Schools & FE · School inspection (EIF)
Oldfield School
Summary
Sarah McGinnis (lead), David New, Jerry Giles, John White, Will Morgan
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection date verified
22 Jan 2020
- Inspectors verified
David New, Jerry Giles, John White, Sarah McGinnis, Will Morgan
- Behaviour and attitudes verified
Good
- Leadership and management verified
Good
- Overall effectiveness verified
Good
- Personal development verified
Good
- Quality of education verified
Good
- Postcode verified
BA1 9AB
- Name on report verified
Oldfield School
- URN verified
136483
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Grade profile
Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2012.
- OverallGood
- Behaviour and attitudesGood
- Leadership and managementGood
- Personal developmentGood
- Quality of educationGood
66% of comparable inspections in the last three years were graded Good (5,043 inspections).
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type graded Good.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Where teachers have high expectations, most pupils concentrate well in lessons. p.2
- The previous ‘outstanding’ judgement reflected the school’s overall effectiveness in September 2012 under the relevant framework at that time. p.1
- The long time between inspections is because the law changed in 2011; it made outstanding schools exempt from routine inspection. 21–22 January 2020 p.1
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No strong criticism found.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- They use this to think carefully about what pupils need to know. p.2
- Typically, pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND) receive the help that they need to support their social and emotional well-being. p.3
- However, they need to have a sharper oversight of the additional funding provided for disadvantaged pupils and for those pupils who need to catch up with their peers in literacy and numeracy. p.3
- Leaders need to ensure that all subjects sequence the curriculum in a way that will help pupils build their understanding over time. p.4
- Leaders need to continue to develop the curriculum and their use of the systems they have in place to improve the attendance of such pupils. p.4
- Leaders need to check how well teachers support pupils to understand and remember what they have learned. p.4
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Leadership & governance19
“Leaders are extremely diligent and record the referrals that are made to them carefully.” p.3Teaching & assessment6
“Where teachers have high expectations, most pupils concentrate well in lessons.” p.2
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 8
- Words of findings
- 1,324
- about usual (typical 1098)
- Reading level
- Fairly hard
- Flesch 55, typical 55
- Average sentence
- 16 words
- Next steps
- 6
- typical 4
- Hedged sentences
- 9%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Inspection of Oldfield School Kelston Road, Bath, Somerset BA1 9AB
p.1
Overall effectiveness Good
The quality of education Good Behaviour and attitudes Good Personal development Good Leadership and management Good Sixth-form provision Good Previous inspection grade Outstanding
p.1
Overall effectiveness Good
The previous ‘outstanding’ judgement reflected the school’s overall effectiveness in September 2012 under the relevant framework at that time.
p.1
Overall effectiveness Good
The new judgement of ‘good’ reflects the current inspection framework as well as any changes at the school since the last inspection.
p.1
Overall effectiveness Good
The school has not been inspected for seven years, which is longer than the five- year maximum interval between inspections. Changes in school effectiveness may have happened at any point in that period. The long time between inspections is because the law changed in 2011; it made outstanding schools exempt from routine inspection. 21–22 January 2020
p.1
What is it like to attend this school?
Oldfield school has changed considerably since its previous inspection. Not only has the school grown in size, but it now admits both girls and boys. Leaders have managed this transition effectively. In many respects, they have established a new school, based on positive relationships and an ambition to be truly inclusive. Pupils reach standards that compare well with other schools.
p.2
What is it like to attend this school?
The majority of pupils are courteous and respectful as they go about their day. Pupils recognise that behaviour has improved because staff have fair and consistent expectations of them. Pupils say that bullying is rare but if it does occur staff will deal with it swiftly.
p.2
What is it like to attend this school?
Where teachers have high expectations, most pupils concentrate well in lessons. They are keen to discuss what they have learned with each other. However, at times some pupils lose focus and do not complete work to the best of their ability.
p.2
What is it like to attend this school?
Leaders encourage pupils to be involved in the life of their school. The extensive work of the school council and the Year 11 prefect team illustrates this well. Pupils spoke of the many clubs and activities that they are involved in. Parents, too, recognise this as a strength of the school.
p.2
better?
A larger proportion of pupils than is typical nationally study subjects that make up the English Baccalaureate in key stage 4. The newly appointed subject leader has quickly got to work to promote modern foreign languages and an appreciation of the culture of other countries. Year 7 pupils, for example, are looking forward to their forthcoming trip to Barcelona or Paris.
p.2
better?
Subject leaders have good subject knowledge. They use this to think carefully about what pupils need to know. In some subjects, leaders have identified the things that pupils find difficult. In science, for example, pupils’ ability to write about their practical investigations at GCSE has been improved by refining the curriculum in key stage 3.
p.2
better?
In English, the subject leader has thoughtfully planned how pupils can best build up their subject knowledge. Pupils who fall behind their peers are supported well by a curriculum that better meets their needs. Pupils are encouraged to read a wide range of high-quality texts.
p.2
better?
However, in some subjects, leaders have not fully planned the order in which pupils will learn important knowledge and skills. There is also inconsistency in how well teachers check that pupils remember what they have learned in the longer term. 21–22 January 2020
p.2
3
The school welcomes pupils from all abilities and backgrounds. Typically, pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND) receive the help that they need to support their social and emotional well-being.
p.3
3
The special educational needs coordinator is working with staff so that they meet the academic needs of pupils with SEND. However, the ability of teaching to meet these needs is variable. This is a view shared by a minority of parents who responded to the Parent View survey.
p.3
3
Leaders work proactively to promote regular attendance. Leaders do everything possible, but pupils’ absence remains a stubborn issue, particularly for disadvantaged pupils and pupils with SEND.
p.3
3
While pupils’ behaviour is good overall, there are some pupils who find behaving well difficult. Leaders think creatively about how the curriculum can meet pupils’ needs and support them with their future plans. Leaders only use exclusion after other strategies have been employed.
p.3
3
Staff and students are proud of the growing sixth form. Teaching supports students to make good progress. Students are ambitious for themselves and feel that this ambition is shared by staff. As part of the enrichment programme, students debate the history of western thought, follow courses, such as media and conversational Spanish, or participate in sporting activities.
p.3
3
In key stages 3 and 4, pupils follow a well-planned programme to support their personal development. Pupils learn how to cook healthily in food technology, consider the dangers of gang culture in drama and discuss the importance of the rule of law in history. However, in key stage 5 the programme is in its early stages. Pupils say that the school is a community which respects and values different faiths and cultures.
p.3
3
Governors have supported leaders to overcome the school’s unsettled history. They are well informed about the work of the school. However, they need to have a sharper oversight of the additional funding provided for disadvantaged pupils and for those pupils who need to catch up with their peers in literacy and numeracy.
p.3
3
Staff are overwhelmingly positive about the support they receive from leaders. As one member of staff said, ‘This is the kindest, friendliest school I have ever worked in.’ This comment was typical of many.
p.3
Safeguarding
The arrangements for safeguarding are effective.
p.3
Safeguarding
Leaders are extremely diligent and record the referrals that are made to them carefully. Staff know the importance of recording even the smallest of incidents so that a detailed profile of pupils who are vulnerable can be built. 21–22 January 2020
p.3
4
Leaders are knowledgeable about the support available from external agencies. They are skilled in ensuring that pupils receive the support that they need. They work with a range of partners, including the police, which means that they are aware of potential risks that pupils might encounter in their everyday lives, for example when using social media.
p.4
(Information for the school and appropriate authority)
There is variability in how well subject leaders have planned the order in which pupils learn important knowledge and skills. This means that pupils are not always able to make sense of their learning so that they are fully prepared for what will come next. Leaders need to ensure that all subjects sequence the curriculum in a way that will help pupils build their understanding over time. Where teaching is less effective, teachers do not check pupils’ understanding sufficiently well. Consequently, some pupils have gaps in their skills or knowledge, including pupils with SEND. Leaders need to check how well teachers support pupils to understand and remember what they have learned. In the sixth form, the curriculum to develop students’ understanding of the full range of important personal, social and moral issues is in its infancy. Therefore, there are gaps in students’ awareness. Leaders need to plan the curriculum so
p.4
(Information for the school and appropriate authority)
that students acquire the important information that they need to prepare them well for their life beyond school. Overall absence and persistent absence for disadvantaged pupils and pupils with SEND are above the national average. Consequently, disadvantaged pupils, in particular, do not achieve as well as their peers. Leaders need to continue to develop the curriculum and their use of the systems they have in place to improve the attendance of such pupils.
p.4
How can I feed back my views?
or to find out what other parents and carers think. We use Ofsted Parent View information when deciding which schools to inspect, when to inspect them and as part of their inspection.
p.4
How can I feed back my views?
The Department for Education has further guidance on how to complain about a school.
p.4
How can I feed back my views?
If you are the school and you are not happy with the inspection or the report, you can complain to Ofsted . 21–22 January 2020
p.4
Further information
You can search for published performance information about the school.
p.5
Further information
In the report, ‘disadvantaged pupils’ refers to those pupils who attract government pupil premium funding: pupils claiming free school meals at any point in the last six years and pupils in care or who left care through adoption or another formal route. 21–22 January 2020
p.5
School details
Local authority Bath and North East Somerset Council
p.6
School details
Inspection number 10133449 Type of school Secondary comprehensive
p.6
provision
Number of pupils on the school roll 1250
p.6
sixth form
Date of previous inspection 12 September 2012
p.6
Information about this school
Since the previous inspection, the school has grown in size. It is now a co- educational 11 to 18 school. The sixth form has also increased in number from 38 students completing post-16 study in 2018 to the current figure of 190 students following a range of A-level courses. The school uses alternative provision provided by: the hospital school, Bath College, South Gloucestershire College, the local authority alternative provider, ‘Rocksteady’ training and the Bath Rugby Foundation. 21–22 January 2020
p.6
Information about this inspection
Inspectors met with representatives from the board of trustees. Inspectors also met with senior leaders, pastoral leaders, the special educational needs coordinator and a group of staff. Inspectors did deep dives in these subjects: English, design technology, geography, mathematics and modern foreign languages. Inspectors discussed the curriculum design with leaders, carried out lesson visits, scrutinised pupils’ work and spoke to pupils and teachers from the lessons visited. A range of other subjects from across the curriculum were also considered. Inspectors evaluated the effectiveness of safeguarding, checked the school’s single central record and scrutinised policies relating to safeguarding and pupils’ behaviour. An inspector met with the designated safeguarding lead and reviewed a sample of case files. Inspectors observed pupils’ behaviour in lessons and around the school site. Inspectors spoke with pupils, both formally and informally, to discuss their views
p.7
Information about this inspection
about their school. Inspectors considered 178 responses to Ofsted’s online survey, Parent View.
p.7
Inspection team
Sarah McGinnis, lead inspector Her Majesty’s Inspector
p.7
Inspection team
David New Ofsted Inspector 21–22 January 2020
p.7
8
regulates and inspects to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.
p.8
8
If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .
p.8
8
You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .
p.8
8
Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .
p.8
8
T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted
p.8
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion