Schools & FE · School inspection (EIF)
The City of Leicester College
Summary
Rachel Tordoff (lead), Alison Davies, Dick Vasey, Gill Martin, Paul Heery
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection date verified
27 Nov 2019
- Inspectors verified
Alison Davies, Dick Vasey, Gill Martin, Paul Heery, Rachel Tordoff
- Behaviour and attitudes verified
Requires improvement
- Leadership and management verified
Requires improvement
- Overall effectiveness verified
Requires improvement
- Personal development verified
Good
- Previous overall verified
Requires improvement
- Quality of education verified
Requires improvement
- Postcode verified
LE5 6LN
- Name on report verified
The City of Leicester College
- URN verified
120297
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Grade profile
Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2017.
- OverallRequires improvement
- Behaviour and attitudesRequires improvement
- Leadership and managementRequires improvement
- Personal developmentGood
- Quality of educationRequires improvement
15% of comparable inspections in the last three years were graded Requires improvement (5,043 inspections).
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type graded Requires improvement.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Leaders must ensure that for any pupil for whom there is a safeguarding concern, there is a comprehensive, up-to-date record. p.4
- Leaders must make sure that the curriculum plans for each subject enable pupils to develop the knowledge that they should. p.4
- Some pupils with SEND do not achieve as well as they should. p.2
- However, over time, some pupils do not achieve as well as they should. p.2
- Leaders must make sure that teachers know how to plan to meet the needs of these pupils so that they achieve well. p.4
- Governors must make sure they have the skills and training necessary to carry out their roles well. p.4
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Teaching & assessment12
“In the sixth form, teachers’ subject knowledge is consistently strong.” p.3Communication & language5
“They use subject-specific vocabulary well to explain key ideas.” p.3
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 8
- Words of findings
- 1,306
- about usual (typical 1215)
- Reading level
- Plain English
- Flesch 60, typical 56
- Average sentence
- 13 words
- Next steps
- 6
- typical 5
- Hedged sentences
- 20%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Inspection of The City of Leicester College Downing Drive, Evington, Leicester, Leicestershire LE5 6LN
p.1
Overall effectiveness Requires improvement
The quality of education Requires improvement Behaviour and attitudes Requires improvement Personal development Good Leadership and management Requires improvement Sixth-form provision Good Overall effectiveness at previous inspection Requires improvement 26–27 November 2019
p.1
What is it like to attend this school?
Pupils value the school’s mantra, ‘be happy, be ambitious, make a difference’. They know that it underpins much of what they do at school. Many pupils enjoy coming to school. They said that new pupils who join the school part-way through a year find it easy to settle in.
p.2
What is it like to attend this school?
Pupils’ attendance is not as good as it should be. Some pupils are regularly absent from school. This is particularly true for pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND) and disadvantaged pupils.
p.2
What is it like to attend this school?
The school celebrates diversity. Pupils benefit from mixing with other pupils who may have a different heritage, religion or belief. One pupil told us, ‘You can learn a lot about different cultures.’ Pupils feel that the school is a welcoming, safe place to be.
p.2
What is it like to attend this school?
Pupils enjoy good relationships with their teachers. They say that teachers help them do well and be aspirational for what they can accomplish in the future. Some pupils with SEND do not achieve as well as they should.
p.2
What is it like to attend this school?
Pupils told us that behaviour has improved because leaders have simplified the rules. Pupils conduct themselves well. Bullying sometimes takes place. Most pupils told us that staff resolve issues quickly.
p.2
better?
Leaders do not make sure that all pupils with SEND achieve as well as possible. In some subjects, teachers do not use the information they hold about pupils with SEND to make sure that they get the help they need. In other subjects, for example English, teachers plan more carefully to meet the needs of these pupils. Pupils with SEND who are taught in the ‘connect centre’ do well.
p.2
better?
The range of topics is too narrow in some subjects. They do not meet the requirements of the key stage 3 national curriculum. In many subjects, new curriculum leaders have reviewed the curriculum plans to make sure that topics are taught in a logical order. For instance, in mathematics, teachers know what to teach, when and why they should teach it. Teachers revisit work frequently so that pupils can build on what they know already and remember more. However, over time, some pupils do not achieve as well as they should.
p.2
better?
In some subjects, teachers provide pupils with chances to enhance their understanding of the topics they are studying. For instance, in geography, Year 7 pupils asked a local Montserratian what it was like living near an erupting volcano. In religious education (RE), Year 9 pupils were discussing what they knew about God. Pupils do not always receive work that challenges them to think more deeply.
p.2
better?
Pupils have good attitudes to learning. Lessons run smoothly. Pupils know how to 26–27 November 2019
p.2
3
improve their work, using a system they call ‘up-levelling’. In all year groups, pupils reflect on their work and think about how they can make it better. Pupils find this process helpful, since it makes them think about what they know from what they have already studied. This can help them apply their knowledge to new situations.
p.3
3
In the sixth form, teachers’ subject knowledge is consistently strong. They use subject-specific vocabulary well to explain key ideas. This helps students to achieve well, particularly in academic subjects.
p.3
3
Leaders make sure that pupils who speak English as an additional language get the right help. Most of these pupils pick up the basics of the English language quickly.
p.3
3
The curriculum makes a significant contribution to pupils’ personal development. There are lots of opportunities for pupils to become confident and independent. For instance, we saw Year 8 pupils lead an assembly on behalf of Amnesty International about the importance of democracies. ‘No-hate ambassadors’ teach their peers about tolerance. Pupils know the importance of looking after their mental health.
p.3
3
Leaders provide sixth-form students with a wide range of academic and vocational subject choices. They benefit from an enrichment programme, including learning British sign language, making ceramics and raising funds for the charity ‘One Nepal’. All students have the chance to experience the world of work, although not all students gain a work placement. Most students complete their courses and achieve well.
p.3
3
Changes to leadership have brought a fresh impetus to bring about improvements. There are systems in place for leaders to check on the impact of their actions. However, some leaders are not clear on their responsibilities or confident in their roles. This limits how effective they are at improving the quality of education.
p.3
3
Governors know what needs to improve. They do not check that leaders are improving these aspects quickly enough, for example for disadvantaged pupils.
p.3
Safeguarding
The arrangements for safeguarding are effective.
p.3
Safeguarding
Pupils know how to reduce any risks and stay safe. For example, they understand issues they may face in the local area related to drugs and knife crime. Pupils have adults they can talk to if they are worried about anything. They feel well supported.
p.3
Safeguarding
Staff are well trained. They know how to spot the signs that a pupil may be at risk. They are confident that leaders will take any action necessary. Leaders understand their safeguarding responsibilities. Sometimes, the records they keep about pupils are not updated quickly enough or do not include enough detail.
p.3
(Information for the school and appropriate authority)
Leaders have not ensured that the key stage 3 curriculum plans match the ambition of the national curriculum. Pupils do not study a broad range of topics in some subjects. This limits their knowledge and understanding. Leaders must make sure that the curriculum plans for each subject enable pupils to develop the knowledge that they should. Some teachers do not understand the particular needs of pupils with SEND and do not provide them with the support that they need in their lessons. This limits these pupils’ achievements. Leaders must make sure that teachers know how to plan to meet the needs of these pupils so that they achieve well. Teachers do not always provide pupils with challenging work. As a result, pupils do not always deepen their learning. Leaders should ensure that teachers are ambitious in the work that they set pupils. Some leaders do not fully understand their responsibilities. They do not hold staff
p.4
(Information for the school and appropriate authority)
sufficiently to account for their work. Every leader, particularly those new to their role, should receive the necessary training to carry out their duties effectively. Governors do not have a close enough oversight of leaders’ work. They do not check that leaders’ actions are bringing about improvements quickly enough. Governors must make sure they have the skills and training necessary to carry out their roles well. Sometimes, leaders do not ensure that their actions to keep children safe are recorded quickly or thoroughly enough. They do not check that safeguarding information about a child is held securely in one place. Leaders must ensure that for any pupil for whom there is a safeguarding concern, there is a comprehensive, up-to-date record. The attendance of some pupils, including those in the sixth form, is not good enough. Too many disadvantaged pupils and pupils with SEND are regularly
p.4
(Information for the school and appropriate authority)
absent from school. Leaders must work with parents and carers to make sure that all pupils, particularly pupils with SEND and disadvantaged pupils, attend school well.
p.4
How can I feed back my views?
or to find out what other parents and carers think. We use Ofsted Parent View information when deciding which schools to inspect, when to inspect them and as part of their inspection.
p.4
How can I feed back my views?
The Department for Education has further guidance on how to complain about a school.
p.4
How can I feed back my views?
If you’re not happy with the inspection or the report, you can complain to Ofsted . 26–27 November 2019
p.4
Further information
You can search for published performance information about the school.
p.5
Further information
In the report, ‘disadvantaged pupils’ refers to those pupils who attract government pupil premium funding: pupils claiming free school meals at any point in the last six years and pupils in care or who left care through adoption or another formal route. 26–27 November 2019
p.5
School details
Inspection number 10110041 Type of school Secondary comprehensive
p.6
provision
Number of pupils on the school roll 1,729
p.6
sixth form
Date of previous inspection 23–24 May 2017
p.6
Information about this school
In September 2018, a new deputy headteacher was appointed. The headteacher now works on a part-time basis. She currently shares the responsibility for leading the school with the deputy headteacher, who is now the co-headteacher. Since January 2018, the school has been receiving external support from leaders at Soar Valley College. The school uses six alternative providers. These are the Leicester Partnership School, Gaz Auto School, Pedestrian Music, Axlr8, Brolay Farm and Mann Motors.
p.6
Information about this inspection
We carried out this inspection under section 5 of the Education Act 2005. 26–27 November 2019
p.6
7
We met with the headteacher and other senior leaders. We met with the coordinator for the provision for pupils with SEND, leaders with oversight of the pupil premium funding and the Year 7 catch-up funding, and leaders responsible for the sixth form. I met with four members of the governing body, including the chair. I also met with a representative of the local authority. We met with teachers and support staff. We met with groups of pupils from each year group. We did deep dives in five subjects: mathematics, English, science, including biology, modern foreign languages and geography. We met with curriculum leaders, visited lessons, looked at pupils’ workbooks, met with pupils, and met with teachers of the lessons we visited. We observed the behaviour of pupils during social times and spoke with pupils informally. I met with the designated safeguarding lead to discuss safeguarding. We also
p.7
7
spoke with staff and pupils about safeguarding. I looked at documentation relating to safeguarding, the school’s system for recruiting staff and the school’s single central register. We spoke with two of the school’s alternative providers. We took into account the 39 responses to Ofsted’s online questionnaire, Parent View. We also considered the 92 responses to the staff survey and the 379 responses to the pupil questionnaire. We reviewed a range of documentation, including self-evaluation of the school’s performance, curriculum plans and information concerning pupils’ attendance and behaviour.
p.7
Inspection team
Rachel Tordoff, lead inspector Her Majesty’s Inspector
p.7
Inspection team
Gill Martin Ofsted Inspector 26–27 November 2019
p.7
8
regulates and inspects to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.
p.8
8
If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .
p.8
8
You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .
p.8
8
Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .
p.8
8
T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted
p.8
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion