Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Early years · Early years inspection (EIF)

Glebe Pre-School

Inspected 22 Jan 2020 · URN 203689

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

Inadequate

Jill Hardaker

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Group verified

    Robinson, Enid Magdalene

  • Group reference verified

    RP513308

  • Inspection date verified

    22 Jan 2020

  • Inspectors verified

    Jill Hardaker

  • Behaviour and attitudes verified

    Inadequate

  • Leadership and management verified

    Inadequate

  • Overall effectiveness verified

    Inadequate

  • Personal development verified

    Inadequate

  • Previous overall verified

    Good

  • Quality of education verified

    Inadequate

  • Postcode verified

    CM7 5RB

  • Name on report verified

    Glebe Pre-School

  • URN verified

    203689

Page 1 of 7
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Each judgement on its scale, weakest to strongest.

  • OverallInadequate
  • Behaviour and attitudesInadequate
  • Leadership and managementInadequate
  • Personal developmentInadequate
  • Quality of educationInadequate

5% of comparable inspections in the last three years were graded Inadequate (17,905 inspections).

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

−34Criticalmore positive than 54% of reports of this type graded Inadequate
OutstandingGoodRIInadequate

In line with other reports of this type graded Inadequate.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praisehappyeffectiveenjoymake good progresseffectivelypositivelysafeconsistently
Criticismpoorat risknot effectivecompromisedweaknessesbreachesdo not knowfailed

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsSafeguardingAbout the inspection positive critical
  • Findings748w−43
  • Safeguarding283w−12

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
7
Words of findings
998
about usual (typical 972)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 49, typical 51
Average sentence
15 words
Next steps
3
typical 1
Hedged sentences
13%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 50%Safeguarding 19%About the inspection 31%

Full report text

Inspection of Glebe Pre-School Community Centre, Glebe Avenue, Braintree, Essex CM7 5RB

p.1

Overall effectiveness Inadequate

The quality of education Inadequate Behaviour and attitudes Inadequate Personal development Inadequate Leadership and management Inadequate Overall effectiveness at previous inspection Good

p.1

The provision is inadequate

Children's safety is compromised by significant weaknesses in leadership and management. The provider does not hold all the required information for children, in line with statutory requirements. For example, some children's dates of birth are not known. The provider does not have clear systems to monitor children's attendance. She does not consider how children's absences may have implications for their safety. The provider shows very little understanding of how to protect children from extreme views in line with the 'Prevent' duty guidance. Furthermore, other staff members have no knowledge of this guidance to protect children's welfare. Children demonstrate they feel happy at the pre-school and play together generally well.

p.2

The provision is inadequate

The quality of education children receive is poor. The provider does not have effective systems to monitor staff's practice. Supervision meetings are not routinely held. For example, the provider shows records of discussions she held with staff four years ago. The provider does not observe or support staff to ensure they all have the skills and knowledge required to fulfil their roles effectively. There is very little interaction between staff and children to support and extend children's learning. The provider and staff are not able to talk about how the curriculum is planned to meet children's needs. They do not make good use of assessment information to establish each child's level of development. As a result, staff are unable to plan suitable learning experiences to support what children need to learn next.

p.2

The provision is inadequate

Some children's dates of birth are recorded incorrectly. This means staff do not always know the ages of children they work with and so their expectations for these children are not accurate. At times, younger children disengage from activities as staff expect them to have the skills to sit and listen. During these times, children's behaviour deteriorates. Children play imaginatively with the resources provided for them. However, their play is often mundane and their learning is not challenged. Consequently, children are not adequately prepared for their next stage of learning and for moving on to school.

p.2

need to do better?

n The provider does not reflect on her practice or identify ways to develop continuously. Consequently, since the last inspection there has been a rapid decline in quality. Breaches to the welfare requirements have a significant impact on children's safety and welfare. For example, for some children the provider holds no required information. This puts children at risk and means that, in an emergency situation, the provider is unable to give correct information on children's ages and individual specific needs, if they require

p.2

need to do better?

22 January 2020 medical assistance. n Children's assessment information is poor and incorrect. The provider and children's key persons do not know how old some children are. It is therefore not possible to accurately identify if children are meeting expected milestones. The provider feels that all children are learning well. However, there is very little evidence to justify her decisions. n The provider and staff do not consider children's learning needs and interests in planned activities. Staff do not interact with children effectively, and children's learning is not well supported. For example, staff do not adapt their teaching to ensure the older and most-able children are challenged sufficiently. n The provider does not provide staff with regular supervision to discuss any concerns or support them to improve their practice. This has a negative impact on their teaching and ongoing professional development. Staff report not to

p.2

need to do better?

have undertaken any training for a significant period of time. n Children demonstrate effective skills when using tools. For example, they correctly use scissors to cut dough. Older children use pencils to draw pictures. They show they understand the difference between pictures and text as they make small marks to represent writing. n Children are learning how to develop healthy lifestyles. They have sufficient time to engage in active play, both inside and outdoors. They enjoy riding bicycles around the hall and negotiate space well. Children know they need to wash their hands before they eat. n Some parents state that they do not know if their children are developing as well as they should be because staff have never informed them of their children's development. However, other parents speak positively about the pre-school and staff. They feel that their children are happy to attend and enjoy the activities.

p.3

Safeguarding

The arrangements for safeguarding are not effective.

p.3

Safeguarding

The provider does not take all reasonable steps to ensure children are kept safe and well. She does not understand how children's unexpected absence could potentially be a safeguarding concern. The provider has failed to gain an understanding of the 'Prevent' duty guidance. She has not reflected on this in line with her policies and procedures. Furthermore, other staff have no knowledge of this guidance. Consequently, they are unable to explain how they might recognise signs of extremist behaviour. The provider and staff understand how to recognise some of the basic signs of abuse. They know how to respond if they feel any child is at risk of being abused.

p.3

Due date

improve the arrangements for safeguarding children in order to ensure children are safe and well, with particular regard to implementing clear procedures to monitor unexpected periods of absence 22/02/2020

p.4

Due date

make sure that correct information is recorded and kept for each child, including full name, date of birth, and the name and address of parents/carers 22/02/2020

p.4

Due date

improve knowledge of the 'Prevent' duty guidance and implement into policies and practice 22/02/2020

p.4

Due date

ensure that staff supervision arrangements are effective in monitoring the effectiveness of teaching, identifying ongoing training needs and tackling underperformance 22/02/2020

p.4

Due date

ensure that observations and assessments of children's development are precise so that staff have an accurate understanding of children's skills and abilities, and use this to plan challenging learning opportunities to help them make good progress 22/02/2020

p.4

Due date

improve the quality of teaching and staff's interactions so all children are consistently engaged in purposeful learning experiences 22/02/2020

p.4

Due date

improve the two-way flow of information with parents to ensure they know how their children are learning and developing. 22/02/2020

p.4

Setting details

Unique reference number 203689 Local authority Essex Inspection number 10072493 Type of provision Childcare on non-domestic premises Registers Early Years Register Day care type Sessional day care Age range of children 2 to 4 Total number of places 26 Number of children on roll 11 Name of registered person Robinson, Enid Magdalene

p.5

reference number

Telephone number 07811975161 Date of previous inspection 4 February 2016

p.5

Information about this early years setting

Glebe Pre-School registered in 1975. The pre-school employs three members of childcare staff, all of whom hold appropriate early years qualifications at level 3. The pre-school opens Monday to Friday during term time. Sessions are from 9.30am until 2.30pm on Monday, Wednesday and Friday, and from 9.30am until 12.30pm on Tuesday and Thursday. The pre-school provides funded early education for two-, three- and four-year-old children.

p.5

Inspection activities

n The inspector had a tour of the pre-school with the provider. They talked about how the setting is organised and discussed the play and learning opportunities provided for children. n The inspector observed the quality of education during activities indoors. n The inspector spoke with staff, volunteers and children during the inspection. She held a meeting with the provider. n A sample of records, including safeguarding policies and procedures and staff's suitability records, were seen by the inspector. n The inspector spoke to a number of parents and took account of their views.

p.5

Inspection activities

22 January 2020 We carried out this inspection under sections 49 and 50 of the Childcare Act 2006 on the quality and standards of provision that is registered on the Early Years Register. The registered person must ensure that this provision complies with the statutory framework for children's learning, development and care, known as the early years foundation stage.

p.5

Inspection activities

22 January 2020 regulates and inspects to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children's social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children's services, and inspects services for looked after children, safeguarding and child protection.

p.6

Inspection activities

If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.7

Inspection activities

You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk

p.7

Inspection activities

Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .

p.7

Inspection activities

T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.7

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion