Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · School inspection (EIF)

Red House Academy

Inspected 15 Jan 2020 · published 3 Feb 2020 · URN 135878

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    15 Jan 2020

  • Inspectors verified

    Chris Smith, Dimitris Spiliotis, Melanie Kane

  • Behaviour and attitudes verified

    Good

  • Leadership and management verified

    Good

  • Overall effectiveness verified

    Good

  • Personal development verified

    Good

  • Quality of education verified

    Good

  • Postcode verified

    SR5 5LN

  • Name on report verified

    Red House Academy

  • URN verified

    135878

Page 1 of 7
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2018.

  • OverallGood
  • Behaviour and attitudesGood
  • Leadership and managementGood
  • Personal developmentGood
  • Quality of educationGood

66% of comparable inspections in the last three years were graded Good (5,043 inspections).

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+5Mixedmore positive than 6% of reports of this type graded Good
OutstandingGoodRIInadequate

Reads more critically than most reports of this type graded Good.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praiseambitiousimprovedexcellentthrivingwell sequencedstrongsuccessfullyrespectful
Criticismweaknessespoorstruggleat riskseriouslyconcernconcernsnot sufficiently

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsSafeguardingAbout the inspection positive critical
  • Findings1040w+9
  • Safeguarding131w−21

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
7
Words of findings
1,143
about usual (typical 1098)
Reading level
Plain English
Flesch 61, typical 55
Average sentence
12 words
Next steps
6
typical 4
Hedged sentences
9%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 59%Safeguarding 7%About the inspection 33%

Full report text

Inspection of Red House Academy Rutherglen Road, Red House Estate, Sunderland, Tyne and Wear SR5 5LN

p.1

Overall effectiveness Good

The quality of education Good Behaviour and attitudes Good Personal development Good Leadership and management Good Previous inspection grade Inadequate 14–15 January 2020

p.1

What is it like to attend this school?

Red House Academy has improved rapidly. Pupils and staff can all feel the difference. Leaders have done an excellent job of raising everyone’s expectations.

p.2

What is it like to attend this school?

Leaders have successfully recruited the teachers they needed. Teachers are well organised. They know what knowledge they need to teach. They work together to prepare interesting lessons. Pupils take their studies seriously. They take pride in their work. The level of attendance has improved considerably. Leaders have introduced subjects, such as French, music and drama, that were not available in the past. Pupils are enjoying the broader curriculum now on offer.

p.2

What is it like to attend this school?

The vast majority of pupils behave well. This is because the staff and pupils are respectful of one another. Pupils applaud each other in lessons. The staff have created a positive culture in which it is OK to try hard. Incidents of bullying have reduced dramatically. It still happens occasionally, but pupils report it and the staff sort it out. Pupils feel that the staff really care about them. Teachers are going the ‘extra mile’ to help Year 11 pupils in the run up to GCSE exams. They know these pupils were not taught well enough in the past and are trying to put this right.

p.2

better?

The leadership team has addressed the weaknesses and instilled a new sense of pride in the school. It has appointed new teachers, broadened the range of subjects available and transformed behaviour. The leadership team has begun to introduce a new, more demanding curriculum. Pupils are thriving.

p.2

better?

Older pupils received a poor education in the past. They are now getting lots of extra help as they prepare for GCSE examinations. Teachers provide extra classes at lunchtime and after school. They are using assessment well. They know what knowledge pupils are uncertain about. Sharply focused teaching is helping pupils to grow in confidence. This approach, coupled with a good careers programme, has raised pupils’ aspirations. Many older pupils now want to go on to a sixth form and to university.

p.2

better?

Trust leaders knew that the curriculum they offered needed to improve. They have developed new planning within each subject that is more ambitious. Teachers’ planning identifies the knowledge they will teach. Subject content has been well sequenced. The curriculum is therefore in a transitional phase. The school has introduced their new curriculum into key stage 3. Although it is early days, pupils are seeing the difference. Pupils’ workbooks show that more knowledge is being taught. Pupils are more able to connect new information with what they already know. Teachers start each lesson by getting pupils to remember things they learned in the past. For example, in mathematics, pupils start each lesson by recalling 14–15 January 2020

p.2

3

important facts. In English, teachers make sure that important concepts are threading through topics.

p.3

3

To date, pupils have not been able to choose the suite of subjects that makes up the English baccalaureate. This means that the school’s most able pupils have not achieved as well as they should. Under the new curriculum, pupils will be able to do so. To encourage this, leaders have decided to give pupils more time to deepen their studies in key stage 3. Leaders expect more than half of pupils to study the English baccalaureate in the future.

p.3

3

The culture in the classroom is much improved. Teachers give lots of praise. Most pupils are keen to take part. Pupils are encouraged to work in groups, to discuss ideas and develop solutions. But some pupils still struggle with basic arithmetic and need more practise at times tables. Some pupils need more opportunities to develop their confidence in speaking aloud to others. Pupils who struggle to behave are supported appropriately. Many improve their attitude. The use of exclusion has fallen sharply.

p.3

3

Although the school is small, the staff provide a good range of extra-curricular activities. Pupils can pursue their interests in sewing, Spanish or netball, for example. The school recently put on a production of Cinderella. The trust has ambitious plans to provide more trips out of school to places of interest.

p.3

Safeguarding

The arrangements for safeguarding are effective.

p.3

Safeguarding

Thorough checks are made on all adults who work in or visit the school. All of the staff are trained in safeguarding. They all understand the duty upon them to act if they have a concern about a pupil’s safety. Staff and pupils know who to report concerns to because there are numerous posters around the school. When leaders need to act, they take prompt action. They keep detailed records. They work well with social care and other agencies, as required.

p.3

Safeguarding

Leaders systematically identify and check on the school’s more vulnerable pupils. They are methodical. As the school is small, the school’s safeguarding leader knows these pupils well. Parents have much more confidence now in the support the school provides for pupils who are struggling.

p.3

(Information for the school and appropriate authority)

 The school’s curriculum has not been ambitious enough. Although leaders have begun to introduce their new, more ambitious curriculum, it is still at an early stage. Currently, no pupils in Years 10 and 11 are following the suite of subjects in the English baccalaureate. This means that the school’s most academically able pupils may not fulfil their potential. Leaders need to ensure that an extended key 14–15 January 2020

p.3

4

stage 3 provides a strong foundation for pupils to choose this suite of subjects when they opt for GCSEs. As the new curriculum is in the early stages of being adopted, the transition arrangements have been applied in this case.  Some pupils are not sufficiently fluent in basic arithmetic. Others need more opportunities to practise speaking to others with confidence. These weaknesses are undermining pupils’ readiness for the next stage of their education, employment or training. Teachers should develop more opportunities for pupils to practise mental mathematics, times tables and presentation skills.  Despite considerable improvements in the overall attendance, absence remains above the national average. Missing too much schooling is negatively affecting some pupils’ learning. Leaders must sustain their efforts to engage pupils in education, particularly those who are most at risk of becoming disaffected.

p.4

How can I feed back my views?

or to find out what other parents and carers think. We use Ofsted Parent View information when deciding which schools to inspect, when to inspect them and as part of their inspection.

p.4

How can I feed back my views?

The Department for Education has further guidance on how to complain about a school.

p.4

How can I feed back my views?

If you are the school and you are not happy with the inspection or the report, you can complain to Ofsted .

p.4

Further information

You can search for published performance information about the school.

p.4

Further information

In the report, ‘disadvantaged pupils’ refers to those pupils who attract government pupil premium funding: pupils claiming free school meals at any point in the last six years and pupils in care or who left care through adoption or another formal route. 14–15 January 2020

p.4

School details

Inspection number 10110611 Type of school Secondary

p.5

School details

Website https://rha.northerneducationtrust.org

p.5

School details

Date of previous inspection 25 September 2018, under section 8 of the Education Act 2005

p.5

Information about this school

 Since the last inspection, a new principal and new executive principal have been appointed. There have been several changes of other leaders, including the heads of department for English, mathematics and science.  Currently, the school places 10 pupils with alternative education providers. The providers used are Cumbric, Evolve Sports Academy, The Beacon of Light and Hopespring School. Most pupils attend these provisions on a part-time basis.

p.5

Information about this inspection

We carried out this inspection under section 5 of the Education Act 2005.

p.5

Information about this inspection

In accordance with section 13(5) of the Education Act 2005, Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector is of the opinion that the school no longer requires significant improvement.

p.5

Information about this inspection

 We met the principal, executive principal and other senior leaders, including the special educational needs coordinator. We also met the trust’s chief executive and the chair of the local academy council. 14–15 January 2020

p.5

6

 We focused on the quality of the curriculum in mathematics, English, science, geography and art and design. We looked at these subjects across the full age range. We met the curriculum leaders for each subject, visited lessons, talked to pupils, looked at pupils’ workbooks and talked to teachers.  We looked at other information about behaviour, attendance, extra-curricular activities and wider enrichment events.  We looked at pupils’ punctuality, behaviour and conduct across the school day. The team held discussions with groups of pupils. We also spoke to different members of staff, including a newly qualified teacher, a teaching assistant, an education welfare officer and a learning manager, to gauge their views about how well pupils behave and conduct themselves. We also met some pupils who have received sanctions in the past.  We looked at the vetting checks that leaders make on adults who work in the

p.6

6

school. We also talked to the leader in charge of staff safeguarding arrangements. We looked at records of the actions taken by leaders to protect pupils at risk. The team spoke to pupils to check how safe they felt. We also checked whether members of staff understand and abide by the school’s safeguarding policy.

p.6

Inspection team

Chris Smith, lead inspector Her Majesty’s Inspector

p.6

Inspection team

Dimitris Spiliotis Her Majesty’s Inspector

p.6

Inspection team

Melanie Kane Ofsted Inspector 14–15 January 2020

p.6

7

regulates and inspects to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.

p.7

7

If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.7

7

You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .

p.7

7

Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .

p.7

7

T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.7

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion