Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · School inspection (EIF)

Christ Church Church of England Voluntary Controlled Primary School

Inspected 5 Dec 2019 · published 22 Jan 2020 · URN 121590

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

Requires improvement

Kirsty Godfrey (lead), Simon McCarthy

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    5 Dec 2019

  • Inspectors verified

    Kirsty Godfrey, Simon McCarthy

  • Behaviour and attitudes verified

    Requires improvement

  • Early years verified

    Requires improvement

  • Leadership and management verified

    Requires improvement

  • Overall effectiveness verified

    Requires improvement

  • Personal development verified

    Good

  • Previous overall verified

    Outstanding

  • Quality of education verified

    Requires improvement

  • Postcode verified

    BD23 2AP

  • Name on report verified

    Christ Church Church of England Voluntary Controlled Primary School

  • URN verified

    121590

Page 1 of 8
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2007.

  • OverallRequires improvement
  • Behaviour and attitudesRequires improvement
  • Early yearsRequires improvement
  • Leadership and managementRequires improvement
  • Personal developmentGood
  • Quality of educationRequires improvement

15% of comparable inspections in the last three years were graded Requires improvement (5,043 inspections).

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

−2Mixedmore positive than 19% of reports of this type graded Requires improvement
OutstandingGoodRIInadequate

In line with other reports of this type graded Requires improvement.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praiseeffectiveeffectivelyenjoysuccessfullypositivehigh expectationssafehigh-quality
Criticismnot effectivelackconcernstoo manyfall behindnot consistentlynot alwaysconcern

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsWhat needs to improveSafeguardingAbout the inspection positive critical
  • Findings1289w−2
  • Safeguarding109w−2
  • What needs to improve34w—

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
8
Words of findings
1,394
about usual (typical 1215)
Reading level
Fairly hard
Flesch 57, typical 56
Average sentence
14 words
Next steps
6
typical 5
Hedged sentences
9%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 66%Safeguarding 6%What needs to improve 2%About the inspection 26%

Full report text

Inspection of Christ Church Church of England Voluntary Controlled Primary School Craven Street, Skipton, North Yorkshire BD23 2AP

p.1

Overall effectiveness Requires improvement

The quality of education Requires improvement Behaviour and attitudes Requires improvement Personal development Good Leadership and management Requires improvement Early years provision Requires improvement Overall effectiveness at previous inspection Outstanding School 4–5 December 2019

p.1

What is it like to attend this school?

Pupils receive a broad curriculum which is supported with visits and experiences that bring their learning to life. For example, pupils enjoy the outdoor learning opportunities which build towards a residential. They say that these activities help them to get along with each other and to work successfully as a team.

p.2

What is it like to attend this school?

Many pupils achieve well in English and mathematics by the time they leave Year 6. However, pupils who are struggling to learn to read are not receiving effective enough support to help them catch up quickly. This hampers them from being able to reading with the fluency needed to access their learning in different subjects.

p.2

What is it like to attend this school?

Some teaching activities are not appropriately matched to pupils’ needs. When this is the case, pupils are fidgety and lack focus and attention. Positive attitudes to learning have not been established quickly enough when pupils start school in Reception. However, most pupils throughout school are polite and behave well.

p.2

What is it like to attend this school?

Pupils say that bullying is rare because staff look after them and keep them safe. They know how to report any concerns. Leaders make sure that any report of bullying is followed up appropriately.

p.2

better?

The school has experienced a period of considerable change since its last inspection. Teaching is not consistently effective. It has been affected by staffing and leadership instability. The current leadership structure is too limited. Important responsibilities, such as leading the early years or phonics, are not allocated or have temporary leadership arrangements in place. Governors have not acted swiftly enough to address the school’s leadership arrangements. This is hindering leaders’ capacity to work on the areas for improvement with greater urgency.

p.2

better?

Leaders have reviewed the curriculum in all subjects. Some subjects, such as personal, social and health education (PSHE) and mathematics are further developed. In other subjects, plans do not always break down the curriculum goals into smaller steps. This makes it difficult for staff to teach the curriculum effectively. They are unclear about precisely what knowledge pupils need to secure or how it builds on their prior learning and prepares them for what is coming next.

p.2

better?

Leadership of early reading is not well developed. The English leader and headteacher are temporarily sharing the role in the absence of a phonics leader. Phonics is taught from the start of Reception. However, sessions are very short. They provide little time for pupils to recap previous learning and to practise newly acquired knowledge. Staff lack the expertise to make sure that activities are focused well enough on the intended learning. For example, pupils who needed to practise blending only had one word to read and wasted valuable time waiting for their turn. School 4–5 December 2019

p.2

3

Staff know which pupils are struggling to learn to read. These pupils, including some with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND), are not receiving enough extra help to make sure they catch up quickly. The books they read are not closely matched to their phonics knowledge. It means they rely on other strategies, such as guessing by using the pictures, to read unfamiliar words. This is knocking their confidence and slowing down the rate of their improvement.

p.3

3

Pupils are enjoying the new approach to English, which is often centred around a high-quality text. This is helping many pupils to take a greater interest in reading. However, by the time they enter Year 3, some pupils have not learned to read with enough fluency. The gap between them and other pupils widens.

p.3

3

Pupils with SEND are included well with their peers. The SENCo checks the effect of strategies used to support pupils’ development and independence. She makes effective use of external support when necessary. Suitable interventions are in place. For example, pupils are introduced to mathematical language and concepts they will need to use later in class. However, support for pupils’ reading is not as well structured. It happens on a more ad-hoc basis and so has less impact.

p.3

3

Pupils understand the positive behaviour system. It helps them to make the right behaviour choices most of the time. However, in lessons, particularly for younger pupils, too many pupils are not focused. Staff do not insist on this and it impacts on pupils’ learning.

p.3

3

Over time, leaders have paid close attention to pupils’ personal development. A link with a school in Zimbabwe gives pupils real-life opportunities to learn about global issues such as waste. Learning about different religions and British values prepares pupils well for life in modern Britain. Pupils enjoy having responsibilities, such as being a digital leader. Staff use their mental health training to support pupils’ well- being effectively.

p.3

Safeguarding

The arrangements for safeguarding are effective.

p.3

Safeguarding

Leaders have created a strong culture of keeping pupils safe. Staff receive regular training which helps them to be alert to possible signs of concern. Reports of concerns are recorded appropriately and are followed up with rigour so that pupils are protected from harm and get the help they need.

p.3

Safeguarding

Leaders are aware of the risks which pupils and families in the local area may face. They make sure that the curriculum addresses these issues well. For example, pupils learn about how to stay safe on the internet. Information about online safety is also shared with parents and carers. School 4–5 December 2019

p.3

(Information for the school and appropriate authority)

 The school’s leadership structure needs urgent attention. Several leadership roles are shared or have temporary arrangements. There are too few leaders and they have too many responsibilities and not enough time to carry them out effectively. Leaders are at the early stages of checking the implementation and impact of the curriculum. This is slowing the pace of the school’s improvement. Governors need to establish an effective leadership structure which provides greater capacity for leaders to check the impact of their actions on improving pupils’ understanding in different subjects.  The curriculum for early reading, including phonics, is not effective enough. Pupils who fall behind are not receiving enough support to help them catch up quickly. Too many pupils in key stage 2 are not reading with age-appropriate fluency and remain on the early stages of the reading scheme. Leaders need to make sure

p.4

(Information for the school and appropriate authority)

that sufficient time is given to phonics teaching. They should make sure that all staff have the expertise to teach phonics well. Pupils who fall behind need to receive more formalised support. The books they read should match their phonics knowledge. In key stage 2, leaders need to make sure that there is greater attention to developing reading fluency, so that all pupils are able to read with understanding and access learning to the full, across the curriculum.  In some subjects, the curriculum has not been considered in enough detail. This leaves teachers unsure about the precise knowledge and skills which pupils need to secure. Leaders need to make sure that curricular goals are broken down into smaller steps to support staff in understanding what pupils need to learn and when. Leaders should check how effective the curriculum is in developing pupils’ understanding. They should make sure that the curriculum is being implemented

p.4

(Information for the school and appropriate authority)

successfully and that staff have the necessary expertise to make appropriate activity choices.  Some staff do not have high enough expectations of pupils’ behaviour for learning. This is not developed well when children begin school in Reception. Leaders need to make sure that all staff have consistently high expectations of pupils’ behaviour for learning and the quality of work they produce. Close attention should be paid to basic skills such as pen grip, letter formation and handwriting so that pupils produce work which they can take pride in.

p.4

How can I feed back my views?

or to find out what other parents and carers think. We use Ofsted Parent View information when deciding which schools to inspect, when to inspect them and as part of their inspection. School 4–5 December 2019

p.4

5

The Department for Education has further guidance on how to complain about a school.

p.5

5

If you’re not happy with the inspection or the report, you can complain to Ofsted .

p.5

Further information

You can search for published performance information about the school.

p.5

Further information

In the report, ‘disadvantaged pupils’ refers to those pupils who attract government pupil premium funding: pupils claiming free school meals at any point in the last six years and pupils in care or who left care through adoption or another formal route. School 4–5 December 2019

p.5

School details

Inspection number 10115211 Type of school Primary

p.6

School details

Appropriate authority The governing body

p.6

School details

Website www.christchurchschoolskipton.org.uk/

p.6

School details

Date of previous inspection 10–11 March 2011

p.6

Information about this school

 There has been some turbulence in the school’s staffing and leadership arrangements since the last inspection. The current headteacher took up post in September 2016. A teacher has recently been given responsibility for the curriculum and acts as a senior teacher, supporting the headteacher in leading the school along with the SENCo. There are currently no other senior leadership positions.  The school is a voluntary-controlled Church of England school.

p.6

Information about this inspection

We carried out this inspection under section 8 of the Education Act 2005. We deemed the inspection a section 5 inspection under the same Act.

p.6

Information about this inspection

 We held meetings with the headteacher, senior teacher, SENCo and subject leaders. Meetings also took place with a group of governors including the chair and vice-chair, and a representative of the local authority. There was a telephone discussion with a representative of the Diocese of Leeds.  We did deep dives in reading, mathematics, PSHE and history. These subjects were considered closely to evaluate the quality of education. In each of these School 4–5 December 2019

p.6

7

subjects, inspection activities included: lesson visits; discussions with staff and pupils; meetings with subject leaders; and work scrutiny. The lead inspector also listened to pupils read.  A range of documentation was considered. This included the school’s self- evaluation and plans for improvement.  The lead inspector spoke to parents informally at the start of the school day.  Many of the inspection activities gave us the opportunity to evaluate the culture of safeguarding in the school. Additionally, we asked staff about the impact of the safeguarding training they have received. Child protection records and the single central record of checks on the suitability of staff to work with children were also scrutinised.

p.7

Inspection team

Kirsty Godfrey, lead inspector Her Majesty’s Inspector

p.7

Inspection team

Simon McCarthy Ofsted Inspector School 4–5 December 2019

p.7

8

regulates and inspects to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.

p.8

8

If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.8

8

You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .

p.8

8

Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .

p.8

8

T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.8

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion