Early years · Early years complaint outcome
Childminder in Doncaster
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection datesingle source
28 Jan 2020
- URN verified
EY552901
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No standout praise found.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No strong criticism found.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 2
- Words of findings
- 317
- about usual (typical 281)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 32, typical 42
- Average sentence
- 23 words
- Next steps
- 1
- typical 1
- Hedged sentences
- 7%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Summary of outcome
All early years providers must meet the legal requirements in the 'Statutory framework for the early years foundation stage', which you can find at www.gov.uk/government/publications/early-years-foundation-stage-framework--2 . If we find that a provider is not meeting the requirements, we can take action to ensure they put matters right. On 25 October 2019 we received concerns that this provider was not meeting some of these requirements. We carried out an announced visit to the premises on the 28 January 2020 and discussed the concerns with the provider. We have sent the provider a Notice to Improve that asks them to take the actions below within the timescale set out.
p.1
Summary of outcome
- demonstrate that induction and training arrangements are sufficiently robust to ensure that all assistants have a clear understanding of their roles and responsibilities, with particular regards to supervision arrangements, behaviour management and risk assessments on outings and the school run
p.1
Summary of outcome
- demonstrate that supervision arrangements for assistants are sufficiently robust to ensure that they foster a culture of mutual support, teamwork and the confidential discussion of sensitive issues, in particular notifying you of any incidents or significant events involving children
p.1
Summary of outcome
- provide evidence of how you will ensure that children are usually within sight and hearing of staff and always within sight or hearing, particularly when on outings or the school run.
p.1
Summary of outcome
We are satisfied with the action taken by the provider to minimise the possibility this would occur again. The provider will be able to give parents further information about this. The provider is still registered with Ofsted.
p.1
Publication of complaints
We publish details of complaints made against childminders, home childcarers and childcare providers where we or the provider have taken action in order to meet legal requirements. We publish details of complaints for five years commencing on the date we complete our investigation.
p.1
Publication of complaints
For further information about the complaints process please view the Concerns and complaints about childminders and childcare providers leaflet .
p.2
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion