Schools & FE · School inspection (EIF)
St Mary & St Joseph's Catholic Primary School
Summary
Stewart Gale (lead), Susan Horsnell
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection date verified
30 Jan 2020
- Inspectors verified
Stewart Gale, Susan Horsnell
- Behaviour and attitudes verified
Requires improvement
- Early years verified
Requires improvement
- Leadership and management verified
Requires improvement
- Overall effectiveness verified
Requires improvement
- Personal development verified
Requires improvement
- Quality of education verified
Requires improvement
- Postcode verified
BH20 6DS
- Name on report verified
St Mary and St Joseph’s Catholic Primary School
- URN verified
140770
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Grade profile
Each judgement on its scale, weakest to strongest.
- OverallRequires improvement
- Behaviour and attitudesRequires improvement
- Early yearsRequires improvement
- Leadership and managementRequires improvement
- Personal developmentRequires improvement
- Quality of educationRequires improvement
15% of comparable inspections in the last three years were graded Requires improvement (5,043 inspections).
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type graded Requires improvement.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- However, there are too many weaknesses in how these are designed and implemented. p.2
- However, teachers’ knowledge of the order in which letters and sounds should be taught is weak. p.2
- This leads to poor progress for some pupils, including those who need to catch up quickly. p.2
- There are weaknesses in the school’s reading and phonics programme. p.3
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Communication & language2
“This leads to gaps in their knowledge, including their vocabulary.” p.2
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 7
- Words of findings
- 1,025
- about usual (typical 1215)
- Reading level
- Fairly hard
- Flesch 56, typical 56
- Average sentence
- 15 words
- Next steps
- 1
- typical 5
- Hedged sentences
- 10%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Inspection of St Mary and St Joseph’s Catholic Primary School Folly Lane, Wool, Wareham, Dorset BH20 6DS
p.1
Overall effectiveness Requires improvement
The quality of education Requires improvement Behaviour and attitudes Requires improvement Personal development Requires improvement Leadership and management Requires improvement Early years provision Requires improvement
p.1
Overall effectiveness Requires improvement
Previous inspection grade Not previously inspected under section 5 of the Education Act 2005 29–30 January 2020
p.1
What is it like to attend this school?
Most pupils enjoy school. They particularly like the outdoor learning programme. This provides wonderful opportunities to explore, play and make dens. Pupils love to build fires and work sensibly to make different objects. However, at other times, pupils do not behave well enough, including during play at breaktimes which can get too rough for some. This spoils an otherwise calm and orderly environment.
p.2
What is it like to attend this school?
Teaching is not successfully building pupils’ perseverance. Some pupils find it difficult to keep trying and they give up easily, including children in early years. This can prevent them from doing as well as they could.
p.2
What is it like to attend this school?
Pupils feel safe. They know that bullying is harmful and that it is not tolerated. The pupils’ colourful anti-bullying posters adorn the school’s corridors. These provide useful prompts and reminders to all about the dangers of bullying.
p.2
better?
Since it became an academy in 2014, the school has had some significant changes, particularly in those leading the school. This led to a decline in the quality of education. However, following the appointment of the headteacher in January 2019, and with the ongoing support of the trust, the school is starting to recover. Leaders have an accurate understanding of what the school needs to do to improve. Nevertheless, this has taken time to achieve and there is much work to do. Some leaders still do not have enough knowledge of their subjects to hold teachers firmly to account, which further impedes improvement.
p.2
better?
Subject leaders have plans for what they want pupils to know in each subject, from Years 1 to 6. However, there are too many weaknesses in how these are designed and implemented. For example, in music, teachers do not take enough account of gaps in pupils’ knowledge. Pupils cannot recall great composers or basic musical notation. Lessons do not ensure that pupils build knowledge sequentially, starting from what pupils know. At other times, such as in science, teachers attempt to teach difficult concepts, such as fossilisation, without ensuring that pupils build secure knowledge. As a result, pupils do not achieve well, including those with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND). Furthermore, leaders do not ensure that the early years curriculum is well planned or sufficiently ambitious to prepare children well for Year 1.
p.2
better?
Since September 2019, leaders have implemented a new approach to reading and phonics. Starting in Reception and continuing to Year 2, pupils are taught phonics every day. However, teachers’ knowledge of the order in which letters and sounds should be taught is weak. This leads to poor progress for some pupils, including those who need to catch up quickly. These pupils are not gaining secure knowledge to be confident and fluent readers. The approach to reading in key stage 2 is confused. Teachers do not know clearly enough what pupils need to learn next. This leads to gaps in their knowledge, including their vocabulary. Recent strategies, such 29–30 January 2020
p.2
3
as the ‘High-Five’ challenge, encourage pupils to read more. Pupils are beginning to show more interest in authors and literature. They all have a reading book and understand the importance of reading.
p.3
3
Pupils enjoy having responsibilities, such as being eco-warriors or class monitors. They understand the school’s gospel values and recognise how these make the school a better place. Staff ensure that pupils learn about the world around them. For example, the children in Reception enjoy learning about Chinese New Year celebrations and cultural similarities and differences. Pupils enjoy the various trips and visits, such as to Corfe Castle, where they learn more about their local heritage and the impact of our lives on future generations. These help to prepare pupils for life in modern Britain.
p.3
Safeguarding
The arrangements for safeguarding are effective.
p.3
Safeguarding
Leaders are diligent in checking that staff and visitors are safe to work with pupils. All the required safeguarding training is fully in place. Staff understand the school’s processes for referring any concerns. Leaders respond swiftly and work well with other professional agencies to keep pupils safe.
p.3
Safeguarding
Pupils know how to stay safe in different situations. They told us how to avoid danger when working online, as well as how to evacuate the school safely in an emergency. Staff also help pupils to manage their emotional and mental health well.
p.3
(Information for the school and appropriate authority)
There are weaknesses in the school’s reading and phonics programme. These prevent pupils from reading fluently and confidently. Leaders must ensure that a robust reading and phonics programme is implemented, along with accurate assessment, to ensure that all pupils learn to read well, including in Reception. The curriculum is not well planned or designed to enable pupils to acquire sufficiently deep knowledge in many subjects, from Reception to Year 6. As a result, pupils have gaps in their knowledge, including vocabulary. Leaders need to ensure that the school’s curricular model builds knowledge and skills sequentially and at the right time, so that pupils are well prepared for the next stage in their education. Some leaders do not have sufficient expertise in their subjects or areas of responsibility. This means that they find it difficult to hold others to account, or evaluate accurately, which weakens the capacity to improve. Leaders need to
p.3
(Information for the school and appropriate authority)
ensure that there is a comprehensive plan to develop leaders’ knowledge and confidence for subject leadership. 29–30 January 2020
p.3
How can I feed back my views?
or to find out what other parents and carers think. We use Ofsted Parent View information when deciding which schools to inspect, when to inspect them and as part of their inspection.
p.4
How can I feed back my views?
The Department for Education has further guidance on how to complain about a school.
p.4
How can I feed back my views?
If you are the school and you are not happy with the inspection or the report, you can complain to Ofsted .
p.4
Further information
You can search for published performance information about the school.
p.4
Further information
In the report, ‘disadvantaged pupils’ refers to those pupils who attract government pupil premium funding: pupils claiming free school meals at any point in the last six years and pupils in care or who left care through adoption or another formal route. 29–30 January 2020
p.4
School details
Inspection number 10020051 Type of school Primary
p.5
School details
Website www.stmaryjosephswool.dorset.sch.uk/
p.5
School details
Date of previous inspection 7–8 November 2011
p.5
Information about this school
St Mary and St Joseph’s Primary School converted to become an academy school on 1 April 2014. It is a member of Plymouth CAST multi-academy trust. When its predecessor school, St Mary’s Catholic First School, was last inspected by Ofsted, it was judged to be outstanding overall. The school’s most recent section 48 inspection was in February 2017.
p.5
Information about this inspection
We carried out this inspection under section 8 of the Education Act 2005. We deemed the inspection a section 5 inspection under the same Act.
p.5
Information about this inspection
We worked with many leaders during the course of the inspection. These included the headteacher, curriculum leaders for English, mathematics, science, history, music and physical education (PE), and the special educational needs coordinator. We also met with an emotional literacy support adviser and the chair of the local governing board. The lead inspector held a telephone conversation with the chief executive officer and met the school’s link education and standards manager. 29–30 January 2020
p.5
6
We scrutinised the school’s safeguarding records, including the single central record, and evaluated the effectiveness of the school’s safeguarding procedures. This involved talking to staff and pupils about their understanding of safeguarding, bullying and health and safety. We undertook deep dives in these subjects: reading, history, mathematics and science. This involved visiting lessons, talking to pupils, looking at pupils’ work and talking to teachers. On the second day, we also looked at music, PE and outdoor education. We checked Parent View, Ofsted’s online survey, and took account of these views during the inspection.
p.6
Inspection team
Stewart Gale, lead inspector Her Majesty’s Inspector
p.6
Inspection team
Susan Horsnell Ofsted Inspector 29–30 January 2020
p.6
7
regulates and inspects to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.
p.7
7
If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .
p.7
7
You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .
p.7
7
Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .
p.7
7
T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted
p.7
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion