Other · Ofsted letter
Setting
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspectorssingle source
Daniel Lambert
- Postcode verified
TN25 4BU
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No next steps set out.
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 3
- Words of findings
- 787
- about usual (typical 963)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 46, typical 48
- Average sentence
- 18 words
- Next steps
- 0
- typical 2
- Hedged sentences
- 5%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Store Street Manchester M1 2WD T 0300 123 1231 www.gov.uk/ofsted
p.1
Mrs Susan Sweet Challock Primary School Church Lane Challock Ashford Kent TN25 4BU
p.1
Subject inspection of Challock Primary School
Following my visit to your school on 22 January, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to confirm the inspection findings. The findings do not change the overall effectiveness judgement of outstanding from the last section 5 inspection.
p.1
Subject inspection of Challock Primary School
This inspection was conducted under section 8 of the Education Act 2005 and in accordance with Ofsted’s published procedures for a no formal designation inspection of schools. The inspection was carried out to enable Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector to better understand the quality of education in specific subjects provided by outstanding primary schools.
p.1
Main findings
Staff have collectively considered how the geography curriculum will build pupils’ knowledge as they move through the school. Curriculum plans detail what pupils will learn during series of lessons and provide staff with an unambiguous guide to delivering these. Thought has been put into how lessons are sequenced so that pupils build their knowledge gradually and revisit this often. Pupils develop a significant body of knowledge that they can easily recall by the time they leave the school. In a few instances, the intended end points are not outlined in sufficient detail. This means that curricular decisions are made by individual staff rather than guided by agreed planning.
p.1
Main findings
The geography curriculum meets, and often exceeds, the ambition of the national curriculum. Pupils study a broad range of human and physical geography during their time at the school. For example, Year 6 pupils can name and identify all of the countries that make up South America and know their relative population sizes and land masses. As pupils acquire more knowledge, they understand and link increasingly complex ideas such as trade, population movement and global warming. Pupils are proud of their knowledge and appreciate their geographical education. As one pupil noted, ‘If we don’t know about the world, how can we look after it?’
p.1
Main findings
Meaningful fieldwork helps pupils to put their knowledge into practice. For example, having completed a series of lessons on rivers and seas, Year 5 visited a local river. This allowed them to identify the key features of river systems and to see, first hand, how the flow rate and volume of the water affects the surrounding landscape.
p.2
Main findings
Pupils are taught to compare contrasting localities and to identify their similarities and differences. Staff are careful to provide realistic sources of information to ensure that pupils do not form stereotypical views. For example, pupils explained to me that relative poverty and homelessness affect all nations, not just those that are economically less developed.
p.2
Main findings
Pupils learn positional language well and are able to create and navigate their own maps. In all year groups, pupils look at, and construct, maps and learn to identify the key features of these. For example, children in Reception understood that the poles are cold in comparison to the equator when discussing a globe.
p.2
Main findings
Curriculum leaders possess a strong understanding of the geography curriculum and have trained and supported staff to deliver this. They have provided additional training in fieldwork that has enhanced the opportunities for pupils to engage in mapwork, orienteering and field trips. Leaders use assessment information well to gain an understanding of how groups of pupils are performing in geography. However, staff do not use this information systematically to identify and address gaps in pupils’ learning, meaning the impact of these assessments is limited.
p.2
Main findings
Pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND) are supported to access and achieve well in geography. Staff work closely with the special educational needs coordinator to adapt and tailor tasks to ensure they are accessible to all. Pupils with SEND benefit from the use of additional support and regular repetition to help them remember the key facts. These pupils are able to readily recall their learning in geography.
p.2
Evidence
During this inspection I met with you, senior leaders, the subject leaders for geography and a group of teachers. I scrutinised curriculum planning and I visited six lessons in the early years and key stages 1 and 2. I met with pupils to talk about their learning in geography and evaluated work in pupils’ books and in electronic journals.
p.2
Context
Challock Primary School is a smaller-than-average-sized primary school. Most pupils are White British. The proportion of pupils who speak English as an additional language is below the national average. The proportion of pupils who are disadvantaged or with SEND is below the national average.
p.3
Context
I am copying this letter to the chair of the governing body, the regional schools commissioner and the director of children’s services for Kent. This letter will be published on the Ofsted website.
p.3
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion