirement for apprentices and staff to receive training on the ‘Prevent’ duty and fundamental British values. They have not developed a ‘Prevent’ duty risk assessment and action plan or any resources to support training. As a result, apprentices do not understand the dangers of radicalisation or extremism, or how these relate to working in the construction sector.

p.4

Insufficient progress

Apprentices feel safe, and they know to whom they should report concerns. They are respectful of colleagues and they do not tolerate discriminatory behaviours in the workplace. Employers promote mental health and well-being, and apprentices show a good awareness of these issues. However, in some construction sites the health and safety culture is poor. Monitoring visit ECM Southwest Ltd, 4-5 February 2020 the guidance ‘Raising concerns and making a complaint about Ofsted’, which is available from Ofsted’s website: www.gov.uk/government/publications/complaints-about-ofsted . If you would like Ofsted to send you a copy of the guidance, please telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk . Learner View Learner View is a website where learners can tell Ofsted what they think about their college or provider. They can also see what other learners think about them too. To find out more go to www.learnerview.ofsted.gov.uk .

p.4

Insufficient progress

Employer View Employer View is a website where employers can tell Ofsted what they think about their employees’ college or provider. They can also see what other employers think about them too. To find out more go to www.employerview.ofsted.gov.uk .

p.5

Insufficient progress

regulates and inspects to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for looked after children, safeguarding and child protection. If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk . You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence , write to

p.5

Insufficient progress

the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .

p.5

Insufficient progress

Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .

p.5

Insufficient progress

T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.5

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion