Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · School inspection (EIF)

Ss John Fisher and Thomas More Roman Catholic High School

Inspected 29 Jan 2020 · published 2 Mar 2020 · URN 119785

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

Requires improvement

Rachel Goodwin (lead), Dean Logan, Philip Wood, Sharon Asquith

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    29 Jan 2020

  • Inspectors verified

    Dean Logan, Philip Wood, Rachel Goodwin, Sharon Asquith

  • Behaviour and attitudes verified

    Good

  • Leadership and management verified

    Good

  • Overall effectiveness verified

    Requires improvement

  • Personal development verified

    Good

  • Quality of education verified

    Requires improvement

  • Postcode verified

    BB8 8JT

  • Name on report verified

    Ss John Fisher and Thomas More Roman Catholic High School

  • URN verified

    119785

Page 1 of 7
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2012.

  • OverallRequires improvement
  • Behaviour and attitudesGood
  • Leadership and managementGood
  • Personal developmentGood
  • Quality of educationRequires improvement

15% of comparable inspections in the last three years were graded Requires improvement (5,043 inspections).

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+8Mostly positivemore positive than 31% of reports of this type graded Requires improvement
OutstandingGoodRIInadequate

In line with other reports of this type graded Requires improvement.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praisestronghappyconfidenthigh expectationssafewell plannedambitiousconfidently
Criticismweaknessesgapsnot good enoughnot alwaysconcernstoo manydo not knowdecline

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsWhat needs to improveSafeguardingAbout the inspection positive critical
  • Findings1126w+1
  • Safeguarding80w+40
  • What needs to improve24w—

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
7
Words of findings
1,193
about usual (typical 1215)
Reading level
Fairly hard
Flesch 60, typical 56
Average sentence
13 words
Next steps
6
typical 5
Hedged sentences
16%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 66%Safeguarding 5%What needs to improve 1%About the inspection 28%

Full report text

Inspection of Ss John Fisher and Thomas More Roman Catholic High School Gibfield Road, Colne, Lancashire BB8 8JT

p.1

Overall effectiveness Requires improvement

The quality of education Requires improvement Behaviour and attitudes Good Personal development Good Leadership and management Good Previous inspection grade Good 28–29 January 2020

p.1

What is it like to attend this school?

The pupils with whom we spoke said that the school is a safe, welcoming place, where they are happy. They like their teachers, their lessons and the activities that are on offer. Most pupils do not think bullying is a problem. If it does happen, they are confident that it will be dealt with.

p.2

What is it like to attend this school?

Pupils behave well. In lessons, they answer questions confidently and try hard. Teachers have high expectations of their pupils. However, some pupils’ learning has been affected because of their teachers being absent. This has meant that not all pupils have benefited from a good quality of education. Some pupils currently at the school have gaps in their knowledge.

p.2

What is it like to attend this school?

Pupils feel well supported. They said that the school is a caring environment. Year 7 pupils described how teachers helped them to settle in quickly and make friends. Pupils embrace the school’s mission statement of ‘Let our bright colours shine’. They are kind to each other. For example, they have raised money so that all pupils can go on trips.

p.2

What is it like to attend this school?

Pupils enjoy the range of extra-curricular activities offered. These include drama, art, music and sport. Pupils value the opportunity to take part in whole-school productions. These experiences support pupils’ personal development well.

p.2

better?

Leaders are aspirational for all pupils. They want pupils to develop into the best that they can be. Last year, however, pupils did not achieve as well as they should in their GCSE examinations.

p.2

better?

Leaders recognised that the previous curriculum was not good enough. They have taken swift and appropriate action to address the weaknesses in the curriculum, as well as the consequences of teachers being absent. However, although progress is being made, work to improve how well the new curriculum is delivered is in its early stages. There is still more to do to ensure that the new curriculum is well planned and implemented so that pupils’ outcomes improve.

p.2

better?

Leaders have ensured that the new curriculum is ambitious. All pupils study subjects at key stage 3 in line with the national curriculum. Leaders have taken steps to increase the number of pupils entering the English Baccalaureate (EBacc) in key stage 4. However, the weaknesses in the previous curriculum mean that some current pupils have too many gaps in their knowledge. This is because, in some subjects, teachers did not think carefully enough about the content of the curriculum.

p.2

better?

Leadership of most subject areas is now strong. Most teachers know what to teach and in which order to teach it. However, current pupils still do not always learn 28–29 January 2020

p.2

3

things in sufficient depth. This means that some pupils do not know more or remember enough over time.

p.3

3

Leaders have prioritised the mental health and well-being of pupils. For example, they have appointed a full-time mental health worker. Pupils are encouraged to be healthy through their diet and lifestyle. Pupils at this school are prepared for life in modern Britain. They understand British values and show respect and tolerance towards others. Discrimination in any form is not tolerated. Leaders are in the process of developing the personal, health, social and economic education (PSHE) curriculum to improve further pupils’ experiences.

p.3

3

Pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND) are supported with their learning during lessons. Even so, some pupils with SEND are withdrawn from some lessons, such as languages, humanities and technology, to have extra literacy sessions. This means that these pupils are missing important lessons, and that they have to catch up at additional times. Leaders are in the process of changing this to ensure that pupils with SEND have the same access to the curriculum as their peers.

p.3

3

Most pupils are courteous and polite. Corridors are calm. Pupils are friendly to each other.

p.3

3

Careers education, information and guidance are strong. Pupils who are disadvantaged benefit from targeted careers support to guide them on to aspirational next steps. However, these pupils do not make as much progress across the curriculum as they should. Although most pupils attend school regularly, some disadvantaged pupils do not attend school as regularly as their peers.

p.3

3

For the most part, staff said that they are happy working at the school. They said that leaders listen and respond to their needs. Staff appreciate the support that they receive from leaders.

p.3

Safeguarding

The arrangements for safeguarding are effective.

p.3

Safeguarding

There is a strong culture of safeguarding at the school. All staff are fully trained and know the processes for keeping pupils safe. The school works closely with external agencies such as children’s social care and the local authority. Pupils know who to go to if they have any concerns. They feel confident in doing this. The pastoral team knows all pupils well. Pupils are aware of how to stay safe, including when online.

p.3

(Information for the school and appropriate authority)

 In the past, weaknesses in curriculum design, and gaps in pupils’ knowledge, led to a sharp decline in outcomes for pupils at the end of Year 11. Leaders have invested in 28–29 January 2020

p.3

4

strengthening the leadership of subject areas. However, the implementation of the improved curriculum is still in its early stages. Leaders should ensure that teachers in all subjects are consistent in identifying precisely what pupils need to learn in each unit of study. This will enable teachers to identify and remedy any gaps in pupils’ knowledge.  Leaders have a clear vision of where the curriculum needs to be. They are in the process of implementing plans to improve the quality of the curriculum. In some subjects, teachers are already using strategies to help pupils to remember. However, this is variable both across and within subjects. Leaders need to ensure that all teachers in all subject areas are planning for the retention of knowledge.  Currently, pupils with SEND are withdrawn from subjects such as languages, humanities, technology and creative arts to have extra literacy support. For the most

p.4

4

part, teachers in these subject areas ensure that pupils catch up on lessons they have missed. However, leaders recognise the negative impact of pupils being withdrawn from a number of subjects. They must guarantee that pupils with SEND have the same equality of access to the curriculum as their peers.  Pupils who are disadvantaged do not attend school as regularly as their peers. This negatively affects their learning and progress across the curriculum. Leaders need to increase the range of strategies that they use to ensure that disadvantaged pupils attend school regularly.

p.4

How can I feed back my views?

or to find out what other parents and carers think. We use Ofsted Parent View information when deciding which schools to inspect, when to inspect them and as part of their inspection.

p.4

How can I feed back my views?

The Department for Education has further guidance on how to complain about a school.

p.4

How can I feed back my views?

If you are the school and you are not happy with the inspection or the report, you can complain to Ofsted .

p.4

Further information

You can search for published performance information about the school.

p.4

Further information

In the report, ‘disadvantaged pupils’ refers to those pupils who attract government pupil premium funding: pupils claiming free school meals at any point in the last six years and pupils in care or who left care through adoption or another formal route. 28–29 January 2020

p.4

School details

Inspection number 10133430 Type of school Secondary comprehensive

p.5

School details

Appropriate authority The governing body

p.5

School details

Date of previous inspection 14 January 2016, under section 8 of the Education Act 2005

p.5

Information about this school

 The school is part of the Diocese of Salford. The school’s last section 48 inspection was in January 2016.  The school uses alternative provision for a small number of pupils at The Heights, Coal Clough Academy and Burnley Football Club.

p.5

Information about this inspection

We carried out this inspection under section 5 of the Education Act 2005.

p.5

Information about this inspection

 During the inspection, we met with the headteacher, other members of the senior leadership team, middle leaders and a wide range of teaching and support staff. We also met with governors and representatives from the local authority and the diocese.  We met with pupils to discuss their views about school life.  We reviewed a wide range of documentation, including the school’s self- evaluation and improvement plans, subject leaders’ curriculum plans, attendance and behaviour records and the procedures in place to keep pupils safe. 28–29 January 2020

p.5

6

 We also considered the 50 responses to Ofsted’s online survey for staff. We also considered the views of 159 parents in their responses to Ofsted’s online survey, Parent View, including the comments received via the free-text facility. There were no responses to the pupils’ survey.  We did deep dives in English, mathematics, science, history and geography. We met with subject leaders for each of these subjects, visited some lessons, looked at pupils’ work and spoke to pupils and teachers. We also considered other subjects, including languages, food technology and creative arts.

p.6

Inspection team

Rachel Goodwin, lead inspector Her Majesty’s Inspector

p.6

Inspection team

Sharon Asquith Ofsted Inspector 28–29 January 2020

p.6

7

regulates and inspects to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.

p.7

7

If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.7

7

You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .

p.7

7

Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .

p.7

7

T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.7

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion