Schools & FE · School inspection (EIF)
Livesey Saint Francis' Church of England School
Summary
Tim Vaughan (lead), James Marsh
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection date verified
22 Jan 2020
- Inspectors verified
James Marsh, Tim Vaughan
- Behaviour and attitudes verified
Good
- Early years verified
Good
- Leadership and management verified
Requires improvement
- Overall effectiveness verified
Requires improvement
- Personal development verified
Requires improvement
- Quality of education verified
Requires improvement
- Postcode verified
BB2 5NX
- Name on report verified
Livesey Saint Francis’ Church of England School
- URN verified
119423
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Grade profile
Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2014.
- OverallRequires improvement
- Behaviour and attitudesGood
- Early yearsGood
- Leadership and managementRequires improvement
- Personal developmentRequires improvement
- Quality of educationRequires improvement
15% of comparable inspections in the last three years were graded Requires improvement (5,043 inspections).
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type graded Requires improvement.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- These weaknesses result in pupils not reading as successfully as they should. p.4
- These weaknesses mean that pupils may miss learning some of the essential information that they need to know. p.3
- This means that pupils are not learning as well as they should. p.4
- However, staff have much to do to ensure that pupils learn all the knowledge that they should in different subjects. p.2
- However, some of these pupils had not learned the knowledge that the national curriculum sets out that they should. p.2
- Pupils’ phonics and reading skills should be better. p.2
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Personal development4
“need to set high expectations for all pupils’ personal development.” p.4Progress & outcomes4
“Pupils enjoy this subject and achieve well.” p.2
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 7
- Words of findings
- 1,230
- about usual (typical 1215)
- Reading level
- Plain English
- Flesch 61, typical 56
- Average sentence
- 15 words
- Next steps
- 6
- typical 5
- Hedged sentences
- 16%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Inspection of Livesey Saint Francis’ Church of England School Cherry Tree Lane, Cherry Tree, Blackburn, Lancashire BB2 5NX
p.1
Overall effectiveness Requires improvement
The quality of education Requires improvement Behaviour and attitudes Good Personal development Requires improvement Leadership and management Requires improvement Early years provision Good Previous inspection grade Good 21–22 January 2020
p.1
What is it like to attend this school?
The quality of pupils’ learning in different subjects has varied too much since the last full inspection of the school in 2014. The school has been on a roller coaster of change. Many staff have changed or been off work at a time when important improvements to the teaching of the national curriculum were needed. The upheaval in staffing at the school has negatively affected the quality of leadership, teaching and pupils’ learning.
p.2
What is it like to attend this school?
In the past year, leaders and governors have started to improve their work and that of the staff team. Children in the early years gain a good start to their education. Pupils throughout the school learn well in mathematics. Even so, in key stages 1 and 2, pupils’ attainment and progress in writing are average. From Year 1 onwards, pupils’ phonics and reading skills are variable, but pupils at the end of key stage 2 read well. The quality of the curriculum in several subjects is better than it was one year ago. However, staff have much to do to ensure that pupils learn all the knowledge that they should in different subjects.
p.2
What is it like to attend this school?
Pupils at the school are happy and behave well. They enjoy attending the breakfast club and after-school clubs such as dodgeball. Pupils feel safe at the school. They told us that bullying is rare and that staff resolve issues fully.
p.2
better?
Leaders have improved the curriculum over the past year. Pupils now learn different units of work in a more logical order than previously. Children in the early years learn well. However, school documents do not always set out in enough detail the knowledge that pupils in key stages 1 and 2 will learn. Leaders are beginning to improve those units of work in reading, science, geography, history and art that need extra detail. However, it is too soon to see the impact of these changes on pupils’ knowledge. During the inspection, some pupils told us about their recent learning in geography. They could recite interesting facts with great enthusiasm. However, some of these pupils had not learned the knowledge that the national curriculum sets out that they should.
p.2
better?
Leaders have successfully improved the school’s curriculum in mathematics from Reception to Year 6. Pupils enjoy this subject and achieve well. They told us that staff successfully help them to explain their reasoning when working out answers to problems. They find mathematics challenging and rewarding. A typical pupil comment was: ‘I used to really struggle with mathematics, but now I don’t, because of the support from staff.’
p.2
better?
The curriculum for reading in key stage 1 is not well developed. Pupils’ phonics and reading skills should be better. Some teachers and teaching assistants have too little up-to-date knowledge of teaching pupils to read. In contrast, staff in Reception have completed recent training. Their better knowledge is helping them to ensure that the youngest children learn to communicate, say rhymes and read well. The books that 21–22 January 2020
p.2
3
teachers select for pupils to practise their reading skills in key stage 1 do not precisely match the sounds that pupils already know. Older pupils in key stage 2 love reading and learning new language such as ‘ample’ and ‘famished’. They develop their reading skills well. It is little wonder that their attainment and progress in reading are above average in Year 6.
p.3
3
Teaching assistants play a valued role in supporting pupils throughout the school to understand the curriculum, including pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND). However, some teachers rely too much on teaching assistants to teach pupils with SEND. Some teachers depend too much on teaching assistants to listen to pupils’ read. This means that some pupils do not develop their knowledge as strongly as they should.
p.3
3
Pupils at the school are keen to learn. They told us that staff give them the emotional and behavioural support that they need to feel calm and settled in lessons. Older pupils take seriously their roles to model good behaviour for younger pupils. Pupils’ behaviour is good. ‘Hot chocolate Friday’ is popular with pupils, when some gain recognition for their efforts or achievement through a celebratory meeting with the headteacher.
p.3
3
Pupils respect other people that may look, speak or live differently from themselves. However, leaders do not plan well enough for pupils’ personal development, except in the early years and Year 6. This holds back pupils from being fully ready for their future lives as British citizens.
p.3
Safeguarding
The arrangements for safeguarding are effective.
p.3
Safeguarding
Leaders and governors make sure that the school premises are safe and secure. They know the local safeguarding risks to pupils and how the school responds to protect pupils. Leaders ensure that staff are well trained and up to date in their knowledge of safeguarding. Leaders and staff act properly to support individual pupils and to link with other agencies. Pupils learn to keep themselves safe, including when online.
p.3
(Information for the school and appropriate authority)
Leaders’ plans for some units of work in the school’s curriculum do not include enough detail about what precisely pupils will learn. This includes in reading, science, geography, history and art. Not all teachers give enough attention to teaching the curriculum to pupils with SEND. Some teachers leave too much work to teaching assistants. These weaknesses mean that pupils may miss learning some of the essential information that they need to know. Leaders should make certain that they and staff plan every subject in enough detail. They should ensure that all teachers teach the curriculum fully to each pupil. 21–22 January 2020
p.3
4
Some leaders and staff lack up-to-date knowledge of how to teach phonics and reading. They have too little understanding of the phonics programme used at the school. Some teachers do not listen to pupils read enough. They rely too much on teaching assistants to support pupils’ reading. The books that teachers select for pupils to practise their reading contain too many sounds and words that pupils do not know. These weaknesses result in pupils not reading as successfully as they should. Leaders need to ensure that all staff develop strong knowledge and expertise in phonics and the teaching of reading. Staff only give adequate attention to developing pupils’ understanding of British values. They do not focus properly on developing pupils’ career aspirations. Staff do not do enough to give pupils roles at school that will develop their personal skills. This means that pupils are not learning as well as they should. Leaders
p.4
4
need to set high expectations for all pupils’ personal development. They should plan more carefully how the school promotes these aspects of learning.
p.4
How can I feed back my views?
or to find out what other parents and carers think. We use Ofsted Parent View information when deciding which schools to inspect, when to inspect them and as part of their inspection.
p.4
How can I feed back my views?
The Department for Education has further guidance on how to complain about a school.
p.4
How can I feed back my views?
If you are the school and you are not happy with the inspection or the report, you can complain to Ofsted .
p.4
Further information
You can search for published performance information about the school.
p.4
Further information
In the report, 'disadvantaged pupils' refers to those pupils who attract government pupil premium funding: pupils claiming free school meals at any point in the last six years and pupils in care or who left care through adoption or another formal route. 21–22 January 2020
p.4
School details
Inspection number 10122005 Type of school Primary
p.5
School details
Appropriate authority The governing body
p.5
School details
Date of previous inspection 5 February 2019, under section 8 of the Education Act 2005
p.5
Information about this school
The chair of governors and the headteacher are new to their roles in the past year. An acting deputy headteacher at the school is on loan from another school.
p.5
Information about this inspection
We carried out this inspection under section 5 of the Education Act 2005.
p.5
Information about this inspection
We spoke with some parents and carers and reviewed 39 responses from parents to Ofsted’s Parent View survey, including 21 free-text responses. We talked with several groups of pupils about their experiences at the school. We spoke with leaders and teaching staff about their work. We checked a sample of leaders’ records about safeguarding. We spoke with representatives of the local authority and diocese and met with five governors, including the chair. We did deep dives in these subjects: reading, mathematics, science and geography. We spoke with subject leaders, visited some lessons, spoke with teachers and pupils and reviewed examples of pupils’ work and leaders’ 21–22 January 2020
p.5
6
curriculum planning. The lead inspector listened to some pupils from Year 1 and Year 2 read to staff. We considered information about the school’s curriculum in history and art.
p.6
Inspection team
Tim Vaughan, lead inspector Her Majesty’s Inspector
p.6
Inspection team
James Marsh Ofsted Inspector 21–22 January 2020
p.6
7
regulates and inspects to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children's social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children's services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.
p.7
7
If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .
p.7
7
You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .
p.7
7
Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .
p.7
7
T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted
p.7
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion