Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · School inspection (EIF)

Thornton Primary School

Inspected 17 Jan 2020 · published 10 Feb 2020 · URN 143944

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    17 Jan 2020

  • Inspectors verified

    Fiona Dixon, Karen Heath, Peter Marsh

  • Behaviour and attitudes verified

    Good

  • Early years verified

    Good

  • Leadership and management verified

    Good

  • Overall effectiveness verified

    Good

  • Personal development verified

    Good

  • Quality of education verified

    Good

  • Postcode verified

    BD13 3NN

  • Name on report verified

    Thornton Primary School

  • URN verified

    143944

Page 1 of 7
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Each judgement on its scale, weakest to strongest.

  • OverallGood
  • Behaviour and attitudesGood
  • Early yearsGood
  • Leadership and managementGood
  • Personal developmentGood
  • Quality of educationGood

66% of comparable inspections in the last three years were graded Good (5,043 inspections).

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+13Mostly positivemore positive than 7% of reports of this type graded Good
OutstandingGoodRIInadequate

Reads more critically than most reports of this type graded Good.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praiseenjoypositivewell plannedhigh expectationsstrongfeel safeenthusiasticsuccessful
Criticismlacksnot ambitiousnot good enoughweaknessesweakertoo fewtoo oftenmissed

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsSafeguardingAbout the inspection positive critical
  • Findings1163w+8
  • Safeguarding87w+44

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
7
Words of findings
1,225
about usual (typical 1098)
Reading level
Fairly hard
Flesch 59, typical 55
Average sentence
14 words
Next steps
6
typical 4
Hedged sentences
9%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 65%Safeguarding 5%About the inspection 30%

Full report text

Inspection of Thornton Primary School Thornton Road, Thornton, Bradford, West Yorkshire BD13 3NN

p.1

Overall effectiveness Good

The quality of education Good Behaviour and attitudes Good Personal development Good Leadership and management Good Early years provision Good

p.1

Overall effectiveness Good

Previous inspection grade Not previously inspected under section 5 of the Education Act. 16–17 January 2020

p.1

What is it like to attend this school?

Pupils at Thornton Primary School have a real zest for learning. They are excited by lessons because teachers make them interesting and fun. Parents agree with their children and talk about the passion staff have for teaching. Pupils enjoy visits to places such as the Industrial Museum because it ‘brings learning to life’.

p.2

What is it like to attend this school?

Teachers have high expectations of pupils’ behaviour both in and out of class. Pupils have positive attitudes to learning and they concentrate in lessons. There are a few pupils whose attendance is not good enough. This makes it hard for them to settle in class when they have missed out on some important learning. Pupils feel safe and well cared for. They say bullying incidents are rare but when they do occur staff sort them out.

p.2

What is it like to attend this school?

The school’s curriculum in reading is well planned. Pupils understand the texts they are reading because they are well linked to the other subjects. Historically the planning of mathematics and writing has not helped pupils learn and remember more. Recent changes to the planning and sequencing of mathematics teaching are now making a positive difference. In the foundation stage and key stage 1 the curriculum planning for teaching writing is not ambitious enough for the most able pupils.

p.2

better?

Children get off to a good start in the school’s Nursery. Activities are well planned to help children build on their learning step by step. They happily follow the school routines. In the Reception classes there is a sharp focus on teaching the skills children need to read and enjoy books. For their age, children read fluently and show a real pleasure when listening to stories.

p.2

better?

Teachers’ planning for the outside area of the Reception classes is not as good as provision in the classroom. Children play in the fresh air and particularly enjoy the sandpit. Some of the activities outside do not build on children’s next steps. Children do not have good opportunities to practise reading and writing skills outside. The weaker planning of the curriculum in the outside area means that children do not sustain concentration and flit about from one thing to another.

p.2

better?

Leaders have received good support and challenge from both the trust and the governing body. This has helped the school to devise a curriculum which has been well thought through. It is particularly strong in reading, history and science. In these subjects lessons carefully build on what pupils have learned before and what they need to learn next. Pupils rise to meet these expectations and achieve well. Pupils are enthusiastic about science. They are keen to be ‘super scientists’. Year 6 studied the circulatory system and dissected a pig heart. In their work pupils wrote up their findings using the correct scientific vocabulary. They used their computing skills to 16–17 January 2020

p.2

3

write a simple animation programme explaining the working of the heart. As they had been reading ‘Pig Heart Boy’ in class pupils could discuss the moral issues around transplantation.

p.3

3

Leaders have been successful in prioritising reading for enjoyment. Throughout the school, pupils have a real love of reading. Teachers choose reading books to help younger readers practise their phonics. Older pupils read to a high standard and confidently talk about their favourite authors.

p.3

3

The school has recently introduced a new approach to the mathematics curriculum. Although it is early days, this is starting to help pupils. They are now building on their previous learning and starting to apply what they know to solving mathematical problems. The planning of the writing curriculum particularly for the younger pupils is not sharp enough. It lacks ambition for most-able writers. Pupils are unsure how to form their letters correctly. In key stage 2 pupils’ written work is of a good standard. Pupils use the skills they have learned in English when they write in other subjects.

p.3

3

The school provides well for disadvantaged pupils and those with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND.) Teachers make detailed plans to set out clear learning steps so these pupils achieve well.

p.3

3

Thornton is an inclusive school and provides well for pupils’ and staff’s well-being. A few pupils have sometimes found it more challenging to focus in school. They say that the support the school has put in place has helped them improve their behaviour. The school’s weekly ‘phrase that pays’ means that pupils reflect on a range of topical issues. They have a mature understanding of why other people might choose to adopt a different lifestyle or religion to their own.

p.3

Safeguarding

The arrangements for safeguarding are effective.

p.3

Safeguarding

Staff work well with parents and carers, and other agencies. This helps to protect pupils and keep them free from harm. Governors check that they meet their statutory duties for the safer recruitment of staff. Staff are well trained and they understand their responsibilities for safeguarding pupils.

p.3

Safeguarding

Pupils know how to keep themselves safe in school, online and in the local community. When they share their worries with staff they are confident they will be followed up effectively. 16–17 January 2020

p.3

(Information for the school and appropriate authority)

 Historical weaknesses in curriculum planning and the sequence of content in mathematics has resulted in gaps in some pupils’ understanding. Recent changes to the curriculum are already having a positive impact. Leaders need to continue to address this legacy so that pupils can use their mathematical knowledge to tackle and solve mathematical problems.  Previously, too few pupils starting secondary school have achieved the expected and higher standard for their age in writing. Improvements to the curriculum planning for writing in key stage 2 have resulted in better achievement for these pupils and has raised teachers’ expectations. This is less evident in key stage 1. The curriculum is not ambitious enough for more-able writers. The sequence of teaching writing should ensure that young pupils consistently write their letters correctly.  The outdoor provision for children in the Reception classes lacks focus. Planning

p.4

(Information for the school and appropriate authority)

the outside activities needs to be an integral part of the learning environment. The curriculum for this age group should build on children’s previous learning and promote all areas of learning, but particularly reading and writing.  Attendance for some groups of pupils has been lower than the national average over the past few years. Too many pupils are absent too often. Leaders have begun to implement more-effective procedures that are beginning to make a difference. They should now ensure that procedures are applied with vigour so that attendance rises, and the persistent absence of all groups of pupils falls.

p.4

How can I feed back my views?

or to find out what other parents and carers think. We use Ofsted Parent View information when deciding which schools to inspect, when to inspect them and as part of their inspection.

p.4

How can I feed back my views?

The Department for Education has further guidance on how to complain about a school.

p.4

How can I feed back my views?

If you are the school and you are not happy with the inspection or the report, you can complain to Ofsted .

p.4

Further information

You can search for published performance information about the school.

p.4

Further information

In the report, ‘disadvantaged pupils’ refers to those pupils who attract government pupil premium funding: pupils claiming free school meals at any point in the last six years and pupils in care or who left care through adoption or another formal route. 16–17 January 2020

p.4

School details

Inspection number 10121647 Type of school Primary

p.5

School details

Date of previous inspection Not previously inspected

p.5

Information about this school

 Thornton Primary School converted to become and academy school on 1 February 2017. When its predecessor school, Thornton Primary School, was last inspected by Ofsted, it was judged to require improvement overall.  Thornton Primary School is part of the Focus Multi-Academy Trust.  Since the school opened, there has been a reduction in staffing, including staff in leadership positions.  The school has a Nursery which children attend both part and full time.

p.5

Information about this inspection

We carried out this inspection under section 5 of the Education Act 2005.

p.5

Information about this inspection

 We met with the headteacher, senior leaders and other members of staff. The lead inspector met with trust representatives, including the chief executive officer, and a group of governors, including the two chairs of the governing body.  We looked in depth at the following subjects: reading, mathematics, science, writing and history. In doing so, we visited classes across all year groups and 16–17 January 2020

p.5

6

reviewed pupils’ work. We spoke to pupils about their learning and listened to them read. We also met with teachers.  We met with those responsible for safeguarding. We looked at a range of documentation linked to safeguarding including: child protection policies and procedures; absence data; information about how pupils’ behaviour is managed; and information about how more-vulnerable pupils are supported. We talked to pupils during the inspection and asked them about how safe they feel.  We observed pupils’ behaviour in lessons and around the school, including at breakfast club, playtimes and lunchtimes. We gathered pupils’ views about the school through formal and informal discussions. We considered the two responses to Ofsted’s pupil survey and 22 responses to Ofsted’s staff survey.  We scrutinised a range of documents, including the school’s self-evaluation and improvement plans, minutes of governing body meetings and safeguarding

p.6

6

documents.  We gathered the views of parents at the start of the day. We considered the 57 responses to Ofsted’s parent questionnaire, Parent View, and the 45 free-text responses.

p.6

Inspection team

Karen Heath, lead inspector Ofsted Inspector

p.6

Inspection team

Peter Marsh Ofsted Inspector 16–17 January 2020

p.6

7

regulates and inspects to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.

p.7

7

If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.7

7

You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .

p.7

7

Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .

p.7

7

T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.7

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion