Summary
Keith Pailthorpe (lead), Andrew Foster, Peter Rodin, Sue Bzikot
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection date verified
15 Jan 2020
- Inspectors verified
Andrew Foster, Keith Pailthorpe, Peter Rodin, Sue Bzikot
- Behaviour and attitudes verified
Good
- Leadership and management verified
Good
- Overall effectiveness verified
Good
- Personal development verified
Good
- Quality of education verified
Good
- Postcode verified
GU14 9RN
- Name on report verified
Cove School
- URN verified
116446
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Grade profile
Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2017.
- OverallGood
- Behaviour and attitudesGood
- Leadership and managementGood
- Personal developmentGood
- Quality of educationGood
66% of comparable inspections in the last three years were graded Good (5,043 inspections).
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type graded Good.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No strong criticism found.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Leaders should continue to identify where those gaps are and take appropriate action to fill them. p.4
- Leaders should ensure that subject leaders get the support they need so that learning in every subject is organised in a sequence so that all pupils know, understand and remember more. 14–15 January 2020 p.3
- The school links well with outside agencies when they should. p.3
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Leadership & governance15
“Student leaders thrive on new responsibilities.” p.2Teaching & assessment11
“Teachers set appropriate work and learning support assistants provide strong support.” p.3Reading & phonics4
“As a result, pupils’ reading skills are improving.” p.2
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 7
- Words of findings
- 988
- about usual (typical 1098)
- Reading level
- Plain English
- Flesch 61, typical 55
- Average sentence
- 13 words
- Next steps
- 3
- typical 4
- Hedged sentences
- 5%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Inspection of Cove School St John’s Road, Cove, Farnborough, Hampshire GU14 9RN
p.1
Overall effectiveness Good
The quality of education Good Behaviour and attitudes Good Personal development Good Leadership and management Good Previous inspection grade Requires improvement 14–15 January 2020
p.1
What is it like to attend this school?
Cove School gives a warm welcome to pupils, staff and visitors. Senior leaders and governors set high standards. Staff care about the pupils and do not give up on them. The school runs many projects that raise motivation and achievement. Pupils now get better teaching across a range of subjects. Leaders have reinforced behaviour systems and apply them consistently. As a result, the vast majority of pupils behave well and relationships are strong throughout the school.
p.2
What is it like to attend this school?
Pupils are very well looked after. Bullying is rare. If it does happen, school staff deal with it quickly and effectively. Pupils feel safe in school. They get good advice and support on physical and mental health. The school teaches them how to keep safe online.
p.2
What is it like to attend this school?
There is a very wide choice of high-quality clubs. After-school clubs encourage pupils to get involved in healthy and thoughtful activities. There are very wide-ranging trips and visits on offer, including going to universities and museums. International visits to Washington, Berlin and Auschwitz all help widen pupils’ understanding of their world. Assemblies raise important moral questions. Student leaders thrive on new responsibilities. Pupils are proud of their school.
p.2
better?
School leaders and governors have raised the bar since the last inspection. They hold staff to account and carry out their responsibilities with passion and determination. Staff and pupils have responded well to this ambitious culture.
p.2
better?
Leaders have established teaching expertise through careful recruitment and high- quality training. Better teaching has improved pupils’ learning across the curriculum and reduced previous gaps in their understanding. Standards are now higher, although this is yet to be reflected in published exam results.
p.2
better?
The school offers a broad range of subjects in key stages 3 and 4. These prepare pupils well for their next steps, with many going on to higher education. Leaders recognise that not enough pupils take a modern foreign language at GCSE but are taking effective action to improve this.
p.2
better?
Reading has a high priority. Well-trained teachers strengthen pupils’ reading ability in key stage 3 through specialist lessons. Pupils read often in their tutor groups from a broad selection of books. Teachers reinforce key vocabulary across a range of lessons with pupils of all ages. As a result, pupils’ reading skills are improving.
p.2
better?
Leaders have thought carefully about what departments will teach and when. Subject leaders organise topics in a logical order. This helps pupils to build on previous learning and remember new facts and ideas more easily. In English, for example, they study a range of Victorian authors in key stage 3, so that they can understand ‘Dr Jekyll and Mr Hyde’ in key stage 4. 14–15 January 2020
p.2
3
In some subjects, this work is not as well developed. Sometimes, topics are delivered in an unrelated order, or the work set for pupils is too easy or too difficult. When this happens, pupils find it hard to remember key knowledge.
p.3
3
School leaders make efficient use of time and manage teachers’ workload well. For example, leaders have refined their use of assessments so that there are fewer, but information is better used. As a result, teachers have a clear picture of pupils’ learning in different subjects. Teachers recognise more quickly where pupils need extra support and take swift action to help.
p.3
3
Pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND) do well. They study a broad range of subjects. Teachers set appropriate work and learning support assistants provide strong support.
p.3
3
Pupils like the improvements that have been made in the school. They are proud of their ‘passport to scholarship’, which records how well they get involved in their community. Pupils are very respectful and tolerant of others. The school runs high- quality programmes to help prepare pupils for their next steps. For example, one group of disadvantaged pupils work with a university PhD student to write their own dissertations. As a result, the pupils are now considering applying to university themselves.
p.3
Safeguarding
The arrangements for safeguarding are effective.
p.3
Safeguarding
Safeguarding has a high priority. The safeguarding lead does her job very well, supported by her well-trained deputies. Leaders carry out thorough checks before they employ anyone to work in the school. The school links well with outside agencies when they should. Governors and staff are diligent in looking after their pupils. Staff keep careful records and follow up incidents appropriately. All staff are trained to believe that ‘it could happen at Cove’.
p.3
Safeguarding
Pupils feel safe in this school. They know who to talk to if they have a problem and they get appropriate help when they need it.
p.3
(Information for the school and appropriate authority)
Leaders have designed a curriculum that prepares pupils for their next steps. All subject areas have adopted this, but some are at an earlier stage than others. Leaders should ensure that subject leaders get the support they need so that learning in every subject is organised in a sequence so that all pupils know, understand and remember more. 14–15 January 2020
p.3
4
Some pupils still have gaps in their knowledge and skills in some subjects. This is because there were historical inconsistencies in the quality of teaching. Leaders should continue to identify where those gaps are and take appropriate action to fill them.
p.4
How can I feed back my views?
or to find out what other parents and carers think. We use Ofsted Parent View information when deciding which schools to inspect, when to inspect them and as part of their inspection.
p.4
How can I feed back my views?
The Department for Education has further guidance on how to complain about a school.
p.4
How can I feed back my views?
If you are the school and you are not happy with the inspection or the report, you can complain to Ofsted .
p.4
Further information
You can search for published performance information about the school.
p.4
Further information
In the report, ‘disadvantaged pupils’ refers to those pupils who attract government pupil premium funding: pupils claiming free school meals at any point in the last six years and pupils in care or who left care through adoption or another formal route. 14–15 January 2020
p.4
School details
Inspection number 10111410 Type of school Secondary comprehensive
p.5
School details
Appropriate authority The governing body
p.5
School details
Date of previous inspection 4 December 2018, under section 8 of the Education Act 2005
p.5
Information about this school
This school has a specially resourced provision for three pupils with hearing impairment. A small number of pupils attend alternative provision at Rowhill School, which provides behavioural and emotional support.
p.5
Information about this inspection
We carried out this inspection under section 5 of the Education Act 2005.
p.5
Information about this inspection
We met with governors, senior leaders and curriculum leaders. We also spoke on the telephone to a representative of the local authority and a representative of Rowhill School. We met a selection of teaching staff, including newly qualified teachers, as well as support staff. We met groups of pupils of different ages and backgrounds. We visited assembly and tutor times. We observed behaviour around the school and during lunchtimes and breaktimes. The lead inspector reviewed a wide range of documents, including published performance information, the school website and other relevant information about the school. 14–15 January 2020
p.5
6
We looked at the 142 responses to Ofsted Parent View, including 141 written free- text comments. We read 108 pupil survey responses and 41 staff responses. We did deep dives in English, mathematics, French, science, history, food technology and art. For each subject, we met curriculum leaders, teachers and pupils. We also visited lessons and looked at pupils’ work. We scrutinised safeguarding procedures in the school, checked the single central record and reviewed safeguarding policies. Two inspectors met with the designated safeguarding lead.
p.6
Inspection team
Keith Pailthorpe, lead inspector Ofsted Inspector
p.6
Inspection team
Andrew Foster Ofsted Inspector 14–15 January 2020
p.6
7
regulates and inspects to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.
p.7
7
If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .
p.7
7
You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .
p.7
7
Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .
p.7
7
T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted
p.7
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion