Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Dudley Metropolitan Borough Council

Inspected 5 Feb 2020 · published 20 Feb 2020 · URN 50218

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

William Baidoe-Ansah (lead), Clive Blanchette, Gillian Forrester

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    5 Feb 2020

  • Inspectors verified

    Clive Blanchette, Gillian Forrester, William Baidoe-Ansah

  • Name on report verified

    Short inspection of Dudley Metropolitan Borough Council

  • URN verified

    50218

Page 1 of 6
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+43Positivemore positive than 46% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praiseexceptionallyeffectiveclearsafestrongenjoyenthusiasticimproved
Criticismtoo oftenlacknot alwaysfall behindstrugglevariablenot effective

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionSafeguardingWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings621w+40
  • Safeguarding95w+25
  • What needs to improve68w+43

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
6
Words of findings
777
shorter than usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 45, typical 45
Average sentence
13 words
Next steps
3
typical 5
Hedged sentences
12%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 51%Safeguarding 8%What needs to improve 6%About the inspection 36%

Full report text

Further education and skills inspection report

p.1

Short inspection of Dudley Metropolitan Borough Council

p.1

Outcome

Dudley Metropolitan Borough Council continues to be a good provider.

p.1

Information about this provider

Dudley Metropolitan Borough Council (MBC) is part of the council’s regeneration and enterprise directorate. It offers 73 accredited and 397 community learning courses each year, taught in 59 community venues across the borough.

p.1

Information about this provider

At the time of the inspection, approximately 550 learners were enrolled on a range of accredited and non-accredited courses, including health and well-being, functional skills English and mathematics, English for speakers of other languages (ESOL) and digital skills. In the previous academic year, a total of 2,976 learners studied with Dudley MBC (the service). It was last inspected in March 2016.

p.1

What is it like to be a learner with this provider?

Learners enjoy their courses. They are enthusiastic in their learning sessions. They collaborate well and recognise the progress they are making. Learners are particularly pleased with how they have grown in confidence during their courses – and rightly so. They can point to the skills they have developed as a result of their participation in interesting but challenging activities.

p.1

What is it like to be a learner with this provider?

Learners receive effective personal support from tutors. In class, tutors establish a safe and cooperative learning environment which puts learners at ease. This enables learners to take measured risks and develop resilience and character. As a result, their well-being is significantly improved. Learners feel safe.

p.1

What is it like to be a learner with this provider?

Learners receive clear information, advice and guidance about their next steps. The vast majority of learners go on to another course within the service, mostly at a more demanding level. A significant number move into higher-level courses provided by the service’s college partners. 4–5 February 2020

p.1

better?

Leaders and managers have a clear strategic vision for each strand of the service’s curriculum delivery. The health and well-being curriculum is clearly focused on those learners furthest from employment. The skills curriculum provides accredited courses. Both strands meet local, regional and funding-body priorities.

p.2

better?

The service offers a wide range of attractive courses, such as painting and drawing, mindfulness and Pilates. In family learning, learners benefit from learning in their local communities, where they feel safe to take those first steps back into education. The service is exceptionally successful at engaging learners who are new to education.

p.2

better?

Tutors organise and order the curriculum well to ensure that learners move from easy to more complex and challenging tasks. This enables them to develop their knowledge and skills, including personal and social skills. For example, a sewing programme covers health and safety before learners are introduced to threading a sewing machine.

p.2

better?

Tutors are exceptionally well qualified and experienced in most subject areas. Learners benefit from art tutors who are practising artists and sewing tutors who have extensive experience of upholstery. However, a few tutors for ESOL learners are not specialist language tutors.

p.2

better?

In the health and well-being curriculum strand, teaching is well paced, with clear expositions at the start of sessions. Activities present the right level of challenge. Where there is a wide disparity in learners’ starting points, tutors recognise this by agreeing tasks of varying difficulty. Tutors ensure that learners have frequent opportunities to practise, and thus develop, their skills. As a result, learners’ work shows clear evidence of skills development.

p.2

better?

In the skills curriculum, tutors create a safe and productive learning environment. Learners develop their skills in English and mathematics well. As a result, they now use spelling and punctuation more confidently in their everyday lives. For example, one learner is now able to fill in forms, which he was unable to do previously.

p.2

better?

In a few lessons, tutors do not use effective assessment strategies. Too often, tutors do not check learners’ understanding fully before moving on to the next activity. As a result, a few learners cannot recall what they have previously learned.

p.2

better?

A few ESOL learners struggle in functional skills lessons due to their lack of basic English skills. Tutors do not always have the specialist skills to develop the language of ESOL learners. As a result, they fall behind or disengage in lessons.

p.2

better?

Governance arrangements have been strengthened since the previous inspection. The board provides a strong strategic steer to senior leaders. This has enabled them to them adapt provision to the changing priorities of the council and other regional 4–5 February 2020

p.2

3

bodies. Governors receive enough information to provide appropriate challenge to senior leaders.

p.3

Safeguarding

The arrangements for safeguarding are effective.

p.3

Safeguarding

As leaders target some of the most vulnerable adult learners in the borough, they give safeguarding the high priority it deserves. Policies are comprehensive and recently updated. Designated officers are in place. All staff have received recent and relevant training in safeguarding. Managers have dealt with the few reported incidents swiftly and appropriately.

p.3

Safeguarding

Managers have good links with external bodies. They keep staff informed about local issues, such as gangs and far-right extremism. Nevertheless, learners’ awareness of how to keep themselves safe from radicalisation and extremism is too variable.

p.3

What does the provider need to do to improve?

 Leaders and managers should ensure that the curriculum for ESOL learners is tailored to meet their specific needs.  Managers should ensure that all staff receive training to make assessment consistently good across all provision to help learners remember what they have learned.  Leaders and managers should ensure the further and consistent development of learners’ awareness of the dangers of radicalisation and extremism. 4–5 February 2020

p.3

Provider details

Address The Council House Priory Road Dudley DY1 1HF

p.4

Provider details

Provider type Community learning and skills

p.4

Provider details

Date of previous inspection 9 March 2016

p.4

Provider details

Main subcontractors N/A 4–5 February 2020

p.4

Information about this inspection

The inspection was the first short inspection carried out since Dudley Metropolitan Borough Council was judged to be good in March 2016.

p.5

Information about this inspection

The inspection team was assisted by the quality improvement manager, as nominee. Inspectors took account of the provider’s most recent self-assessment report and development plans, and the previous inspection report. The inspection was carried out using the further education and skills inspection handbook and took into account all relevant provision at the provider. Inspectors collected a wide range of evidence to inform judgements, including observing learning sessions, scrutinising learners’ work, seeking the views of learners, staff and other stakeholders, and examining the provider’s documentation and records.

p.5

Inspection team

William Baidoe-Ansah, lead inspector Her Majesty’s Inspector Clive Blanchette Ofsted Inspector Gillian Forrester Ofsted Inspector 4–5 February 2020

p.5

6

regulates and inspects to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.

p.6

6

If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.6

6

You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .

p.6

6

Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .

p.6

6

T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.6

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion