Summary
Julie Bather (lead), Kathryn Parkinson
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection date verified
27 Nov 2019
- Inspectors verified
Julie Bather, Kathryn Parkinson
- Behaviour and attitudes verified
Good
- Leadership and management verified
Inadequate
- Overall effectiveness verified
Inadequate
- Personal development verified
Requires improvement
- Previous overall verified
Inadequate
- Quality of education verified
Inadequate
- Postcode verified
BB9 8BP
- Name on report verified
Hendon Brook School
- URN verified
119110
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Grade profile
Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2017.
- OverallInadequate
- Behaviour and attitudesGood
- Leadership and managementInadequate
- Personal developmentRequires improvement
- Quality of educationInadequate
3% of comparable inspections in the last three years were graded Inadequate (5,043 inspections).
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type graded Inadequate.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Curriculum planning is weak and lacks ambition. p.2
- As a result, the school remains inadequate. p.2
- Too little progress has been made since the previous inspection, when the school was judged inadequate. p.2
- As a result, the capacity for the school to improve is poor. p.2
- The result is that pupils are experiencing a series of poorly planned lessons with no long-term aims. p.3
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Leaders must make sure that provision for pupils’ development is carefully woven into the curriculum. p.4
- Teachers do not understand what pupils should know and be able to do in line with the national curriculum requirements. p.3
- Should the school remain open, leadership capacity needs to be strengthened so that the school becomes less reliant on external support. p.4
- They do not set out the knowledge and skills that pupils should be acquiring in each year group as they move through the school This has resulted in subjects being delivered in a shallow or ‘ad-hoc’ way. p.4
- Leaders should ensure that teachers use the information they have about what pupils know and can do when planning activities to deliver the curriculum. p.4
- Subject leaders need to ensure that all subjects are carefully planned, with clearly defined end points that at least match the statutory requirements of the national curriculum. p.4
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Leadership & governance17
“The low expectations of leaders and teachers have not helped pupils to achieve well.” p.2Teaching & assessment11
“The low expectations of leaders and teachers have not helped pupils to achieve well.” p.2Reading & phonics5
“Pupils enjoy their books and are confident readers.” p.3
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 8
- Words of findings
- 1,344
- about usual (typical 1552)
- Reading level
- Fairly hard
- Flesch 56, typical 53
- Average sentence
- 15 words
- Next steps
- 6
- typical 6
- Hedged sentences
- 7%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Inspection of Hendon Brook School Hendon Brook, Townhouse Road, Nelson, Lancashire BB9 8BP
p.1
Overall effectiveness Inadequate
The quality of education Inadequate Behaviour and attitudes Good Personal development Requires improvement Leadership and management Inadequate Overall effectiveness at previous inspection Inadequate 26–27 November 2019
p.1
What is it like to attend this school?
Pupils are not getting a good deal at this school. There has been no permanent headteacher in post since October 2018. Consequently, pupils have experienced a number of different leaders and staff.
p.2
What is it like to attend this school?
The local authority has recently consulted with parents and carers and other stakeholders on the future of the school. As yet, no decision has been made. This uncertainty, combined with insecure leadership and staffing, has severely disrupted the quality of education provided at Hendon Brook. The low expectations of leaders and teachers have not helped pupils to achieve well. As a result, the school remains inadequate. Too little progress has been made since the previous inspection, when the school was judged inadequate.
p.2
What is it like to attend this school?
The new, temporary leaders have created a calm, settled and positive environment for the pupils. Pupils feel well supported by the adults who work with them. We observed warm and respectful relationships between pupils and staff throughout the school.
p.2
What is it like to attend this school?
Pupils enjoy attending and feel safe in school. They told us that there used to be bullying but not anymore. They believe that staff sort out any worries about bullying. Pupils behave well, get on well together and help each other.
p.2
better?
Pupils do not get a good start to their education at this school. The succession of temporary senior leaders has made too little difference to the quality of education that pupils experience. Most of the areas for improvement identified at the last inspection have not been met. There is no permanent headteacher in post and the school is heavily reliant on external support which could be withdrawn at any time. In addition, the future of the school is uncertain. As a result, the capacity for the school to improve is poor.
p.2
better?
Since the last inspection, governors have faced many challenges which have had a negative impact on their ability to hold senior leaders to account. For example, they were not aware that all pupils are moving to new schools in January 2020. Consequently, governors are unclear about some of their statutory roles and responsibilities.
p.2
better?
The current temporary leaders have been supporting the school since April 2019. They have wasted no time in working with parents, and the local authority, to identify appropriate permanent school places for all pupils currently at the school. They are working closely with staff in the new schools to make sure every pupil has a planned and supported move into their new placements. Leaders have ensured that pupils attend a calm and safe environment.
p.2
better?
Curriculum planning is weak and lacks ambition. In English and mathematics, 26–27 November 2019
p.2
3
teachers have clear plans and know what they want pupils to know and be able to do by the end of the academic year. However, this is not in place for the other subjects, such as science, history and religious education. The result is that pupils are experiencing a series of poorly planned lessons with no long-term aims. Teachers do not understand what pupils should know and be able to do in line with the national curriculum requirements.
p.3
3
The activities that teachers plan to deliver the curriculum do not help pupils to learn successfully. Teachers have not put enough thought into how pupils can practise and deepen their learning. They do not make effective use of assessment to make sure that pupils can build on prior learning. Consequently, pupils are not building secure knowledge and skills across a range of subjects.
p.3
3
Reading is a high priority in school. Pupils enjoy their books and are confident readers. They enjoy reading to adults who encourage them to talk about the story and the characters. All staff have had training to enable them to teach phonics. They develop pupils’ understanding of the sounds that letters represent through a range of meaningful activities tailored to meet the specific needs of each pupil. This helps pupils to read with increasing accuracy.
p.3
3
Staff provide pupils with an adequate range of activities to promote their spiritual, moral, social and cultural (SMSC) development. Pupils participate in science days and opportunities to visit places of worship, for example a local mosque. Pupils recently completed a project on Remembrance Day. Teachers explained that they plan these extra activities as they go along. However, these activities do not always have a big impact on pupils’ learning or their preparation for life in modern Britain. This is because they sometimes lack purpose. Leaders have not done enough to ensure that opportunities to promote pupils’ personal development are carefully considered as part of the school’s curriculum plan.
p.3
3
The calm, friendly and respectful atmosphere in the school helps pupils to settle quickly in lessons. Consequently, pupils have positive attitudes to learning. Staff are quick to identify if a pupil may need some additional support. Behaviour in and around the school has improved significantly since the last inspection and is now good. Pupils commented positively to us about the new systems that have been put in place to manage behaviour. They also learn strategies that they can use to manage their own behaviour and emotions within school.
p.3
3
Pupils enjoy their outdoor learning. They build fires, cook food and make shelters. They learn to work together, take risks and try different activities. Pupils also enjoy their physical education classes and learn to work as a team. They also learn that sometimes you lose and that is okay.
p.3
Safeguarding
The arrangements for safeguarding are effective.
p.3
Safeguarding
The high staff-to-pupil ratio works to keep pupils safe. Staff are vigilant and quick to 26–27 November 2019
p.3
4
respond to any behaviour that may indicate a cause for concern. Leaders respond quickly and contact external agencies for support where it may be needed.
p.4
4
Pupils told inspectors that they have adults they can go to if they feel worried or upset. They told us that adults listen to them and help them.
p.4
(Information for the school and appropriate authority)
At the time of this inspection, it was unclear whether the school will remain open or close. This has hampered improvement since the previous inspection. Should the school remain open, leadership capacity needs to be strengthened so that the school becomes less reliant on external support. Subject leaders do not have well-thought-out curriculum plans for subjects other than English and mathematics. Curriculum plans for science and the foundation subjects lack detail. They do not set out the knowledge and skills that pupils should be acquiring in each year group as they move through the school This has resulted in subjects being delivered in a shallow or ‘ad-hoc’ way. Subject leaders need to ensure that all subjects are carefully planned, with clearly defined end points that at least match the statutory requirements of the national curriculum. Teachers’ use of assessment information to plan pupils’ next steps in learning is
p.4
(Information for the school and appropriate authority)
weak. As a result, pupils are not able to build on their prior learning. In turn, this leads to gaps in pupils’ knowledge across a range of subjects. Leaders should ensure that teachers use the information they have about what pupils know and can do when planning activities to deliver the curriculum. Leaders have not made sure that there is a well-planned curriculum to support pupils’ personal development. This has resulted in shallow opportunities to develop pupils’ SMSC development and their understanding of British values. Leaders must make sure that provision for pupils’ development is carefully woven into the curriculum.
p.4
How can I feed back my views?
or to find out what other parents and carers think. We use Ofsted Parent View information when deciding which schools to inspect, when to inspect them and as part of their inspection.
p.4
How can I feed back my views?
The Department for Education has further guidance on how to complain about a school.
p.4
How can I feed back my views?
If you’re not happy with the inspection or the report, you can complain to Ofsted . 26–27 November 2019
p.4
Further information
You can search for published performance information about the school.
p.5
Further information
In the report, ‘disadvantaged pupils’ refers to those pupils who attract government pupil premium funding: pupils claiming free school meals at any point in the last six years and pupils in care or who left care through adoption or another formal route. 26–27 November 2019
p.5
School details
Inspection number 10110874 Type of school Pupil referral unit
p.6
School details
Appropriate authority The local authority
p.6
School details
Date of previous inspection 19–20 April 2017
p.6
Information about this school
A consultation on the future of Hendon Brook School closed on 18 October 2019. A decision had not been made at the time of the inspection. The current headteacher has been seconded through the local authority to support the school. She is the fourth leader since the school was placed in special measures in 2017. The school provides education for primary-aged pupils out of mainstream school due to behavioural, social, emotional or mental health reasons. All pupils at the school have an education, health and care plan or are in the process of receiving one.
p.6
Information about this inspection
We carried out this inspection under section 5 of the Education Act 2005.
p.6
Information about this inspection
In accordance with section 44(1) of the Education Act 2005, Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector is of the opinion that this school requires special measures because it is failing to give its pupils an acceptable standard of education and the persons responsible for leading, managing or governing the school are not demonstrating the capacity to secure the necessary improvement in the school. 26–27 November 2019
p.6
7
The school may not appoint newly qualified teachers.
p.7
7
We held discussions with the headteacher, teachers, other members of staff and members of the governing body. These discussions considered the quality of education, the wider experiences of pupils at the school, aspects of pupils’ behaviour, and leadership and management. An inspector spoke with one parent by telephone. In considering the quality of education, we concentrated on reading, English, mathematics and history in depth. We discussed the arrangements for the curriculum and teaching with the headteacher and teachers. We visited lessons and then talked with pupils about what they had been learning. We looked at pupils’ exercise books in these subjects. We spoke to staff, governors and pupils about how the school keeps pupils safe. We examined the single central record of the checks undertaken to make sure that staff are suitable to work in school. We reviewed the school’s safeguarding policy.
p.7
7
We also spoke to pupils and staff about the wider curriculum, including the school’s work to enhance pupils’ spiritual, moral, social and cultural development.
p.7
Inspection team
Julie Bather, lead inspector Ofsted Inspector
p.7
Inspection team
Kathryn Parkinson Ofsted Inspector 26–27 November 2019
p.7
8
regulates and inspects to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.
p.8
8
If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .
p.8
8
You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .
p.8
8
Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .
p.8
8
T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted
p.8
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion