Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · School inspection (EIF)

Mundella Primary School

Inspected 15 Jan 2020 · published 5 Feb 2020 · URN 107006

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Steve Shaw

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    15 Jan 2020

  • Inspectors verified

    Steve Shaw

  • Postcode verified

    S8 8SJ

  • Name on report verified

    Mundella Primary School

  • URN verified

    107006

Page 1 of 7
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+61Positivemore positive than 66% of reports of this type
OutstandingGoodRIInadequate

In line with other reports of this type.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praisestrongvery welleffectiveproudskilledoutstandingwell-ledwarm
Criticismseriousinconsistencydisruptiondecliningconcernsgapsnot happy

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsSafeguardingAbout the inspection positive critical
  • Findings1284w+55
  • Safeguarding109w+74

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
7
Words of findings
1,388
about usual (typical 1153)
Reading level
Plain English
Flesch 63, typical 55
Average sentence
15 words
Next steps
2
typical 4
Hedged sentences
2%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 67%Safeguarding 6%About the inspection 28%

Full report text

Inspection of a good school: Mundella Primary School Mundella Place, Sheffield, South Yorkshire S8 8SJ

p.1

Outcome

Mundella Primary School continues to be a good school.

p.1

What is it like to attend this school?

This is a warm, friendly and welcoming school. Pupils are happy here and they feel safe.

p.1

What is it like to attend this school?

Expectations of what pupils can achieve are high across the board, from the foundation stage to Year 6. Although pupils do well at the end of key stage 2, the school does not just focus on academic outcomes. Leaders want their pupils to grow into well-rounded young people, ready to take their place in the world. The school curriculum has been built to achieve this.

p.1

What is it like to attend this school?

Standards of behaviour are high. Even when confined indoors on a wet lunchtime, pupils behave well. They respect the school’s rules and they manage their own behaviour very well. Teachers trust them to conduct themselves properly. Bullying is not tolerated and is rare. Pupils strongly believe that adults in the school would spot it quickly and sort it out if it happened.

p.1

What is it like to attend this school?

Pupils are proud of the school. They speak very highly of the quality of the teaching they receive and the support that is provided for them. Staff are similarly proud to work here. They feel supported and valued by leaders. There is a strong sense of ‘the Mundella family’ and the ‘Mundella way of doing things’, which runs through the school.

p.1

What does the school do well and what does it need to do better?

Leaders have put an effective curriculum in place. Pupils experience a broad and balanced range of subjects. Leaders have carefully thought through their curriculum. It is well organised, so that teachers follow logically sequenced series of lessons.

p.1

What does the school do well and what does it need to do better?

Leaders have changed the curriculum in the best interests of pupils. For example, although pupils did very well in mathematics at the end of key stage 2 in 2019, leaders spotted that pupils had gaps in their mathematics knowledge. A new mathematics scheme was introduced as a result. This begins in the early years, where children have started to learn the essentials of number skills. In history, a new curriculum has been introduced. It 14–15 January 2020

p.1

2

is organised chronologically to help pupils build up their understanding of history. Pupils have started to make links between different historical events as a result. There is more work to do to establish the necessary history skills in the curriculum, but it is well underway. Leaders have already started work on improvements to the curriculum in a small number of subjects such as design technology and music.

p.2

2

Teaching across the school is strong. From the early years to Year 6, teachers explain the topics and ideas clearly. They check that pupils have ‘got it’. They, and teaching assistants, help out when pupils get stuck.

p.2

2

Leaders have made the importance of reading a priority. As a result of good teaching, pupils do very well in the phonics screening check at the end of Year 1. Teachers in the early years and key stage 1 are skilled at checking how well the pupils are getting on with learning their letters and the sounds they make. Extra support is put in place for those pupils who are finding reading more of a challenge, including in the early years. All staff use the same phonics scheme, so pupils do not get confused. The books that pupils read are carefully matched to their reading level. These strategies help the weakest readers. They are catching up quickly. The support is skilled, but there is a little inconsistency in the approaches staff take to help pupils catch up with their reading. Pupils’ comprehension of what they have just read is sometimes not checked.

p.2

2

Behaviour throughout the school is strong. In the early years, the children are calm, cooperative and considerate. They are quickly learning how to get on with other children. Low-level disruption is rare and efficiently handled. Bullying is not tolerated. All of the pupils who spoke to the inspector said that they knew that school would sort out any worries about bullying. They especially appreciate the ‘Worry Boxes’, which gives them a way of letting school know about things that are on their mind.

p.2

2

Leaders have put a broad curriculum in place. For instance, a philosophy course helps pupils reflect on their world. They participate in community events and fundraising work, including sleepovers for a homeless charity. In the early years, children are learning about making choices by voting for which book they will have at story time.

p.2

2

The support and provision for pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND) is strong. For example, termly reviews held with staff, parents, carers and pupils are used to adapt the teaching and the curriculum where necessary.

p.2

2

The school is well-led and managed. Staff feel valued and supported. Leaders’ decisions are driven by what is in the best interests of pupils.

p.2

Safeguarding

The arrangements for safeguarding are effective.

p.2

Safeguarding

There is a strong culture of safeguarding in the school. Staff are vigilant. They know their pupils well and know the warning signs to look out for. Staff are clear on their responsibilities and what to do should they be worried about any safeguarding matter. 14–15 January 2020

p.2

3

Processes for checking the suitability of staff to work at the school meet requirements. Safeguarding leaders are effective in spotting when a pupil needs help, taking the necessary action and making sure that the pupil is kept safe. Links with external agencies are made when required.

p.3

3

In the early years, safeguarding arrangements are similarly effective.

p.3

(Information for the school and appropriate authority)

 The school’s curriculum is not planned and sequenced well enough in a small number of subjects. In other subjects, substantial work has already been done to implement new curriculums. It is clear from the actions that leaders have already taken to plan the curriculum and train staff in how to teach it that they are well into the process of bringing about a coherent and sequenced curriculum. Leaders should continue the work already underway to implement their curriculum across all subject areas.  The teaching of phonics and early reading is strong. It has led to outcomes in the phonics screening check in Year 1 that are in the top 20% of schools nationally. Staff charged with helping those pupils who are finding reading more of a challenge use the school’s chosen phonics scheme with fidelity, and support is quickly put in place. The effectiveness of this support could be further improved if all staff consistently use the

p.3

(Information for the school and appropriate authority)

school’s chosen support strategies. At present, there is variability in the application of these methods, so pupils experience a varied level of help. It would also further sharpen the support for the weakest readers if their comprehension of texts is checked, as well as their ability to decode and segment words and how well they blend sounds.

p.3

Background

When we have judged a school to be good, we will then normally go into the school about once every four years to confirm that the school remains good. This is called a section 8 inspection of a good school or non-exempt outstanding school. We do not give graded judgements on a section 8 inspection. However, if we find some evidence that the school could now be better than good or that standards may be declining, then the next inspection will be a section 5 inspection. Usually this is within one to two years of the date of the section 8 inspection. If we have serious concerns about safeguarding, behaviour or the quality of education, we will convert the section 8 inspection to a section 5 inspection immediately.

p.3

Background

This is the second section 8 inspection since we judged Mundella Primary School to be good on 19 September 2011. 14–15 January 2020

p.3

How can I feed back my views?

find out what other parents and carers think. We use Ofsted Parent View information when deciding which schools to inspect, when to inspect them and as part of their inspection.

p.4

How can I feed back my views?

The Department for Education has further guidance on how to complain about a school.

p.4

How can I feed back my views?

If you are the school and you are not happy with the inspection or the report, you can complain to Ofsted .

p.4

Further information

You can search for published performance information about the school.

p.4

Further information

In the report, ‘disadvantaged pupils’ refers to those pupils who attract government pupil premium funding: pupils claiming free school meals at any point in the last six years and pupils in care or who left care through adoption or another formal route. 14–15 January 2020

p.4

School details

Inspection number 10097548 Type of school Primary

p.5

form

Date of previous inspection 12 November 2015

p.5

Information about this school

 The school is an above-average sized primary school.  Pupils are predominantly of White British heritage.  The proportion of pupils in receipt of free school meals is below the national average.  The proportion of pupils who receive support for their SEND is below the national average. The proportion of pupils with an education, health and care plan is above the national average.

p.5

Information about this inspection

 I met with the headteacher and deputy headteacher. I also met senior leaders with responsibility for SEND and pupils’ personal development. I met a group of governors, including the chair and vice-chair. I met a representative of the local authority. 14–15 January 2020

p.5

6

 As part of this inspection, I carried out in-depth considerations, known as ‘deep dives’, of the following three subjects: reading, mathematics and history. A deep dive consists of: a meeting with the subject leader to get an overview of the curriculum planning and how it works in practice; a visit to several lessons in that subject in different year groups, accompanied by a leader; a meeting with some of the teachers whose lessons were visited; a discussion with some of the pupils who were in the lessons visited; and a scrutiny of pupils’ workbooks.  To inspect the safeguarding arrangements in school, I looked at the records of staff and volunteers at the school and the checks made on them. I met with the staff with particular responsibility for safeguarding. I sampled case files to look at how the school identifies, helps and manages vulnerable pupils. I spoke with numerous pupils, staff and governors about safeguarding.

p.6

6

 I considered a range of school documents, including leaders’ self-evaluation of the school’s effectiveness and their improvement plan. I considered all of the responses to Ofsted’s online questionnaires for staff and parents, including free-text responses and email. I spoke to one parent as they brought their child into school.

p.6

Inspection team

Steve Shaw, lead inspector Her Majesty’s Inspector 14–15 January 2020

p.6

7

regulates and inspects to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.

p.7

7

If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.7

7

You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .

p.7

7

Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .

p.7

7

T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.7

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion