Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Social care · Social care inspection (SCCIF)

Penn Hall School

Inspected 7 Nov 2019 · published 31 Jan 2020 · URN SC043187

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    7 Nov 2019

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Alison Cooper, Michelle Spruce

  • Helped and protected verified

    Good

  • Leadership and management verified

    Good

  • Overall effectiveness verified

    Good

  • Postcode verified

    WV4 5HP

  • Name on report verified

    Penn Hall School

  • URN verified

    SC043187

Page 1 of 7
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2019.

  • OverallGood
  • Helped and protectedGood
  • Leadership and managementGood

70% of comparable inspections in the last three years were graded Good (12,716 inspections).

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+44Positivemore positive than 51% of reports of this type graded Good
OutstandingGoodRIInadequate

In line with other reports of this type graded Good.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praiseenjoyeffectivelyoutstandingpositivewell-plannedeffectiveskilledproud
Criticismineffectivemissednot consistentlyconcernsnot alwayslack

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspection positive critical

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
7
Words of findings
1,544
about usual (typical 1609)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 48, typical 43
Average sentence
16 words
Next steps
3
typical 5
Hedged sentences
7%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 81%About the inspection 19%

Full report text

Inspection report for residential special school - Penn Hall School 1 Penn Hall School Penn Hall School, Vicarage Road, Penn, Wolverhampton WV4 5HP Residential provision inspected under the social care common inspection framework

p.1

Information about this residential special school

Penn Hall is an inclusive special school meeting a wide range of needs including physical disabilities, a range of learning and communication needs, complex medical needs and autistic spectrum conditions. The school is located on the outskirts of Wolverhampton. There are currently 103 children and young people on roll. The residential provision is on the school site. Six young people stay overnight at any one time.

p.1

Overall experiences and progress of

children and young people, taking into account

p.1

good

How well children and young people are helped and protected good

p.1

good

The effectiveness of leaders and managers good

p.1

good

The residential special school provides effective services that meet the requirements for good.

p.1

good

Date of previous inspection: 22 January 2019

p.1

good

Overall judgement at last inspection: outstanding Inspection report for residential special school - Penn Hall School 2

p.1

Overall experiences and progress of children and young people: good

Children and young people are supported by dedicated staff who know them well. Staff continually strive to provide all children and young people with an opportunity to enhance their life skills by accessing the service. As a result, children and young people benefit from well-planned transitions into residency that enable them to enjoy and benefit from overnight stays. The residential setting provides children and young people with opportunities to have fun experiences and spend time with their friendship groups. Staff provide children and young people with a range of exciting activities in and outside the home. As a result, children and young people have experiences that they may not have if they did not attend residence. Children and young people say they enjoy their stays in residence, where they can be with their friends. On the occasions when children and young people find their stay difficult, skilled and

p.2

Overall experiences and progress of children and young people: good

sensitive staff manage situations in a way that places the child at the centre of their practice. This helps children and young people to settle quickly and means that they, and others, can continue to enjoy their stay without too much disruption. Staff celebrate children and young people’s achievements. This helps children and young people to feel proud of themselves and increases their confidence and self- esteem. In addition, children and young people are motivated to succeed and meet their set targets. Relationships between children and young people and staff are warm, trusting and nurturing. Staff know children and young people and their families well and communicate effectively with them. This enables staff to keep parents informed about their child’s experiences and progress. Children and young people make informed choices that develop and shape the experiences that they have when in residence. For example, they plan meals and

p.2

Overall experiences and progress of children and young people: good

activities for their overnight stays. This inclusive approach ensures that children and young people are listened to and get the best out of their stay. Large black refuse bags used to collect laundry hang from bedposts in children and young people’s bedrooms. In addition, hospital screens are used when children and young people are undertaking personal care. These practices do not lend themselves to the child-centred, home-from-home feel set out in the statement of purpose and have the potential to affect children and young people’s experiences.

p.2

How well children and young people are helped and protected: good

The staff team has created a calm and positive environment for children and young people. Staff implement personalised care that promotes each child and young person’s welfare. This assists children and young people who have high levels of anxiety and complex needs. Staff maintain firm boundaries while at the same time showing sensitivity, care and Inspection report for residential special school - Penn Hall School 3 patience. This helps children and young people to feel safe and to know what is expected of them. Staff work in partnership with medical and health professionals. This joined-up approach between health and residential staff helps children and young people to access residence with the assurance that their complex health needs will be met. Children and young people with complex medical needs are kept safe during their overnight stay because they receive additional support during the night from

p.2

How well children and young people are helped and protected: good

qualified nursing staff. The manager safely recruits staff. This helps to protect children and young people from unsuitable adults working with them. Children and young people enjoy accessing the internet while having their overnight stay. However, during the inspection parental controls and filters in place to protect children and young people from accessing inappropriate content were found to be ineffective. Immediate action was taken by staff to reduce the risk and there was no direct impact on children and young people’s safety. Managers also agreed to ensure that, moving forward, routine checks will take place as required to assure themselves that internet safety controls are in working order. Most aspects of safeguarding training are good, which means that staff broadly understand their roles and responsibilities in keeping children and young people safe and well. However, staff do not receive training in respect of anti-bullying. This is a

p.3

How well children and young people are helped and protected: good

missed opportunity for staff to take a detailed look at the different forms of bullying and consider how they identify, manage, record and report incidents of bullying. Inspectors found that recording and reporting of some bullying incidents were not consistently good. This hinders the ability of leaders and managers to monitor and respond to bullying incidents effectively. There have been no safeguarding referrals arising since the last inspection. However, staff know how to report safeguarding concerns if they need to. Regular weekly pastoral meetings help with information sharing across the whole school, including residency. This helps to promote children and young people’s safety and welfare.

p.3

The effectiveness of leaders and managers: good

The school senior leadership team, staff and governors are passionate about the residential provision and the role that it plays in enhancing and improving the lives of children and young people. Residency is viewed as an integral part of the whole school, which ensures that in the main children and young people receive seamless care. The leaders and managers recognise that funding has impacted on the residential service. However, considerable effort is being applied by leaders and managers to secure funding to improve the residency. This action demonstrates how driven, passionate and motivated everyone is in their commitment to improving the service.

p.3

The effectiveness of leaders and managers: good

Partnership working between staff and professionals from the school and residency is commendable. Professionals speak highly of the positive relationships that help to Inspection report for residential special school - Penn Hall School 4 ensure that children and young people continue to receive a holistic approach to school, health and education. This improves the life chances of children and young people. Children and young people in residency benefit from a consistent staff team that knows their needs and has good relationships with their families. Staff know the aims of the service and support children and young people to develop their skills and abilities during their stays. Staff attend a variety of training courses. Training undertaken is recorded on an individual training record for each member of staff. However, leaders and managers were unable to provide inspectors with evidence that they have a learning and

p.3

The effectiveness of leaders and managers: good

development programme which is kept under review. This is a missed opportunity to look holistically at the training needs and development of residential staff and have a clear plan to meet these needs. Staff have weekly team meetings and an annual appraisal and so have some opportunities to reflect on their practice. However, staff do not receive individual supervision. Individual supervision has been replaced by group supervision. This means that staff do not have opportunities to talk individually with their line manager about their practice, strengths and areas for development. Some aspects of the physical condition of the residential environment are tired. In addition, damage to door frames and carpets needs to be repaired. Managers do not always act quickly enough when potential hazards are bought to their attention. A lack of funding for the residential service has had a direct impact on the quality of

p.4

The effectiveness of leaders and managers: good

the physical environment. Leaders and managers are working to address this. The development plan identifies some of the works needed to improve the fabric of the building. The business manager and the headteacher said that some of the works have been undertaken. However, despite the standard 20 report of May 2019 highlighting the shortfalls with physical conditions six months ago, little action has been taken to remedy all the shortfalls. Inspection report for residential special school - Penn Hall School 5

p.4

special schools

The school does not meet the following national minimum standards for residential special schools:  6.2 The school premises, accommodation and facilities provided therein are maintained to a standard such that, as far as is reasonably practicable, the health, safety and welfare of children are ensured.  12.3 Staff receive appropriate training and support to recognise and deal with incidences of challenging behaviour or bullying. This training should include assistance in managing staff members’ responses and feelings arising from working with children who have emotional difficulties which result in challenging behaviour. Staff training is regularly refreshed.  13.4 The school’s leadership and management consistently fulfil their responsibilities effectively so that the standards are met.  19.1 Staff are equipped with the skills required to meet the needs of the children as they relate to the purpose of the setting. Training keeps them up to date with

p.5

special schools

professional, legal and practice developments and reflects the policies, legal obligations and business needs of the school.  19.4 The learning and development programme is evaluated for effectiveness at least annually and is updated if necessary.  19.6 All staff have access to support and advice for their role. They also have regular supervision and formal annual appraisal of their performance.

p.5

Information about this inspection

Inspectors have looked closely at the experiences and progress of children and young people using the ‘Social care common inspection framework’. This inspection was carried out under the Children Act 1989 to assess the effectiveness of the service, how it meets the core functions of the service as set out in legislation, and to consider how well it complies with the national minimum standards. Inspection report for residential special school - Penn Hall School 6

p.5

Residential special school details

Social care unique reference number: SC043187

p.6

Residential special school details

Headteacher/teacher in charge: Mrs Fiona Gillespie

p.6

Residential special school details

Type of school: Residential special school

p.6

Inspectors

Michelle Spruce, social care inspector (lead) Alison Cooper, social care inspector Inspection report for residential special school - Penn Hall School 7 to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for looked after children, safeguarding and child protection.

p.6

Inspectors

If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk . You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit http://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .

p.7

Inspectors

Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .

p.7

Inspectors

T: 0300 123 4234 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: http://www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.7

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion