Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection date verified
5 Feb 2020
- Inspectorssingle source
Nigel Bragg
- Postcode verified
PE9 3NZ
- Name on report verified
Cips Corporate Services Limited
- URN verified
2539288
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No standout praise found.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No strong criticism found.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No next steps set out.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 5
- Words of findings
- 21
- shorter than usual (typical 1049)
- Reading level
- —
- Average sentence
- 7 words
- Next steps
- 0
- typical 5
- Hedged sentences
- 0%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Cips Corporate Services Limited Monitoring visit report
p.1
Name of lead inspector: Nigel Bragg, Ofsted Inspector
p.1
Type of provider: Independent learning provider
p.1
Address:
Easton House Easton on the Hill Stamford PE9 3NZ Monitoring visit: Cips Corporate Services Limited, 4–5 February 2020
p.1
Context and focus of visit
From October 2018, Ofsted undertook to carry out monitoring visits to all newly directly funded providers of apprenticeship training provision which began to be funded from April 2017 or after by ESFA and/or the apprenticeship levy. This monitoring visit was undertaken as part of those arrangements and as outlined in the ‘Further education and skills inspection handbook’, especially the sections entitled ‘Monitoring visits’ and ‘Monitoring visits to providers that are newly directly publicly funded’. The focus of these visits is on the themes set out below.
p.2
Context and focus of visit
Cips Corporate Services Limited (Cips) was awarded a contract to provide levy- funded apprenticeships in January 2018. It began enrolling apprentices in November 2018. It currently has 172 standards-based apprentices studying commercial procurement and supply at level 4. The vast majority of apprentices are adults. Cips works with one subcontractor that delivers functional skills English and mathematical qualifications on its behalf.
p.2
Reasonable progress
Leaders have implemented a commercial procurement and supply apprenticeship that matches the needs of employers and apprentices. Careful curriculum planning ensures that apprentices receive the training they want in order to access higher- level qualifications in their chosen careers. Employers rightly value the skills, knowledge and behaviours that apprentices gain, which contribute effectively to business goal attainment.
p.2
Reasonable progress
Leaders have established relevant arrangements for apprentices to complete the end-point assessment (EPA). Most apprentices have a good understanding of the EPA, although not all have an adequate appreciation of the relevant grading criteria.
p.2
Reasonable progress
The small minority of apprentices who commence the programme without an English and mathematical qualification at level 2 receive good additional support. Consequently, examination pass rates at first attempt are high.
p.2
Reasonable progress
Governance arrangements are adequate. Governors receive a relevant range of reports to aid their scrutiny of leaders’ and managers’ decision-making. Challenges from governors have resulted in improvements that benefit apprentices. Monitoring visit: Cips Corporate Services Limited, 4–5 February 2020 Leaders ensure that apprentices receive their full apprenticeship entitlement. As a result, a high proportion of apprentices pass examinations during the programme. Apprentices are aware of their right to paid time off during work time for private study. Not all apprentices log their off-the-job hours accurately or frequently enough. This hinders managers’ ability to take swift corrective action.
p.2
Reasonable progress
Managers routinely evaluate training quality, and this leads to improved professional practice. Consequently, leaders have an appropriate appreciation of the provision’s strengths and areas for improvement. They correctly recognise that they have been slow in applying comprehensive processes to evaluate the subcontractor’s effectiveness. Information systems are new and not all have enough data to support managers’ rapid intervention to correct performance shortfalls.
p.3
Reasonable progress
Leaders only recruit staff who have the high-level skills and vocational knowledge needed to undertake their role. However, a small number of tutors have yet to commence relevant trainer training.
p.3
Reasonable progress
Apprentices develop a good range and variety of new skills, knowledge and behaviours. Improvements in their self-assurance and self-esteem are particularly good. Apprentices are proud of what they are undertaking and achieving. Their workplace supervisors encourage them to exploit contacts with other professionals. This fosters their wider learning successfully.
p.3
Reasonable progress
The curriculum suits apprentices’ and employers’ needs well. All apprentices receive a good introduction to relevant concepts and how to apply them within their roles. They quickly develop the confidence to use their learning at work. For example, early in their programme apprentices can put together a business case for cost savings, which considers acquisition cost, usage, disposal and risk.
p.3
Reasonable progress
Tutors deliver off-the-job training to a good standard. They use their extensive commercial experience to make links between theory and its practical application. This accelerates apprentices’ development. Apprentices receive helpful and supportive feedback from tutors. They know how to improve to achieve their potential. Revision sessions are particularly effective in embedding apprentices’ knowledge and understanding. The quality of apprentices’ completed work is good.
p.3
Reasonable progress
On-the-job training promotes and extends apprentices’ learning effectively. However, not all Cips workplace mentors support apprentices from the start of their programme. This slows the pace of apprentices’ achievement.
p.3
Reasonable progress
Apprentices do not have access to enough impartial careers guidance. All apprentices receive relevant help prior to commencing their programme. Consequently, they have a realistic appreciation of how the apprenticeship contributes to their short- Monitoring visit: Cips Corporate Services Limited, 4–5 February 2020 term career aspirations, including promotion in their own workplaces. However, few apprentices have an adequate understanding of what is available to them in the wider employment market.
p.3
Reasonable progress
All tutors use information on apprentices’ prior attainment and experience to establish a relevant programme of study. Tutors accurately identify apprentices’ English and mathematical development needs, but rarely improve skills levels beyond those required of the apprenticeship standard.
p.4
Reasonable progress
Safeguarding arrangements are fit for purpose. Senior leaders have put in place all the necessary policies and procedures to protect apprentices. These include arrangements for the safe recruitment of staff working with young and vulnerable people.
p.4
Reasonable progress
The designated safeguarding officer (DSO) has received appropriate training and is suitably knowledgeable to carry out the role. The DSO takes relevant and swift action if safeguarding concerns arise. Staff have an adequate understanding of their safeguarding roles, although they are yet to receive more detailed and appropriate training.
p.4
Reasonable progress
Tutors extend apprentices’ awareness of safeguarding effectively, throughout their training. Apprentices usually know how to raise issues and whom they should contact if they have concerns about their own or others’ safety. Most apprentices have, at least, an adequate appreciation of the dangers inherent in radicalisation or extremism. They have a good understanding of how to stay safe when using the internet and social media. Monitoring visit: Cips Corporate Services Limited, 4–5 February 2020 regulates and inspects to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council
p.4
Reasonable progress
children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.
p.5
Reasonable progress
If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .
p.5
Reasonable progress
You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .
p.5
Reasonable progress
Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .
p.5
Reasonable progress
T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted
p.5
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion