Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · School inspection (EIF)

Stanwell Fields CofE Primary School

Inspected 16 Jan 2020 · published 31 Jan 2020 · URN 144001

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    16 Jan 2020

  • Inspectors verified

    Francois Walker, Julie Sackett

  • Behaviour and attitudes verified

    Good

  • Early years verified

    Good

  • Leadership and management verified

    Good

  • Overall effectiveness verified

    Good

  • Personal development verified

    Good

  • Quality of education verified

    Good

  • Postcode verified

    TW19 7DB

  • Name on report verified

    Stanwell Fields Church of England Primary School

  • URN verified

    144001

Page 1 of 7
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Each judgement on its scale, weakest to strongest.

  • OverallGood
  • Behaviour and attitudesGood
  • Early yearsGood
  • Leadership and managementGood
  • Personal developmentGood
  • Quality of educationGood

66% of comparable inspections in the last three years were graded Good (5,043 inspections).

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+44Positivemore positive than 25% of reports of this type graded Good
OutstandingGoodRIInadequate

In line with other reports of this type graded Good.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praiseenjoyfeel safecleareffectivelyimprovedeffectiveimprovingstrong
Criticismpoorfalling behindinconsistentinconsistenciesconcernsunclearpersistent absencenot happy

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsSafeguardingAbout the inspection positive critical
  • Findings1126w+43
  • Safeguarding109w+38

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
7
Words of findings
1,210
about usual (typical 1098)
Reading level
Fairly hard
Flesch 51, typical 55
Average sentence
18 words
Next steps
5
typical 4
Hedged sentences
8%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 65%Safeguarding 6%About the inspection 28%

Full report text

Inspection of Stanwell Fields Church of England Primary School Clare Road, Stanwell, Staines, Surrey TW19 7DB

p.1

Overall effectiveness Good

The quality of education Good Behaviour and attitudes Good Personal development Good Leadership and management Good Early years provision Good

p.1

Overall effectiveness Good

Previous inspection grade Not previously inspected under section 5 of the Education Act 2005 15–16 January 2020

p.1

What is it like to attend this school?

This is a rapidly improving school which provides an increasingly good quality of education for its pupils. New leaders are working hard to improve all areas of provision. Expectations of pupils’ conduct and engagement in learning are high. Consequently, pupils are learning more and their achievements in a range of subjects are much better than before.

p.2

What is it like to attend this school?

Although the attendance of some could be better, pupils told inspectors that they now enjoy school. Pupils were very clear that the poor behaviour that marred their earlier school experiences has now largely been eradicated. They put this down to ‘stricter staff’ who deal with potential disruptions well. They also said that bullying used to be a problem, but that ‘meanness’ is now dealt with quickly by staff and does not worry them, unlike in the past.

p.2

What is it like to attend this school?

Although a small minority of parents retain their negative views of the school, many more recognise the improving picture at Stanwell Fields. Staff who talked to inspectors and the very large majority who completed Ofsted’s staff questionnaire are positive about the school. This was summed up by a comment that staff and pupils were increasingly able to ‘shine’, because of the changing culture at the school.

p.2

better?

Much has been achieved in a short period of time since the school converted to become an academy. New governance arrangements and new appointments into leadership positions, including a new headteacher, have been transformational. Although there is still much to do, strong foundations have been laid for the school to improve further.

p.2

better?

The early years is a strength of the school. The curriculum here is carefully thought through with clear links to what children will need to know as they move into Year 1 and beyond. Children play and work together well. They feel safe because staff know them well and the learning environment is comfortable and welcoming.

p.2

better?

The school’s wider curriculum has been strengthened in the last two years. However, leaders are not complacent and are constantly looking for ways to develop it further. Improvements in the quality of teaching in reading, writing and mathematics are clear to see.

p.2

better?

The science curriculum is fit for purpose, with pupils enjoying the different layers of challenge that staff set for them during lessons. Pupils listen carefully and engage well in activities and tasks in science. For instance, pupils in Year 6 were enthusiastic during a lesson about inherited characteristics and the work of Darwin and Mendel. This included pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND) who were supported effectively to access key language and learning. 15–16 January 2020

p.2

3

Pupils’ personal, social and health education (PSHE) is also catered for well. Pupils were able to explain their prior learning when asked, including their work linked to the school’s own values and the importance of the work they had completed to help prepare them for life in modern Britain. Pupils’ personal development is also supported well by a range of extra-curricular opportunities, including clubs, educational visits, and residential trips. Older pupils in particular have a clear understanding of the potential dangers associated with using the internet and know what to do if they have problems when using social media.

p.3

3

Leaders have prioritised improvements in the way pupils are taught to read. A new phonics scheme has been introduced. Staff have been trained appropriately to deliver it. New phonics resources are available and used effectively, including for pupils with SEND, those from disadvantaged backgrounds, and those in danger of falling behind. As a result, the school’s Year 1 phonics screening check saw a significant uplift in 2019.

p.3

3

Leaders have also given a high priority to developing pupils’ enjoyment of reading across the school. A beautifully refurbished library excites pupils’ interest in books, for instance. Raising the profile of reading across the school is already paying dividends in improved outcomes in national tests and assessments at the end of Years 2 and 6. However, some staff in key stage 2 are inconsistent in their approach to reading with pupils. Additionally, leaders are unclear about what books some years groups are reading, with pupils in parallel classes sometimes experiencing a different range and quality in the books they are introduced to.

p.3

3

Pupils enjoy their mathematics lessons. Staff are confident and clear about what knowledge and skills pupils should be taught as they move through the school. They have access to the resources they need, although leaders are aware of some inconsistencies in approach to teaching mathematics in some year groups. Nevertheless, pupils achieve well in mathematics.

p.3

Safeguarding

The arrangements for safeguarding are effective.

p.3

Safeguarding

Staff understand their responsibilities to keep pupils safe. Their training is up to date and has recently focused on the risks and dangers pupils may encounter in the local community. Staff know what to do if they have concerns.

p.3

Safeguarding

Leaders and governors also understand their responsibilities to protect the welfare, health and safety of pupils and staff. Statutory checks on adults and effective policies and procedures are all in place.

p.3

Safeguarding

Pupils told inspectors they feel safe and cared for in school. The large majority of parents who replied to Ofsted’s questionnaire also think that their children feel safe in school. 15–16 January 2020

p.3

(Information for the school and appropriate authority)

 Leaders have been successful at strengthening the school’s provision to develop pupils’ early reading skills. Encouraging a love of reading and ensuring that older pupils have equitable access to a wide range of high-quality texts are less well developed. Leaders should prioritise this, so that all pupils learn to value and enjoy books and reading before they move on to the next stage of their education.  Rates of pupil absence, particularly persistent absence, remain stubbornly high. Leaders and governors are aware of this but now need to redouble their efforts to improve attendance. This will ensure that pupils, particularly those from disadvantaged backgrounds, attend school more often and so benefit from the better quality of education the school is now providing.  Although the school has improved significantly in all areas, a minority of parents continue to hold negative views about some aspects of the school’s work. This is

p.4

(Information for the school and appropriate authority)

no doubt due in part to the legacy of the past, but leaders and those in positions of governance need to work harder at improving the perception parents have of the quality of provision, so that parents have more confidence in the school as it improves further over time.

p.4

How can I feed back my views?

or to find out what other parents and carers think. We use Ofsted Parent View information when deciding which schools to inspect, when to inspect them and as part of their inspection.

p.4

How can I feed back my views?

The Department for Education has further guidance on how to complain about a school.

p.4

How can I feed back my views?

If you are the school and you are not happy with the inspection or the report, you can complain to Ofsted .

p.4

Further information

You can search for published performance information about the school.

p.4

Further information

In the report, ‘disadvantaged pupils’ refers to those pupils who attract government pupil premium funding: pupils claiming free school meals at any point in the last six years and pupils in care or who left care through adoption or another formal route. 15–16 January 2020

p.4

School details

Inspection number 10122185 Type of school Primary

p.5

School details

Website www.stanwellfields.surrey.sch.uk

p.5

School details

Date of previous inspection Not previously inspected

p.5

Information about this school

 This was the first inspection of the school since it became part of the LDBS Academies Trust 2. The school converted to become an academy school on 1 April 2017. When its predecessor school, of the same name, was last inspected by Ofsted, it was judged to require improvement.  As a school with a distinctive Christian ethos, the predecessor school was last inspected under section 48 of The Education Act 2005 in January 2017. Since converting to become an academy, the school has not yet had an equivalent inspection.

p.5

Information about this inspection

We carried out this inspection under section 5 of the Education Act 2005.

p.5

Information about this inspection

 We held a wide range of meetings during the inspection. These included meetings with leaders, teaching and support staff, pupils and parents. The lead inspector met with representatives of the multi-academy trust, as well as the chair of the local academy committee. He also talked to the chief executive officer of the multi-academy trust on the telephone. 15–16 January 2020

p.5

6

 When considering the quality of the curriculum, we did deep dives in these subjects: reading; mathematics; science and PSHE. Deep dives included visiting lessons, looking at pupils’ work, and talking to leaders, teachers and pupils about how teaching in these subjects builds on pupils’ knowledge over time. The lead inspector also heard pupils read.  We assessed the school’s culture to keep pupils safe throughout the inspection. A wide range of documentation was considered, including policies and leaders’ self- evaluation and improvement planning. The single central record of checks on the suitability of adults to work with children was also scrutinised.

p.6

Inspection team

Clive Close, lead inspector Her Majesty’s Inspector

p.6

Inspection team

Julie Sackett Her Majesty’s Inspector 15–16 January 2020

p.6

7

regulates and inspects to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.

p.7

7

If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.7

7

You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .

p.7

7

Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .

p.7

7

T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.7

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion