Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · School inspection (EIF)

The Royal Harbour Academy

Inspected 9 Jan 2020 · published 24 Jan 2020 · URN 135826

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

Requires improvement

Lucy English (lead), Mark Roessler, Paul Murphy, Philip Storey

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    9 Jan 2020

  • Inspectors verified

    Lucy English, Mark Roessler, Paul Murphy, Philip Storey

  • Behaviour and attitudes verified

    Good

  • Leadership and management verified

    Requires improvement

  • Overall effectiveness verified

    Requires improvement

  • Personal development verified

    Good

  • Quality of education verified

    Requires improvement

  • Postcode verified

    CT12 6RH

  • Name on report verified

    The Royal Harbour Academy

  • URN verified

    135826

Page 1 of 7
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2018.

  • OverallRequires improvement
  • Behaviour and attitudesGood
  • Leadership and managementRequires improvement
  • Personal developmentGood
  • Quality of educationRequires improvement

15% of comparable inspections in the last three years were graded Requires improvement (5,043 inspections).

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+29Mostly positivemore positive than 63% of reports of this type graded Requires improvement
OutstandingGoodRIInadequate

In line with other reports of this type graded Requires improvement.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praiseambitiouspositiveenjoyimprovedconfidentproudextremelywell planned
Criticismnot consistentlynot yetconcernvariabletoo lowconcernsseriouslygaps

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsWhat needs to improveSafeguardingAbout the inspection positive critical
  • Findings1061w+32
  • Safeguarding90w−3
  • What needs to improve28w—

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
7
Words of findings
1,141
about usual (typical 1215)
Reading level
Fairly hard
Flesch 54, typical 56
Average sentence
15 words
Next steps
6
typical 5
Hedged sentences
5%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 59%Safeguarding 5%What needs to improve 2%About the inspection 35%

Full report text

Inspection of The Royal Harbour Academy Newlands Lane, Ramsgate, Kent CT12 6RH

p.1

Overall effectiveness Requires improvement

The quality of education Requires improvement Behaviour and attitudes Good Personal development Good Leadership and management Requires improvement Sixth-form provision Good Previous inspection grade Inadequate 8–9 January 2020

p.1

What is it like to attend this school?

Pupils are happy at The Royal Harbour Academy (RHA). They recognise the improvements that have been made and appreciate the care and concern that staff demonstrate for them day in, day out. Pupils speak extremely positively about the way there is always someone looking out for them. This helps them to feel safe.

p.2

What is it like to attend this school?

There is a real sense of purpose and ambition embedding at the school. Pupils have responded well to this. They behave well and work hard. Sixth-form students are impressive role models for the whole community.

p.2

What is it like to attend this school?

Pupils also enjoy the wide range of extra-curricular activities and work-related learning provided. For example, they enjoy enterprise tasks and learning to challenge each other in a constructive manner. Pupils show high levels of respect and consideration and say that bullying is not an issue at the school.

p.2

What is it like to attend this school?

Leaders have improved the quality of education overall. However, these improvements are not yet secure in all subjects and for all pupils. Pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND) do not receive the support leaders intend they should in all lessons. While pupils’ published outcomes at GCSE remain too low, sixth-form students do well.

p.2

better?

Leaders have continued to improve RHA. They have created a positive environment where pupils are confident and proud of their learning. There is an exciting focus on pupils’ futures. Staff work hard to provide a wide range of meaningful opportunities. For example, ethics and philosophy lessons challenge pupils to explore moral and ethical issues and offer reasoned views about them.

p.2

better?

Pupils display positive attitudes to their studies. They recognise the dedication of staff and feel valued. Those pupils who have struggled to manage their own behaviour in the past have been supported very effectively. They are proud of the improvements they have achieved and are adamant that their success is due to the relentless care and concern of the whole staff. Overall, a very positive and respectful culture runs through the school.

p.2

better?

Leaders have structured the curriculum according to the needs of pupils. They have developed an innovative approach for lower-school pupils. A single teacher delivers grouped national curriculum subjects, for example English and history. This allows more emphasis to be put on improving literacy and numeracy. Leaders have made good use of the expertise of primary colleagues in the Coastal Academies Trust (CAT). This has helped staff to identify and fill any gaps in pupils’ knowledge. Teachers routinely help pupils to recall their knowledge and apply it to their new learning. 8–9 January 2020

p.2

3

Pupils in Year 9 follow a more traditional approach. Each subject is taught discretely before they pick their GCSEs for key stage 4. Historically, leaders have not ensured that pupils continue with the range of subjects that cover the breadth of the English Baccalaureate (EBacc). Instead, they offered vocational and other qualifications they felt were more suited to pupils’ needs. Leaders are changing their approach as the school changes. They intend for all pupils to have the broad and ambitious curriculum that will allow them to select EBacc subjects.

p.3

3

In many subjects, for example English and design and technology, the curriculum is well planned. Learning activities are designed so that pupils build their knowledge and skills systematically. However, this is not the case in all subjects, for example key stage 4 science. Senior leaders make good use of the support from CAT to help develop subject and other middle leaders. There is still work to do to roll this support out to secure further improvements.

p.3

3

Even where leaders have planned the curriculum well, it is not yet delivered as they intend for all pupils. This is particularly the case for pupils with SEND. Leaders provide a variety of support and training to develop teachers’ subject knowledge and teaching skills. This development is not yet embedded consistently and so has not had the intended impact. Some teachers do not consistently use the strategies suggested by the special educational needs coordinator (SENCo). Consequently, while the quality of education has improved, it is still too variable, especially in key stage 4 and for pupils with SEND.

p.3

3

The sixth form continues to be good. Sixth form students are ambitious and determined. They continue to do well in their studies and benefit from the well- designed programmes of study. These help them to develop detailed knowledge and gain the qualifications they need for their next steps, be they in education, employment or training. In contrast to other key stages, students with SEND do particularly well due to the well-considered support they receive.

p.3

Safeguarding

The arrangements for safeguarding are effective.

p.3

Safeguarding

The care and concern that staff show for pupils and their families are informed by ongoing training and strong communication. Staff are well informed and know about safeguarding issues relevant to the local area. They follow the agreed processes for reporting any concerns about pupils.

p.3

Safeguarding

Pupils are confident that staff will listen to them and take them seriously if they have any worries. They learn about how to identify risk and keep themselves safe, including online and in the local community. 8–9 January 2020

p.3

(Information for the school and appropriate authority)

 Leaders have a clear and ambitious vision for the quality of education for pupils at RHA. Most subjects have well-planned approaches to ensuring that pupils learn what they need to in order to achieve well. However, these good intentions are not consistently realised across each subject area, especially in key stage 4. In order to improve pupils’ achievement across the curriculum, leaders need to continue to support staff to develop their subject and pedagogical knowledge. Teachers need to deliver the curriculum as leaders intend.  Some subject and other middle leaders have benefited from training provided by CAT. Senior leaders need to support and train leaders at all levels so they deliver further changes to the curriculum and teaching quickly and securely.  Support for pupils with SEND is too variable. The SENCo provides some information for teachers but this is not used consistently. Some staff say they

p.4

(Information for the school and appropriate authority)

need more training. Teachers need to have and use strategies to support pupils with SEND so that their needs are met across the curriculum.

p.4

How can I feed back my views?

or to find out what other parents and carers think. We use Ofsted Parent View information when deciding which schools to inspect, when to inspect them and as part of their inspection.

p.4

How can I feed back my views?

The Department for Education has further guidance on how to complain about a school.

p.4

How can I feed back my views?

If you are the school and you are not happy with the inspection or the report, you can complain to Ofsted .

p.4

Further information

You can search for published performance information about the school.

p.4

Further information

In the report, ‘disadvantaged pupils’ refers to those pupils who attract government pupil premium funding: pupils claiming free school meals at any point in the last six years and pupils in care or who left care through adoption or another formal route. 8–9 January 2020

p.4

School details

Inspection number 10122206 Type of school Modern (non-selective)

p.5

sixth form

Appropriate authority The governing body

p.5

sixth form

Date of previous inspection 12 June–12 July 2018

p.5

Information about this school

 There have been changes to leaders at all levels since the last inspection. A new deputy headteacher and several new subject leaders have been appointed.  The academy order enabling the Coastal Academies Trust (CAT) to bring The Royal Harbour Academy into its multi-academy trust (MAT) has still not been enacted. The school remains a foundation school, and therefore the legal responsibility of the local authority, Kent County Council (KCC). Since the autumn term 2018, KCC has contracted CAT to be accountable to them for the school’s effectiveness. CAT continues to describe the school as an ‘associate member’ of the MAT. This relationship is recognised by the regional schools commissioner.  Over 60% of pupils in the school are disadvantaged pupils. This is well above the national average.  A small number of pupils attend the pupil referral unit, Enterprise Learning Alliance. 8–9 January 2020

p.5

Information about this inspection

We carried out this inspection under section 5 of the Education Act 2005.

p.6

Information about this inspection

In accordance with section 13(5) of the Education Act 2005, Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector is of the opinion that the school no longer requires significant improvement.

p.6

Information about this inspection

 We held meetings with the headteacher, deputy headteachers, the head of sixth form, the SENCo, subject leaders, pastoral leaders, teachers and teaching assistants.  The lead inspector met with representatives from the local authority and CAT. She also met with three members of the governing body, including the chair of the governing body.  We spoke to pupils from every year group about RHA and took into account the nine responses to Ofsted’s online pupil survey.  We took account of the 21 responses by parents to Ofsted’s Parent View, including 14 written responses.  We considered the views of staff from conversations and the 63 responses to Ofsted’s online staff survey.  We evaluated the effectiveness of safeguarding by reviewing leaders’ knowledge, recording and actions. This included looking at documentation, including the school’s single central record and a sample of case files. Inspectors met with the

p.6

Information about this inspection

designated safeguarding lead and spoke to pupils, staff and governors about this aspect of their work.  We did deep dives into these subjects: English, mathematics, science, history, design and technology and ethics and philosophy. This involved discussions with the leaders of each of these subjects, visits to lessons, scrutiny of pupils’ work, and discussions with pupils and teachers from the lessons visited about the subjects.

p.6

Inspection team

Lucy English, lead inspector Her Majesty’s Inspector

p.6

Inspection team

Mark Roessler Ofsted Inspector 8–9 January 2020

p.6

7

regulates and inspects to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.

p.7

7

If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.7

7

You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .

p.7

7

Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .

p.7

7

T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.7

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion