Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Melanie Martin

Inspected 23 Jan 2020 · published 14 Feb 2020 · URN 2539280

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Darrell Bate

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection datesingle source

    23 Jan 2020

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Darrell Bate

  • Postcode verified

    SW20 0BA

  • Name on report verified

    Melanie Martin t/a Watson Martin

  • URN verified

    2539280

Page 1 of 5
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+20Mostly positivemore positive than 35% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praiseindependent

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspection positive critical

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No next steps set out.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
5
Words of findings
22
shorter than usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
—
Average sentence
7 words
Next steps
0
typical 5
Hedged sentences
0%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 2%About the inspection 98%

Full report text

Melanie Martin t/a Watson Martin Monitoring visit report

p.1

Name of lead inspector: Darrell Bate, Ofsted Inspector

p.1

Type of provider: Independent learning provider

p.1

Address:

112–120 Coombe Lane London SW20 0BA Monitoring visit: Melanie Martin t/a Watson Martin, 22–23 January 2020

p.1

Context and focus of visit

From October 2018, Ofsted undertook to carry out monitoring visits to all newly directly funded providers of apprenticeship training provision which began to be funded from April 2017 or after by the Education and Skills Funding Agency and/or the apprenticeship levy. This monitoring visit was undertaken as part of those arrangements and as outlined in the ‘Further education and skills inspection handbook’, especially the sections entitled ‘Monitoring visits’ and ‘Monitoring visits to providers that are newly directly publicly funded’. The focus of these visits is on the themes set out below.

p.2

Context and focus of visit

Watson Martin was established in 2004. It offers professional qualifications in learning and development and human resource management. In January 2018, the company became an accredited apprenticeship provider. At the time of the inspection, there were 69 apprentices on level 3 and level 5 standards, split evenly between human resources management and learning and development standards.

p.2

Reasonable progress

Leaders and managers have forged close working relationships with large employers. They co-design apprenticeship programmes to match employers’ specific business needs. Following the first cohort of apprentices, leaders have put in place effective plans to improve the learning experience. For example, they encourage collaboration between apprentices from different employers to share best practice from others. Apprentices benefit greatly from the professional accreditation and career progression within human resources and learning and development roles that the apprenticeship provides. Many aspire to go on to the Level 7 postgraduate programme.

p.2

Reasonable progress

Employers fully understand and meet their obligations, including for the off-the-job training entitlement. Employers are very supportive of their apprentices and, as a result, very few leave the programme. Apprentice advisers regularly inform line managers about upcoming off-the-job training and assessment deadlines. This helps to keep apprentices on track.

p.2

Reasonable progress

Leaders and managers have put in place effective arrangements to track apprentices’ progress. They produce bespoke progress reports for each employer that identify those at risk of falling behind or who are not meeting off-the-job training quotas. Monitoring visit: Melanie Martin t/a Watson Martin, 22–23 January 2020 The vast majority of apprentices are on course to complete within planned timescales.

p.2

Reasonable progress

In their contract with employers, managers ensure that they commit to all the elements of each apprentice’s programme. Leaders manage effectively the subcontractor that delivers the English and mathematics components. The few apprentices that require these qualifications begin these studies early in their programme and most pass at the first attempt.

p.3

Reasonable progress

Quality assurance arrangements are effective. Managers regularly observe face-to- face and online training sessions in order to raise standards. Advisers meet frequently to review all aspects of delivery. The quality improvement plan identifies appropriate improvement actions; however, leaders do not accurately self-assess their past performance. Managers do not use data, including learner feedback, to identify any differences in the progress of different groups of apprentices.

p.3

Reasonable progress

Apprentices acquire new and occupationally specific knowledge, skills and behaviours. They gain in confidence through leading meetings or holding difficult conversations with staff. Advisers sequence knowledge components of the standard in a logical order that enables apprentices to apply theory to their working practice. For example, apprentices improve their teamwork as a result of knowing the personality types associated with Belbin team roles.

p.3

Reasonable progress

Leaders and managers conduct thorough assessments of apprentices’ skills and knowledge at the start of the programme. They carry out competence-based interviews to screen potential apprentices. They involve line managers when assessing prior learning and matching apprentices to the right level and standard. In some cases, experienced employees are deemed unsuited for the programme.

p.3

Reasonable progress

Apprentices receive good-quality off-the-job training from well-qualified advisers. They benefit from the extensive professional experience that advisers bring to individual coaching sessions. All apprentices attend and actively participate in themed workshops and webinars that bring the apprenticeship to life. These activities are complemented with course materials and extensive online resources, allowing those who miss a session to catch up. Apprentices complete a weekly reflective journal that provides an insightful record of their learning.

p.3

Reasonable progress

Advisers provide effective support for apprentices. They maintain frequent contact and monitor apprentices’ progress via their electronic portfolios. Regular assessments are matched closely to qualification specifications. However, advisers’ feedback on these submissions lacks critical analysis of how apprentices can improve, especially Monitoring visit: Melanie Martin t/a Watson Martin, 22–23 January 2020 at level 5. Apprentices receive detailed progress reviews and these contain useful targets.

p.3

Reasonable progress

Arrangements for end-point assessment are well-planned. Apprentices understand the requirements for end-point assessment; for example, they work towards their final project. However, they are not fully aware of how to attain higher grades.

p.4

Reasonable progress

Apprentices that require English and mathematics qualifications receive good support from specialist tutors. Those that require extra support are quickly helped. Advisers do not sufficiently develop apprentices’ English skills to study at higher levels.

p.4

Reasonable progress

Leaders and managers place high importance on the safety and well-being of apprentices. They have effective arrangements to keep them safe. Safeguarding is routinely discussed at management meetings and referenced in apprentices’ progress reviews.

p.4

Reasonable progress

All staff have checks to ensure that they are suitable to work with apprentices. They complete training in safeguarding and the ‘Prevent’ duty. The designated safeguarding lead has taken an advanced safeguarding course. Appropriate policies are in place, although these lack detail about individual staff responsibilities. Leaders and managers meet their obligations under the ‘Prevent’ duty.

p.4

Reasonable progress

Apprentices know how to report any concerns. They have access to an out-of-hours line to the multi-agency safeguarding hub. Apprentices understand topical safeguarding issues in the workforce, for example social media harassment. They are aware of the dangers of extremism and radicalisation; for example, they receive training in how to respond to a terrorist or weapons threat. Monitoring visit: Melanie Martin t/a Watson Martin, 22–23 January 2020 regulates and inspects to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council

p.4

Reasonable progress

children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.

p.5

Reasonable progress

If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.5

Reasonable progress

You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .

p.5

Reasonable progress

Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .

p.5

Reasonable progress

T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.5

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion