Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · School inspection (EIF)

St Ann's CE Primary School

Inspected 14 Nov 2019 · published 23 Jan 2020 · URN 139169

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

Requires improvement

Bryony Freeman (lead), Phil Garnham

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    14 Nov 2019

  • Inspectors verified

    Bryony Freeman, Phil Garnham

  • Behaviour and attitudes verified

    Good

  • Early years verified

    Requires improvement

  • Leadership and management verified

    Requires improvement

  • Overall effectiveness verified

    Requires improvement

  • Personal development verified

    Good

  • Previous overall verified

    Good

  • Quality of education verified

    Requires improvement

  • Postcode verified

    N15 5JG

  • Name on report verified

    St Ann’s CE Primary School

  • URN verified

    139169

Page 1 of 7
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2016.

  • OverallRequires improvement
  • Behaviour and attitudesGood
  • Early yearsRequires improvement
  • Leadership and managementRequires improvement
  • Personal developmentGood
  • Quality of educationRequires improvement

15% of comparable inspections in the last three years were graded Requires improvement (5,043 inspections).

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+34Mostly positivemore positive than 71% of reports of this type graded Requires improvement
OutstandingGoodRIInadequate

In line with other reports of this type graded Requires improvement.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praisestronghigh expectationsvery wellwell plannedambitiousenthusiasticenjoylove
Criticismnot alwaysconcernsnot stronggapsnot happy

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsWhat needs to improveSafeguardingAbout the inspection positive critical
  • Findings1055w+22
  • Safeguarding97w+74
  • What needs to improve32w—

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
7
Words of findings
1,149
about usual (typical 1215)
Reading level
Plain English
Flesch 65, typical 56
Average sentence
15 words
Next steps
6
typical 5
Hedged sentences
19%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 64%Safeguarding 6%What needs to improve 2%About the inspection 28%

Full report text

Inspection of St Ann’s CE Primary School Avenue Road, London N15 5JG

p.1

Overall effectiveness Requires improvement

The quality of education Requires improvement Behaviour and attitudes Good Personal development Good Leadership and management Requires improvement Early years provision Requires improvement Overall effectiveness at previous inspection Good 13–14 November 2019

p.1

What is it like to attend this school?

Pupils like coming to this school. While they are enthusiastic about learning, they do not learn to read as well or as quickly as they could. Some subjects are taught well and some less so. This means that pupils do not always gain the knowledge they should in all subjects.

p.2

What is it like to attend this school?

Pupils enjoy the trips they go on and taking part in musical activities, particularly learning to play steel pans. Pupils know there are adults they can talk to if things are bothering them. Parents and carers said that they like the way the school explains what their children are learning. They spoke highly of the care shown by school staff to their children.

p.2

What is it like to attend this school?

Pupils behave well in classrooms and when moving around the school. Those who need more support with their behaviour are well managed. Pupils said bullying is not acceptable in the school, and when it happens teachers resolve it quickly. Most parents agreed and said that school leaders were approachable if they had concerns.

p.2

What is it like to attend this school?

Pupils appreciate the work that has been done to make the playground a good environment. They cooperate well together in self-organised games. Pupils know that it is important to treat people with respect.

p.2

better?

Some pupils do not achieve as well as they could. This is because lessons in some subjects do not build on what children already know. The school puts a priority on fostering children’s love of reading through quality children’s books. The ‘reading cafes’ for each year group are enjoyed by parents and pupils. A structured approach to teaching understanding of texts has helped pupils in Years 3 to 6 with improving their reading. However, this has not had as much impact as leaders hoped on pupils reaching the expected standards in the end of Year 6 tests.

p.2

better?

The proportion of pupils meeting the expected standard in the Year 1 phonics screening check was broadly average in 2019. However, in lessons pupils do not have enough opportunity to apply their knowledge of letter sounds to reading. Teachers give them books from ‘book bands’ to take home. These books do not always match the sounds they need to practise. This means that some pupils do not learn to read fluently as quickly as they could.

p.2

better?

Teaching in mathematics is much stronger. The programme in mathematics is well planned. Teachers use it well to build pupils’ knowledge. The school uses assessment well to identify gaps in pupils’ knowledge and adapt teaching in this subject. This has led to an improvement in pupils’ confidence with number work.

p.2

better?

In some subjects, such as music, learning is structured well. The programme is 13–14 November 2019

p.2

3

ambitious and helps children to learn well. For instance, what pupils learn about reading music and playing together has been carefully planned from Reception to Year 6. We saw pupils in Year 3 playing a simple song on the recorder with good tone after only a few weeks of lessons. In other subjects, such as science, lessons are less well structured, because teachers do not always have the knowledge and resources to put plans into practice. For instance, pupils do not routinely have the right opportunities to learn how to carry out scientific investigation or to use the vocabulary of science.

p.3

3

Leaders understand the requirements of pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND). Leaders have shown teachers how to match work to the needs of pupils with SEND, so that they learn the right things. Because of this, they have begun to make better progress. Teachers have high expectations of what pupils with SEND can do and make sure they learn across all subjects. The school looks carefully at how disadvantaged pupils are achieving. They make it a priority to help any disadvantaged pupils catch up.

p.3

3

Pupils understand the school’s values and put them into practice. They know that they should treat people from all groups equally. They can talk about different beliefs with understanding and respect. They understand democracy, through having the opportunity to vote for different positions of responsibility in the school. Pupils develop a good understanding of many different cultures in London.

p.3

3

In the early years, some children do not learn as well as they could. Some teaching in the early years is strong. Staff build on children’s knowledge with skilful questioning. Some adult-led activities engage children and help them to gain knowledge. The provision in Nursery for children’s active learning is well thought out. However, provision in Reception for children’s active learning is not as strong. Children do not get enough opportunities to apply their knowledge of letter sounds through reading.

p.3

3

Leaders have developed strong and successful links with parents, the community and local agencies. Staff feel that leaders are considerate of their workload and the demands placed on them.

p.3

Safeguarding

The arrangements for safeguarding are effective.

p.3

Safeguarding

There is a strong culture of keeping children safe at the school. Leaders and trustees make sure that all staff have up-to-date training in safeguarding and that all necessary checks on staff are carried out. Staff understand the signs they need to look out for and what to do if they are concerned. Staff work well with external agencies to protect the children in their care. Leaders understand the risks in the local community very well and have made sure that pupils learn to stay safe online and in the neighbourhood.

p.3

(Information for the school and appropriate authority)

 Some pupils do not learn to read as quickly or as well as they could. Leaders need to make sure pupils have systematic opportunities to apply their phonics knowledge to reading through opportunities in taught sessions and with books matched to the sounds they know.  The environment in the early years does not always support children’s active learning. Leaders need to make sure that all children in the early years can access active learning opportunities that build on what they have been taught.  The school has developed sequences of learning in all subjects. Where teachers have the knowledge and resources to plan from these, pupils learn well. Leaders need to make sure that teachers have the knowledge and resources to implement curriculum plans well in all subjects, including in science.

p.4

How can I feed back my views?

or to find out what other parents and carers think. We use Ofsted Parent View information when deciding which schools to inspect, when to inspect them and as part of their inspection.

p.4

How can I feed back my views?

The Department for Education has further guidance on how to complain about a school.

p.4

How can I feed back my views?

If you’re not happy with the inspection or the report, you can complain to Ofsted .

p.4

Further information

You can search for published performance information about the school.

p.4

Further information

In the report, ‘disadvantaged pupils’ refers to those pupils who attract government pupil premium funding: pupils claiming free school meals at any point in the last six years and pupils in care or who left care through adoption or another formal route. 13–14 November 2019

p.4

School details

Inspection number 10110405 Type of school Primary

p.5

School details

Date of previous inspection 10 February 2016, under section 8 of the Education Act 2005

p.5

Information about this school

 The school is a Church of England school.  The school became an academy in 2013. It is part of the LDBS Academy Trust. It is one of three schools and a nursery school in the trust who share an executive headteacher.  The school was last inspected by the National Society under Section 48 of the Education Act 2005 in January 2017.

p.5

Information about this inspection

We carried out this inspection under section 5 of the Education Act 2005.

p.5

Information about this inspection

 We met with five members of the governing body, the head of school, the executive headteacher, senior leaders of the school and subject leaders. The lead inspector spoke to the chief executive officer of the multi-academy trust to which the school belongs.  We considered reading, mathematics, science and music in depth. We interviewed senior and subject leaders. We looked at curriculum plans, visited lessons and 13–14 November 2019

p.5

6

talked to teachers about their work. We heard pupils read, looked at pupils’ workbooks and talked to them about their learning.  We examined information about safeguarding arrangements. We reviewed the school’s single central record. We held meetings with senior leaders and the local academy committee about safeguarding. We spoke to staff, pupils and parents about how well pupils are cared for. We met with groups of pupils to gain their views on school life. We made visits to the playground, assembly and a parent event.

p.6

Inspection team

Bryony Freeman, lead inspector Her Majesty’s Inspector

p.6

Inspection team

Phil Garnham Her Majesty’s Inspector 13–14 November 2019

p.6

7

regulates and inspects to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.

p.7

7

If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.7

7

You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .

p.7

7

Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .

p.7

7

T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.7

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion