Schools & FE · School inspection (EIF)
Ss John Fisher and Thomas More Roman Catholic High School
Summary
Rachel Goodwin (lead), Dean Logan, Philip Wood, Sharon Asquith
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection date verified
29 Jan 2020
- Inspectors verified
Dean Logan, Philip Wood, Rachel Goodwin, Sharon Asquith
- Behaviour and attitudes verified
Good
- Leadership and management verified
Good
- Overall effectiveness verified
Requires improvement
- Personal development verified
Good
- Quality of education verified
Requires improvement
- Postcode verified
BB8 8JT
- Name on report verified
Ss John Fisher and Thomas More Roman Catholic High School
- URN verified
119785
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Grade profile
Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2012.
- OverallRequires improvement
- Behaviour and attitudesGood
- Leadership and managementGood
- Personal developmentGood
- Quality of educationRequires improvement
15% of comparable inspections in the last three years were graded Requires improvement (5,043 inspections).
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type graded Requires improvement.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- However, the weaknesses in the previous curriculum mean that some current pupils have too many gaps in their knowledge. p.2
- In the past, weaknesses in curriculum design, and gaps in pupils’ knowledge, led to a sharp decline in outcomes for pupils at the end of Year 11. p.3
- Leaders recognised that the previous curriculum was not good enough. p.2
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- They must guarantee that pupils with SEND have the same equality of access to the curriculum as their peers. p.4
- Last year, however, pupils did not achieve as well as they should in their GCSE examinations. p.2
- However, these pupils do not make as much progress across the curriculum as they should. p.3
- Leaders need to ensure that all teachers in all subject areas are planning for the retention of knowledge. p.4
- Leaders need to increase the range of strategies that they use to ensure that disadvantaged pupils attend school regularly. p.4
- Leaders have a clear vision of where the curriculum needs to be. p.4
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Leadership & governance17
“Leaders recognised that the previous curriculum was not good enough.” p.2Teaching & assessment12
“Teachers have high expectations of their pupils.” p.2Personal development5
“Careers education, information and guidance are strong.” p.3
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 7
- Words of findings
- 1,193
- about usual (typical 1215)
- Reading level
- Fairly hard
- Flesch 60, typical 56
- Average sentence
- 13 words
- Next steps
- 6
- typical 5
- Hedged sentences
- 16%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Inspection of Ss John Fisher and Thomas More Roman Catholic High School Gibfield Road, Colne, Lancashire BB8 8JT
p.1
Overall effectiveness Requires improvement
The quality of education Requires improvement Behaviour and attitudes Good Personal development Good Leadership and management Good Previous inspection grade Good 28–29 January 2020
p.1
What is it like to attend this school?
The pupils with whom we spoke said that the school is a safe, welcoming place, where they are happy. They like their teachers, their lessons and the activities that are on offer. Most pupils do not think bullying is a problem. If it does happen, they are confident that it will be dealt with.
p.2
What is it like to attend this school?
Pupils behave well. In lessons, they answer questions confidently and try hard. Teachers have high expectations of their pupils. However, some pupils’ learning has been affected because of their teachers being absent. This has meant that not all pupils have benefited from a good quality of education. Some pupils currently at the school have gaps in their knowledge.
p.2
What is it like to attend this school?
Pupils feel well supported. They said that the school is a caring environment. Year 7 pupils described how teachers helped them to settle in quickly and make friends. Pupils embrace the school’s mission statement of ‘Let our bright colours shine’. They are kind to each other. For example, they have raised money so that all pupils can go on trips.
p.2
What is it like to attend this school?
Pupils enjoy the range of extra-curricular activities offered. These include drama, art, music and sport. Pupils value the opportunity to take part in whole-school productions. These experiences support pupils’ personal development well.
p.2
better?
Leaders are aspirational for all pupils. They want pupils to develop into the best that they can be. Last year, however, pupils did not achieve as well as they should in their GCSE examinations.
p.2
better?
Leaders recognised that the previous curriculum was not good enough. They have taken swift and appropriate action to address the weaknesses in the curriculum, as well as the consequences of teachers being absent. However, although progress is being made, work to improve how well the new curriculum is delivered is in its early stages. There is still more to do to ensure that the new curriculum is well planned and implemented so that pupils’ outcomes improve.
p.2
better?
Leaders have ensured that the new curriculum is ambitious. All pupils study subjects at key stage 3 in line with the national curriculum. Leaders have taken steps to increase the number of pupils entering the English Baccalaureate (EBacc) in key stage 4. However, the weaknesses in the previous curriculum mean that some current pupils have too many gaps in their knowledge. This is because, in some subjects, teachers did not think carefully enough about the content of the curriculum.
p.2
better?
Leadership of most subject areas is now strong. Most teachers know what to teach and in which order to teach it. However, current pupils still do not always learn 28–29 January 2020
p.2
3
things in sufficient depth. This means that some pupils do not know more or remember enough over time.
p.3
3
Leaders have prioritised the mental health and well-being of pupils. For example, they have appointed a full-time mental health worker. Pupils are encouraged to be healthy through their diet and lifestyle. Pupils at this school are prepared for life in modern Britain. They understand British values and show respect and tolerance towards others. Discrimination in any form is not tolerated. Leaders are in the process of developing the personal, health, social and economic education (PSHE) curriculum to improve further pupils’ experiences.
p.3
3
Pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND) are supported with their learning during lessons. Even so, some pupils with SEND are withdrawn from some lessons, such as languages, humanities and technology, to have extra literacy sessions. This means that these pupils are missing important lessons, and that they have to catch up at additional times. Leaders are in the process of changing this to ensure that pupils with SEND have the same access to the curriculum as their peers.
p.3
3
Most pupils are courteous and polite. Corridors are calm. Pupils are friendly to each other.
p.3
3
Careers education, information and guidance are strong. Pupils who are disadvantaged benefit from targeted careers support to guide them on to aspirational next steps. However, these pupils do not make as much progress across the curriculum as they should. Although most pupils attend school regularly, some disadvantaged pupils do not attend school as regularly as their peers.
p.3
3
For the most part, staff said that they are happy working at the school. They said that leaders listen and respond to their needs. Staff appreciate the support that they receive from leaders.
p.3
Safeguarding
The arrangements for safeguarding are effective.
p.3
Safeguarding
There is a strong culture of safeguarding at the school. All staff are fully trained and know the processes for keeping pupils safe. The school works closely with external agencies such as children’s social care and the local authority. Pupils know who to go to if they have any concerns. They feel confident in doing this. The pastoral team knows all pupils well. Pupils are aware of how to stay safe, including when online.
p.3
(Information for the school and appropriate authority)
In the past, weaknesses in curriculum design, and gaps in pupils’ knowledge, led to a sharp decline in outcomes for pupils at the end of Year 11. Leaders have invested in 28–29 January 2020
p.3
4
strengthening the leadership of subject areas. However, the implementation of the improved curriculum is still in its early stages. Leaders should ensure that teachers in all subjects are consistent in identifying precisely what pupils need to learn in each unit of study. This will enable teachers to identify and remedy any gaps in pupils’ knowledge. Leaders have a clear vision of where the curriculum needs to be. They are in the process of implementing plans to improve the quality of the curriculum. In some subjects, teachers are already using strategies to help pupils to remember. However, this is variable both across and within subjects. Leaders need to ensure that all teachers in all subject areas are planning for the retention of knowledge. Currently, pupils with SEND are withdrawn from subjects such as languages, humanities, technology and creative arts to have extra literacy support. For the most
p.4
4
part, teachers in these subject areas ensure that pupils catch up on lessons they have missed. However, leaders recognise the negative impact of pupils being withdrawn from a number of subjects. They must guarantee that pupils with SEND have the same equality of access to the curriculum as their peers. Pupils who are disadvantaged do not attend school as regularly as their peers. This negatively affects their learning and progress across the curriculum. Leaders need to increase the range of strategies that they use to ensure that disadvantaged pupils attend school regularly.
p.4
How can I feed back my views?
or to find out what other parents and carers think. We use Ofsted Parent View information when deciding which schools to inspect, when to inspect them and as part of their inspection.
p.4
How can I feed back my views?
The Department for Education has further guidance on how to complain about a school.
p.4
How can I feed back my views?
If you are the school and you are not happy with the inspection or the report, you can complain to Ofsted .
p.4
Further information
You can search for published performance information about the school.
p.4
Further information
In the report, ‘disadvantaged pupils’ refers to those pupils who attract government pupil premium funding: pupils claiming free school meals at any point in the last six years and pupils in care or who left care through adoption or another formal route. 28–29 January 2020
p.4
School details
Inspection number 10133430 Type of school Secondary comprehensive
p.5
School details
Appropriate authority The governing body
p.5
School details
Date of previous inspection 14 January 2016, under section 8 of the Education Act 2005
p.5
Information about this school
The school is part of the Diocese of Salford. The school’s last section 48 inspection was in January 2016. The school uses alternative provision for a small number of pupils at The Heights, Coal Clough Academy and Burnley Football Club.
p.5
Information about this inspection
We carried out this inspection under section 5 of the Education Act 2005.
p.5
Information about this inspection
During the inspection, we met with the headteacher, other members of the senior leadership team, middle leaders and a wide range of teaching and support staff. We also met with governors and representatives from the local authority and the diocese. We met with pupils to discuss their views about school life. We reviewed a wide range of documentation, including the school’s self- evaluation and improvement plans, subject leaders’ curriculum plans, attendance and behaviour records and the procedures in place to keep pupils safe. 28–29 January 2020
p.5
6
We also considered the 50 responses to Ofsted’s online survey for staff. We also considered the views of 159 parents in their responses to Ofsted’s online survey, Parent View, including the comments received via the free-text facility. There were no responses to the pupils’ survey. We did deep dives in English, mathematics, science, history and geography. We met with subject leaders for each of these subjects, visited some lessons, looked at pupils’ work and spoke to pupils and teachers. We also considered other subjects, including languages, food technology and creative arts.
p.6
Inspection team
Rachel Goodwin, lead inspector Her Majesty’s Inspector
p.6
Inspection team
Sharon Asquith Ofsted Inspector 28–29 January 2020
p.6
7
regulates and inspects to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.
p.7
7
If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .
p.7
7
You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .
p.7
7
Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .
p.7
7
T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted
p.7
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion