Other · Ofsted report
Stoke-on-Trent Unitary Authority
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection date verified
14 Jan 2020
- Inspectorssingle source
Martin Ward
- Postcode verified
ST4 1HH
- Name on report verified
Stoke-on-Trent Unitary Authority
- URN verified
54636
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No standout praise found.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No strong criticism found.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No next steps set out.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 6
- Words of findings
- 14
- shorter than usual (typical 1049)
- Reading level
- —
- Average sentence
- 7 words
- Next steps
- 0
- typical 5
- Hedged sentences
- 0%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Stoke-on-Trent Unitary Authority Re-inspection monitoring visit report
p.1
Name of lead inspector: Martin Ward, HMI
p.1
Address:
Civic Centre Glebe Street Stoke-on-Trent ST4 1HH Monitoring visit: Stoke-on-Trent Unitary Authority, 14 January 2020
p.1
Context and focus of visit
This is the first re-inspection monitoring visit to Stoke-on-Trent Unitary Authority following publication of the inspection report on 15 July 2019 which found the provider to be inadequate overall.
p.2
Context and focus of visit
Stoke-on-Trent forms the largest part of the North Staffordshire conurbation. Around 30% of the households in Stoke-on-Trent have two or more indicators of disadvantage, which is higher that the national rate. Some 20% of households with dependent children do not have adults in employment. Approximately 13% of adults do not have any qualifications.
p.2
Context and focus of visit
The employment, learning and skills section (the service) is part of learning services in the children and family services directorate. The service provides city-wide access to provision through adult and community learning programmes. Accredited adult learning programmes were the focus for this monitoring visit.
p.2
Reasonable progress
Council leaders have been swift to establish a governing body with oversight for adult learning courses. Governors have the appropriate range of skills to hold senior managers to account for the quality of the provision. The membership includes relevant cabinet members and also external representatives. For example, the board includes a local college principal, and a local business leader. They challenge senior leaders to provide more information on the quality of teaching and learning and on learners’ destinations. Governors are clearly committed to improving the quality of the provision. They have supported significant changes to the management structure. The new managers challenge tutors to improve their performance. Governors support this new approach. Governors receive information about the performance of tutors. Managers provide additional training for tutors and end their contracts when they do not meet
p.2
Reasonable progress
expected standards. Governors meet monthly and receive accurate and timely information about adult learners’ enrolments, achievement rates, retention and attendance. Governors ask questions about any unexpected variations and receive prompt responses from managers. For example, one governor was interested in the link between the assessment of learners’ starting points and the numbers of learners staying on their courses, and this is something that managers have reviewed effectively. Monitoring visit: Stoke-on-Trent Unitary Authority, 14 January 2020 Governors have an accurate understanding of the current quality of the adult learning provision. They review the quality improvement plan at each meeting and are aware of the progress that managers are making. Senior managers provide helpful briefing sessions for cabinet members whose responsibilities are closely linked to education, training and employment.
p.2
Reasonable progress
Governors have not yet reviewed the full breadth of performance against appropriate benchmarks. Following discussion with governors, managers are preparing a report to include information on learners’ destinations and course satisfaction. Governors and leaders should ensure that the attendance of governors and other invitees is consistently high, so that there is continuity, and impact, in their work.
p.3
Reasonable progress
Managers use a range of information about the performance of tutors well. They conduct lesson observations, review learners’ work, and have regular individual meetings with tutors. They combine the information to provide an accurate picture of tutors’ strengths and weaknesses. On the basis of this assessment, managers provide effective support and guidance with the help of newly appointed lead tutors. Where the tutor’s attendance is too low, managers are well supported by the human resources department. In a few cases, tutors leave the organisation. Managers meet monthly to review attendance and retention data. Managers now look at weekly attendance data as well as cumulative data. Managers are responding swiftly and effectively to poor attendance. Learners’ attendance is high and better than last year. Managers have used retention data well to review the curriculum. Managers extended the time for initial assessment for English for speakers of other
p.3
Reasonable progress
languages (ESOL) courses. More learners now stay on the course. Managers use the quality improvement plan to monitor the progress they are making in improving the quality of adult learning programmes. They address all the areas for improvement from the previous inspection. Where appropriate, managers have identified precise numerical targets to supplement qualitative aspirations. Current achievement rates for adult learners are high and particularly strong in English and mathematics functional skills. Managers do not yet monitor the progress that learners are making from their starting points. They are not aware of the proportion of learners, or particular groups of learners, who are making better or slower progress than expected. Managers cannot assess whether further management action is needed to address a broader issue. Managers now track and report on learners’ destinations. Managers need to refine
p.3
Reasonable progress
the reports to demonstrate whether the successful completion of the course has helped the learner to move closer to their career or life goals. Monitoring visit: Stoke-on-Trent Unitary Authority, 14 January 2020
p.3
Significant progress
Leaders and managers have introduced a new initial assessment process. Tutors now collect a broader range of information including learners’ aspirations, prior attainment and qualifications. Tutors now add this information to the assessments in English and mathematics. As a result, leaders, managers and tutors have a much clearer and reliable understanding of learners’ starting points. Leaders and managers have enriched and extended the time for initial assessment. For example, in information technology, learners complete an introductory course which assesses their competency in word processing while developing their understanding of British values. As a result, tutors can gain a deeper understanding of learners’ starting points prior to the start of their course. Tutors are using starting points more effectively in placing learners on a course that is appropriate and challenging. For example, in information technology, tutors moved
p.4
Significant progress
some learners to a higher-level course following introductory classes. These learners are motivated and remain on the course. Most tutors use the range of information that is collected at the initial assessment to plan a range of learning activities and assessments which are linked to the interests of their learners. For example, one tutor set targets for an aspiring hairdresser to develop their use of appropriate hairdressing terminology. Another tutor challenged a learner to give the correct change to support their job as a taxi driver. As a result, tutors prepare learners better for their next steps.
p.4
Reasonable progress
Most tutors have followed a programme of professional development and training. This has included external trainers and support from internal lead tutors. Tutors have acquired new techniques and approaches to curriculum design and teaching, learning and assessment. For example, the mathematics tutors are putting into practice their understanding of ‘mastery techniques’. Another mathematics tutor deploys ‘flipped learning’ whereby learners are asked to complete a reading task prior to the lesson, so that the tutor can spend lesson time exploring the more challenging aspects of the topic. Learners in mathematics are able to discuss the new knowledge and skills that they have acquired. For example, one learner was able to explain how the ‘Box Method’ enabled them to decide more systematically on which factors to choose to solve a mathematics problem. Another learner was able to say how they had used their new
p.4
Reasonable progress
understanding of ‘area’ and ‘perimeter’ to help their children with their homework. An aspiring nurse was able to describe how a greater accuracy in using percentages was going to help them with dispensing medicines. Monitoring visit: Stoke-on-Trent Unitary Authority, 14 January 2020 Managers and tutors have adapted the English curriculum at entry level so that there is more focus on phonics and spelling techniques. Tutors now allow learners more time and opportunities to repeat and recall their learning. Learners remember more. Learners have improved their spelling through the use of the ‘look, cover and spell’ strategy. A learner in level 2 English is able to identify key linguistic features within a short scenario. This is something that they had not been able to do before the start of the course. Managers are not yet able to demonstrate the impact of these changes on learners across the provision. Not all tutors have participated in the training. Managers are
p.4
Reasonable progress
aware that they need to address both these issues. Monitoring visit: Stoke-on-Trent Unitary Authority, 14 January 2020 regulates and inspects to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.
p.5
Reasonable progress
If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .
p.6
Reasonable progress
You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .
p.6
Reasonable progress
Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .
p.6
Reasonable progress
T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted
p.6
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion