Schools & FE · Further education inspection (EIF)
St Helens College
Summary
Alison Cameron Brandwood (lead), Beth Selwood, Emma Woods, Lisa Duncalf, Maria Rayworth, Michelle Brabner, Richard Ronksley, Ruth Stammers, Sarah McGrath, Tracy Gillett
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection date verified
17 Jan 2020
- Inspectors AI-checked
Alison Cameron Brandwood, Beth Selwood, Emma Woods, Lisa Duncalf, Maria Rayworth, Michelle Brabner, Richard Ronksley, Ruth Stammers, Sarah McGrath, Tracy Gillett
- Behaviour and attitudes verified
Requires improvement
- Leadership and management verified
Requires improvement
- Overall effectiveness verified
Requires improvement
- Personal development verified
Requires improvement
- Quality of education verified
Requires improvement
- Name on report verified
St Helens College
- URN verified
130488
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Grade profile
Each judgement on its scale, weakest to strongest.
- OverallRequires improvement
- Behaviour and attitudesRequires improvement
- Leadership and managementRequires improvement
- Personal developmentRequires improvement
- Quality of educationRequires improvement
15% of comparable inspections in the last three years were graded Requires improvement (5,043 inspections).
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type graded Requires improvement.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Teachers do not always use assessment well enough to identify students’ gaps in knowledge in their written work. p.3
- The curriculum for most students with high needs is poor. p.3
- For example, level 3 health and social care students do not know what they need to do to improve their assignments because feedback from teachers is unclear. p.3
- Management oversight of the apprenticeship provision in construction and engineering is weak. p.4
- Careers information, advice and guidance that young people and apprentices receive are not good enough. p.4
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Governors should establish a stable leadership team that creates an aspirational culture and ambitious curriculum where students and apprentices thrive and achieve. p.5
- Design programmes for students with learning difficulties and/or disabilities well so that they are prepared effectively for adulthood. p.5
- Ensure that teachers plan a curriculum that challenges students to achieve high grades in their qualifications. p.5
- Ensure that the curriculum for apprentices, particularly those on engineering and construction frameworks, develops their knowledge, skills and behaviours quickly. p.5
- Improve careers information, advice and guidance so that these are clear, accurate and meaningful so that students and apprentices understand the range of options available to them to meet their aspirations. p.5
- Ensure that students attend their courses regularly. 14–17 January 2020 p.5
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 8
- Words of findings
- 1,634
- longer than usual (typical 1228)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 43, typical 40
- Average sentence
- 16 words
- Next steps
- 6
- typical 5
- Hedged sentences
- 12%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Further education and skills inspection report
p.1
Overall effectiveness Requires improvement
The quality of education Requires improvement Behaviour and attitudes Requires improvement Personal development Requires improvement Leadership and management Requires improvement Education programmes for young people Requires improvement Adult learning programmes Good Apprenticeships Requires improvement Provision for learners with high needs Inadequate Previous inspection grade Not previously inspected
p.1
Information about this provider
St Helens College is a general further education college. It was formed in December 2017 following a merger between St Helens College and Knowsley Community College. The college consists of five campuses. The largest is the town centre campus in St Helens which delivers approximately two thirds of the provision. The Knowsley campus provides around one quarter of delivery. The remaining provision is at the Technology campus in St Helens and the IAMTech campus in Huyton, which deliver engineering and construction courses, and the Kirby campus, which provides programmes for adults.
p.1
Information about this provider
At the time of the inspection, the college provided education programmes for 2,220 young people who mainly followed vocational programmes from entry level to level 3. There were 44 Year 11 students on 14 to 16 full-time study programmes. The large majority of the 2,716 adult students study part time. Just under two thirds of the college’s 704 apprentices are on frameworks, with the rest on standards-based apprenticeships. Most apprentices study engineering and construction. There are 127 students for whom the college receives high-needs funding. The college works with one subcontractor that provides Prince’s Trust courses to young people and adults. The college offers courses in most subject areas. 14–17 January 2020
p.1
What is it like to be a learner with this provider?
Students and apprentices like the community feeling across the college and how well everyone gets on. They appreciate the support they receive from staff in their studies and personally. Students and apprentices are polite and respectful. They contribute to the calm and friendly environment across all campuses.
p.2
What is it like to be a learner with this provider?
Although most students on education programmes for young people develop skills they need for their chosen careers, leaders do not always design the curriculum to meet the needs and aspirations of all students. A large majority of students who have high needs do not benefit from a broad and rich curriculum that prepares them for adulthood.
p.2
What is it like to be a learner with this provider?
Apprenticeship programmes are designed with employers to meet specific local skills gaps and help them to develop their own staff. For example, engineering apprentices work on projects that develop their skills in interpreting and putting into practice design drawings and specifications. Although apprentices develop a range of new knowledge, skills and behaviours relevant for work and their next career steps, the majority do not develop them quickly enough.
p.2
What is it like to be a learner with this provider?
Adult students benefit from a curriculum that is well planned and frequently reviewed. The range of programmes are designed to meet local needs such as reducing unemployment. Students show resilience and improve their confidence and organisational skills. They demonstrate positive attitudes to their learning. Students studying at level 3 go on to higher education courses as a result.
p.2
What is it like to be a learner with this provider?
Students and apprentices feel safe. They demonstrate effective health and safety practices. For example, access to higher education students know how to sterilise equipment and reduce contamination of agar plates when carrying out work in laboratories.
p.2
better?
The interim principal has begun to stabilise the college following the merger and extensive changes to staffing and college structures. New senior leaders have a clear strategic direction, but the appointment of a permanent principal is yet to be finalised. Governors challenge leaders to improve the quality of education, but the lack of stability at the college has had a negative impact on the pace of improvement.
p.2
better?
Appointments to the new curriculum director posts have just been finalised. Newly appointed leaders and managers have started the process of reviewing the curriculum. Their actions have yet to ensure that the curriculum for all students and apprentices is ambitious enough. Young people and those with high needs are not always placed on programmes at a high enough level. Teachers do not routinely challenge them to achieve high grades in their qualifications. A significant minority 14–17 January 2020
p.2
3
of construction and engineering apprentices make slow progress. This is in part due to leaders not recruiting enough staff with the right expertise quickly enough.
p.3
3
Most staff are well qualified, knowledgeable and experienced in their vocational areas. Most teachers and assessors plan and deliver learning and training in an interesting and logical order. Consequently, students and apprentices know more and can remember more. For example, level 2 plumbing students learned how to make a copper frame within accepted tolerances. They carry out pressure tests to industry standards.
p.3
3
Teachers and assessors do not benefit from a well-planned professional development programme. Training to develop their teaching skills is not focused enough on individual staff’s needs or the curriculum area they work in. Training that is more responsive and focuses on specific and individual development needs has begun but is not yet rolled out across the college.
p.3
3
The curriculum for most students with high needs is poor. It is not designed to meet the individual needs of students with learning difficulties and/or disabilities on foundation programmes. Leaders do not ensure that managers and staff accurately assess students’ skills before they start their programme. Students are frequently set unambitious goals and targets below what they can achieve. Students on foundation programmes do not work towards the outcomes set out in their education, health and care (EHC) plans. For example, students do not take part in external work placements or meaningful travel training because managers have not planned enough staff to facilitate these important aspects of their education.
p.3
3
Around a quarter of students with high needs study on supported internships and vocational courses. They benefit from a curriculum that is well planned and supported to meet their EHC plan targets. For example, vocational students in art and design achieve well and at the same rate as their peers. Supported interns settle into their workplace quickly. They build their knowledge and skills over time because tutors plan their learning incrementally.
p.3
3
Students on education programmes for young people do not all benefit from an ambitious curriculum. For example, in level 2 business, most current students wish to progress to higher education. The curriculum they are studying focuses on employment as the next step. Students in construction all start on a level 1 course regardless of prior attainment in school or at college. Consequently, students do not all achieve to the best of their ability.
p.3
3
Teachers do not always use assessment well enough to identify students’ gaps in knowledge in their written work. For example, level 3 health and social care students do not know what they need to do to improve their assignments because feedback from teachers is unclear. Students develop their practical skills well because teachers constantly share hints and tips when students are practising until they refine their skills to an industry standard. For example, teachers in level 2 beauty therapy corrected mistakes in students’ massage techniques. They supported the students 14–17 January 2020
p.3
4
until they became confident and skilled in carrying out a hand and arm massage as part of a full manicure.
p.4
4
The large majority of students on education programmes for young people benefit from a wide range of work-related experiences. For example, travel and tourism students gain valuable experience when they shadow airport staff and cabin crew on a trip to Tenerife. Students studying construction courses and those aged 14 to 16 do not complete beneficial work experience.
p.4
4
In off-the-job training sessions, teachers do not plan learning that is ambitious enough or closely linked to apprentices’ jobs. They are slow to identify and correct misunderstandings in apprentices’ knowledge. Management oversight of the apprenticeship provision in construction and engineering is weak. A significant minority of apprentices remain on their programme for longer than necessary.
p.4
4
Apprentices on standards-based apprenticeships benefit from a well-planned curriculum. They build their skills and knowledge gradually to gain a deeper understanding of the topic they are learning about. For example, electrotechnical apprentices develop the mathematical concepts they need to know before learning about electronics and circuitry.
p.4
4
Leaders and managers frequently review and update the adult curriculum. Revised programmes meet adult students’ career goals, local employment opportunities and community needs. For example, work-ready and mental health awareness programmes have been developed to meet the needs of unemployed adults.
p.4
4
Teachers on most adult learning programmes plan learning activities that enable students to know more and remember more. For example, on access to higher education courses, teachers use blood-pressure machines and heart dissection activities to embed knowledge of systolic and diastolic blood pressure in students’ memories. Teachers do not always provide feedback that is clear or precise enough for students to know what they have done incorrectly and how to improve their work. For example, students achieving merits in their assignments do not know what they need to do to obtain distinctions.
p.4
4
Careers information, advice and guidance that young people and apprentices receive are not good enough. Guidance is often too general and superficial to prepare them for what they want to do next. Most young people are not aware of the range of options available to them on the completion of their course. In contrast, adult students are prepared well for their next steps. Access to higher education students receive clear advice and support in applying to university. Many successfully gain a place on a range of relevant degree courses.
p.4
4
Staff are optimistic about the future of the college under the new leadership team. Most are positive about the recent changes and value the improvements in communication. The culture across the college reflects leaders’ strategy to raise students’ and apprentices’ aspirations through improved behaviour and attitudes. 14–17 January 2020
p.4
5
Students and apprentices demonstrate high standards of behaviour and respect. Most take pride in their work. Despite this, students’ attendance remains too low.
p.5
Safeguarding
The arrangements for safeguarding are effective.
p.5
Safeguarding
Governors, leaders and managers place a high priority on safeguarding. Staff follow appropriate procedures for reporting any concerns. The safeguarding team responds to concerns promptly. The team has built positive relationships with a wide range of external agencies, including support for mental health. As a result, students and apprentices receive the help they need in and out of college.
p.5
Safeguarding
Staff, students and apprentices receive regular updates and training. This includes local and regional agendas such as knife crime and county lines drug trafficking. Students have created a poster commissioned by the local police force entitled ‘real men don’t carry knives’ which is being used to raise awareness of knife crime. Although students and apprentices receive training about the dangers associated with radicalisation and extremism, a significant minority only have a superficial understanding of these.
p.5
What does the provider need to do to improve?
Governors should establish a stable leadership team that creates an aspirational culture and ambitious curriculum where students and apprentices thrive and achieve. Design programmes for students with learning difficulties and/or disabilities well so that they are prepared effectively for adulthood. Ensure that teachers plan a curriculum that challenges students to achieve high grades in their qualifications. Ensure that the curriculum for apprentices, particularly those on engineering and construction frameworks, develops their knowledge, skills and behaviours quickly. Improve careers information, advice and guidance so that these are clear, accurate and meaningful so that students and apprentices understand the range of options available to them to meet their aspirations. Ensure that students attend their courses regularly. 14–17 January 2020
p.5
Provider details
Address Water Street St Helens Merseyside WA10 1PP
p.6
Provider details
Principal Monica Box (interim principal)
p.6
Provider details
Provider type General further education college
p.6
Provider details
Date of previous inspection Not previously inspected
p.6
Provider details
Main subcontractors Merseyside Fire and Rescue Service 14–17 January 2020
p.6
Information about this inspection
The inspection team was assisted by the deputy principal, as nominee. Inspectors took account of the provider’s most recent self-assessment report and development plans, and the previous inspection report. The inspection was carried out using the further education and skills inspection handbook and took into account all relevant provision at the provider. Inspectors collected a wide range of evidence to inform judgements including visiting learning sessions, scrutinising learners’ work, seeking the views of learners, staff and other stakeholders, and examining the provider’s documentation and records.
p.7
Inspection team
Alison Cameron Brandwood, lead inspector Her Majesty’s Inspector Emma Woods Her Majesty’s Inspector Ruth Stammers Her Majesty’s Inspector Tracy Gillett Ofsted Inspector Michelle Brabner Ofsted Inspector Sarah McGrath Ofsted Inspector Lisa Duncalf Ofsted Inspector Maria Rayworth Ofsted Inspector Beth Selwood Ofsted Inspector Richard Ronksley Ofsted Inspector 14–17 January 2020
p.7
8
regulates and inspects to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.
p.8
8
If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .
p.8
8
You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .
p.8
8
Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .
p.8
8
T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted
p.8
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion